Table 1.
Factors containing significant socio-psychological constructs that predict engagement in dietary relational organizing.
Table 2.
Overview of demographic variables for participants in the study.
Fig 1.
Effect of factor messages on the binary outcome of whether participants wrote a short script for relational organizing, compared to the control condition.
Note. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. Effect size is the regression coefficient, on a binary outcome (this can be interpreted as percentage point difference between treatment and control). Vertical bars represent the 95% confidence intervals (CI), while the dotted line represents the control condition.
Fig 2.
Effect of factor messages on the general intention to engage in relational organizing, compared to the control condition.
Note. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. Effect size is the regression coefficient, on a 7-point Likert scale. Vertical bars represent the 95% confidence intervals (CI), while the dotted line represents the control condition.
Table 3.
Summary of treatment effects by outcome (1 = overall effects, 2 = effects by data source), with which constructs explain the impact.
Table 4.
Summary of the LM to model the effect of factor treatments and other variables on the general intention to engage in relational organizing (contemplation).