Metric-based vs peer-reviewed evaluation of a research output: Lesson learnt from UK’s national research assessment exercise

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Kushwanth Koya ,

* E-mail: k.koya@northumbria.ac.uk

Affiliation iSchool @ Department of Computers and Information Sciences, Faculty of Engineering and Environment, Pandon Building, Camden Street, Northumbria University, Newcastle City Campus, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7718-1116

⨯
Gobinda Chowdhury

Affiliation iSchool @ Department of Computers and Information Sciences, Faculty of Engineering and Environment, Pandon Building, Camden Street, Northumbria University, Newcastle City Campus, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom
⨯

Reader Comments (0)

Research assessment
Is the Subject Area "Research assessment" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Clinical medicine
Is the Subject Area "Clinical medicine" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Research quality assessment
Is the Subject Area "Research quality assessment" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Clinical psychology
Is the Subject Area "Clinical psychology" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Scientific publishing
Is the Subject Area "Scientific publishing" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Bibliometrics
Is the Subject Area "Bibliometrics" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Electronics engineering
Is the Subject Area "Electronics engineering" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Psycholinguistics
Is the Subject Area "Psycholinguistics" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.