Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Simulated nitrogen deposition significantly reduces soil respiration in an evergreen broadleaf forest in western China

Abstract

Soil respiration is the second largest terrestrial carbon (C) flux; the responses of soil respiration to nitrogen (N) deposition have far-reaching influences on the global C cycle. N deposition has been documented to significantly affect soil respiration, but the results are conflicting. The response of soil respiration to N deposition gradients remains unclear, especially in ecosystems receiving increasing ambient N depositions. A field experiment was conducted in a natural evergreen broadleaf forest in western China from November 2013 to November 2015 to understand the effects of increasing N deposition on soil respiration. Four levels of N deposition were investigated: control (Ctr, without N added), low N (L, 50 kg N ha−1·a−1), medium N (M, 150 kg N ha−1·a−1), and high N (H, 300 kg N ha−1·a−1). The results show that (1) the mean soil respiration rates in the L, M, and H treatments were 9.13%, 15.8% (P < 0.05) and 22.57% (P < 0.05) lower than that in the Ctr treatment (1.56 ± 0.13 μmol·m−2·s−1), respectively; (2) soil respiration rates showed significant positive exponential and linear relationships with soil temperature and moisture (P < 0.01), respectively. Soil temperature is more important than soil moisture in controlling the soil respiration rate; (3) the Ctr, L, M, and H treatments yielded Q10 values of 2.98, 2.78, 2.65, and 2.63, respectively. N deposition decreased the temperature sensitivity of soil respiration; (4) simulated N deposition also significantly decreased the microbial biomass C and N, fine root biomass, pH and extractable dissolved organic C (P < 0.05). Overall, the results suggest that soil respiration declines in response to N deposition. The decrease in soil respiration caused by simulated N deposition may occur through decreasing the microbial biomass C and N, fine root biomass, pH and extractable dissolved organic C. Ongoing N deposition may have significant impacts on C cycles and increase C sequestration with the increase in global temperature in evergreen broadleaf forests.

Citation: Zhou S, Xiang Y, Tie L, Han B, Huang C (2018) Simulated nitrogen deposition significantly reduces soil respiration in an evergreen broadleaf forest in western China. PLoS ONE 13(9): e0204661. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204661

Editor: Dafeng Hui, Tennessee State University, UNITED STATES

Received: May 8, 2018; Accepted: September 12, 2018; Published: September 27, 2018

Copyright: © 2018 Zhou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper.

Funding: This work was supported by the Sci-tech Project of the “12th Five -year-plan” of China (2010BACO1A11) from the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (http://www.most.gov.cn/) granted to Congde Huang., the Crop Breeding Research Project of the “12th Five-year-plan” of Sichuan Province (2011NZ0098-10) form the Department of Science and Technology of Sichuan Province (http://www.scst.gov.cn/) granted to Congde Huang, and the joint Ph.D. program grant (201706910038) from the China Scholarship Council (http://www.csc.edu.cn/) granted to Shixing Zhou. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: No,the authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

The amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) released through soil respiration can reach 68–100 Pg C each year [1], and slight changes in soil respiration can significantly alter CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere [2, 3]. It is well known that a complex array of biotic and environmental factors, such as temperature, precipitation, soil moisture, root biomass, oxygen, changes in microbial C use efficiency and substrate availability, affect soil respiration [4–7]. Global changes (such as global warming, elevated CO2 and nitrogen (N) deposition) may also substantially mediate soil respiration [7–9].

Human activities such as fossil fuel combustion and synthetic fertilizer application have dramatically accelerated the fixation and global movement of reactive N since the Industrial Revolution [10, 11]. At present, the amount of active N produced by human activities exceeds the amount of active N produced by natural land processes [10]. After Europe and the United States, China is considered the third-largest N deposition region in the world [10, 12, 13]. Excess N deposition has caused a series of ecological problems, such as plant growth alterations, soil acidification, soil nutrient storage imbalances, and changes to other ecosystem functions [10, 11, 14]. Many studies in terrestrial ecosystems have reported that N deposition generally promotes plant growth; however, N deposition may have negative effects in some N-rich ecosystems [11, 15–17]. The C balance in terrestrial ecosystems is determined by C fixation (e.g., plant growth) and C emission (e.g., soil respiration) processes. Therefore, the direction and extent of the C balance can be significantly affected by N deposition via soil respiration alterations [18].

The rainy area of western China is a large ecotone on the western edge of the Sichuan Basin that spans 400–450 km north to south and 50–70 km east to west with an area of approximately 25,000 km2 (Fig 1) [19–21]. Due to the high elevation and the effect of the East Asian Monsoon and Indian Monsoon, warm moist air from the Sichuan Basin is readily condensed into rain on the western edge of the basin, resulting in abundant rainfall [19, 22]. Due to the climate and topography, this area receives considerable N deposition from the Sichuan Basin [13, 23]. The average atmospheric wet N deposition in this area was approximately 95 kg N·ha-1 from 2008 to 2010 [13, 24, 25], which is much higher than that in other areas of China [13]. Numerous manipulative experiments have demonstrated that the response of soil respiration to N deposition can be complex. Previous studies have indicated that N deposition suppressed [26–28], promoted [29–31], or had no effect [32–34] on soil respiration. Although soil respiration has been widely explored, most previous studies have been conducted in temperate forest ecosystems (with relatively low rates of ambient N deposition) [18, 28]. The effects of N deposition on soil respiration in ecosystems that are impacted by increasing ambient N deposition (especially tropical and subtropical forest ecosystems) are not well understood. To understand the responses of soil respiration to increasing N deposition, especially under high levels of ambient N deposition, we performed a manipulative N deposition field experiment in a natural evergreen broadleaf forest (subtropical forest) in the rainy area of western China. It has been hypothesized that an increase in N concentration possibly increases soil respiration and microbial activity in N-limited forest ecosystems [18, 27, 30, 35]. Moreover, we previously reported that the natural evergreen broadleaf forests in the rainy area of western China are N-rich forest ecosystems, and N deposition was found to significantly decrease litter decomposition [20, 36]. Considering these findings, we hypothesized that simulated N deposition likely reduces soil respiration through the combined negative effects on plant and microbial activities in these N-rich subtropical forests, especially under conditions of high atmospheric N deposition.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 1. Locations of the rainy area of western China and the study site.

The map was generated with ArcGIS version 10.0 (ESRI, Redlands, CA, USA, http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204661.g001

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

All researches were in compliance with laws in People’s Republic of China, no specific permissions were required for these locations or activities, and measurements on humans, animals and endangered or protected plants were not involved in our work.

Site description

The study was conducted in a natural evergreen broadleaf forest at the Bi Feng Gorge Scenic Spot, Ya’an City, Sichuan Province (30°03’N, 102°59’E, 1,170 m above sea level, Fig 1). The region is located in a subtropical moist forest zone with a monsoon climate [18, 20, 21]. The mean annual precipitation is approximately 1700 mm (average from 1961 to 2011), with approximately 60% falling from July to September [37], and the mean annual temperature is 16.2°C (25.4°C in July and 6.1°C in January) [20, 21, 36]. The soil is classified as a Lithic Dystrudepts (according to USDA Soil Taxonomy), derived from purple sandstone and shale, with a depth of more than 60 cm. The mean concentrations of total C, total N, nitrate N and ammonium N in the soil (0–20 cm depth) are 17.17 ± 1.54 g·kg-1, 1.14 ± 0.13 g·kg-1, 9.45 ± 1.03 mg·kg-1 and 6.87 ± 0.56 mg·kg-1, respectively, and the pH is 6.21 ± 0.13 (November 2013) [20, 21, 36]. The dominant tree species are Schima superba, Machilus pingii, Rhus succedanea, Lithocarpus hancei, Acer davidii, Pittosporum tobira, Machilus lichuanensis, Eurya japonica, Symplocos botryantha, Cinnamomum cassia, Lithocarpus megalophyllus, Acer sinense, and Camellia japonica [20, 21, 36].

Experimental design

Twelve plots (3 × 3 m) at 3 m intervals were randomly established in a representative natural evergreen broadleaf forest at the Bi Feng Gorge Scenic Spot in October 2013 [20, 21, 36]. Four levels of N addition with three replicates were established: control (Ctr, without N added), low N deposition (L, 50 kg N ha−1·a−1), medium N deposition (M, 150 kg N ha−2·a−1), and high N deposition (H, 300 kg N ha−1·a−1) [20, 21, 36]. From November 2013 to November 2015, ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3) was added as a fertilizer twice each month. For each application, the fertilizer was weighed, dissolved in 2 L of water, and evenly sprayed back and forth at a height of 50 cm above the ground with a sprayer. The control plot received 2 L of distilled water without [20, 36].

Soil respiration rate measurements

In October 2013, three polyvinyl chloride collars (20 cm inside diameter and 12 cm height) were randomly installed into the soil to a depth of 7 cm in each plot. From December 2013 to November 2015, the soil respiration rate (μmol·m−2·s−1) was measured monthly using an LI-8100 automated soil CO2 flux system (LI-COR Inc., USA). All living plants inside the collars were clipped at least 24 h before soil respiration measurements were collected to eliminate the effect of aboveground plant respiration. All soil respiration measurements were performed between 9:00 and 18:00 (local time) on each measurement date at 3 h intervals, and the measurements were performed four times per measurement day [18, 26]. The average of the four measurements was calculated as the soil respiration rate for each month.

Soil temperature and moisture measurements

Soil temperature (°C) at a soil depth of 10 cm was measured by inserting a soil temperature probe connected to the LI-8100 near the soil CO2 flux chamber while soil respiration was being monitored. Simultaneously, a time-domain reflectometer (mini Trase 6050X3K1, ICT, USA) with probes (0–15 cm depth) was used to measure the volumetric soil moisture (%).

Fine root biomass and soil biochemical characteristic measurements

In November 2015, soil samples (0–20 cm) were collected using a stainless steel soil corer (6 cm in diameter and 20 cm in depth). Three cores were randomly collected from each plot, thoroughly mixed and then divided into two subsamples, one for fine root biomass (subsample 1) and one for the biochemical characteristic (subsample 2) measurements. Fine roots were separated from soils (subsample 1) by washing and sieving with a 0.25 mm sieve. Then, the roots were washed on a sieve, separated, dried at 60°C for 48 h and weighed [38]. The samples in subsample 2 were passed through a 2 mm mesh sieve and used to determine the soil extractable dissolved organic C (DOC) and microbial biomass C and N (MBC and MBN). The soil samples were extracted with distilled water (soil:water ratio, 2:1), shaken for 0.5 h (170 rpm) at 25°C, and centrifuged for 20 min at 3500 rpm; the supernatant was filtered through a membrane (0.45 μm, Millipore, Xingya Corporation, Shanghai, China) into a plastic bottle [39]. Then, the DOC concentrations were determined using a total C and N analyzer (Shimadzu model TOC-VCPH +TNM-1, Kyoto, Japan). In addition, MBC and MBN were measured using the chloroform fumigation extraction technique via the total C and N analyzer. The soil pH value was determined by a glass electrode in aqueous extracts (pH-H2O).

Data analysis

The relationships between soil respiration rate, soil temperature and soil moisture were determined using linear and nonlinear regression models [28, 40, 41]. We fitted the soil respiration rate and soil temperature to an exponential function model: RS = α × eβt. Q10 was obtained from the following coefficient: Q10 = e10β. In the preceding equations, RS is the soil respiration rate (μmol·m−2·s−1), t denotes the soil temperature (°C), and β indicates the temperature response coefficient [29, 42]. The soil respiration rate and soil moisture were fitted to the following linear equation: RS = aW + b, where W is the soil moisture (%). We use the model: RS = a × ebt + cW to determine the relationship between soil respiration rate, soil temperature and soil moisture [40].

A repeated-measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA) with N deposition as the between-subject effect and measuring time as the within-subject effect was used to analyze the changes in soil respiration, soil temperature and soil moisture. The data were adjusted using the Greenhouse-Geisser method when Mauchly’s test of sphericity was not fulfilled. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a least significant difference (LSD) test was used to inspect the differences in soil MBC, MBN, DOC, pH and fine root biomass among all treatments at the end of the experiment. The data were inspected for homogeneity of variance using a Levene test before ANOVA and log10-transformed if required. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 20.0 (SPSS Inc., USA) for Microsoft Windows.

Results

Soil temperature and moisture

Soil temperature at a soil depth of 10 cm followed a strong seasonal pattern (Fig 2A), whereas soil moisture varied little with season (Fig 2B). Soil temperature in the control ranged from 5.2 ± 0.4°C (January 2013) to 19.2 ± 0.4°C (July 2015, Fig 2A); soil moisture ranged from 22.7 ± 0.8% (April 2014) to 33.1 ± 2.2% (June 2014, Fig 2B). RM-ANOVA showed that soil temperature and moisture did not significantly differ among the treatments (P = 0.32 and 0.99, respectively; Fig 2 and Table 1).

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 2. Monthly variations in soil temperature and soil moisture from December 2013 to November 2015.

Error bars represent standard deviations of the means (n = 3). Ctr (control, without N added), L (low N deposition, 50 kg N ha−1·a−1), M (medium N deposition, 150 kg N ha−2·a−1), and H (high N deposition, 300 kg N ha−1·a−1).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204661.g002

thumbnail
Download:
Table 1. Results of the repeated-measures ANOVAs of soil respiration rate (log transformed), soil temperature and soil moisture (Mean ± SD).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204661.t001

Soil respiration

Soil respiration rate followed a clear seasonal pattern during the two year study period, and it was higher in summer and lower in winter (Fig 3). In the control treatment, the maximum soil respiration occurred in July 2014 (2.68 ± 0.15 μmol·m−2·s−1), and the minimum occurred in January 2014 (0.64 ± 0.13 μmol·m−2·s−1) (Fig 3). The mean soil respiration rate in the control treatment was 1.56 ± 0.13 μmol·m−2·s−1 (Table 2).

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 3. Monthly dynamics of soil respiration rate from December 2013 to November 2015.

Error bars represent standard deviations of the means (n = 3). Treatment abbreviations are provided in Fig 1.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204661.g003

thumbnail
Download:
Table 2. Parameters of different regression models between soil respiration rate, soil temperature and soil moisture.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204661.t002

Throughout the study period, the mean soil respiration rates in the L, M, and H treatments were 1.41 ± 0.12, 1.31 ± 0.09 and 1.20 ± 0.07 μmol·m−2·s−1, respectively (Table 1), which were 9.13%, 15.8% (P < 0.05) and 22.57% (P < 0.05) lower than those in the Ctr treatment (1.56 ± 0.13 μmol·m−2·s−1), respectively. Simulated N deposition significantly reduced soil respiration rates in the M and H treatments compared with those in the Ctr and L treatments (P < 0.05, Fig 3 and Table 1).

Relationships among soil respiration, soil temperature and moisture

Relationship between soil respiration rate and soil temperature was fitted with an exponential model, and soil temperature explained 72–82% of the monthly variations in soil respiration (P < 0.01, Fig 4 and Table 2). There was a highly significant linear relationship between soil respiration and soil moisture; soil moisture explained 47–61% of the monthly variations in soil respiration (P < 0.01, Fig 5 and Table 2). The model that combined an exponential component (soil respiration rate and soil temperature) with a linear component (soil respiration rate and soil moisture) yielded higher R2 values than the exponential or linear model alone (Table 2); adding soil moisture to models with only soil temperature increased the R2 values from 0.72–0.82 to 0.79–0.83. Soil temperature was more important than soil moisture in controlling the soil respiration rate in this natural evergreen broadleaf forest.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 4. Relationships between soil respiration rate and soil temperature.

Treatment abbreviations are provided in Fig 2.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204661.g004

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 5. Relationships between soil respiration rate and soil moisture.

Treatment abbreviations are provided in Fig 2.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204661.g005

The Q10 values of the L, M, and H treatments were 0.2, 0.13, and 0.15 lower than that in the Ctr treatment (2.98), respectively (Table 2). Simulated N deposition decreased the temperature sensitivity of soil respiration in this natural evergreen broadleaf forest.

MBC, MBN, DOC, pH and fine root biomass

Simulated N deposition significantly affected MBC, MBN, DOC, pH and fine root biomass (S1 Table and Fig 6). After 2 years of simulated N deposition, the soil MBC values in the L, M, and H treatments were 10.84% (P < 0.05), 11.42% (P < 0.05), and 23.61% (P < 0.05) lower than that in the Ctr treatment, respectively (663.30 ± 27.58 mg·kg-1, Fig 6A). Moreover, the MBN values in the L, M and H treatments were 8.25% (P < 0.05), 14.33% (P < 0.05), and 24.89% (P < 0.05) lower than that in the Ctr treatment, respectively (57.23 ± 3.58 mg·kg-1, Fig 6B). The extractable DOC values in the L, M, and H treatments were 10.84% (P < 0.05), 11.42% (P < 0.05), and 23.61% (P < 0.05) lower than that in the Ctr treatment, respectively (144.72 ± 10.01 mg·kg-1, Fig 6C). The pH values in the L, M, and H treatments were 6.53% (P < 0.05), 4.44% (P < 0.05), and 5.13% (P < 0.05) lower than that in the Ctr treatment, respectively (6.53 ± 0.02, Fig 6D). The fine root biomass values in the L, M, and H treatments were 16.39% (P < 0.05), 26.17% (P < 0.05), and 42.83% (P < 0.05) lower than that in the Ctr treatment, respectively (165.43 ± 14.63 g·m-2, Fig 6E). Thus, all simulated N deposition treatments significantly decreased the pH, fine root biomass and concentrations of MBC, MBN, and DOC. (P < 0.05).

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 6.

MBC (A), MBN (B), DOC (C), pH (D) and fine root biomass (E) under different treatments in November 2015. Different letters denote significant differences (one-way ANOVA with Fisher’s LSD test, P < 0.05) between treatments. Error bars represent standard deviations of the means (n = 3). Treatment abbreviations are provided in Fig 2.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204661.g006

Discussion

In our study, we found that soil respiration followed a clear seasonal pattern in this natural evergreen broadleaf subtropical forest, and it was higher in summer and lower in winter (Fig 3). The clear seasonal pattern of soil respiration can be reflected by similar seasonal changes in soil temperature (Fig 2A). Many previous studies found that soil temperature and soil moisture were two of the most important environmental parameters that controlled the temporal variations in soil respiration [3, 4, 26, 28, 40]. In our study, we found that soil temperature explained 72–82% of the monthly variations, while soil moisture explained 47–61% of the monthly variations in soil respiration; adding soil moisture to a model with only soil temperature increased the R2 values from 0.72–0.82 to 0.79–0.83 (Table 2). Soil temperature was found to be more important than soil moisture in controlling soil respiration in our study. Generally, in most forest ecosystems, soil temperature is the dominant factor in soil respiration [26, 43]. In our study, this finding may be due to the relatively high annual rainfall in this zone (1700 mm) and the strong water-holding capacity of the soil during the monitoring period (soil moisture ranged from 22.7 ± 0.8% to 33.1 ± 2.2%, Fig 2B). As a result, relatively high soil moisture was maintained, and the humidity conditions in the soil were suitable for plant root and microbial activities. However, soil temperature can directly affect plants and microbial activities and indirectly change soil moisture and the amount and quality of soil organic matter [44, 45]. Therefore, the soil temperature becomes the dominant factor that influences soil respiration in this natural evergreen broadleaf forest.

Q10 values reflect the sensitivity of the soil respiration rate to temperature and are commonly used to estimate soil C emissions [46–48]. The Q10 value in the control treatment in our study was 2.98 (Table 2). This value is similar to that measured in a tundra forest (3.05) [49], but it is lower than that in a temperate hardwood forest (3.9) [50] and higher than those in a bamboo ecosystem (2.48) [23] and a tropical moist forest (2.6) [28]. Furthermore, we also found simulated N deposition had a negative effect on the Q10 values, and the values of the L, M, and H treatments were 0.2, 0.13, and 0.15 lower than that of the Ctr treatment (2.98), respectively (Table 2). This result suggests that N deposition changes the temperature control on soil respiration; however, the effects were slight. This result is consistent with the results of studies by Mo et al. [28] in a tropical old-growth monsoon evergreen broadleaf forest, Tu et al. [18] in a subtropical bamboo ecosystem and Sun et al. [26] in a temperate larch forest. A reduction in the Q10 values may result from an increase in the stability of soil organic C via the formation of stabilizing organic matter [27] or the decrease in allocation of photosynthates to the rhizosphere [26, 51] under N-rich conditions.

As intended, simulated N deposition significantly decreased soil respiration, and this was most pronounced in the M and H treatments (Fig 3 and Table 1), which induced decreases in CO2 transfer from the soil to the atmosphere. Recently, a study conducted in a secondary evergreen broad-leaved forest in the rainy area of western China also found that N deposition (150 kg N ha−1·a−1) significantly decreased soil respiration [22, 52]. These findings agree with several studies that revealed that N deposition leads to short-term decreases in soil respiration [26–28, 53]; however, these results are contradictory to the results of other studies [18, 23, 54–56]. Generally, soil respiration comprises both heterotrophic respiration from fauna and free-living soil microorganisms (actinomycetes, bacteria, fungi and protozoans) and rhizosphere respiration from mycorrhizae, roots and other microorganisms associated with root systems [26, 52, 57, 58]. Soil respiration can also be roughly divided into microbial respiration and root respiration on the basis of CO2 emissions [23, 58]. Therefore, the effects of N deposition on soil respiration can be classified into two aspects: root respiration and microbial respiration. The decrease in soil respiration due to the simulated N deposition in our study may be related to the following two mechanisms.

First, N deposition may decrease rhizosphere respiration from plant roots. In general, plant root respiration contributes a large proportion to soil respiration. Previous studies found that fine root biomass is significantly and positively correlated with soil respiration [52, 59, 60]. Similar to the results of this study, many previous studies found that N deposition can decrease root biomass, which leads to less input from belowground roots to the soil [22, 27, 28, 61]. In our study, we found that fine root biomass was significantly reduced by simulated N deposition (P < 0.05, Fig 6E). An increase in soil N availability may induce plants to allocate a greater proportion of biomass to aboveground organs and decrease the allocation of photosynthates to the rhizosphere [26, 51], resulting in a reduction in underground biomass [62] and thus leading to decreased root respiration in the soil.

Second, N deposition may reduce heterotrophic respiration from the microbial community. Soil microbial respiration depends on soil temperature, moisture, microbial biomass and extracellular enzyme activities, as well as substrate quality and quantity [18, 27, 28, 52]. In our study, we found that N deposition significantly decreased the pH (Fig 6D). Given that soil pH is crucial to enzyme functioning [27, 63], soil acidification caused by N deposition could have a detrimental effect on microbial activity, thus leading to reduced heterotrophic respiration from the microbial community. Moreover, in our previous papers, we have reported that simulated N deposition significantly decreased the number of culturable bacteria and fungi [64] at our study sites. In this study, after two years of simulated N deposition, the MBC and MBN values in the L, M, and H treatments were significantly lower than those in the Ctr treatment (Fig 6A and 6B). Simulated N deposition significantly decreased MBC and MBN in our study, and this result is in line with previous studies in other forest ecosystems [9, 22, 26, 27, 65]. Furthermore, we also found that N deposition significantly decreased the concentration of DOC (Fig 6C). The reduction in MBC, MBN and DOC caused by N deposition indicates that simulated N deposition might have strongly decreased heterotrophic respiration in our study.

Conclusions

Our results highlight that simulated N deposition significantly affects soil respiration, and this was most pronounced in the M and H treatments despite the high rates of ambient N deposition. The negative impacts of N deposition on soil respiration may occur via negative impacts to plant and microbial activities (i.e., decreasing the MBC, MBN, fine root biomass, and DOC contents). Furthermore, N deposition also decreased the Q10 value. Ongoing N deposition may have a potentially significant impact on C cycles and could increase C sequestration with the increase in global temperature, thereby threatening the long-term persistence of evergreen broadleaf forest ecosystems in western China.

Supporting information

S1 Table. ANOVA table for the effects of N deposition on MBC, MBN, DOC, pH and fine root biomass.

SS = sum of squares; d.f. = degrees of freedom; MS = mean square; F = F statistics; P = statistics significance.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204661.s001

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Yongxiang Xiao, Shiping Huang, Xiong Liu, Chao Luo, Junxi Hu, and Shengzhao Wei for their kind assistance in the field. Shixing Zhou acknowledges the financial support by the China Scholarship Council via a joint PhD program grant (201706910038). This work was supported by the Crop Breeding Research Project of the “12th Five-year-plan” of Sichuan Province (2011NZ0098-10) and the Sci-tech Project of the “12th Five-year-plan” of China (2010BACO1A11) granted to Congde Huang.

References

  1. 1. Melillo J, Steudler P, Aber J, Newkirk K, Lux H, Bowles F, et al. Soil warming and carbon-cycle feedbacks to the climate system. Science. 2002;298(5601):2173–6. pmid:12481133
  2. 2. Schlesinger WH, Andrews JA. Soil respiration and the global carbon cycle. Biogeochemistry. 2000;48(1):7–20.
  3. 3. Chang SX, Shi Z, Thomas BR. Soil respiration and its temperature sensitivity in agricultural and afforested poplar plantation systems in northern Alberta. Biol Fert Soils. 2016;52(5):629–41.
  4. 4. Burton AJ, Pregitzer KS. Field measurements of root respiration indicate little to no seasonal temperature acclimation for sugar maple and red pine. Tree physiology. 2003;23(4):273–80. pmid:12566263
  5. 5. Fisk MC, Fahey TJ. Microbial biomass and nitrogen cycling responses to fertilization and litter removal in young northern hardwood forests. Biogeochemistry. 2001;53(2):201–23.
  6. 6. Reynolds LL, Johnson BR, Pfeifer‐Meister L, Bridgham SD. Soil respiration response to climate change in Pacific Northwest prairies is mediated by a regional Mediterranean climate gradient. Global Change Biology. 2015;21(1):487–500. pmid:25205511
  7. 7. Frey SD, Lee J, Melillo JM, Six J. The temperature response of soil microbial efficiency and its feedback to climate. Nature Climate Change. 2013;3(4):395–8.
  8. 8. Lu M, Zhou X, Yang Q, Li H, Luo Y, Fang C, et al. Responses of ecosystem carbon cycle to experimental warming: a meta‐analysis. Ecology. 2013;94(3):726–38. pmid:23687898
  9. 9. Bowden RD, Davidson E, Savage K, Arabia C, Steudler P. Chronic nitrogen additions reduce total soil respiration and microbial respiration in temperate forest soils at the Harvard Forest. Forest Ecology and Management. 2004;196(1):43–56.
  10. 10. Galloway JN, Dentener FJ, Capone DG, Boyer EW, Howarth RW, Seitzinger SP, et al. Nitrogen cycles: past, present, and future. Biogeochemistry. 2004;70(2):153–226.
  11. 11. Niu S, Classen AT, Dukes JS, Kardol P, Liu L, Luo Y, et al. Global patterns and substrate-based mechanisms of the terrestrial nitrogen cycle. Ecology Letters. 2016;19(6):697–709. Epub 2016/03/05. pmid:26932540.
  12. 12. Zheng X, Fu C, Xu X, Yan X, Huang Y, Han S, et al. The Asian nitrogen cycle case study. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment. 2002;31(2):79–87.
  13. 13. Xu Z, Tu L, Hu T, Schädler M. Implications of greater than average increases in nitrogen deposition on the western edge of the Szechwan Basin, China. Environmental Pollution. 2013;(177):201–2.
  14. 14. Rabalais NN. Nitrogen in aquatic ecosystems. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment. 2002;31(2):102–12.
  15. 15. Hyvönen R, Persson T, Andersson S, Olsson B, Ågren GI, Linder S. Impact of long-term nitrogen addition on carbon stocks in trees and soils in northern Europe. Biogeochemistry. 2008;89(1):121–37.
  16. 16. Magill AH, Aber JD, Currie WS, Nadelhoffer KJ, Martin ME, McDowell WH, et al. Ecosystem response to 15 years of chronic nitrogen additions at the Harvard Forest LTER, Massachusetts, USA. Forest Ecology and Management. 2004;196(1):7–28.
  17. 17. Yue K, Fornara DA, Yang W, Peng Y, Li Z, Wu F, et al. Effects of three global change drivers on terrestrial C:N:P stoichiometry: a global synthesis. Global Change Biology. 2017;23(6):2450–63. Epub 2016/11/20. pmid:27859966.
  18. 18. Tu LH, Hu TX, Zhang J, Li XW, Hu HL, Liu L, et al. Nitrogen addition stimulates different components of soil respiration in a subtropical bamboo ecosystem. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2013;58:255–64. PubMed PMID: WOS:000317158300031.
  19. 19. Zhuang P, Gao X. The concept of the Rainy Zone of West China and its significance to the biodiversity conservation in China. Chinese Biodiversity. 2002;10(3):339–44.
  20. 20. Zhou S, Huang C, Han B, Xiao Y, Tang J, Xiang Y, et al. Simulated nitrogen deposition significantly suppresses the decomposition of forest litter in a natural evergreen broad-leaved forest in the Rainy Area of Western China. Plant and Soil. 2017;420(1–2):135–45.
  21. 21. Zhou S, Huang C, Xiang Y, Tie L, Han B, Scheu S. Effects of reduced precipitation on litter decomposition in an evergreen broad-leaved forest in western China. Forest Ecology and Management. 2018;430:219–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.08.022.
  22. 22. Peng Y, Chen G, Chen G, Li S, Peng T, Qiu X, et al. Soil biochemical responses to nitrogen addition in a secondary evergreen broad-leaved forest ecosystem. Scientific Reports. 2017;7(1):2783. Epub 2017/06/07. pmid:28584271; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5459847.
  23. 23. Tu LH, Hu TX, Zhang JA, Li RH, Dai HZ, Luo SH. Short-term simulated nitrogen deposition increases carbon sequestration in a Pleioblastus amarus plantation. Plant and Soil. 2011;340(1–2):383–96. PubMed PMID: WOS:000288607300030.
  24. 24. Tu LH, Peng Y, Chen G, Hu HL, Xiao YL, Hu TX, et al. Direct and indirect effects of nitrogen additions on fine root decomposition in a subtropical bamboo forest. Plant and Soil. 2015;389(1–2):273–88. PubMed PMID: WOS:000352153600020.
  25. 25. Tu L, Hu H, Chen G, Peng Y, Xiao Y, Hu T, et al. Nitrogen addition significantly affects forest litter decomposition under high levels of ambient nitrogen deposition. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e88752. Epub 2014/02/20. pmid:24551152; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3925158.
  26. 26. Sun Z, Liu L, Ma Y, Yin G, Zhao C, Zhang Y, et al. The effect of nitrogen addition on soil respiration from a nitrogen-limited forest soil. Agricultural and forest meteorology. 2014;197:103–10.
  27. 27. Janssens IA, Dieleman W, Luyssaert S, Subke JA, Reichstein M, Ceulemans R, et al. Reduction of forest soil respiration in response to nitrogen deposition. Nature Geoscience. 2010;3(5):315–22.
  28. 28. Mo J, Zhang W, Zhu W, Gundersen P, Fang Y, Li D, et al. Nitrogen addition reduces soil respiration in a mature tropical forest in southern China. Global Change Biology. 2008;14(2):403–12.
  29. 29. Cleveland CC, Townsend AR. Nutrient additions to a tropical rain forest drive substantial soil carbon dioxide losses to the atmosphere. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2006;103(27):10316–21. pmid:16793925
  30. 30. Xu W, Wan S. Water-and plant-mediated responses of soil respiration to topography, fire, and nitrogen fertilization in a semiarid grassland in northern China. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2008;40(3):679–87.
  31. 31. Comeau L-P, Hergoualc'h K, Hartill J, Smith J, Verchot LV, Peak D, et al. How do the heterotrophic and the total soil respiration of an oil palm plantation on peat respond to nitrogen fertilizer application? Geoderma. 2016;268:41–51.
  32. 32. Ambus P, Robertson G. The effect of increased N deposition on nitrous oxide, methane and carbon dioxide fluxes from unmanaged forest and grassland communities in Michigan. Biogeochemistry. 2006;79(3):315–37.
  33. 33. Samuelson L, Mathew R, Stokes T, Feng Y, Aubrey D, Coleman M. Soil and microbial respiration in a loblolly pine plantation in response to seven years of irrigation and fertilization. Forest Ecology and Management. 2009;258(11):2431–8.
  34. 34. Wei D, Liu Y, Wang Y, Wang Y. Three-year study of CO2 efflux and CH4/N2O fluxes at an alpine steppe site on the central Tibetan Plateau and their responses to simulated N deposition. Geoderma. 2014;232:88–96.
  35. 35. Aber JD, Nadelhoffer KJ, Steudler P, Melillo JM. Nitrogen saturation in northern forest ecosystems. BioScience. 1989;39(6):378–286.
  36. 36. Zhou S, Huang C, Xiang Y, Xiao Y, Tang J, Han B, et al. Response of carbon and nitrogen release to simulated nitrogen deposition in natural evergreen broad-leaved forests in a rainy area in Western China. Acta Ecologica Sinica. 2017;37(4):258–64.
  37. 37. Li H, Feng Y, Jiang H, Li X, Gao C. Analysis on the time series of annual precipitation in lately 50 years of Ya'an City. Sichaun Forestry Exploration and Design. 2016;4:16–21.
  38. 38. Powers JS, Treseder KK, Lerdau MT. Fine roots, arbuscular mycorrhizal hyphae and soil nutrients in four neotropical rain forests: patterns across large geographic distances. New Phytologist. 2005;165(3):913–21. pmid:15720702
  39. 39. Lei Z, Sun H, Li Q, Zhang J, Song X. Effects of nitrogen deposition on soil dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen in Moso bamboo plantations strongly depend on management practices. Forests. 2017;8(11).
  40. 40. Tang X, Liu S, Zhou G, Zhang D, Zhou C. Soil-atmospheric exchange of CO2, CH4, and N2O in three subtropical forest ecosystems in southern China. Global Change Biology. 2006;12(3):546–60.
  41. 41. Zhang L, Wang S, Liu S, Liu X, Zou J, Siemann E. Perennial forb invasions alter greenhouse gas balance between ecosystem and atmosphere in an annual grassland in China. Science of The Total Environment. 2018;642:781–8. pmid:29920464.
  42. 42. Lloyd J, Taylor J. On the temperature dependence of soil respiration. Functional ecology. 1994:315–23.
  43. 43. Hanson P, Edwards N, Garten CT, Andrews J. Separating root and soil microbial contributions to soil respiration: a review of methods and observations. Biogeochemistry. 2000;48(1):115–46.
  44. 44. Chapin FS. Direct and indirect effects of temperature on arctic plants. Polar Biology. 1983;2(1):47–52.
  45. 45. Davidson EA, Janssens IA. Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change. Nature. 2006;440(7081):165–73. Epub 2006/03/10. pmid:16525463.
  46. 46. Janssens IA, Pilegaard K. Large seasonal changes in Q10 of soil respiration in a beech forest. Global Change Biology. 2003;9(6):911–8.
  47. 47. Pregitzer KS, King JS, Burton AJ, Brown SE. Responses of tree fine roots to temperature. New Phytologist. 2000;147(1):105–15.
  48. 48. Zhang L, Chen Y, Zhao R, Li W. Significance of temperature and soil water content on soil respiration in three desert ecosystems in Northwest China. Journal of Arid Environments. 2010;74(10):1200–11.
  49. 49. Peng S, Piao S, Wang T, Sun J, Shen Z. Temperature sensitivity of soil respiration in different ecosystems in China. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2009;41(5):1008–14.
  50. 50. Davidson E, Belk E, Boone RD. Soil water content and temperature as independent or confounded factors controlling soil respiration in a temperate mixed hardwood forest. Global change biology. 1998;4(2):217–27.
  51. 51. Savage KE, Parton WJ, Davidson EA, Trumbore SE, Frey SD. Long‐term changes in forest carbon under temperature and nitrogen amendments in a temperate northern hardwood forest. Global change biology. 2013;19(8):2389–400. pmid:23589498
  52. 52. Peng Y, Chen G-t, Li S, Hu H-l, Hu T-x, Liu L, et al. Nitrogen additions reduce rhizospheric and heterotrophic respiration in a subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest. Plant and Soil. 2018.
  53. 53. Ding W, Yu H, Cai Z, Han F, Xu Z. Responses of soil respiration to N fertilization in a loamy soil under maize cultivation. Geoderma. 2010;155(3):381–9.
  54. 54. Chen J, Luo Y, Li J, Zhou X, Cao J, Wang RW, et al. Costimulation of soil glycosidase activity and soil respiration by nitrogen addition. Global Change Biology. 2017;23(3):1328–37. pmid:27362835
  55. 55. Fang C, Ye JS, Gong Y, Pei J, Yuan Z, Xie C, et al. Seasonal responses of soil respiration to warming and nitrogen addition in a semi-arid alfalfa-pasture of the Loess Plateau, China. Science of The Total Environment. 2017;590–591:729–38. Epub 2017/03/14. pmid:28285856.
  56. 56. Yoshitake S, Sasaki A, Uchida M, Funatsu Y, Nakatsubo T. Carbon and nitrogen limitation to microbial respiration and biomass in an acidic solfatara field. European Journal of Soil Biology. 2007;43(1):1–13.
  57. 57. Bond-Lamberty B, Thomson A. Temperature-associated increases in the global soil respiration record. Nature. 2010;464(7288):579–82. Epub 2010/03/26. pmid:20336143.
  58. 58. Kuzyakov Y. Sources of CO2 efflux from soil and review of partitioning methods. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2006;38(3):425–48.
  59. 59. Tateno R, Hishi T, Takeda H. Above-and belowground biomass and net primary production in a cool-temperate deciduous forest in relation to topographical changes in soil nitrogen. Forest Ecology and Management. 2004;193(3):297–306.
  60. 60. Rodeghiero M, Cescatti A. Indirect partitioning of soil respiration in a series of evergreen forest ecosystems. Plant and Soil. 2006;284(1–2):7–22.
  61. 61. Wang C, Han S, Zhou Y, Yan C, Cheng X, Zheng X, et al. Responses of fine roots and soil N availability to short-term nitrogen fertilization in a broad-leaved Korean pine mixed forest in northeastern China. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e31042. pmid:22412833
  62. 62. Eissenstat D, Yanai R. The ecology of root lifespan. Advances in ecological research. 1997;27:1–60.
  63. 63. Nannipieri P, Trasar-Cepeda C, Dick RP. Soil enzyme activity: a brief history and biochemistry as a basis for appropriate interpretations and meta-analysis. Biol Fert Soils. 2018;54(1):11–9.
  64. 64. Zhou S, Xiang Y, Xiao Y, Huang C, Luo C, Han B, et al. Response of culturable soil microorganisms to simulated nitrogen deposition in a natural evergreen broadleaf forest in the Rainy Area of Western China. Acta Ecologica Sinica. 2017;37(4):1191–8.
  65. 65. Frey SD, Knorr M, Parrent JL, Simpson RT. Chronic nitrogen enrichment affects the structure and function of the soil microbial community in temperate hardwood and pine forests. Forest Ecology and Management. 2004;196(1):159–71.