Table 1.
Data of the human specimen used in this study.
Table 2.
Antibodies used in this study.
Figure 1.
A, Immunohistochemistry for CB in the MD.
High power view of some CB-ir neurons in the human mediodorsal thalamic nucleus without the employ of citraconic anhydride solution. B, high power view of CB-ir neurons in the same nucleus employing the citraconic anhydride solution. Note the enhancement in the intensity of CB-ir somata. Scale bar: 50 µm.
Figure 2.
A, Neuropeptide immunohistochemistry in the human thalamus.
Bright field photomicrographs in high magnification of SP fibers without citraconic anhydride solution in the anteroventral thalamic nucleus. B, bright field photomicrographs in high magnification of SP fibers with citraconic anhydride solution in the same nucleus. Note the enhancement in the intensity of SP-ir fibers and in the number of fibers. Scale bar: 25 µm.
Figure 3.
A, Interneuron immunohistochemistry in the MD.
High power view of some GAD-ir neurons in the mediodorsal thalamic nucleus without the use of citraconic anhydride solution. B, high power view of a GAD-ir neuron in the mediodorsal thalamic nucleus utilizing the citraconic anhydride solution. Scale bar: 25 µm.
Figure 4.
A–B, Immunohistochemistry for TH in the substantia nigra.
High power view (10× and 20× magnification respectively) of TH-ir neurons in the substantia nigra employing the citraconic anhydride solution. Note the enhancement in the intensity and morphology (somas more preserved and processes more delineated) compared to the conventional immunostaining method (C–D). Scale bar: A and C 100 µm; B and D 50 µm.
Figure 5.
A, Immunohistochemistry for ENK in the caudate nucleus.
Bright field photomicrographs in high magnification of ENK fibers without citraconic anhydride solution in the caudate nucleus. B, bright field photomicrographs in high magnification of ENK fibers with citraconic anhydride solution in the same nucleus. Note that the latter fibers are better delineated than in the conventional immunostaing method. Scale bar: 50 µm.
Figure 6.
Schematic view of formaldehyde fixation stages.
On the top: formation of methylene glycol by the addition of water and formaldehyde. On the bottom: formaldehyde reacts with various parts of proteins molecules forming adducts. This reaction is followed by the formation of methylene bridges between closed proteins.