Statistical Multiplicity in Systematic Reviews of Anaesthesia Interventions: A Quantification and Comparison between Cochrane and Non-Cochrane Reviews

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Georgina Imberger ,

* E-mail: gimberger@gmail.com

Affiliations Cochrane Anaesthesia Review Group, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark, Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark, Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
⨯
Alexandra Damgaard Vejlby,

Affiliation Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
⨯
Sara Bohnstedt Hansen,

Affiliation Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
⨯
Ann M. Møller,

Affiliations Cochrane Anaesthesia Review Group, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark, Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
⨯
Jørn Wetterslev

Affiliation Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
⨯

Reader Comments (0)

Systematic reviews
Is the Subject Area "Systematic reviews" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Metaanalysis
Is the Subject Area "Metaanalysis" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Research errors
Is the Subject Area "Research errors" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Anesthesia
Is the Subject Area "Anesthesia" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Statistical data
Is the Subject Area "Statistical data" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Medical risk factors
Is the Subject Area "Medical risk factors" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Confidence intervals
Is the Subject Area "Confidence intervals" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Statistical distributions
Is the Subject Area "Statistical distributions" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.