Individual-based network model for Rift Valley fever in Kabale District, Uganda
Fig 4
Comparisons among fractions of infected cattle for a homogeneous network for three different values of k and lower range of β; blue dots showed the fraction of infected for k = 0.1, while red rectangles and green triangles showed the fraction of infected for k = 0.01 and 0.001 respectively.
For the same value of transmission rate, we always had more infected cattle for greater values of k (0.1) than the smaller ones (0.01 and 0.001). Therefore, increasing movement probability meant more widespread epizootic. For example, the fraction of infected cattle at β = 0,005 was ~0.399, ~0.537, and ~1 for k = 0.001, 0.01, and 0.1, respectively.