Disaggregated analysis of birth averted due to family planning use in India: An evidence from NFHS-4 (2015–16)

Ujjaval Srivastava; Kaushalendra Kumar Singh; Pawan Kumar Yadav

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0239376

Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Disaggregated analysis of birth averted due to family planning use in India: An evidence from NFHS-4 (2015–16)

Ujjaval Srivastava ,

Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

* E-mail: ujjavalsri777@gmail.com

Affiliations Department of Statistics, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India, National Statistical System Training Academy, Ministry of Statistics & Programme Implementation, Government of India, India

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2541-4504

⨯
Kaushalendra Kumar Singh,

Roles Formal analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation Department of Statistics, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India
⨯
Pawan Kumar Yadav

Roles Resources, Software, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation International Institute of Population Sciences, Mumbai, India

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3567-8570

⨯

Disaggregated analysis of birth averted due to family planning use in India: An evidence from NFHS-4 (2015–16)

Ujjaval Srivastava,
Kaushalendra Kumar Singh,
Pawan Kumar Yadav

Published: September 23, 2020
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239376

Reader Comments

Post a new comment on this article

The missing author's disclaimer and one minor correction

Posted by Ujjaval_Srivastava on 13 Oct 2020 at 17:47 GMT

In original published article, author’s disclaimer was missing.
Author’s disclaimer:
"The views expressed by Ujjaval Srivastava in this article are his personal and not that of
Government of India."

Another correction under heading STEP II-Calculation of potential TFR (TFRP) for each district
in line number 6 is as follows:
Residual plot analysis also suggested that when we regress log of TFR on CPR, the residuals
were normally distributed.

The above mentioned correction do not affect the results, conclusions and overall scientific
understanding of our study in any way.

No competing interests declared.

Subject Areas
?

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.
We want your feedback. Do these Subject Areas make sense for this article? Click the target next to the incorrect Subject Area and let us know. Thanks for your help!

Female contraception
Is the Subject Area "Female contraception" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Contraception
Is the Subject Area "Contraception" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Human families
Is the Subject Area "Human families" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
India
Is the Subject Area "India" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Contraceptives
Is the Subject Area "Contraceptives" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Fertility rates
Is the Subject Area "Fertility rates" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Tamil people
Is the Subject Area "Tamil people" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Birth
Is the Subject Area "Birth" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.

Disaggregated analysis of birth averted due to family planning use in India: An evidence from NFHS-4 (2015–16)

Disaggregated analysis of birth averted due to family planning use in India: An evidence from NFHS-4 (2015–16)

Reader Comments

Post Your Discussion Comment

Why should this posting be reviewed?

Thank You!

The missing author's disclaimer and one minor correction

Posted by Ujjaval_Srivastava on 13 Oct 2020 at 17:47 GMT