Reader Comments

Post a new comment on this article

Cytoplasmic labelling

Posted by Niedobitek on 04 Nov 2015 at 07:55 GMT

I note from your Fig. 1 that the signal you are getting seems to be located exclusively in the cytoplasm of labelled cells while nuclei are unstained. Given that you are looking specifically for BLV DNA which should be integrated into the host genome, I would be grateful for an explanation.

No competing interests declared.

RE: Cytoplasmic labelling

gbuehring replied to Niedobitek on 07 Nov 2015 at 00:46 GMT

This issue that you raise is discussed in the third paragraph of the Discussion section of the manuscript. Although in other oncogenic retroviral families (alpha-, beta-, and gammaretroviruses) integration is the usual pattern, this is not the case for Deltaretroviruses, which do not have to integrate to be oncogenic. They produce their own oncogenic protein, tax. Studies by others have found that BLV in cattle lymphocytes and the closely related HTLV-1 in human lymphocytes are more commonly unintegrated until the very advanced stages of malignant disease when integrated nuclear forms are detected. Integration sites are random. The citations for those studies are given in that same paragraph. The photograph shown in this manuscript is of an area in the tissue that is an early malignancy (in situ).

No competing interests declared.

RE: RE: Cytoplasmic labelling

Niedobitek replied to gbuehring on 09 Nov 2015 at 13:27 GMT

With all due respect, but the issue of cytoplasmic labelling is not adressed anywhere in the discussion. Viruses may well persist in an extrachromosomal form in the nuclei of infected cells (e.g., EBV, HPV). So, what you are discussing is a different question.
Are you suggesting that the BLV RNA genome is retrotranscribed into DNA which then is maintained in the cytoplasm of tumour cells in a clonal manner? Is there any precedent for such a model? Or do I completely misunderstand something here?

No competing interests declared.

RE: RE: RE: Cytoplasmic labelling

gbuehring replied to Niedobitek on 16 Jan 2016 at 00:21 GMT

I don’t have a conclusive answer to your question, but I can speculate. Upon entry into a cell, the RNA genome of retroviruses is retrotranscribed with reverse transcriptase into DNA. It must then complete the difficult task of crossing the nuclear membrane in order to integrate into host cell DNA within the nucleus. Retroviral nuclear entry has been studied extensively only in murine leukemia virus (MLV), an oncogenic gammaretrovirus, and HIV-1, a lentivirus (reviewed in Metreyek et al., Viruses 5:2483-2511, 2013; Kobiler et al., Nucleus 3:526-539, 2012; Suzuki et al., Nat Rev Microbiol 5:187-196, 2007). Studies on MLV, indicate that cell mitosis (with temporary dissolution of the nuclear membrane) is necessary for retroviral entry into the nucleus. If mitosis does not occur, the unintegrated forms remain in the cytoplasm. The more complex HIV-1 is able to enter the nucleus in the absence of mitosis, by a mechanism not completely elucidated. The mechanism of nuclear entry in the oncogenic deltaretrovirus group, to which BLV belongs, has not been studied, but presumably would be more like MLV. I would speculate that the cells pictured in our publication, were perhaps not dividing. The donor of the tissue was 50 years old, so likely low in the steroid hormones that would stimulate mammary epithelial cell division during pregnancy, and lactation. The specimen was obtained during reduction mammaplasty surgery; the donor had no breast malignancy or history of breast cancer. Even though BLV in this situation may not be active, it serves as a biomarker for exposure to the virus, which is useful for epidemiologic studies.

No competing interests declared.