Skip to main content
Advertisement

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Study area location map.

Illustrates the basins of Ethiopia, Rift Valley Basin, and Gelana Watershed, compiled using DEM data and watershed boundaries. The map also highlights river gauging stations, meteorological stations, streamlines, and the main river line. DEM data was obtained from ASTER GDEM which is Available at: https://asterweb.jpl.nasa.gov/ and the Watershed Boundary Dataset was obtained from: https://www.usgs.gov/.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

The coverage area and land use/land cover percentage changed from 1987 to 2020.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Land use/land cover accuracy assessment from 1987 to 2020.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

1987,2002 and 2020 LULC map of Gelana catchment.

(accessed via US geological survey (http://www.usgs.gov/) data processed and analysed by using ArcGIS, ERDAS, and survey data). The maps revealed spatio-temporal trends of Land Use/land cover (LULC) change classes as built-up, forest, agriculture, and pasture land.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 3.

Proportional area of actual and simulated LULC image of 2020.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 3.

LULC for 2040 and 2060.

(predicted by using a Multi-Layer Perceptron Neural Network (MLP-NN) with a Cellular Automata-Markov Chain Model), which is found in the software of the TerrSet 18.32 framework. https://clarklabs.org/product/terrset-2020-academic-license-upgrade/. The maps illustrate the spatial distribution of LULC classes (Built-up, Pasture land, Forest, and Agriculture) and the projected trends over the specified periods.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 4.

LULC proportion from 2040 to 2060.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Precipitation changes (%) between the three RCMs under the RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 scenarios.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Temperature change (°C) for three different RCMs under the RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 scenarios.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Global sensitive flow parameters [84].

More »

Table 7 Expand

Fig 4.

Observed and simulated monthly average streamflow for calibration and validation.

(source: MoWIE; Tore Gauging Station data (1990–2013), calibrated and validated within SWAT-CUP). This figure presents the comparison between observed and simulated monthly average streamflow for the calibration (1990–2005) and validation (2006–2013) at the Tore Gauging Station.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 8.

Variation of the annual hydrological components under land use/ land cover change.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

Variation of the annual hydrological components under Climate change.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Fig 5.

Hydrological response to LULC and climate change.

This figure depicts the hydrological response to changes in land use/land cover (LULC) and climate, with climate data sourced from historical records and RCM, LULC data from USGS, and hydrological variables simulated using the SWAT model.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 10.

Variation of hydrological components under combined climate and LULCC.

More »

Table 10 Expand