Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Drought risk assessment under climate change is sensitive to methodological choices for the estimation of evaporative demand

Fig 5

21st century trends in E0 across the different E0 formulations.

Trends in MJJAS E0 projected from Penman-Monteith (green), Hargreaves-Samani (blue), and Priestley-Taylor (red) formulations driven by GFDL-ESM2M and CanESM2 data for the Northern Great Plains. The top row shows seasonal totals in mm, center row shows E0 anomalies as % of the 1976–2005 mean, and bottom row shows standardized E0 anomalies.

Fig 5

doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174045.g005