An economic analysis of the health-related benefits associated with bicycle infrastructure investment in three Canadian cities
Fig 2
Findings from the univariate sensitivity analyses for the moderate change (2% increase) scenario in Victoria (Panel A), Kelowna (Panel B) and Halifax (Panel C), where variation in inputs led to a change in the respective benefit:cost ratio. Details of the changes made to the input parameters are provided in SM2.a a A ‘change’ in a ratio estimate is defined as an absolute difference for the benefit term equal to or greater than 0.05. The results of all sensitivity analyses (to one decimal place) are reported in SM3. In each panel, the dashed line indicates the point where the benefit:cost ratio is 1:1.