Reader Comments (8)
Post a new comment on this article
-
0 Responses05 Feb 2018
21:21 GMT
Most RecentFlawed for some things, but the major finding stands Posted by jpetruska on 05 Feb 2018 at 21:21 GMT -
1 Response23 Mar 2016
16:36 GMT
Most RecentNotification from PLOS ONE Staff Posted by PLOS_ONE_Group on 22 Mar 2016 at 22:23 GMT -
0 Responses14 Mar 2016
15:56 GMT
Most RecentFlawed study should be retracted immediately Posted by DariuszLeszczynski on 14 Mar 2016 at 15:56 GMT -
0 Responses29 Feb 2016
22:13 GMT
Most RecentHopelessly flawed study Posted by kfoster99 on 29 Feb 2016 at 22:13 GMT -
0 Responses26 Feb 2016
18:05 GMT
Most RecentFrom the authors, regarding RF exposure Posted by bjb140530 on 26 Feb 2016 at 18:05 GMT -
0 Responses19 Feb 2016
15:26 GMT
Most RecentRequest to withdraw Posted by rjirji on 19 Feb 2016 at 15:26 GMT -
0 Responses05 Feb 2016
02:19 GMT
Most RecentValuable data however with some misleading comments Posted by PriBandara on 05 Feb 2016 at 02:19 GMT