Reader Comments
Post a new comment on this article
Post Your Discussion Comment
Please follow our guidelines for comments and review our competing interests policy. Comments that do not conform to our guidelines will be promptly removed and the user account disabled. The following must be avoided:
- Remarks that could be interpreted as allegations of misconduct
- Unsupported assertions or statements
- Inflammatory or insulting language
Thank You!
Thank you for taking the time to flag this posting; we review flagged postings on a regular basis.
closeRequest for further information and comments
Posted by whiteroseupton on 23 Feb 2018 at 17:56 GMT
Dear Prof/Dr Carmen Munoz-Almagro
I write to please ask you for additional information to help my colleagues and I interpret the data reported in your interesting manuscript in PLOS one.
1. Please could you advise whether blood samples used for MBL genotyping were collected at the time of admission to hospital with pneumococcal infection, or were these obtained later? (Presumably later, otherwise you might have had genotype information available for the children who unfortunately died).
2. In the first line of your methods section, you report that 104 PM episodes were identified among 93 children. This implies that one or more children experienced more than one episode. It is not entirely clear whether you subsequently used number of episodes, or number of children, for your results. In the results text, sometimes the denominator is 93 children (eg, 29/93), and sometimes 104 episodes (eg 12/104, 33/104 and 8/104 excluded for various reasons). Therefore it is not entirely clear whether the overall denominator used to analyses results, N=48, refers to children, or episodes. If episodes, please could you advise whether any child was counted more than once?
3. Please could you explain how many of the 8 children who died were aged < 12/12. (The paper reports the number aged <2 years, even though your analysis divided children into those aged <12/12 or >12/12)
4. Please could you explain why you divided children into those <12/12/>12/12, when the second paragraph of your introduction, and the second paragraph of your discussion refers to <2 years of age as being relevant to colonisation by low invasive capacity serotypes, and to the role of the innate immune response. Was a cut-off at 12/12 a post-hoc or an a priori decision?
5. I would be grateful if you could comment on the implications of missing data for the children who died. (Are there any published data from other groups, or from your own, about the relationship between death from IPD or PM and MBL2 deficient genotype?)
Thank you in anticipation of your help
Yours sincerely
Dr M. Upton MBBS MRCGP