Moving Stimuli Are Less Effectively Masked Using Traditional Continuous Flash Suppression (CFS) Compared to a Moving Mondrian Mask (MMM): A Test Case for Feature-Selective Suppression and Retinotopic Adaptation

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Pieter Moors ,

* E-mail: Pieter.Moors@ppw.kuleuven.be

Affiliation Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, University of Leuven (KU Leuven), Leuven, Belgium
⨯
Johan Wagemans,

Affiliation Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, University of Leuven (KU Leuven), Leuven, Belgium
⨯
Lee de-Wit

Affiliation Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, University of Leuven (KU Leuven), Leuven, Belgium
⨯

Reader Comments (1)

Visual system
Is the Subject Area "Visual system" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Vision
Is the Subject Area "Vision" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Eyes
Is the Subject Area "Eyes" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Motion
Is the Subject Area "Motion" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Neurons
Is the Subject Area "Neurons" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Sensory perception
Is the Subject Area "Sensory perception" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Simulation and modeling
Is the Subject Area "Simulation and modeling" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Experimental psychology
Is the Subject Area "Experimental psychology" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.