Figure 1.
Distribution of abundance and biomass records in the “CoML Fresh Biomass Database”.
References and locations for each size class are given in Appendix S1 and File S1. Bathymetric layer uses NOAA ETOPO 1 Global Relief Model [26].
Table 1.
Global datasets of environmental predictors.
Figure 2.
Biomass as a function of depth for bacteria, meiofauna, macrofauna, and megafauna.
Biomass was log10 transformed and the effects of latitude and longitude were removed by partial regression. Figure legend follows Rex et al. [8] for comparison. References of data source are available in Appendix S1 and File S1. Regression equations and test statistics for each size categories are available in Table 2.
Figure 3.
Abundance as a function of depth for bacteria, meiofauna, macrofauna, and megafauna.
Abundance was log10 transformed and the effects of latitude and longitude were removed by partial regression. Figure legend follows Rex et al. [8] for comparison. References of data source are available in Appendix S1 and File S1. Regression equations and test statistics for each size category are available in Table 2.
Figure 4.
Average body size as a function of depth for bacteria, meiofauna, macrofauna, and megafauna.
The average size was calculated by dividing biomass with abundance. The body size was log10 transformed and the effects of latitude and longitude were removed by partial regression. Figure legend follows Rex et al. [8] for comparison. References of data source are available in Appendix S1 and File S1. Regression equations and test statistics for each size categories are available in Table 2.
Table 2.
Regression analyses of biomass, abundance, and body size against depth for bacteria, meiofauna, macrofauna, and megafauna.
Figure 5.
Random Forests (RF) performance on biomass and abundance of each size class.
(a) Mean percent variance explained by the RF model ± S.D. (error bar) from 4 RF simulations. Abbreviations: Bact = bacteria, Meio = meiofauna, Macro = macrofauna, Mega = megafauna, and invert = invertebrates. (b) Observed against OOB predicted biomass from the 4 RF simulations. Color legends indicate 4 major size classes.
Figure 6.
Mean predictor Importance on total seafloor biomass.
The predictor importance of major size classes were combined (Figure S3) and mean ± S.D. (error bar) was calculated from 4 RF simulations. The top 20 most important variables are shown in descending order. Increase of mean square error (MSEOOB) indicates the contribution to RF prediction accuracy for that variable.
Figure 7.
Distribution of seafloor biomass predictions.
The total biomass was combined from predictions of bacteria, meiofauna, macrofauna, and megafauna biomass (Figure S5a, b, c, d). Map was smoothed using Inverse Distance Weighting interpolation to 0.1 degree resolution and displayed in logarithm scale (base of 10).
Figure 8.
Coefficient of variation (C.V.) for mean seafloor biomass prediction.
The C.V. was computed as S.D./mean * 100% from 4 RF simulations. Map was smoothed using Inverse Distance Weighting interpolation to 0.1 degree resolution.
Figure 9.
Global zonal integrals of benthic biomass (bars) in unit of megaton carbon based on 100-m bins (a) and 2-latitude-degree bins (b).
The blue line shows integrals of seafloor area in unit of square kilometer. Color legends indicate 4 major size classes.
Figure 10.
Seafloor biomass predictions against depths for the (a) Atlantic Ocean, (b) Pacific Ocean, (c) Indian Ocean, (d) Southern Ocean, (e) Arctic Ocean, (f) Mediterranean Sea, and (g) Gulf of Mexico.
Blue color gradient indicates kernel density estimates. Panel (h) shows the regional predicted trends based on smoothing spline function. Color legend indicates the spline trends for each basin.