Figure 1.
Structure of C18-LCB containing GM1a.
Gangliosides comprise a large family; their oligosaccharides structures differ in the glycosidic linkage position, sugar configuration, and the contents of neutral sugars and sialic- acid content. The ceramide moiety of gangliosides, it also has some variation varies with respect to the type of long -chain base (LCB) (sphingosine- base) and fatty acid moiety.
Figure 2.
Direct MALDI-MS and MSn allows specific detection of ganglioside molecular species.
A. Averaged mass spectra obtained from the entire hippocampal formation. In the spectra, the mass peaks corresponding to GM1, GD1, and GT1 are detected, and IMS provides distinct signals for molecular species containing C18- and C20-sphingosines. B. MSn structural analysis of ions corresponding to GM1. (a) MS2 product ion spectra show that the ions at m/z 1544 and 1572 had the same oligosaccharide structure, i.e., they contained a sialic acid moiety, but the ceramide mass peaks were observed at different m/z values. (b) MS3 product ion mass spectra of m/z 888.3 and 916.3 were obtained to determine the different structural constituents in the ceramide moieties. Because of the detection of m/z 283.0 (fatty acid-related ion) in both the spectra, the 28-u difference between m/z 1544 and m/z 1572 was attributed to the difference in the sphingosine constituent; m/z 1544 had C18-sphingosine and m/z 1572 had C20-sphingosine.
Table 1.
Figure 3.
Localization of C20-sphingosine-containing gangliosides in the hippocampal formation.
IMS at 50 µm raster step size was used to gain an overview of ganglioside distribution in different brain regions (A), and IMS at 15 µm raster size was used to study in detail the distribution pattern of gangliosides in the hippocampus (B). In both panels, schematic diagram of the brain section (a) and ion images of STs (b–c) are presented. For ions corresponding to the GD1 molecular species, we observed the ion distributions of both sodium and potassium complexes, i.e., the ions at m/z 1858 (f) and m/z 1886 (g), which correspond to the [M+Na-H]− form of C18- and C20-GD1, and those at m/z 1874 (h) and m/z 1902 (i), which correspond to the [M+K-H]− form of C18- and C20-GD1, respectively. The ion distribution patterns corresponding to the GD1-Na salts and GD1-K salts are fairly uniform for both C18- and C20- species. For GM1, m/z 1544 (d) and m/z 1572 (e), which correspond to C18- and C20-sphingosines containing GM1 respectively are shown.
Figure 4.
Localization of C20-sphingosine-containing gangliosides was confirmed by MS of extracted and methyl-esterified gangliosides.
To determine the percentage of GM1/GD1 gangliosides containing the C20-species in different regions without allowing sialic acid dissociation during MS measurement, we extracted gangliosides from the dendritic region of the SR (region A, (a)) and the ML/SLM (region B, (b)). They were derivatized to methyl-esterified gangliosides. From the result of MS of underivatized gangliosides and methyl-esterified gangliosides (c), the percentage of GM1/GD1 gangliosides containing the C20-species were calculated (d). Three different mouse brain sections were used, and the data were expressed as mean±S.D. * and ** indicate P<0.05 and P<0.005, respectively, Student's t-test.
Figure 5.
Development- and aging-related accumulation of C20-GD1 in the ML and SLM of the hippocampal formation.
We visualized the ion corresponding to GD1 (m/z 1874 and 1902) in the mouse hippocampus at the indicated time points (P0, P3, P14, 1 month, and 33 months). For each time point, intensity scale of C20-GD1 is normalized in order that the brightest pixels of C20-GD1 have 60% of the maximal C18-GD1 intensity value. In the P14 mouse hippocampus, C20-GD1 was concentrated in the narrow area of DG-SMm and began to spread over the medial edge of the region (arrow heads). In contrast, the concentration of the C-18 species decreased in the ML/SLM with aging (arrows). Quantification result of C20-GD1 on the total GD1 signal in the ML, SLM and SR region has also been shown (B). *; At P0 and P3, we could not distinguish between the ML and SLM area; therefore, values obtained from the region corresponding to ML/SLM have been used for both the regions in the graph.