Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Loading metrics

The hidden health costs of climate change: Accounting for extreme heat harms to women in the global South

Global climate warming is fueling complex and compounding threats to populations worldwide, especially in the Global South where climate hazards pose an additional threat to health and well-being in communities heavily burdened by pollution [1]. Extreme heat poses a particular hazard to populations in South Asia because temperatures in that region are approaching the physiological limits to human tolerability [2].

While climate change-fueled extreme heat is dangerous to all, it poses particular risks to women–but the gendered dimensions of heat-related health impacts are poorly captured in current understanding of harms and policy responses to address climate-sensitive health inequities. Researchers estimate that extreme heat caused about 47,000 premature deaths in India in 2019 [1], but it is unclear the extent to which gender-specific health risks identified in other studies are considered in such national-level estimates. This limitation is a concern because finer scale data on heat-related health harms suggests that women are suffering disproportionately from heat: for example, during a May 2010 extreme heat event in Ahmedabad, India 1,344 excess deaths were recorded, with a significantly higher share of female deaths during this event [3].

Even as evidence continues to emerge on the health hazards that extreme heat poses to women, the true societal costs of this growing problem, in economic terms, are not being adequately considered in climate change policies [4]. Extreme temperatures inflict damage to physical and mental health, but also impose financial costs on individuals, families, communities, employers, and governments [4, 5]. Prior research in the United States has illuminated billion-dollar ramifications of extreme heat-related health costs linked to morbidity and mortality, including those tied to healthcare delivery, prescription medications, outpatient care needs, and lost work wages [5]. However, such evidence on the health-related financial costs of extreme heat (and other climate-sensitive hazards such as floods, ozone air pollution, and certain infectious diseases) is limited in the Global South due to myriad data access challenges and gender-specific health considerations are typically excluded from economic assessments of heat-related economic risks. For example, a prominent 2020 of potential future economic productivity losses tied to extreme heat in India did not quantify heat-related health problems that could reduce worker productivity amongst women, including in informal work sectors [6].

More information on the health-related financial harms of extreme heat can help to inform planning for climate change adaptation South Asia and the Global South by helping to provide robust evidence for the avoidable health harms and associated financial damage achievable through enhanced implementation of climate change adaptation projects [4]. Societal adaptation to extreme heat is an urgent priority in this region, and India has taken leadership to confront heat-related health risks by initiating comprehensive Heat Action Plans (HAPs) that help to disseminate temperature forecasts, socialize heat as a threat to human health, and strengthen capacity building in the healthcare sector to anticipate and response to heat-related health problems in hospitals and emergency rooms [7]. Preliminary evidence indicates that HAPs can achieve reductions in all-cause mortality post-implementation [8], but the gender equity benefits of these plans are not yet clear.

Greater attention to the health-related costs of extreme heat on women’s health can help to strengthen resilience efforts at multiple scales in Global South communities. At the municipal level where cities are implementing heat preparedness actions on the ground, preliminary evidence indicates that certain elements of HAPs are cost-effective, but a deeper understanding of these dynamics could help to provide a stronger rationale for expanded implementation of adaptation actions in the Global South. For example, cool roof installations that help to reduce the concentration of heat in urban areas [9] can also deliver important health benefits and energy savings [10]. Cool roof materials are affordable and widely available, but their implementation in India thus far lags behind the available potential. Improved quantification of the health benefits of improved thermal comfort and energy savings from lower air conditioning burdens is needed to better characterize the economic benefits of such interventions [11].

At the regional level, health cost estimates can provide new insight to inform planning for extreme heat preparedness for countries of the Global South. In a analysis of HAPs across India, researchers identified gender-specific vulnerability analyses as a key limitation [12]. Such information can also be used to shape equitable public policy responses and deployment of limited resources to address priority heat risks [13]; for example, evaluation of health benefits from adaptation expressed in economic terms can help to motivate greater financing for HAP implementation [14].

At the national and international levels, improved accounting of the full range of health-related financial costs associated with climbing global temperatures can also help to ground the global dialogue on financial compensation for irreversible loss and damage resulting from climate impacts. It is clear that the global burden of climate-sensitive hazards will be shouldered by countries that are collectively least responsible for emissions of climate pollution. Climate change impact assessments of damages experienced to date and integrated assessment modeling of potential future harms, however, are dominated by accounting of insurable losses—that is, resources for which climate damages are readily assessed and for which insurance instruments can be used to attach economic value. Inclusion of a broader range of extreme heat-related health endpoints is needed to improve economic models so that these tools can better characterize intensifying economic losses being borne by vulnerable populations [15].

Climate change-driven damages to health are already widespread across the Global South, but a lack of data on costs shouldered by women undermines efforts to equitably respond to this intensifying challenge through expanded investments in climate change adaptation. Stronger attention to the health-related financial costs of extreme heat can provide an evidence base from which to justify greater investments in health-protective programs that will ultimately help to keep more women out of harm’s way. Ultimately, better estimates of the true health and financial tolls of climate change on women in the Global South can function to motivate stronger health-protective and cost-effective climate change response actions over the long-term.

References

  1. 1. Romanello M, Di Napoli C, Drummond P, Green C, Kennard H, Lampard P, et al. The 2022 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: health at the mercy of fossil fuels. The Lancet. 2022; S0140673622015409. pmid:36306815
  2. 2. Asseng S, Spänkuch D, Hernandez-Ochoa IM, Laporta J. The upper temperature thresholds of life. The Lancet Planetary Health. 2021;5: e378–e385. pmid:34119012
  3. 3. Azhar GS, Mavalankar D, Nori-Sarma A, Rajiva A, Dutta P, Jaiswal A, et al. Heat-related mortality in India: Excess all-cause mortality associated with the 2010 Ahmedabad heat wave. PLoS One. 2014;9: e91831. pmid:24633076
  4. 4. Limaye VS, Max W, Constible J, Knowlton K. Estimating The Costs Of Inaction And The Economic Benefits Of Addressing The Health Harms Of Climate Change. Health Affairs. 2020;39: 2098–2104. pmid:33284700
  5. 5. Limaye VS, Max W, Constible J, Knowlton K. Estimating the Health‐Related Costs of 10 Climate‐Sensitive U.S. Events During 2012. GeoHealth. 2019;3: 245–265. pmid:32159045
  6. 6. McKinsey Global Institute. Will India get too hot to work? 2020. Available: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/business%20functions/sustainability/our%20insights/will%20india%20get%20too%20hot%20to%20work/will-india-get%20too-hot-to-work-vf.pdf
  7. 7. Knowlton K, Kulkarni S, Azhar G, Mavalankar D, Jaiswal A, Connolly M, et al. Development and Implementation of South Asia’s First Heat-Health Action Plan in Ahmedabad (Gujarat, India). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2014;11: 3473–3492. pmid:24670386
  8. 8. Hess JJ, Lm S, Knowlton K, Saha S, Dutta P, Ganguly P, et al. Building Resilience to Climate Change: Pilot Evaluation of the Impact of India’s First Heat Action Plan on All-Cause Mortality. Journal of Environmental and Public Health. 2018;2018: 1–8. pmid:30515228
  9. 9. Vellingiri S, Dutta P, Singh S, Sathish L, Pingle S, Brahmbhatt B. Combatting Climate Change-induced Heat Stress: Assessing Cool Roofs and Its Impact on the Indoor Ambient Temperature of the Households in the Urban Slums of Ahmedabad. Indian J Occup Environ Med. 2020;24: 25–29. pmid:32435111
  10. 10. Joshi J, Magal A, Limaye VS, Madan P, Jaiswal A, Mavalankar D, et al. Climate change and 2030 cooling demand in Ahmedabad, India: opportunities for expansion of renewable energy and cool roofs. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change. 2022;27: 44. pmid:35967931
  11. 11. Limaye VS, Magal A, Joshi J, Maji S, Dutta P, Rajput P, et al. Air quality and health co-benefits of climate change mitigation and adaptation actions by 2030: an interdisciplinary modeling study in Ahmedabad, India. Environ Res: Health. 2022 [cited 2 Dec 2022]. pmid:36873423
  12. 12. Centre for Policy Research. How is India Adapating to Heatwaves? An Assessment of Heat Action Plans With Insights for Transformative Climate Action. 2023 Mar. Available: https://cprindia.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Heat-Report_27March-23_Updated-Table.pdf
  13. 13. Alcayna T, O’Donnell D, Chandaria S. How much bilateral and multilateral climate adaptation finance is targeting the health sector? A scoping review of official development assistance data between 2009–2019. PLOS Global Public Health. 2023;3: e0001493. pmid:37315049
  14. 14. Limaye VS. Reducing the inequitable health and financial burdens of climate change. One Earth. 2022;5: 320–323.
  15. 15. Cromar KR, Anenberg SC, Balmes JR, Fawcett AA, Ghazipura M, Gohlke JM, et al. Global Health Impacts for Economic Models of Climate Change: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Annals ATS. 2022;19: 1203–1212. pmid:35073249