Discrete choice experiment versus swing-weighting: A head-to-head comparison of diabetic patient preferences for glucose-monitoring devices

Chiara Whichello; Ian Smith; Jorien Veldwijk; G. Ardine de Wit; Maureen P. M. H. Rutten- van Molken; Esther W. de Bekker-Grob

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0283926

Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Discrete choice experiment versus swing-weighting: A head-to-head comparison of diabetic patient preferences for glucose-monitoring devices

Chiara Whichello ,

Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

* E-mail: chiara.whichello@evidera.com

Affiliations Evidera, London, United Kingdom, Erasmus Choice Modelling Centre, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1905-8985

⨯
Ian Smith,

Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

Affiliations Erasmus Choice Modelling Centre, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
⨯
Jorien Veldwijk,

Roles Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

Affiliations Erasmus Choice Modelling Centre, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
⨯
G. Ardine de Wit,

Roles Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
⨯
Maureen P. M. H. Rutten- van Molken,

Roles Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

Affiliations Erasmus Choice Modelling Centre, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
⨯
Esther W. de Bekker-Grob

Roles Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

Affiliations Erasmus Choice Modelling Centre, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7645-6168

⨯

Discrete choice experiment versus swing-weighting: A head-to-head comparison of diabetic patient preferences for glucose-monitoring devices

Chiara Whichello,
Ian Smith,
Jorien Veldwijk,
G. Ardine de Wit,
Maureen P. M. H. Rutten- van Molken,
Esther W. de Bekker-Grob

Published: July 28, 2023
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283926

Reader Comments (0)

Post a new comment on this article

Subject Areas
?

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.
We want your feedback. Do these Subject Areas make sense for this article? Click the target next to the incorrect Subject Area and let us know. Thanks for your help!

Glucose
Is the Subject Area "Glucose" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Body weight
Is the Subject Area "Body weight" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Diabetes mellitus
Is the Subject Area "Diabetes mellitus" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Surveys
Is the Subject Area "Surveys" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Health education and awareness
Is the Subject Area "Health education and awareness" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Blood sugar
Is the Subject Area "Blood sugar" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Measurement equipment
Is the Subject Area "Measurement equipment" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Numeracy
Is the Subject Area "Numeracy" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.