Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Stakeholder priorities and conceptualization of One Health: Insights from fuzzy cognitive mapping and grounded theory

Fig 4

Heatmap of standardized centrality scores (z-scores) for components included in four or more stakeholder group maps.

Stakeholder groups included administration (e.g., chiefs, village administrators, community, community frontline workers (CFWs), human health (e.g., public health officer), environment (e.g., environment, water, and climate change officials), NGOs (e.g., TUPADO, USAID Nawiri, and IRC), and veterinary (e.g., veterinary officers). Higher scores (green) indicate greater relative importance within each group’s map, while lower scores (red) indicate lower relative importance. The “Max-Min Difference” column reflects the range across groups for each component, highlighting the most variation in perceived importance.

Fig 4

doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0338167.g004