Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Loading metrics

Beyond broken homes: Why climate resilience must start with the human psyche

  • Monalisha Sahu ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    drmonalisha@outlook.com

    Affiliation Department of Occupational Health, All India Institute of Hygiene and Public Health, Kolkata, West Bengal, India

  • Gaurab Basu

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Division of Global Health Equity, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, & Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

Climate change has become synonymous with broken embankments, submerged villages, rising heat charts, and blazing forests. While these images shape public memory and policymaking, they tell only half the story. The other half is carried silently through grief, fear, disorientation, and an exhaustion that lingers long after the water recedes or the fires are put out [1]. Global Climate Change (GCC) multiplies environmental stressors on human populations and is likely to increase allostatic load [2]. It is steadily reshaping the emotional fabric of communities, yet mental health remains largely absent from adaptation frameworks. If resilience is the world’s primary strategy for navigating the coming decades, it must begin with the human psyche. Ignoring this psychological burden is not just a moral failure, but an economic one, as unaddressed mental distress and loss of productivity drain public health and social systems.

Climate-related mental health effects are widespread, persistent, and socially patterned, contributing substantially to individual suffering, reduced functioning, and long-term population-level disease burden. It exerts profound and sustained effects on mental health through three major interconnected and overlapping pathways: acute exposure to extreme events, chronic environmental degradation, and anticipatory anxiety related to future climate threats. These pathways interact across neurobiological, emotional, and behavioural domains, producing a spectrum of outcomes that includes post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depressive disorders, and anxiety disorders [1,3,4]. Population-level evidence indicates that this burden is unevenly distributed, with disproportionate impacts in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where pre-existing service gaps and structural vulnerabilities amplify climate-related psychological morbidity [5].

Acute trauma from extreme weather events

Discrete climate hazards such as floods, cyclones, wildfires, and extreme heat events constitute potent traumatic stressors. Exposure to such events is associated with acute neurobiological dysregulation, including hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis activation and autonomic imbalance, increasing vulnerability to PTSD, acute stress reactions, and comorbid anxiety and depression [6]. Systematic reviews consistently document high levels of clinically significant psychological distress following climate-related disasters, with a substantial proportion of exposed populations developing persistent symptoms months to years after the event [1,4,5].

Empirical evidence from diverse settings illustrates the durability of this burden. Following Hurricane Katrina, nearly half of low-income survivors experienced clinically significant mental health symptoms, with high rates of distress persisting years later, with displacement and economic insecurity acting as key mediators [7]. In India, post-disaster assessments after the 2013 Uttarakhand floods found a substantial proportion (66.7%) of affected children/adolescents reported psychosocial adversities attributable to the disaster. Loss of shelter and loss of playing space were the social issues having a statistically significant association with psychological distress signals such as feelings of anxiety, helplessness, insecurity, grief and uncertainty [8]. Longitudinal studies of Australian bushfire-affected communities similarly demonstrate elevated prevalence of PTSD, depression, and anxiety well beyond the immediate aftermath, underscoring the long-term mental health consequences of climate-driven disasters [9].

These impacts are magnified in LMICs, where mental health systems are already under-resourced. Cross-national surveys indicate that fewer than one in five individuals with major depressive disorder receive adequate treatment in high-income and 1 in 27 in low-/lower-middle-income countries, a gap that widens further when climate disasters disrupt health services, supply chains, and social support networks [10].

Chronic environmental degradation and solastalgia

Beyond episodic disasters, slow-onset environmental change represents a distinct and under-recognised pathway linking climate change to mental ill-health. Processes such as sea-level rise, soil salinisation, desertification, prolonged drought, and coastal erosion progressively undermine livelihoods, cultural continuity, and place attachment. The concept of solastalgia, articulated by Glenn Albrecht, describes the place-based psychosocial distress experienced when familiar environments deteriorate while individuals remain physically rooted to those settings [11]. Unlike acute trauma, this form of distress accumulates gradually and is mediated through chronic stress mechanisms, contributing to grief, hopelessness, and functional impairment.

A scoping review of 29 studies (2004–2018) identifies a consistent global pattern of solastalgia, where chronic environmental changes, such as drought and sea ice decline disrupt identity and health from the Arctic to the Global South. The review found that 83% of studies explicitly link these slow-onset transformations to emotional and existential distress, with impacts significantly magnified among Indigenous communities. In these contexts, climate-driven landscape loss intersects with historical traumas and structural vulnerabilities, transforming environmental degradation into a profound mental health burden [12].

Eco-anxiety and anticipatory stress

Climate change also affects mental health through anticipatory pathways, particularly among children, adolescents, and young adults. Climate anxiety refers to persistent distress arising from awareness of climate change and its perceived future consequences and has been documented across diverse sociocultural contexts [3]. A large international survey published in The Lancet Planetary Health found that 59% of young people reported feeling very or extremely worried about climate change, while 45% reported impairment in daily functioning, including sleep and concentration difficulties [13]. These findings suggest that climate change is increasingly shaping emotional development, future orientation, and perceived life trajectories well before adulthood.

Discussion

The mental health impacts of climate change challenge conventional distinctions between environmental exposure and psychiatric risk. Unlike traditional mental health determinants, climate-related distress is collective, cumulative, and deeply embedded within social, economic, and ecological systems. It disproportionately affects populations that are least responsible for greenhouse gas emissions yet most exposed to environmental harm, including Indigenous communities, informal workers, smallholder farmers, women, children, and adolescents [1,5,8,10,12,14]. These inequities mirror broader patterns of climate injustice and demand a planetary health lens that integrates mental health into climate adaptation and mitigation strategies.

Current health systems are poorly equipped to respond to this rising crisis. Climate-related disasters further disrupt fragile health infrastructure, while slow-onset environmental change erodes social cohesion and informal support systems that often buffer psychological distress. Despite this, national climate action plans and adaptation frameworks rarely include mental health indicators, dedicated funding, or workforce development.

Addressing this gap requires reframing mental health as a core climate outcome rather than a downstream consequence. Surveillance systems should incorporate mental health indicators alongside physical health and economic metrics. Climate adaptation policies must be designed to reduce psychological as well as material vulnerability, for example by protecting livelihoods, strengthening community cohesion, and supporting culturally grounded responses to environmental loss. Importantly, mental health interventions should not be limited to post-disaster care but integrated across the climate risk continuum, including preparedness, recovery, and long-term adaptation.

Conclusion

The mental health burden of climate change is real, measurable, and unequally distributed. Acute trauma, chronic environmental degradation, and anticipatory climate anxiety together constitute a silent but expanding dimension of climate-related disease burden. Continued neglect risks normalising distress, widening health inequities, and undermining resilience at individual and societal levels. Integrating mental health into planetary health frameworks is therefore not optional; it is essential for effective, equitable, and humane climate action.

References

  1. 1. Cuijpers P, Miguel C, Ciharova M, Kumar M, Brander L, Kumar P, et al. Impact of climate events, pollution, and green spaces on mental health: an umbrella review of meta-analyses. Psychol Med. 2023;53(3):638–53. pmid:36606450
  2. 2. Crews DE, Kawa NC, Cohen JH, Ulmer GL, Edes AN. Climate change, uncertainty and allostatic load. Ann Hum Biol. 2019;46(1):3–16. pmid:30786781
  3. 3. Clayton S. Climate anxiety: Psychological responses to climate change. J Anxiety Disord. 2020;74:102263. pmid:32623280
  4. 4. Cianconi P, Betrò S, Janiri L. The Impact of Climate Change on Mental Health: A Systematic Descriptive Review. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11:74. pmid:32210846
  5. 5. Sharpe I, Davison CM. Climate change, climate-related disasters and mental disorder in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review. BMJ Open. 2021;11(10):e051908. pmid:34649848
  6. 6. Martínez Lozada PS, Leon-Rojas JE. Neurological and mental health in the era of climate change: mechanisms, clinical impacts, and adaptation. Front Public Health. 2025;13:1630975. pmid:41018788
  7. 7. Kessler RC, Galea S, Gruber MJ, Sampson NA, Ursano RJ, Wessely S. Trends in mental illness and suicidality after Hurricane Katrina. Mol Psychiatry. 2008;13(4):374–84. pmid:18180768
  8. 8. Aneelraj D, Kumar CN, Somanathan R, Chandran D, Joshi S, Paramita P, et al. Uttarakhand disaster 2013: a report on psychosocial adversities experienced by children and adolescents. Indian J Pediatr. 2016;83(4):316–21.
  9. 9. Zhang Y, Workman A, Russell MA, Williamson M, Pan H, Reifels L. The long-term impact of bushfires on the mental health of Australians: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022;13(1):2087980. pmid:35957633
  10. 10. Thornicroft G, Chatterji S, Evans-Lacko S, Gruber M, Sampson N, Aguilar-Gaxiola S, et al. Undertreatment of people with major depressive disorder in 21 countries. Br J Psychiatry. 2017;210(2):119–24. pmid:27908899
  11. 11. Albrecht G, Sartore G-M, Connor L, Higginbotham N, Freeman S, Kelly B, et al. Solastalgia: the distress caused by environmental change. Australas Psychiatry. 2007;15 Suppl 1:S95-8. pmid:18027145
  12. 12. Galway LP, Beery T, Jones-Casey K, Tasala K. Mapping the Solastalgia Literature: A Scoping Review Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(15):2662. pmid:31349659
  13. 13. Hickman C, Marks E, Pihkala P, Clayton S, Lewandowski RE, Mayall EE, et al. Climate anxiety in children and young people and their beliefs about government responses to climate change: a global survey. Lancet Planet Health. 2021;5(12):e863–73. pmid:34895496
  14. 14. Sahu M, Chattopadhyay B, Das R, Chaturvedi S. Measuring Impact of Climate Change on Indigenous Health in the Background of Multiple Disadvantages: A Scoping Review for Equitable Public Health Policy Formulation. J Prev (2022). 2023;44(4):421–56. pmid:36512184