Peer Review History
| Original SubmissionAugust 3, 2025 |
|---|
|
PCSY-D-25-00082 Bifurcation, Sensitivity, and Noise: Stochastic Dynamics of Cholera with Vaccination and Sanitation Controls PLOS Complex Systems Dear Dr. Welu, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS Complex Systems. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS Complex Systems's publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. Please submit your revised manuscript within 60 days Dec 27 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at complexsystems@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pcsy/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file. Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript: * A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'. This file does not need to include responses to any formatting updates and technical items listed in the 'Journal Requirements' section below. * A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'. * An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'. If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, competing interests statement, or data availability statement, please make these updates within the submission form at the time of resubmission. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter. We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Kind regards, Joshua Kiddy K. Asamoah, PhD Academic Editor PLOS Complex Systems Joshua Asamoah Academic Editor PLOS Complex Systems Hocine Cherifi Editor-in-Chief PLOS Complex Systems Journal Requirements: 1. We ask that a manuscript source file is provided at Revision. Please upload your manuscript file as a .doc, .docx, .rtf or .tex. 2. Please upload separate figure files in .tif or .eps format. Also, remove the figures from your manuscript file but keep the legends. For more information about figure files please see our guidelines: https://journals.plos.org/sustainabilitytransformation/s/figures https://journals.plos.org/sustainabilitytransformation/s/figures#loc-file-requirements 3. We note that your Data Availability Statement is currently as follows: “The data supporting the findings of this study are derived from publicly available secondary sources. All datasets utilized in this manuscript have been properly cited in the references section, and their original sources are accessible: All underlying data sources are fully cited and traceable. Data extraction and processing methods are detailed in the Methods section to enable replication. Where applicable, ethical reuse permissions for restricted-access datasets (e.g., government or proprietary data) were obtained and are documented.” Please confirm at this time whether or not your submission contains all raw data required to replicate the results of your study. Authors must share the “minimal data set” for their submission. PLOS defines the minimal data set to consist of the data required to replicate all study findings reported in the article, as well as related metadata and methods (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-minimal-data-set-definition). For example, authors should submit the following data: - The values behind the means, standard deviations and other measures reported; - The values used to build graphs; - The points extracted from images for analysis. Authors do not need to submit their entire data set if only a portion of the data was used in the reported study. If your submission does not contain these data, please either upload them as Supporting Information files or deposit them to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of recommended repositories, please see https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/recommended-repositories. If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent. If data are owned by a third party, please indicate how others may request data access. If the reviewer comments include a recommendation to cite specific previously published works, please review and evaluate these publications to determine whether they are relevant and should be cited. There is no requirement to cite these works unless the editor has indicated otherwise. Additional Editor Comments (if provided): [Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.] Reviewers' Comments: Reviewer's Responses to Questions Comments to the Author 1. Does this manuscript meet PLOS Complex Systems’s publication criteria ? Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe methodologically and ethically rigorous research with conclusions that are appropriately drawn based on the data presented.-->?> Reviewer #1: Yes ********** 2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?-->?> Reviewer #1: N/A ********** 3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available (please refer to the Data Availability Statement at the start of the manuscript PDF file)??> The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception. The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.--> Reviewer #1: No ********** 4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??> Reviewer #1: Yes ********** Reviewer #1: Re-derive R₀ Cleanly • Keep (A, I, B) or (A, I, T, B) as infected states. • Use the same DFE (S₀, V₀) from your DFE theorem. • Linearize the B equation correctly; write the environmental block as r − η − − ζ .. • Report R₀ = R_hh + R_env with both parts dimensionally positive and discuss the case r > η + + ζ (environmental invasion).(environmental invasion). Bifurcation Proofs • For β ₁: perform center-manifold analysis at R₀ = 1, compute coefficients (a, b), and show subcritical (backward) behavior under explicit parameter conditions.₁: perform center-manifold analysis at R₀ = 1, compute coefficients (a, b), and show subcritical (backward) behavior under explicit parameter conditions. • For β ₂: carry out an analogous analysis and demonstrate supercritical (forward) bifurcation.₂: carry out an analogous analysis and demonstrate supercritical (forward) bifurcation. • Add a 2-parameter continuation plot (AUTO or MATCONT) showing stability of branches. Stochastic Section • Define noise structure explicitly (is σ eX dWe multiplicative in which states?).ₓX dWₜ multiplicative in which states?). • Replace 'R₀ˢ' with invasion probability and/or the top Lyapunov exponent of the linearized SDE; present Monte Carlo estimates with confidence intervals. • For '30% greater dispersion' claims, provide the actual statistic (ΔIQR or coefficient of variation) at day t, with sample size n, seed, and CI. Sensitivity Analysis • Specify parameter priors and sampling design (LHS size, distributions, correlations). • Include barplots with error bars; report both first-order (Sᵢ) and total-order (S_Tᵢ) sensitivity indices. • If claiming 'log-sensitivity of B to ζ implies 15–20% more effort,' include the elasticity curve and relate elasticity to program coverage targets.implies 15–20% more effort,' include the elasticity curve and relate elasticity to program coverage targets. Figures & Code • Include all referenced figures (axes, legends, parameter values) for transparency. • Archive MATLAB scripts (RK4, Euler-Maruyama, continuation routines) with a README for reproducibility. Sample Abstract Rewrite We develop a cholera model (SVAITRS-B) that links vaccination with waning protection, asymptomatic carriage, treatment failure, and an explicit environmental reservoir. Using a next-generation approach at the disease-free equilibrium (DFE) that retains vaccination coupling, we decompose the basic reproduction number R₀ into human-to-human and environmental components. Center-manifold analysis shows a backward bifurcation when varying the person-to-person transmission rate β ₁ under specific parameter constraints, whereas varying the environmental transmission rate ₁ under specific parameter constraints, whereas varying the environmental transmission rate β ₂ yields a forward (transcritical) bifurcation. Stochastic simulations with multiplicative noise highlight greater outbreak variability in the human transmission pathway than in the environmental pathway, while the latter governs long-run persistence. Global and local sensitivity analyses identify ₂ yields a forward (transcritical) bifurcation. Stochastic simulations with multiplicative noise highlight greater outbreak variability in the human transmission pathway than in the environmental pathway, while the latter governs long-run persistence. Global and local sensitivity analyses identify β ₁, ₁, β ₂, ₂, γ e, and ᵢ, and ζ as key levers. We provide code and parameter priors to support reproducibility and policy exploration.as key levers. We provide code and parameter priors to support reproducibility and policy exploration. ********** what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .--> Reviewer #1: No ********** [NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.] Figure resubmission: Reproducibility: To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that authors of applicable studies deposit laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols
|
| Revision 1 |
|
Bifurcation, Sensitivity, and Noise: Stochastic Dynamics of Cholera with Vaccination and Sanitation Controls PCSY-D-25-00082R1 Dear Dr. Welu, We're pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements. Within one week, you'll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you'll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication. An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pcsy/ click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. For questions related to billing, please contact billing support at https://plos.my.site.com/s/. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact complexsystems@plos.org. Kind regards, Emma Faid Staff Admin PLOS Complex Systems Reviewers' comments: Reviewer's Responses to Questions Comments to the Author Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed -------------------- publication criteria ? Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe methodologically and ethically rigorous research with conclusions that are appropriately drawn based on the data presented.-->?> Reviewer #1: Yes -------------------- 3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?-->?> Reviewer #1: N/A -------------------- 4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available (please refer to the Data Availability Statement at the start of the manuscript PDF file)??> The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception. The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.--> Reviewer #1: Yes -------------------- 5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English? PLOS Complex Systems does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.-->?> Reviewer #1: Yes -------------------- Reviewer #1: (No Response) -------------------- what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .--> Reviewer #1: Yes: Oludoun Yetunde Olajumoke -------------------- |
Open letter on the publication of peer review reports
PLOS recognizes the benefits of transparency in the peer review process. Therefore, we enable the publication of all of the content of peer review and author responses alongside final, published articles. Reviewers remain anonymous, unless they choose to reveal their names.
We encourage other journals to join us in this initiative. We hope that our action inspires the community, including researchers, research funders, and research institutions, to recognize the benefits of published peer review reports for all parts of the research system.
Learn more at ASAPbio .