Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Suggested deafness during hypnosis and simulation of hypnosis compared to a distraction and control condition: A study on subjective experience and cortical brain responses

Fig 5

Source-level effects of the auditory Three-Stimulus-Oddball paradigm during the P3b window (320–470 ms) in the control (CON), distraction (DIS), hypnosis (HYP), and simulation (SIM) condition.

(A/C) Statistical comparison (t-contrast) of Target > Standard (top row) and Target > Distractor (bottom row) for source activities within the P3b window in the CON, DIS, HYP and SIM. The cortical images show sources that were significantly more activated following processing of target as compared to standard stimulus. The labeled brain structures refer to the cluster peaks. l = left; r = right; MFG = middle frontal gyrus; MTG = middle temporal gyrus; PCu = precuneous; OFG = occipital fusiform gyrus; PrG = precentral gyrus. The summary statistic images of the cortical mesh were thresholded at uncorrected p = .001 with FWE correction at cluster-level, p = .05, based on random field theory. (B/D) Parameter estimates (β-value, 90% C.I.) of target, distractor and standard in CON, DIS, HYP, and SIM for sources located within cluster peaks of the left and right hemisphere (see Fig 5A, top row) where sources in question are located. Values of source strength are expressed as root mean square (RMS, in arbitrary units). Grey rectangle marks the P3b window.

Fig 5

doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240832.g005