Fig 1.
Steps for conducting the local feasibility assessment of adaptation options.
Fig 2.
Phase III steps to perform the feasibility assessment using local expert expertise (modified from Singh et al.
[17]).
Fig 3.
Case Study area: Puerto Morazán.
This figure is created using QGIS 3.34.9 version. (Sources: Base map layer from OpenStreetMap (OSM), licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0 https://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/ and international and municipal boundaries from https://public.opendatasoft.com/explore/dataset/world-administrative-boundaries/export/, licensed under CC BY 4: https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/).
Table 1.
Adaptation options identified in Puerto Morazán.
Fig 4.
Priorities among indicators identified by local experts using the AHP.
Fig 5.
Priorities among dimensions identified by local experts using the AHP.
Table 2.
Overall feasibility of adaptation options. Green: High feasibility (insignificant barriers). Yellow: Medium Feasibility (mixed or moderate but still existent barriers). Red: Low feasibility (Multiple barriers, in this dimension, may block implementation).
Table 3.
Feasibility of adaptation options per dimension. Green: High feasibility (insignificant barriers). Yellow: Medium Feasibility (mixed or moderate but still existent barriers). Red: Low feasibility (Multiple barriers, in this dimension, may block implementation). (NLP) No local priorities considered; (LP) Local priorities considered.