Reader Comments

Post a new comment on this article

Correction to figure legend

Posted by RSanders1 on 14 Oct 2013 at 12:24 GMT

Please note there is a typo in figure legend 1, which we were unable to change post publication. It should state the equivalent UV estimates for both ERCC-25 and ERCC-99 as 1896 copies per panel, not 1185 copies per panel.

No competing interests declared.