Figures
Abstract
What is considered climate change varies across space and time, partly due to micro-level differences in weather events and human experiences of climate change effects mediated by socio-cultural factors such as gender. It is essential to understand micro-level variations in climate, their effects, and adaptation measures adopted by men and women smallholder farmers, who constitute a large proportion of the population of Sub-Saharan Africa. This study employed a qualitative participatory research tool to co-produce knowledge on smallholder farmers’ perceptions of climate change, its effects on their crop and livestock production, and the adaptation measures they have instituted. Data was collected from ten farmers in each of six chiefdoms from three districts in eastern Zambia. The data was transcribed and analyzed for common themes guided by the study’s research questions. Results show similarities in perceptions of micro-level climate change across the study sites, with subtle differences influenced by the interaction of gender and other factors. The most common climate change effects on livestock production are increased incidences of diseases, fodder and water shortages and lower productivity. For crop production, yields and pest infestations were reported. Autonomous adaptation measures for livestock production included fodder and water supplementation, investments in medicines and vaccines, and improved shelter construction. Crop production risk was mediated through early planting, crop diversification, crop residue retention, and applying fertilizers, pesticides, and lime. The adaptation measures were perceived to be effective to varying degrees, with those contingent on purchased inputs seen as less effective by women. Co-production of knowledge helped research participants learn about adaptation measures used in other chiefdoms and enhanced their understanding of the micro-scale similarities and differences in climate change. The study recommends that practitioners, policymakers, and researchers pay attention to micro-level climate variations in their design and implementation of interventions to ensure they are appropriate for all community subgroups.
Citation: Bwalya B, Mwanza K (2025) Co-production of knowledge on climate change, its effects, and adaptation measures: A gender-responsive qualitative study of smallholder farmers. PLOS Clim 4(8): e0000531. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000531
Editor: Benjamin Sultan, IRD: Institut de recherche pour le developpement, FRANCE
Received: October 25, 2024; Accepted: July 16, 2025; Published: August 14, 2025
Copyright: © 2025 Bwalya, Mwanza. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: Excerpts of the transcripts relevant to the study have been shared as Supporting Information.
Funding: The funding for the research reported in the study was provided by the Food Systems Research Network for Africa (FSNET)- Africa as part of a fellowship program for BB. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Climate change is a global phenomenon with local scale variations. What is considered climate change varies across space and time. Differences in extreme weather events at the micro level add to residents’ varied perceptions of climate change within the same regional and national boundaries. Evidence suggests that individuals can accurately perceive climate variation at fine spatial scales [1], and experience with local weather can influence beliefs about climate change [2,3]. Perception is a prerequisite to successfully adapting agricultural strategies against climate change effects [4,5]. It is important to understand climate variations at local spatial and temporal scales and how these dynamics affect the livelihoods of local people and their adaptations to climate change. Besides, understanding public perceptions of climate change and how individuals perceive it is critical to developing effective communication and response strategies to relieve the risks of climate change [6].
Inhabitants of rural areas of Sub-Saharan Africa are highly dependent on agriculture, and climate variations can adversely impact their agriculture-based livelihoods [7,8]. The rural dwellers broadly engage in smallholder farming. Smallholder farming households are households that derive their livelihoods mainly but not exclusively from agriculture, predominantly utilize family labor in farm production, are characterized by a partial engagement in input and output markets, and are both producers and consumers [7,9]. Smallholders farming households are very vulnerable to the impacts of extreme climate events [10,11] due to the rain-fed character of their farming [5,12,13].
Farmers’ closeness to the land and their dependence on the weather means that they are often acutely perceptive to subtle changes in local weather patterns [14], and this awareness usually leads to them changing their practices to enhance their resilience [15]. Further, the activities of smallholder farming households are mediated by sociocultural norms that influence gender roles and gender relations. Thus, men and women in the same community may be differentially vulnerable to climate change impacts [10,16,17]. Differences in gender roles mean that men and women engage in different farming activities. Consequently, their experiences of climate change impacts vary based on their gender roles [18–20]. For instance, women tend to manage household kitchen gardens and small livestock, while men have responsibility for commercial crops and large livestock [21]. As a result, men are more likely to report increased water scarcity due to their need to move longer distances in search of water for their large livestock.
As producers of food legumes for home consumption, women may report heavier rainfall and increased weed infestations that reduce legume harvests [17]. Men and women who practice irrigated vegetable gardening may notice dried-up dambos as they fail to conduct their dry season irrigation. Thus, men and women farmers acquire different experiential knowledge about climate change even when living in the same community. Women farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa are often more disadvantaged due to the gender gaps in access to resources and productivity, which increases their vulnerability to climate change and excludes them from benefiting equally from climate-smart agriculture adoption [18,19,22]. Climate change adaptation might reproduce inequitable intra-household gender relations [23].
Thus, it is essential to understand micro-level variations in climate, their effects, and adaptation measures adopted by men and women smallholder farmers. Paying attention to micro-level variations in climate and their gendered effects is very useful in designing contextually relevant interventions. Considering farmer perceptions allows management-level institutions to connect with concerns, knowledge, and endogenous adaptation at a local and informal level [14]. Equally important is ensuring that the voices of both gender groups are heard and differences in their experiences and perceptions are unmasked. Using approaches that result in the co-production of knowledge makes these goals achievable. Furthermore, knowledge co-production not only makes it possible for men and women smallholder farmers to have spaces to share information but to do so in a reflective manner that enhances their appreciation of others’ experiences and knowledge. Adapting participatory approaches to exploring gender dynamics in the context of climate change may be the most effective way to enhance the level of understanding within the climate change research community [24].
Ultimately, the co-produced knowledge is more holistic as it encompasses a diversity of perspectives and the synergistic benefits that derive from collecting and synthesizing multiple perspectives to form combined perspectives that are more than the sum of their parts. In line with this background, this study had three research questions as follows: (i) How did men and women smallholder farmers across the study sites perceive climate change? (ii) How was climate change perceived to have affected smallholder crop and livestock production by men and women smallholder farmers? (iii) How effective were the adaptation measures to climate change perceived to be by men and women smallholder farmers? We adopt [14] definition of farmer perceptions of climate change as subjective judgments that inform appropriate reactions based on explicit and tacit knowledge about the characteristics and severity of the risk. Our study contributes to the knowledge of micro-level climate changes and nuanced perceptions influenced by the interactions of gender and other socio-cultural factors. This is of value to practitioners, policymakers, and researchers in the design of inclusive and flexible interventions for local-scale climate change adaptation. The study showcases the importance of the co-production of knowledge in the use of participatory processes, which give voice to all participants and emphasize mutual learning. Finally, our study highlights adaptation measures autonomously adopted by resource-poor smallholder farming households and their perceptions on the effectiveness of the measures. This information provides a foundation for scaling up adaptation measures that are grounded in farmers’ decisions.
Methods
Ethics statement
Informed consent was acquired from all research participants after explaining the purpose to them. Participants were assured of anonymity and confidentiality and advised that they could withdraw at any time. Permission to record discussions with digital recorders was obtained, with the understanding that recordings would only be listened to by research team members and would be deleted after transcription. Approval for the study was granted by the University of Zambia’s Natural and Applied Sciences Research Ethics Committee (REF NO. NASREC-2022-NOV.-023).
The primary data for this study was collected during September 2023. Before the main fieldwork, the study team undertook a reconnaissance visit to the study area in February 2023 to validate research questions with local stakeholders such as the Ministry of Agriculture and Department of Chiefs and Traditional Affairs. Courtesy calls were paid to the six chiefs in whose localities the study was planned to take place, as per local custom. The purpose of the study was explained to the chiefs, after which they granted permission for the study to proceed in their chiefdoms.
Study context
Fieldwork for this study was conducted between the 4th and 30th of September, 2023. The study was conducted by a team of seven from six chiefdoms spread across three districts in the Eastern Province of Zambia (Fig 1). The six chiefdoms were Mphamba, Zumwanda, Chitungulu, Magodi, Phikamalaza, and Mwasemphangwe, and the three districts were Lundazi, Chasefu, and Lumezi. The Eastern Province typically experiences seasonal rainfall of between 800 and 1000 mm and a crop-growing period of 100–140 days. Like the rest of Zambia, it is characterized by three seasons: warm and wet (from November to May), cold and dry (June to August), and hot and dry (September to October). Its predominant socio-economic activity is rain-fed smallholder farming.
(Source for base map: https://data.humdata.org/group/zmb).
The main crops grown are maize (Zea Mays), groundnuts (Arachis hypogaea), cotton (Gossypium hirsutum), tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum), soya beans (Glycine max), sweet potatoes (Ipomoea batatas), cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata), sorghum (Sorghum bicolor), rice (Oryza sativa), cassava (Manihot esculenta), common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus). A smaller proportion of rural households engage in irrigated vegetable production during the dry harvest season. Only those with fields close to perennial streams, from which they draw water for irrigation, participate and produce crops such as tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum), rape (Brassica napus), Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa Pekinensis), African eggplant (Solanum macrocarpon), carrots (Daucus carota), Spinach (Spinacia oleracea), onion (Allium cepa) and peppers (Capsicum annuum). Common livestock reared are cattle, goats, sheep and pigs. Poultry is very prevalent, with most households rearing free-range chickens and, less commonly, ducks, guinea fowls, and geese.
The three main tribes found in the Eastern province are the Chewa, Ngoni, and Tumbuka. The Chewa are matrilineal, while the Ngoni and Tumbuka are patrilineal. Among the Chewa, land is inherited through women. Male children inherit land from their mother’s brothers. Among the Ngoni and Tumbuka, sons inherit property such as land and livestock from their parents. It is expected that daughters will marry, move to their husbands’ villages, and access such assets through them [25]. Essentially, under these customary systems, women have secondary rights because they can only access land and livestock through their male relations.
Data collection methods
Data was collected from the six chiefdoms using a qualitative data collection approach known as social learning laboratories. The chiefdoms were purposively sampled to represent the three main tribes in Eastern Province. The participants were recruited based on their engagement in crop production and the rearing of livestock. These inclusion criteria were used to select participants with a rich mix of experiences from both subcategories of agriculture. The recruitment of participants started on 6th September, 2023 and ended on 27th September 2023. A total of 60 participants were recruited and participated in the study.
A brief description of the social learning laboratories follows in the next sub-section.
Social learning laboratories.
For each social learning laboratory (SLL) session, ten participants were invited, comprising five men and five women. Once all the participants arrived, one member of our research team explained the purpose of the research in the local language of the chiefdom. The research team member explained that the day’s activities comprised two phases. During the first phase, the farmers were going to be divided into two groups based on gender. The men and women’s groups would then have discussions after which they would regroup in a plenary session. A representative of each gender group would present the salient features of their group’s discussions, followed by further deliberation in which clarifications would be sought and reflections on mutual learning made. The research team member explained that this process was known as social learning laboratories (SLLs), and it emphasized mutual learning and co-production of knowledge, with the goal of all participants sharing their knowledge and learning from each other. The participants were informed that they reserved the right to participate in the SLL and could choose not to. Further, they could withdraw at any time. They were then asked if they understood what had been explained to them and to respond individually by saying yes or no. Once they answered affirmatively, they were asked if they were willing to participate, and they all responded with “yes” individually. After they agreed to participate, permission was obtained from them to take photos and record the discussions. The IRB approved this method of obtaining verbal consent.
The research team member then presented the discussion questions and elaborated that the SLL included participants ranking the answers to selected questions using a five-point scale. The scoring ranged from very low (1), low (2), moderate (3), high (4), to very high (5). The participants were then invited to suggest and agree on the local language equivalents of the scores. The translated scores were then written and displayed on flip charts for reference in the group discussions. This ensured that everyone had the same understanding of the scores. Afterward, the men’s and women’s groups proceeded to have separate discussions, each of which was facilitated by a research team member. Another team member sat in to observe and occasionally ask questions.
In the two gender groups, the activity was designed such that each individual shared their scores, one after the other. The scores were recorded. Each individual participant was asked to give reasons for their score. The group then had to build consensus and agree on a group score. The discussions continued until a consensus was reached. During the consensus-building process, participants shared their experiences, which influenced their scores, and were encouraged to listen and reflect on the experiences of others actively. When all the parameters were scored, the group agreed on the points to be presented in the plenary session and on who to present on behalf of the group.
During the plenary session, the facilitator invited group representatives to present summaries of their discussion, including their scores and reasons for them. The facilitator alternated which group presented first, for the different sections of the discussion questions. Discussions ensued after each group’s presentation. Research team members that had observed the breakout sessions asked probing questions to ensure issues of interest were discussed in the plenary session. For instance, areas of dissonance in scoring. Members of both groups endeavored to explain their respective group’s decisions. When all the scores for the different parameters had been deliberated and mutual lessons reflected upon, the facilitator invited comments on the SLL by asking the discussants to share their views on the process.
SLLs depart from traditional participatory approaches by consciously including a diverse range of stakeholders, making sure that all viewpoints are heard, and resolving power inequalities brought on by cultural norms [26]. The approach promotes knowledge co-production and enables all parties involved to contribute knowledge equally and in a mutually beneficial way [27]. SLLs reduce elite capture and power dynamics through intra- and inter-stakeholder group dialogues that provide space for every participant to share their views and for all participants to use language focused on mutual learning rather than differences in opinions. The setup of SLLs encourages cross-fertilisation of ideas and reflexivity, which produce unique insights.
Data analysis
The SLLs were independently transcribed by two members of the research team. This process involved listening to the audio recordings and playing back several times. The dialogue was transcribed word for word to accurately capture the participants’ responses, comments, and interactions. Whenever feasible, the participants were identified by their allocated numbers and gender to guarantee that particular remarks could be correctly attributed to particular people, genders, or chiefdoms. Repeated listening was utilized to make sense of the discussion in situations when some words or phrases were obscure. Following transcription, the text was checked for accuracy and readability to ensure the data accurately represented the spoken content without changing its meaning. The transcripts from the two transcribers were compared, and areas of difference were resolved by returning to the sections. The transcripts are available as Supplementary Information (S1 Data).
Results and discussion
Climate change manifestations over the past 10–20 Years
Across the six chiefdoms, there was a consensus that weather patterns had significantly altered, with profound implications for smallholder farming. The delayed onset of the rainy season was mentioned by all the groups in all the six chiefdoms, except for men in Magodi (Table 1). A shorter rainy season was reported by men and women in four chiefdoms except Magodi and men from Phikamalaza and Mwasempangwe. Statements such as “The rainy season starts late compared to the old days” and “the rains shifted from starting in November to December and stop in March or April” were made by women in Mphamba. For Zumwanda, the women narrated that the rainy season used to be seven months long, from October to April, but only lasts three months nowadays. “The season starts late, and it ends early,” they observed.
Although there were reports of prolonged cold seasons as a manifestation of climate change from five of the six chiefdoms, this observation was only made by women in three of the chiefdoms, and only in two chiefdoms did both men and women report it (Table 1). The women in Zumwanda narrated that, “Long ago, it was only cold in June and July, but nowadays it is cold up to August.” The men in Magodi recollected that “this year, June and July were even warmer than usual but August and September were extremely cold with strong winds.” More frequent incidences of droughts were reported in all chiefdoms except Chitungulu, which lies in a valley area historically characterized by very low seasonal rainfall and high temperatures.
Less commonly reported were what was termed “abnormal winds,” heavier rainfall, hailstorms, thunder and increased outbreaks of pests and diseases. Abnormal winds were reported by men only from four chiefdoms while only women in one chiefdom mentioned them. The winds are associated with conflict when they blow at the start of the rainy season and with reconciliation at the end of the rainy season. One participant in Mwasemphangwe explained the local beliefs about winds associated with rains as follows;
Danani rain comes with strong winds that cause maize stalks to fall over in some fields but not others, leading to accusations of witchcraft. Later, Yanjanani rain comes with strong winds blowing in the opposite direction, making the fallen maize stalks upright again, bringing reconciliation.
In Mphamba, it was explained that the Danani rain is associated with conflict because it falls at the onset of the rainy season when food is scarce. Neighboring households do not have good relationships for fear of being asked for food. Meanwhile, the Yanjanani rain falls at the end of the rainy season, when food is plentiful, and neighboring households are reconciled because no one asks for food from another. These narrations on increased incidences of heavier rains and drought align with national-level predictions. Recent projections on Zambia’s climate risk profile cautioned that more extreme weather events (excess rain and dry spells) are expected [28].
Increased pests and diseases was the least common answer, with men and women from Chitungulu mentioning it and only women from Zumwanda (Table 1). Chitungulu may have experienced more incidences of pests and diseases as it is located next to a national park and interactions between humans, livestock and wild animals are very common during periods of water scarcity and likely contribute to outbreaks of livestock diseases. Additionally, high temperatures and winds are associated with pests such as the fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda). Observations on climate-related increases in pest and disease incidences align with literature. Climate change is expected to alter pest and disease outbreaks and increase the likelihood of poor yields, crop failure, and livestock mortality [29].
The results on perceptions of climate change reveal similarities and differences across the chiefdoms and between men and women within and between chiefdoms. Not a single chiefdom recorded the exact same answers from its men and women groups. For instance, in Phikamalaza, the men mentioned three ways the local climate had changed while the women from the same chiefdom listed seven examples. Zumwanda women did not mention droughts, abnormal winds, and pests, while the men did. Chitungulu men mentioned hailstorms and abnormal winds, but the women did not, while the women mentioned floods, which the men did not list. Of note is that women’s views across the six chiefdoms were not uniform, suggesting that gender interacts with other factors in perception formation.
In all cases, the plenary sessions provided opportunities for the groups to reflect on the responses, learn from each other, and appreciate the nuanced experiences that existed within chiefdoms. These results align with [2], who observed that most people experience changes only in local weather patterns, which are highly variable and may not reflect long-term global climate trends. However, farmers’ tacit, embodied knowledge may provide crucial insight into local conditions, vulnerabilities, and opportunities to which higher-level institutions may not have access [30]. The results highlight a critical shift in local weather patterns and suggest a widespread change in climate. This has disrupted long-established environmental rhythms, with implications for smallholder farming, rural Zambia’s predominant economic and socio-cultural activity. In the next sections, we explore the effects of climate change on livestock and crop production.
Effects of climate change on livestock production
The impact of climate change on livestock rearing in the six chiefdoms is both severe and multifaceted, affecting water availability, pasture quality, productivity and livestock health (Table 2). All the groups reported shortages of fodder for livestock as an effect of climate change. The fodder shortage led to weight losses in livestock. Similarly, all groups except women from Mphamba chiefdom reported increased livestock diseases. Water shortages and reduced livestock productivity were also commonly reported.
Zumwanda women noted that chickens were especially affected by diseases during the hot and dry season. They lamented that “traditional livestock have also become like Hybrid livestock which need medication all the time”. Magodi women narrated that they barely got any milk from the cows and the calves suffered due to low milk production by the cows. Phikamalaza women noted that when it becomes very cold, chicks die from the cold. Mwasemphangwe men complained about the increased expenses on medicines and vaccines due to the increased prevalence of livestock diseases. Previous studies on impacts of climate change on livestock found that climate change affected production, reproduction, disease occurrences and product quality [31–34].
In Zumwanda Chiefdom, the women illustrated the shortage of water as “due to water shortages, the livestock are forced to drink muddy water leading to an increase in diseases.” At the same time, men in Phikamalaza observed that “our livestock are forced to move long distances in search of water, and they are not healthy due to various challenges.” Similar issues are echoed in Mphamba and Magodi, where “reduced pasture” and “increased diseases” have been reported as common challenges. The higher temperatures have made Newcastle disease endemic in Chitungulu, further straining the already vulnerable livestock populations.
The consistency in reports of adverse effects of climate change on livestock production across multiple chiefdoms emphasizes the broad and devastating impact of climate change on rural livelihoods. Fodder and water shortages interacted to heighten the ill-effects on health and low animal productivity. Essentially, livestock-producing households incur higher costs in treating livestock diseases and securing supplementary fodder but suffer reduced benefits due to livestock mortality from diseases and lower animal productivity.
Effects of climate change on crop production
Reduction in crop harvests was mentioned by all the groups except the men’s group in Chitungulu, while the pest attacks on crops were mentioned by all except the men in two of the chiefdoms (Table 3). Declines in soil fertility and increased weed infestations were less frequent themes in the social learning labs. Crop harvests were reported to have reduced due to interconnected reasons. Pest infestations reduce crop yields. Crop-producing households must routinely apply pesticides while dealing with other challenges such as lower soil fertility, water logging during flooding, erratic rainfall, and higher weed pressure. Late planting of crops because of delays to the start of rains risks crops not maturing by the end of the season.
Zumwanda, Phikamalaza, and Chitungulu women noted that all crops now require pesticides to grow well, with maize, cotton, pumpkin, and soya beans being the worst affected by pests. Crops mature late in the season because they are planted late due to delays in the onset of the rainy season. Chitungulu men and Magodi women reported increased weed infestations, with the women singling out witchweed, a pernicious weed that particularly affects legumes. Phikamalaza women lamented that “all crops get affected by diseases nowadays.” Mwasemphangwe women noted that the continued application of chemicals to soils had led to fertility loss and that poverty increased in households due to the loss of agricultural income induced by low production. Mwasemphangwe women lamented that “suffering in households has increased because we have no harvest to sell.” Phikamalaza women remarked that heavy rains damaged crops as fields became waterlogged, leading to low yields, while at other times, crop yields are low because of insufficient rainfall. Phikamalaza men echoed the sentiment and cited incidences of not having any harvests at all.
The results suggest that both men and women smallholder farmers are attuned to climate change effects that directly affect their livelihood activities. Women and men tend to attribute different levels of importance to climate risks such as drought or floods based on how exposed or dependent they are on the weather, natural resources, and environments [18,35]. Women tend to produce food legumes and use lower quantities of pesticides. They are thus more adversely affected and experience much lower harvests. More women mentioned increased household poverty as a result. Similar observations were made by [36] who noted that peasant farmers in Chiapas, Mexico perceived decreases in rainfall and increases in temperature as these factors were related to changes in the maize planting season and the introduction of crops which were usually only found in hot regions. Furthermore, the farmers’ perceptions were structured according to cultural and individual experience and tied to agriculture and the annual weather calendar. Farmers in Madagascar were frequently exposed to pest and disease outbreaks and extreme weather events (particularly cyclones), which caused significant crop and income losses and exacerbated food insecurity [29]. A study [5] on a semi-arid community in central Zimbabwe found that farmers were concerned about how rainfall variations affected crop and livestock productivity, availability of water resources, and food and nutrition security.
As mixed farming households, our study participants endured adverse climate change effects in a mutually enforcing manner and had to make tradeoffs in allocating their limited resources to adapt to these effects. For instance, decisions have to be made on whether to purchase pesticides for crop protection or vaccines for livestock health management. Climate change effects on crop and livestock production could ultimately drive households towards increased food and nutritional insecurity unless effective adaptation measures are implemented. Local climate-change experience may play an important role in adaptation, mitigation behavior, and policy support [2]. Adapting agricultural practices is an important strategy to mitigate climate change’s harmful impacts on food security and livelihoods [10]. In the next section, we present results on adaptation measures adopted by smallholder farming households for their livestock and crop production, as well as their perceptions of the effectiveness of the measures.
Measures adopted to adapt livestock production to climate change
Several measures adopted to adapt livestock production to climate change were reported from the social learning labs (Table 4). Some were more common than others and perceptions on their effectiveness were mixed. Using traditional herbs to treat livestock diseases was mentioned by all groups and ranked as moderately to highly effective. The average rank for using traditional herbs was the same as the measures of providing fodder and storing fodder. Mphamba and Chitulungu women thought the use of traditional herbs was moderately effective because the herbs take long to work and do not completely prevent livestock mortality. Zumwanda women noted the use of traditional remedies such as “administering hot chilies and super dip juice to chickens,” while in Chitungulu and Magodi, use was made of “aloe vera and chilies in drinking water” as a traditional remedy to prevent diseases. These measures demonstrate the communities’ adaptability, combining modern practices with traditional knowledge to safeguard their livestock.
Magodi men thought the fodder provision was only moderately effective because it was only given to oxen used for plowing, as it was difficult to secure fodder for all the livestock. They complemented this practice by opening the kraals very early in the morning so that the livestock could free-range across communal pastures for much longer. Phikamalaza women, on the other hand, ranked fodder provision as very effective because providing fodder to livestock helped the livestock to reproduce. Mphamba women have taken similar steps, with measures such as “keeping residues of groundnuts and maize and harvesting grass “ to provide fodder during dry spells. Mphamba women ranked crop residue retention highly because the residues are used as fodder for livestock, in addition to their soil fertility-enhancing benefits. Overall, crop residue retention was the highest-ranked adaptation measure.
The measure of water provision was ranked highly and reflects a proactive approach to managing water scarcity and disease. The measure entailed “digging a trough close to a borehole where water is stored for the livestock to drink from.” Zumwanda women rated vaccinations very highly because “vaccines save our livestock from diseases”.” In contrast, Mphamba women noted that vaccines were expensive and thus not very accessible, reducing their effectiveness to low. Similarly, Phikamalaza men thought vaccines were only moderately effective as some livestock die despite vaccine administration. Phikamalaza men further noted that improved shelter reduced diseases and kept livestock safe. Mwasemphangwe men pour water into livestock shelters to keep them cool during periods of extreme heat. This measure was, however, only mentioned by two groups. Local-scale case studies from developing countries reported incremental adaptation options such as shifts in choice of livestock, development of irrigated pasture, provision of shade, managing pests and diseases, and improvement in water management practices [37].
Measures adopted to adapt crop production to climate change
All the women groups except one ranked basin making as very highly effective for adapting to climate change. The one exception ranted it as highly effective. For the men, three out of the six groups ranked basin making as moderately effective and two groups ranked it as highly effective, while one group did not mention it. A similar pattern was observed for ripping, although the measure received lower average rankings than basin-making. Basins and ripping, which are minimum tillage practices associated with climate smart agriculture, were commonly perceived to be very effective at storing water during drought periods. Magodi women and Phikamalaza men favored basins for their positive effects on crop yields. conversely, Magodi men believed basins were only moderately effective; although they were good for water retention, they were labour-intensive, and only a few farmers adopted them. They preferred ripping because it utilised animal draught power for the tillage practice Table 5.
Agroforestry was reported by four chiefdoms, with scores ranging from moderately to highly effective. Several tree species were used. For example, Zumwanda women planted winter thorn (Faideherbia albida), sesame (Sesamum indicum), and Jatropha (Jatropha curcas) for soil fertility enhancement while the men from Magodi planted Tephrosa (Tephrosia vogelii), Glyricidia (Glyricidia sepium) and water berry (Syzygium cordatum)
Retaining crop residues in the fields and diversifying crops were reported as climate change adaptation measures for crop production by five groups. Chitungulu women observed that with crop residues present in the field, pests leave the crops alone and attack the residues instead. Crop diversification was ranked between highly and very highly effective while crop residue retention received a slightly lower rank of highly effective. Magodi men noted that crop diversification disrupted pest/ disease cycles and enhanced soil fertility, while Phikamalaza women valued it as a risk-hedging measure as “even if some crops fail, others will survive.”
Early planting received the highest average score and was generally deemed to be very highly effective by the groups that mentioned it, largely men’s groups. Noteworthy is that four women’s groups did not mention it at all, while only one men’s group was silent about it. Chitungulu women said they planted early in the season due to a much shorter rainy season. “Nowadays, when you delay planting, you will not harvest anything, so we practice early planting”. Magodi men similarly noted that early planting was very effective as crops matured before the offset of the shortened rainy season. Magodi women elaborated the importance of planting early maturing crop varieties and affirmed that, “early maturing seed varieties save families from hunger”. Phikamalaza men reaffirmed the effectiveness of early maturing crop varieties and observed that “With early maturing varieties, whether rainy season is short or long, we always have high yields.”
The least popular adaptation measures were applying fertilizers, applying pesticides, adding agricultural lime, irrigated vegetable gardening, and planting soil-improving crops (Table 4). Mphamba women reported adding agricultural lime to the soil as an adaptation measure but ranked it lowly because “it required to be bought”. In a similar vein, Zumwanda women noted that fertilizer application was moderately effective because “money is required to buy fertilizer and its effectiveness is dependent on quantities applied”. These responses suggest that effectiveness was perceived to be affected by whether or not the inputs had to be externally procured and lack of money to acquire such inputs rendered them ineffective, as they were likely unattainable when needed. Of note is that this explanation was provided by two women’s groups. Phikamalaza men noted that fertilizer is washed away during heavy rainfall, which reduces its effectiveness, while pesticides are considered harmful to human health. The rankings for this group of men were not related to the affordability of fertilizer, contrary to the women’s justifications. Only Phikamalaza men cited pesticide application as a climate adaptation measure. However, they contended that the pesticides were not effective as pests and diseases continue to be problematic for crop production. Magodi women thought vegetable gardening was a very effective measure due to the diversity of crops grown, which mitigated hunger during lean periods. However, this measure is limited to households that have fields near perennial streams and are able to irrigate their vegetables during the dry season. With drier periods, we contend that this is unlikely to be a sustainable adaptation measure as perennial streams increasingly dry up. The perception that pesticides are ineffective as a climate adaptation measure resonates with recent opinions by [29], who cautioned against smallholder farmers’ incessant and incorrect application of pesticides in Zambia.
The adaptation measures reported in this study have been applied elsewhere. Smallholder farmers in Zimbabwe adapted to rainfall variability through choice of crop and planting dates, adjusting The levels of fertiliser and cropping in areas with a high water table [5]. Adjustments in planting times, the utilisation of drought-tolerant crop varieties, and the adoption of new crops are the primary adaptation practices employed by farmers in Pakistan [38]. In Uganda, the most commonly reported changes include intercropping, dry planting before the rains begin, earlier planting, adoption of drought-resistant varieties, rotating and intercropping crops, and adjusting the timing of weeding and harvesting [19]. Agroforestry is recognised as an promising method for increasing forage availability, enhancing soil moisture retention, and boosting resilience to climate variability in livestock systems of East and Southern Africa [39]. Promoting neglected and underutilised crops helps diversify farming systems, which enhances ecosystem resilience and reduces risks from climate-related shocks [40].
Reflections on the social learning laboratories
The participants valued the co-production of knowledge and the participatory approach of SLLs. In the secure setting of the social learning labs, participants felt at ease disclosing their experiences, admitting they learned a lot, especially about some of the adaptation measures that can be implemented during droughts, like setting up troughs near the boreholes for livestock and dam constructions. The potential for learning and transformation was increased due to the open exchange of experiences and the richness of the debates. The structure promoted inclusiveness, a sense of ownership of the knowledge produced, and reciprocal learning.
The gender-responsive approach effectively illuminated differences between male and female livestock smallholder farmers. Nuances between male and female farmers and farmers’ perceptions of climate change were revealed. It’s critical to recognize unequal power dynamics and take action against them by purposefully making room for those with less influence to feel heard and seen. One way to do this is to keep asking participants to share what they have learned from paying attention to one another.
Construct validity was strengthened by discussing the scoring system and deciding on comparable scores in the local languages. Ensuring that all participants comprehended the issues being discussed was crucial in ensuring that any discrepancies in responses reflected actual variations in opinions.
We drew some lessons from the process as a research team. Time management is very important. We did not have as much time as we would have preferred during the plenary sessions. We did not want to extend the time beyond what was planned, as the participants had to return to their homes in good time. It is crucial to choose SLL participants who reflect the community and the range of its viewpoints to avoid results that are tilted towards one or a few groups. The value of a facilitator with good facilitation skills and expertise in the research topic cannot be overemphasized. A qualified and effective facilitator carefully directs the discourse, assures equal participation, and extracts useful insights from participants.
We reflect on our positionality as Zambian researchers. Our team consisted of seven members, with five having lived in the Eastern Province throughout their lives and being regarded as locals; the remaining two members were from the capital city. The inclusion of locals in the research team helped foster trust and build relationships with the participants. The ability of the entire team to relate ethnically with their participants enhanced discussions and facilitated the co-production of knowledge. Having a balanced mix of men and women on the team allowed men to conduct SLLs with male participants and women with female participants. We were conscious of the power dynamics between us as university researchers and the local community members. We endeavoured to respect cultural practices and informed the participants that our purpose was to learn from them, not to influence their responses, but to listen and understand. We encouraged openness in sharing their views and clearly communicated that we were not seeking specific answers but interested in their lived experiences.
Conclusion
Men and women smallholder farmers across the study area have similar views on the changes in the local climate change, with nuances influenced by bio-physical locations and culturally assigned gender roles, which determined their main agricultural tasks and responsibilities. Men reported more variations in the local climate in about half of the study sites, while the opposite was the case for the rest, with women highlighting more ways in which the climate had changed. Out of the eight ways the local climate had changed, the most dominant manifestations of climate change reported were a shorter rainy season and higher drought frequencies, both of which had catastrophic effects on crop and livestock production in the study area. As smallholder farmers, the residents are highly dependent on seasonal rainfall, and shifts in timing and quantity have cascading effects on their agricultural productivity and, ultimately, household and nutritional security and incomes.
Specifically, the changes in the local climate have caused severe water shortages and reduced crop and livestock productivity. Given that agricultural productivity is already low, further reductions have knock-on effects on farming households’ vulnerability to climate hazards and food insecurity, ultimately creating a negative feedback loop or vicious circle of poverty. Pests and diseases have become endemic, which has cost implications for smallholder farming households as they have to purchase pesticides and vaccines to manage crop and livestock diseases. The persistent application of pesticides and herbicides has environmental sustainability implications. Adaptation measures reported included water and fodder provision for livestock and better animal health management. Shifting to early maturing crop varieties and planting them early was lauded as having much promise for crop production. Measures that depended on external resources, such as pesticide and fertilizer application, were deemed to be largely ineffective, especially by women, as they could not work as a fallback plan for households with limited resources.
We acknowledge that by employing a qualitative research design, our study results have limited generalizability. Still, the results make an important contribution to understanding experiences and perceptions of climate change among smallholder farming households at a local scale, insights that are typical across similar households in a broader context. We recommend that practitioners, policymakers, and researchers pay attention to micro-level climate variations in their design and implementation of interventions to ensure they are appropriate for all community subgroups. District-level agricultural offices could formulate and execute climate adaptation, communication and response strategies that are grounded in the local context and developed with input from local communities through approaches such as SLLs. Community members have varied experiences and needs influenced by interactions of factors that dictate their roles and responsibilities. Using inclusive approaches in understanding community perceptions around climate change and adaptation is cardinal.
Supporting information
S1 Data. Transcripts of Social Learning Labs.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000531.s001
(DOCX)
References
- 1. Ruddell D, Harlan SL, Grossman-Clarke S, Chowell G. Scales of perception: public awareness of regional and neighborhood climates. Climatic Change. 2011;111(3–4):581–607.
- 2. Howe PD, Markowitz EM, Lee TM, Ko C-Y, Leiserowitz A. Global perceptions of local temperature change. Nature Clim Change. 2012;3(4):352–6.
- 3. Zaval L, Keenan EA, Johnson EJ, Weber EU. How warm days increase belief in global warming. Nature Clim Change. 2014;4(2):143–7.
- 4. Li S, Juhász-Horváth L, Harrison PA, Pintér L, Rounsevell MDA. Relating farmer’s perceptions of climate change risk to adaptation behaviour in Hungary. J Environ Manage. 2017;185:21–30. pmid:28029477
- 5. Makuvaro V, Walker S, Munodawafa A, Chagonda I, Masere P, Murewi C, et al. Constraints to crop production and adaptation strategies of smallholder farmers in semi-arid Central and Western Zimbabwe. Afr Crop Sci J. 2017;25(2):221.
- 6. Arnout BA. Climate values as predictor of climate change perception in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Front Psychol. 2022;13:1044697. pmid:36532997
- 7. Barrett TM, Soarimalala V, Pender M, Kramer RA, Nunn CL. Climate Change Perceptions and Adaptive Behavior Among Smallholder Farmers in Northeast Madagascar. PLOS Clim. 2025;4(3):e0000501.
- 8. Zenda M. A systematic literature review on the impact of climate change on the livelihoods of smallholder farmers in South Africa. Heliyon. 2024;10(18):e38162. pmid:39381222
- 9. Umar BB. A critical review and re-assessment of theories of smallholder decision-making: a case of conservation agriculture households, Zambia. Renew Agric Food Syst. 2013;29(3):277–90.
- 10. Moore M, Niles MT. Gendered implications for climate change adaptation among farmers in Madagascar. Climate Development. 2024;17(4):297–314.
- 11. Vignola R, Harvey CA, Bautista-Solis P, Avelino J, Rapidel B, Donatti C, et al. Ecosystem-based adaptation for smallholder farmers: Definitions, opportunities and constraints. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 2015;211:126–32.
- 12. Serdeczny O, Adams S, Baarsch F, Coumou D, Robinson A, Hare W, et al. Climate change impacts in Sub-Saharan Africa: from physical changes to their social repercussions. Reg Environ Change. 2016;17(6):1585–600.
- 13. Fierros-González I, López-Feldman A. Farmers’ Perception of Climate Change: A Review of the Literature for Latin America. Front Environ Sci. 2021;9.
- 14. Soubry B, Sherren K, Thornton TF. Are we taking farmers seriously? A review of the literature on farmer perceptions and climate change, 2007–2018. J Rural Studies. 2020;74:210–22.
- 15.
Benhin JKA. Climate change and South African agriculture. 21. Pretoria, South Africa: University of Pretoria. 2006.
- 16. Haque ATMS, Kumar L, Bhullar N. Gendered perceptions of climate change and agricultural adaptation practices: a systematic review. Climate and Development. 2023;15(10):885–902.
- 17. Mphande E, Umar BB, Kunda-Wamuwi CF. Gender and Legume Production in a Changing Climate Context: Experiences from Chipata, Eastern Zambia. Sustainability. 2022;14(19):11901.
- 18. Huyer S, Loboguerrero AM, Chanana N, Spellman O. From gender gaps to gender-transformative climate-smart agriculture. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 2024;67:101415.
- 19. Jost C, Kyazze F, Naab J, Neelormi S, Kinyangi J, Zougmore R, et al. Understanding gender dimensions of agriculture and climate change in smallholder farming communities. Climate and Development. 2015;8(2):133–44.
- 20. Goh A. A literature review of the gender-differentiated impacts of climate change on women’s and men’s assets and well-being in developing countries. CGIAR Systemwide Program on Collective Action and Property Rights (CAPRi) Working Paper No. 106. Washington, DC: 2012.
- 21. Howe PD, Mildenberger M, Marlon JR, Leiserowitz A. Geographic variation in opinions on climate change at state and local scales in the USA. Nature Clim Change. 2015;5(6):596–603.
- 22. Glemarec Y. Addressing the gender differentiated investment risks to climate-smart agriculture. AIMS Agriculture and Food. 2017;2(1):56–74.
- 23. Niemann J, El-Mahdi M, Samuelsen H, Tersbøl BP. Gender relations and decision-making on climate change adaptation in rural East African households: A qualitative systematic review. PLOS Clim. 2024;3(1):e0000279.
- 24.
Lilja N, Ashby JA, Sperling L. Assessing the impact of participatory research and gender analysis. Cali: CGIAR Program for Participatory Research and Gender Analysis (PRGA). 2001. http://ciat-library.ciat.cgiar.org/Articulos_Ciat/quito.pdf
- 25. Umar BB. Adapting to climate change through conservation agriculture: a gendered analysis of Eastern Zambia. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2021;5.
- 26. Nyanga PH, Umar BB, Wakun’uma WL. Social Learning on Land Equity: Stakeholders’ Perspectives on Customary Land Certification in Eastern and Central Zambia. Lusaka, Zambia: Sustainable Agricultural Intensification Research and Learning in Africa. 2020.
- 27. Beier P, Hansen LJ, Helbrecht L, Behar D. A How‐to Guide for Coproduction of Actionable Science. Conservation Letters. 2016;10(3):288–96.
- 28.
GIZ. Climate Risk Profile: Zambia. Bonn, Germany: Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2022.
- 29. Harvey CA, Rakotobe ZL, Rao NS, Dave R, Razafimahatratra H, Rabarijohn RH, et al. Extreme vulnerability of smallholder farmers to agricultural risks and climate change in Madagascar. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014;369(1639):20130089. pmid:24535397
- 30. Lehébel-Péron A, Sidawy P, Dounias E, Schatz B. Attuning local and scientific knowledge in the context of global change: The case of heather honey production in southern France. J Rural Stud. 2016;44:132–42.
- 31. Escarcha JF, Lassa JA, Zander KK. Livestock Under Climate Change: A Systematic Review of Impacts and Adaptation. Climate. 2018;6(3):54.
- 32. Rojas-Downing MM, Nejadhashemi AP, Harrigan T, Woznicki SA. Climate change and livestock: Impacts, adaptation, and mitigation. Climate Risk Management. 2017;16:145–63.
- 33. Cheng M, McCarl B, Fei C. Climate Change and Livestock Production: A Literature Review. Atmosphere. 2022;13(1):140.
- 34. Jawhar safi SA, Mehmet Akif ÇAM, Emal Habibi, Ömer Faruk YILMAZ. Effects of Climate Change on Animal Production. JNSR. 2024;2(2):1–14.
- 35. Osiemo J, Ruben R, Girvetz E. Farmer Perceptions of Agricultural Risks; Which Risk Attributes Matter Most for Men and Women. Sustainability. 2021;13(23):12978.
- 36. Sánchez-Cortés MS, Chavero EL. Indigenous perception of changes in climate variability and its relationship with agriculture in a Zoque community of Chiapas, Mexico. Climatic Change. 2010;107(3–4):363–89.
- 37. Abazinab H, Duguma B, Muleta E. Livestock farmers’ perception of climate change and adaptation strategies in the Gera district, Jimma zone, Oromia Regional state, southwest Ethiopia. Heliyon. 2022;8(12):e12200. pmid:36531631
- 38. Ali A, Erenstein O. Assessing farmer use of climate change adaptation practices and impacts on food security and poverty in Pakistan. Climate Risk Management. 2017;16:183–94.
- 39. Mohamed IA, Schaeffer M, Baarsch F. Adapting East and Southern Africa’s livestock to climate change: a decision making under deep uncertainty-based approach for effective actions. Climate and Development. 2024;:1–15.
- 40. Omotayo AO, Omotoso AB, Asong JA. Leveraging Africa’s underutilized crops to combat climate change, water scarcity, and food insecurity in South Africa. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):19404. pmid:40461609