Stigma and Ebola survivorship in Liberia: Results from a longitudinal cohort study
Fig 2
Stigma subscale scores at all study visits.
Fig 2: Scatter plots of stigma sub-scores across visits with local regression lines using LOESS method and span = 0.2. X-axis labels are the study visit, followed by the number of participants sampled at that visit. Later study enrollees have not yet reached visits 6, 7 and 8. Gray bands represent 95% confidence intervals. Follow-up visits are not statistically different in the sub-scores: perceived-external stigma (F7,1643 = 1.516, p = 0.152), internalized stigma (F7, 1643 = 0.924, p = 0.487), and enacted stigma (F7, 1643 = 1.14, p = 0.335). The disclosure concern score at visit 6, 1.81, was greater than the score at visit 1, 0.74 (F7,1643 = 2.042, p = 0.0469).