Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

The trial procedure for the emotional attentional-blink paradigm.

Note that the distractors were varied in four categories, disgust, erotic, fear, and neutral at 200, 400, 600, and 800 ms time lags.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Accuracy scores for each emotion by time lag.

Error bars represent standard error of the mean.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Table 1.

Raw means and standard deviations of percent correct (accuracy) for the target for each emotional distracter category by lag interval.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Figure 3.

Attentional blink magnitude scores for each emotion category by lag, error bars represent standard error of the mean.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Table 2.

Comparison between emotional blink magnitude scores at each lag.

More »

Table 2 Expand