Reader Comments
Post a new comment on this article
Post Your Discussion Comment
Please follow our guidelines for comments and review our competing interests policy. Comments that do not conform to our guidelines will be promptly removed and the user account disabled. The following must be avoided:
- Remarks that could be interpreted as allegations of misconduct
- Unsupported assertions or statements
- Inflammatory or insulting language
Thank You!
Thank you for taking the time to flag this posting; we review flagged postings on a regular basis.
closeViolet light vs. ultra-violet light
Posted by KazuoTsubota on 11 Aug 2017 at 01:18 GMT
Dear Yin Guo and associates,
I read your paper with great interest, and noticed that you mentioned greater ultra-violet light is related to the suppression of myopia and cited our paper (Ref. 33) in the Discussion. I would like to clarify that our paper is not focused on ultra-violet light, but violet light itself.
Violet light (360 to 400 nanometers) is visible to most people. However, conventionally it is also deemed as ultra-violet, in particular, ultra-violet A from 315 to 400nm wavelength. International Lighting Vocabulary of CIE (Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage) lists these definitions at http://eilv.cie.co.at/.
The point I would rather make in our paper is that our lifestyle in modern society depletes violet light due to overprotection from ultra-violet light through manmade materials such as window glass, LEDs and most eyeglasses.
Thank you for your understanding.
Kazuo Tsubota, MD, PhD
Prof. & Chair
Department of Ophthalmology
Keio University School of Medicine
Tokyo, Japan