Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Personally speaking: Developing and evaluating an ontology of dimensions of meaning for self-disclosure with a conversational assistant

Fig 7

Further linguistic profiles of self-disclosure in conversational context: Motivational drives and social references.

“Control before” and “control after” utterances are included in the leftmost two bars, high self-disclosure utterances are in the middle two bars, and low to moderate self-disclosure are in the rightmost two bars. A: Language related to motivational drives is higher in rater-agreed instances of self-disclosure than in the control dialogue segments. B: Social references are highest in both high intimacy instances of self-disclosure and high rater agreement. Note: Values on the y axes differ between plots. SD = self-disclosure, Mod. = Moderate, Agree. = Extent of across-rater agreement in classifying the dialogue instance as involving self-disclosure.

Fig 7

doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0341640.g007