Figure 1.
A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve comparing SBaSeTraM, GMATIM, and MAST.
For SBaSeTraM, the posterior cut-off was varied to obtain a series of points. For MAST, the p-value cutoff was varied. For GMATIM, the parameters listed in the MATCHTM paper were used to generate the point on the curve.
Figure 2.
Comparing SBaSeTraM to GMATIM predictions for each transcription factor.
The results are shown with the overall False Positive Rate for SBaSeTraM matched at that obtained from GMATIM with the parameters in the MATCHTM paper, namely 53.3%. Arrows run from the point obtained using SBaSeTraM to the point obtained using GMATIM.
Figure 3.
Box and whisker plot showing the spread of true and false positive rates for SBaSeTraM and GMATIM.
The results are shown with the overall False Positive Rate for SBaSeTraM matched at that obtained from GMATIM with the parameters in the MATCHTM paper, namely 53.3%.