Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Experimental setup.

The photos show the typical facial expressions induced by the chop stick in the smile and no-smile conditions.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Results of the EWL-60-S questionnaire; Data were collected on a separate sample, Facial Feedback group is coded by line color.

Items summarized according to the EWL-60-S-manual. Scores are based on difference post-experimental EWL-60-S minus pre-experimental EWL-60-S results; positive values indicate that people loaded higher on this scale after completion of the EEG experiment. Error bars indicate +/−1 SE.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Table 1.

Reaction times and error rates.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Post-error slowing.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Figure 3.

Response-locked ERPs on midline electrodes FZ and CZ for correct (thin lines) and erroneous (thick lines) responses.

Stick-positions are coded by line style.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Figure 4.

Spline-interpolated isovoltage maps depicting the mean amplitude in a time window 20 to 100 ms of the difference wave “error” minus “correct”.

Relative scaling is used with lighter shades representing more negative amplitudes.

More »

Figure 4 Expand