Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Trial profile of the study and patient flow for a) adults and b) children.

ITT = intent to treat population; PP = per-protocol population.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Table 1.

Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of the Day 3 per-protocol population.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Primary efficacy outcome: mean time to PC90 (±95% confidence intervals) in the Day 3 per-protocol population for (a) adults and (b) children.

*P ≤0.05 versus CPG−DDS alone; **P ≤0.01 versus CPG–DDS alone.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Table 2.

Mean time to PC90 (primary endpoint) for the Day 3 per-protocol (PP) population (principal analysis population) and supportive analyses: sensitivity analysis on the Day 3 PP population and outcomes for the Day 14 PP population and the intent to treat (ITT) population.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Ex-vivo parasite viability at 12 h after the first dose of study drug in the Day 3 per-protocol population.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Figure 3.

Results for Day 3 per-protocol population for mean time to PC50 and mean time to PC99 for (a) adults and (b) children.

*P ≤0.05 versus CPG−DDS alone; **P ≤0.01 versus CPG–DDS alone. Five adults (two in the CPG−DDS group, two in the +artesunate 1 mg/kg group and one in the +artesunate 2 mg/kg group) and 14 children (three from the CPG−DDS group, and five, three and three from the +artesunate 1, 2 and 4 mg/kg groups, respectively) were excluded from the mean time to PC50 analysis due to poor model fit. Seven adults (five in the CPG−DDS group, and one each in the +artesunate 1 mg/kg and 2 mg/kg groups) and five children (two from the CPG−DDS group, two from the +artesunate 1 mg/kg and one from the +artesunate 2 mg/kg group) were excluded from the mean time to PC99 analysis due to poor model fit.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Figure 4.

Adults: Percentage of patients who were gametocytemic in the Day 3 per-protocol population at each scheduled assessment time.

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Figure 5.

Children: Percentage of patients who were gametocytemic in the Day 3 per-protocol population at each scheduled assessment time.

More »

Figure 5 Expand

Table 4.

Treatment responses at Day 14 based on WHO 2002 definitions [20] (Day 14 per-protocol population).

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Treatment emergent investigational drug-related adverse events reported during the study and the most common adverse events reported in ≥10% of patients in any treatment group for the intent to treat (safety) population.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Blood parameters where significant changes were observed during treatment for the intent to treat (safety) population.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Number of patients with a decrease in hemoglobin of ≥2 and ≥4 g/dL from baseline for adults and children in the intent to treat (safety) population.

More »

Table 7 Expand