Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Cost-effectiveness of primary HPV genotyping and dual-stain or cytology reflex testing versus cytology-based screening for cervical cancer in Chile

Fig 2

Screening algorithms for the PAP-3, hrHPV-CINtec, and hrHPV-PAP comparators.

In the hrHPV–PAP-5 strategy, colposcopy is recommended for patients testing positive for HPV 16/18, or for 12 other+ when the reflex cytology result is ASC-US or higher. If the reflex cytology is NILM, shortened surveillance is advised. A negative test for high-risk HPV returns women to routine screening, with the next HPV DNA test scheduled in 5 years.

Fig 2

doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0332010.g002