Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Cost-effectiveness of primary HPV genotyping and dual-stain or cytology reflex testing versus cytology-based screening for cervical cancer in Chile

Fig 3

Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis Results for Cervical Cancer Screening Strategies.

A) Scatter plot of PSA simulations for the hrHPV-CINtec-5 strategy versus PAP-3; B) Scatter plot for the hrHPV-PAP-5 strategy versus PAP-3; C) Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve (CEAC) corresponding to panel (A); D) CEAC corresponding to panel (B). Dashed vertical lines represent the willingness-to-pay threshold set at one GDP per capita (USD$17.093 according to World Bank).

Fig 3

doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0332010.g003