Reader Comments
Post a new comment on this article
Post Your Discussion Comment
Please follow our guidelines for comments and review our competing interests policy. Comments that do not conform to our guidelines will be promptly removed and the user account disabled. The following must be avoided:
- Remarks that could be interpreted as allegations of misconduct
- Unsupported assertions or statements
- Inflammatory or insulting language
Thank You!
Thank you for taking the time to flag this posting; we review flagged postings on a regular basis.
closeCorrection to our recommended minimum fossil calibration date for the crocodile-lizard split
Posted by richjbutler on 16 Mar 2014 at 23:21 GMT
It has been brought to our attention that we made an error in the date that we reported for the Kupferschiefer. We stated in the text that Brauns et al. [1]: "reported a date of 257.3±2.6 Ma (Late Permian/Lopingian: Wuchiapingian) for the Kupferschiefer based on a Re-Os geochronological study." However, in actual fact the date reported by Brauns et al. [1] was 257.3±1.6 Ma (Late Permian/Lopingian: Wuchiapingian).
Although this error has no impact on the vast majority of the conclusions of the paper, it does mean that our recommended minimum fossil calibration date for the crocodile-lizard split of 254.7 Ma is incorrect, and should in fact be 255.7 Ma.
We have contacted PLoS ONE to request that an erratum be published, but wish to make readers aware of this error in the meantime.
Richard Butler (on behalf of all the authors)
Reference:
1. Brauns CM, Pätzold T, Haack U (2003) A Re–Os study bearing on the age of the Kupferschiefer at Sangerhausen (Germany). Utrecht: Abstracts XVth Intern Congress on Carboniferous and Permian Stratigraphy. p. 66.