Reader Comments

Post a new comment on this article

Erratum

Posted by mnigliodefigueiredo on 23 Nov 2018 at 10:58 GMT

Dear Reader,
thanks for your interest in our work. Unfortunately one error occurred in the Effect Size column of Table 7: the numbers figure one line below their real place. Because of that the values in the discussion of the abstract should read: "The intervention group showed a statistically significant improvement (ES d=0.45, p=.01) in the All items domain of the rating scales between t1 and t2 and showed a significant advantage compared with the CG (ES=.41, p=.04)". These errors don’t affect in any way the results, conclusions, and overall scientific understanding of our study.
A formal correction process has been initiated and the corrected Table will soon be available.

Marcelo Niglio de Figueiredo

No competing interests declared.