Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Main pathway of starch biosynthesis including sucrose synthesis, sucrose degradation and starch synthesis in rice.

FBP1, fructose-1,6-bisphophatase1; PGM, phosphoglucomutase; AGPase, ADP-glucose pryophosphorylase; PPi, pyrophosphate.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Table 1.

Means and ranges of eating quality parameters in eight japonica rice varieties.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Palatability (P), apparent amylose content (AAC) (%), and protein content (PC) (%) in polished rice of eight japonica varieties.

Letters A–F, difference is significant at 0.05 level.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Table 2.

Correlation matrix of rice eating quality parameters.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Highly associated SNPs and insertion-deletions with eating quality properties identified under general linear model.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Figure 3.

UPGMA tree based on 35 SNPs and insertion-deletions from five genes in eight japonica varieties.

The 35 SNPs and insertion-deletions are as follows: S2, S3, S4, S5, S6, S7, S8, S9, S11, S12, S13, S14, S16, S18, S19, S20, S21, S22, S24, S30, S31, S32, S33, S34, S35, S37, S38, S39, S40, S41, S44, S48, S55, S58, S60 (See Table S4).

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Figure 4.

Enzyme activities related to amylopectin biosynthesis during rice grain filling in eight japonica varieties.

Letters A–G indicate significant differences at 0.05 level.

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Table 4.

Correlation analysis between eating quality traits and enzyme activities during rice grain filling.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Figure 5.

SBE1 and SBE3 expressions based on real-time RT-PCR during grain filling in eight japonica varieties.

Letters A–F indicates difference is significant at 0.05 level.

More »

Figure 5 Expand

Table 5.

mRNA expressions of SBE1 and SBE3 related to eating quality properties among high, middle, and low palatability groups.

More »

Table 5 Expand