Fig 1.
Integrative model to predict SAI acceptability.
Note. Based on the results in the step I procedure using “Cognitive-Affective Maps” measures for Climate Change Concern, Moral Hazard, and Tampering with Nature (highlighted in gray) were included. These additional factors, as well as the Ethical Factors, are depicted without specifying the effect of the single factors to the central constructs included in the core model (within dotted rectangle).
Table 1.
Overview of the applied survey scales separated for all identified studies.
Table 2.
Overview of all scales in the integrative model shown in Fig 1.
Fig 2.
Representation of the study design.
Fig 3.
Aggregated CAM consisting of N = 58 CAMs.
Note. A PDF file to zoom in and out can be found on OSF (https://osf.io/jb3vk). Yellow represents neutral, green positive and red negative concepts. A concept was drawn as neutral if the average valence of the respective concept is within [-.5,.5] to indicate that the emotional feelings regarding the concept are mixed.
Table 3.
Descriptive statistics and correlations among the central constructs in Fig 1.
Fig 4.
Structural equation model for the proposed integrative model to measure SAI acceptability.
Note. Only the structural model is shown. Each circle represents a measurement model. Dotted lines indicate a non-significant direct path.