Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Musicians' instrumental histories.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Group characteristics.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Figure 1.

Performance for musicians and non-musicians on speech-in-noise and backward masking tasks.

Musicians demonstrated enhanced performance for all three measures of speech-in-noise perception (QuickSIN, HINT and WIN), indicating that they were better able to hear in more challenging signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). Musicians performed better (i.e., had lower thresholds) on the auditory temporal acuity test as assessed by backward masking. Error bars represent one standard error. * p<0.05 ** p<0.01.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Performance for musicians and non-musicians on working memory tasks.

Musicians demonstrated significantly better auditory working memory than non-musicians, but no enhancement for visual working memory. Error bars represent one standard error. ** p<0.01.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Table 3.

Group behavioural performance.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Figure 3.

Correlations between measures of speech-in-noise perception, working memory and auditory temporal acuity.

Better performance on QuickSIN (more negative) was correlated with lower (better) auditory temporal acuity as assessed by backward masking thresholds (top: r = 0.573, p<0.005) and higher working memory ability (middle: r = −0.402, p = 0.014). Working memory and backward masking thresholds were also correlated (bottom: r = −0.495, p = 0.002).

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Table 4.

Relationship between age of onset and years of practice with perceptual and cognitive measures (musicians only).

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Relationship between years of practice with perceptual and cognitive measures (musicians only).

More »

Table 5 Expand