Reader Comments
Post a new comment on this article
Post Your Discussion Comment
Please follow our guidelines for comments and review our competing interests policy. Comments that do not conform to our guidelines will be promptly removed and the user account disabled. The following must be avoided:
- Remarks that could be interpreted as allegations of misconduct
- Unsupported assertions or statements
- Inflammatory or insulting language
Thank You!
Thank you for taking the time to flag this posting; we review flagged postings on a regular basis.
closeSpecific number of threads?
Posted by cement_head on 28 Dec 2019 at 19:19 GMT
Hello,
I might have missed this in the paper & supplemental, but is there a way to specify the number of CPU threads to utilise? TIA
RE: Specific number of threads?
wfrohmberg replied to cement_head on 30 Dec 2019 at 21:14 GMT
Although GRASShopPER steps can be perceived as inseparable elements of the assembly pipeline they were actually implemented independently. The grasshopper executable is merely the script integrating all steps of the method together. To perform given step GRASShopPER invokes appropriate application(s) with its own set of parameters and independently designed parameter naming schema. In order to stick to the "keep it simple and straight" principle we decided to prevent from overwhelming user with a ton of parameters -- we have extracted only those parameters that are relevant for result quality measures tuning. Of course there is always a backdoor to change the default behavior of grasshopper which in this case involves changing the scripts that runs corresponding step:
${REPO}/grasshopper-scripts/run-grasshopper-<step-name>.sh
Two main grasshopper steps namely build and traverse comes with respectively --gpus and --threads options for suppressing number of application threads. It need to be stated, though, that in case of build step the number of threads is strictly connected to the graphics cards to be utilized by the application.
WF
RE: RE: Specific number of threads?
cement_head replied to wfrohmberg on 03 Jan 2020 at 19:25 GMT
Cheers & thanks for the clarification(s).