Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Aberrant Expression of TIMP-2 and PBEF Genes in the Placentae of Cloned Mice Due to Epigenetic Reprogramming Error

  • Hong Rye Kim,

    Affiliation Department of Animal Science & Biotechnology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea

  • Jae Eun Lee,

    Affiliation Department of Animal Science & Biotechnology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea

  • Reza Kheirkhahi Oqani,

    Affiliation Department of Animal Science & Biotechnology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea

  • So Yeon Kim,

    Affiliation Department of Animal Science & Biotechnology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea

  • Teruhiko Wakayama,

    Affiliation Faculty of Life and Environmental Science, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan

  • Chong Li,

    Affiliation School of Medicine, Tongi University, Shanghai, China

  • Su Jin Sa,

    Affiliation Department of Animal Resource Development, National Institute of Animal Science, Cheonan, Republic of Korea

  • Je Seok Woo,

    Affiliation Department of Animal Resource Development, National Institute of Animal Science, Cheonan, Republic of Korea

  • Dong Il Jin

    dijin@.ac.kr

    Affiliation Department of Animal Science & Biotechnology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea

Abstract

Cloned mice derived from somatic or ES cells show placental overgrowth (placentomegaly) at term. We had previously analyzed cloned and normal mouse placentae by using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry to identify differential protein expression patterns. Cloned placentae showed upregulation of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 (TIMP-2), which is involved in extracellular matrix degradation and tissue remodeling, and downregulation of pre-B cell colony enhancing factor 1 (PBEF), which inhibits apoptosis and induces spontaneous labor. Here, we used Western blotting to further analyze the protein expression levels of TIMP-2 and PBEF in cloned placentae derived from cumulus cells, TSA-treated cumulus cells, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), and natural mating (NM control). Cloned and TSA-treated cloned placentae had higher expression levels of TIMP-2 compared with NM control and ICSI-derived placentae, and there was a positive association between TIMP-2 expression and the placental weight of cloned mouse concepti. Conversely, PBEF protein expression was significantly lower in cloned and ICSI placentae compared to NM controls. To examine whether the observed differences were due to abnormal gene expression caused by faulty epigenetic reprogramming in clones, we investigated DNA methylation and histone modification in the promoter regions of the genes encoding TIMP-2 and PBEF. Sodium bisulfite sequencing did not reveal any difference in DNA methylation between cloned and NM control placentae. However, ChIP assays revealed that the level of H3-K9/K14 acetylation at the TIMP-2 locus was higher in cloned placentae than in NM controls, whereas acetylation of the PBEF promoter was lower in cloned and ICSI placenta versus NM controls. These results suggest that cloned placentae appear to suffer from failure of histone modification-based reprogramming in these (and potentially other) developmentally important genes, leading to aberrant expression of their protein products. These changes are likely to be involved in generating the abnormalities seen in cloned mouse placentae, including enlargement and/or a lack of proper placental function.

Introduction

The placenta connects the developing fetus to the mother’s body, and its growth is an essential characteristic of mammalian pregnancy. Successful placental development is important for the survival of the growing conceptus, as the placenta specifically nurtures the fetus, protects it from harmful waste, executes the exchange of respiratory gases and a multitude of nutrients, and acts as an immunological barrier [1]. Therefore, the study of placentation is considered key to understanding the pregnancy failures of cloned animals, the pathogenesis of some congenital diseases, and the transplacental transmission of teratogenic microbial agents [2].

Many of the fetal losses and phenotypic abnormalities observed among cloned mammals are associated with placental abnormalities [2,3,4]. For example, cloned mouse fetuses have been shown to develop to term and yield placental overgrowth (placentomegaly) regardless of the sex or source of the donor nuclei [5,6,7,8]. This placentomegaly has been associated with expanded spongiotrophoblast layers, increased glycogen cell numbers, and enlarged trophoblastic cells [9]. Trophoblast cells develop into some extra-embryonic membranes and much of the placenta [10], so perfect reprogramming of transferred somatic nuclei (which is needed to properly establish the trophoblast cell lineage) is required for the correct development of reconstructed embryos. It has been speculated that placentomegaly in cloned mice could reflect the acquisition of epigenetic abnormalities, at least partly via inadequate nuclear reprogramming. Consistent with this hypothesis, errors in the epigenetic reprogramming of the somatic cell genome have been associated with the expressional dysregulation of developmentally imprinted genes in cloned embryos, fetuses and placentae, and abnormalities in the resulting cloned animals [11,12,13,14,15]. In this context, numerous researchers have observed abnormal gene expression patterns following somatic cell nuclear transfer [16,17,18,19]. However, the existence, importance, and regulation of epigenetic modification-related abnormalities in gene expression have not yet been fully elucidated in the context of placentation.

Chromatin-modification-related changes in gene expression [20], called “epigenetic changes,” support: various processes that require accurate gene activation/inactivation during development; the assembly of histones and histone variants into nucleosomes; and the remodeling of chromatin-associated proteins (e.g., linker histones, polycomb proteins, nuclear scaffold proteins, and transcription factors) [21]. Changes in chromatin configuration are critical to normal development, and are primarily determined by genomic DNA methylation and the histone acetylation/methylation status. Successful placental development depends on precisely regulated gene expression and may be negatively influenced by the abnormal expression of developmentally significant genes [22]: aberrant gene expression in the placenta (i.e., that arising via epigenetic error) may alter the placenta and perhaps even the conceptus.

We had previously used two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry to conduct a global proteomic analysis of cloned and normal mouse placentae, in an effort to identify differential protein expression patterns [17,18,19]. TIMP-2 and PBEF which was related with pregnancy and placenta development, are abnormally expressed in cloned bovine and mouse placentae [17,18,19] and differentially expressed during pregnancy [23, 24]. TIMP-2 has been associated with trophoblastic invasion and extracellular matrix remodeling during pregnancy [25], while PBEF appears to function at the proximal end of the labor initiation pathway [26,27,28]. The development of mouse cloned embryos could be improved by trichostatin A (TSA, histone deacetylase inhibitor) treatment which could adjust pre-existing epigenetic state of donor cells or reconstructed embryos [29]. To examine the potential contribution of epigenetic modification to this gene expression process, we herein analyzed the protein and mRNA levels of TIMP-2 and PBEF in cloned, TSA-treated cloned, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)-derived and normal mating-derived (NM control) placentae. Following their confirmation as differentially expressed proteins, we examined the DNA methylation and histone acetylation patterns in their gene promoter regions to determine whether their expression changes were associated with differences in the epigenetic programming of cloned versus normal mouse placentae. The novel identification of these genes as being differentially expressed in the placentae of cloned mice and our assessment of their epigenetic regulation provide important new insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying placental development. In the future, this may help researchers improve the efficiency of cloning.

Materials and Methods

Placental samples

All animal procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Chungnam National University. Cloned, TSA-treated, normal mating-derived (NM controls), and ICSI-derived mouse placentae were generated as previously described [27]. The mice were maintained on a 14L:10D schedule and allowed free access to food and water. To generate NM controls, 6- to 8-wk-old B6D2F1 females were housed with adult B6D2F1 male mice and examined daily for vaginal plugs. Noon of the day on which a vaginal plug was found was designated as 0.5 days postcoitum (dpc). Cesarean sections were performed at 18.5 dpc, and the wet weights of fetuses and placentae were recorded separately. To generate ICSI-derived placentae, B6D2F1 mice were used as the sources of oocytes and spermatozoa, and embryos were generated and transferred to recipient surrogate mothers (ICR mice) as previously described [28]. To generate cloned placentae, the nuclei of B6D129F1 embryonic stem (ES) cells were injected into enucleated B6D2F1 oocytes; the reconstituted embryos were incubated for 72 h; and those that developed to the morula or blastocyst stages were transferred to the uteri of 2.5 dpc pseudopregnant ICR females, as previously described [5]. TSA-treated cloned placentae were generated using standard mouse cloning procedures [29]. Briefly, donor nuclei from somatic cells were injected into enucleated oocytes, and the reconstructed oocytes were activated by culture in Ca2+-free CZB medium containing 5 mM Sr2+. After 6 h, the activation medium was changed to KSOM. For TSA treatments, the activated oocytes were cultured in KSOM including TSA for 14 h, and then transferred to KSOM without TSA. The resulting cloned embryos were subjected to embryo transfer into surrogate mothers on the second day. Concepti were collected by Cesarean section at 18.5 dpc, and four placental samples per ICSI, cloned, TSA treatment and natural mating separated and frozen until use. Anesthesia was induced with ketamine (100 mg/kg) and xylazine (16 mg/kg), and 100% CO2 gas was used for sacrifice in this experiment.

Protein extraction and Western blot analysis

Each placental sample was mixed with an equal volume of lysis buffer A containing 1% SDS, 1 mM PMSF, protease inhibitor (Roche Diagnostics), and 100 mM Tris-HCl. The samples were sonicated, and the resulting protein lysates were treated with 100 U/mL endonuclease (Sigma) and quantified using a Bradford assay kit (Bio-Rad). Total proteins (30 μg) were resolved by 12% SDS-PAGE and electro-transferred to PVDF membranes (Bio-Rad). Mouse anti-TIMP-2 (diluted 1:1000; Abcam), rabbit anti-β-actin (diluted 1:5000; Abcam), and rabbit anti-PBEF (diluted 1:10,000; Bethyl) antibodies were used to measure the expression level of each protein.

RT- PCR

Total RNA was extracted from placentae using the AccuZol reagent (Bioneer). Quantitative real-time RT-PCR using fluorogenic 5’nuclease assay technology with TaqMan® probes and primers (Applied Biosystems) were employed for RNA expression analysis. Amplification of individual genes was performed on the Applied Biosystems 7300 Real-Time PCR System using TaqMan® Universal PCR Master Mix and a standard thermal cycler protocol. TaqMan® Gene Expression Assay Reagents for mouse TIMP-2, mouse PBEF, and mouse GAPDH were used for specific probes and primers of PCR amplifications. The threshold cycle (CT) was determined and relative quantification was calculated by the comparative CT method as described previously. [30] The experiments were conducted in triplicate, and the results were normalized with respect to the mRNA expression level of GAPDH.

Isolation and bisulfite treatment of genomic DNA

Genomic DNA was isolated from cloned, TSA-treated cloned, ICSI-derived, and NM control placentae using phenol/chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. The purified genomic DNA (1 μg) was subjected to sodium bisulfate treatment using an MSP kit (In2Gen). The treated DNA was purified according to the protocol provided with the MSP kit, precipitated with ethanol, and resuspended in 20 μl of distilled water. The TIMP-2 and PBEF promoter regions were PCR amplified using primers designed to convert the cytosines to uracils, as follows: for TIMP-2, MF1(F) 5'-TTTTTTAGGGATAAGGTTTGAGTTTTAT-3' and MR1(R) 5'-TTATACCCAACCTAACACAAACTAC-3', and MF2(F) 5'-GTAGTTTGTGTAGGTTGGGTTT-3' and MR2(R) 5'-CAAACTTTATATCCTCTTTATCAAAA-3'; and for PBEF, PM3(F) 5'-AGTGGGTGGTTTTTTGGTTTTA-3' and PM3(R) 5'-CCCATCCCRAAAACAAAA-3', and PM4(F) 5'-GGGYGTAGTTGAGGTAGAG-3' and PM4(R) 5'-ACAAAAAAAAAAATAAACTTCRC-3'. Amplification was performed using an ExTaq Hot Start kit (Takara). The resulting PCR products were ligated into T-plasmids using the pGEMP®P-T Easy Vector System (Promega), and 10 subclones per experiment were randomly picked and sequenced.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) was performed as previously described [31] using antibodies against acetylated histone H3-K9/K14 (acetyl-lysines 9 and 14) and H4-K5 (acetyl-lysine 5), as both of these modifications have been correlated with gene activation [31]. The anti-acetyl-histone H3-K9/K14 and anti-acetyl-H4-K5 antibodies were obtained from Upstate. Tissues samples (20~40 mg/ml) were frozen, homogenized, and then centrifuged. The pellets were resuspended in 1 ml of 4% formaldehyde in PBS, crosslinked at 37°C for 30 min, and then centrifuged at 2000 g for 5 min at 4°C. The resulting pellets were resuspended in SDS lysis buffer (150 mM NaCl, 25 mM Tris∙HCl, pH 7.5, 5 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% SDS, and 0.5% sodium deoxycholate; Upstate) per the manufacturer’s instructions. The samples were sonicated four times for 10 sec each with the sonicator (Hielscher) set at 13% maximal power to generate fragments of < 500 bp in length, as confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis. For ChIP, the sonicated chromatin (150 μl) was diluted 10-fold, cleared with salmon sperm DNA/protein A-agarose (80 μl), and then purified with specific antiserum (2–5 μl) and protein A-agarose (60 μl). The crosslinking was then reversed, the samples were treated with proteinase K, and the chromatin-bound DNA was precipitated and diluted in 100 μl of low-TE buffer (1 mM Tris, 0.1 mM EDTA). Real-time PCR amplification was performed in triplicate using SYBR Green (Roche Diagnostics) on a Rotor Gene 2000 PCR machine (Cobett Research), with the following primers: for TIMP-2, TIMP-2(F) 5'-TGTGTGGCTGCTTAGATTGC-3' and TIMP-2(R) 5'-CAGTCTCACCTGCTGAGTGC-3'; and for PBEF, PBEF(F) 5’-CTTTCCCTAAGACGCAAAGG-3' and PBEF(R) 5'-ACGATGGATGGAATCTTTGG-3'. The fold induction over the input was calculated using the 2-ΔΔCT method [30].

Statistical analysis

Significant differences among samples were determined by ANOVA followed by Duncan’s multiple range tests, using the GLM found in the SAS package (SAS Institute). P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Overgrowth of cloned placentae

The weights and sizes of mouse cloned and TSA-treated cloned placentae were compared with those of ICSI-derived and NM control placentae. As shown in Fig 1, the cloned and TSA-treated cloned placentae tended to have larger diameters than the NM control placentae (Fig 1), and weighed (on average) 310% (cloned) and 282% (TSA-treated cloned) of the mean weights of the NM control (0.092 g). There was no significant difference in weight between the cloned and TSA-treated cloned placentae (average 0.286 and 0.260 g, respectively). In addition, ICSI-derived placentae (0.140 g) tended to have higher weights (152%) than the NM control (0.092 g).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Weights of cloned mouse placentae measured immediately after Cesarean section.

Size differences between NM control, ICSI-derived, cloned, and TSA-treated cloned placentae are shown. Four placental samples per ICSI, cloned, TSA treatment and natural mating were collected. Error bars show the standard error (SE). Different letters (a-c) above the bars denote statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166241.g001

Abnormal protein expression of TIMP-2 and PBEF in cloned placentae

We previously reported two proteins that appear to be differentially expressed during pregnancy and placental development: TIMP-2 and PBEF. The former contributes to extracellular matrix degradation and remodeling and is upregulated in cloned placentae [17,18,19], while the latter contributes to inhibiting apoptosis and inducing spontaneous labor [26] and is down-regulated in cloned placentae [19]. Here, we used Western blotting to analyze the protein expression patterns of TIMP-2 and PBEF in cloned, TSA-treated cloned, ICSI-derived and NM control placentae. A TIMP-2-immunoreactive band of the appropriate size (24 kDa) was found in all tested samples (Fig 2A). Consistent with our previous results, cloned and TSA-treated cloned placentae expressed markedly higher levels of TIMP-2 protein than ICSI-derived and NM control placentae (Fig 2A and 2C). PBEF, which was successfully detected as a ~56-kDa band in all tested samples (Fig 2B), was observed at significantly lower levels in cloned, TSA-treated cloned and ICSI-derived placentae compared to NM controls (Fig 2B and 2D). Notably, ICSI-derived and TSA-treated cloned mouse placentae had comparable expression levels of PBEF (Fig 2D).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Western blot analyses of TIMP-2 and PBEF expression levels in in NM control, ICSI-derived, cloned, and TSA-treated cloned placentae.

(A) Representative bands detected with anti-TIMP-2 and anti-β-actin antibodies. (B) Representative bands detected by anti-PBEF and anti-β-actin antibodies. (C, D) Protein levels were subjected to densitometric quantification followed by normalization against the protein level of β-actin. Four replicates were performed. The mean of expression levels with different superscripts (a-c) differ significantly (P < 0.05). Error bars show the standard error (SE).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166241.g002

Abnormal mRNA expression of TIMP-2 and PBEF in cloned placentae

Real time-PCR (RT-PCR) was used to examine the mRNA expression patterns of TIMP-2 and PBEF in all tested samples. The cloned and TSA-treated cloned placentae showed higher TIMP-2 expression levels compared to the NM control and ICSI-derived placentae (Fig 3A). The mRNA expression levels of PBEF were significantly lower in cloned, TSA-treated cloned, and ICSI-derived placentae compared with NM control placentae (Fig 3B). These findings are consistent with the observed protein expression pattern of PBEF (Fig 2B and 2D).

thumbnail
Fig 3. The mRNA expression levels of TIMP-2 and PBEF in NM control, ICSI-derived, cloned, and TSA-treated cloned placentae.

(A) TIMP-2 mRNA level (relative fold induction) in RT-PCR. (F) PBEF mRNA level (relative fold induction) in RT-PCR. Four replicates were performed. The mean of expression levels with different superscripts (a-c) differ significantly (P < 0.05). Error bars show the standard error (SE).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166241.g003

Abnormal epigenetic modification of the TIMP-2 and PBEF promoter regions

To evaluate whether the observed expression changes in TIMP-2 and/or PBEF were associated with epigenetic changes, we examined the DNA methylation and acetylation levels of their gene promoter regions. Bisulfite sequencing was used to monitor the DNA methylation levels in the TIMP-2 promoter region, which encompassed 641 bp and included 47 CpG sites (Fig 4A). As shown in Fig 4B, most of the CpG sites in the TIMP-2 promoter were unmethylated, and there was no significant difference in methylation status between normal and cloned placentae. Similar results were obtained with the PBEF promoter, which did not demonstrate any difference in methylation status (Fig 4C and 4D). Next, ChIP assays were used to examine the acetylation levels of the TIMP-2 and PBEF genes in cloned, TSA-treated cloned, ICSI, and NM control placentae (Fig 5). Chromatin fragments were precipitated using antibodies against acetylated histone H3 (acetyl-lysines 9 and 14) and H4 (acetyl-lysines 5), and real-time PCR was used to amplify fragments encoding the promoter regions of TIMP-2 and PBEF. Our results revealed that the H3K9 and -K14 acetylation levels of the TIMP-2 gene in ICSI and NM control mouse placentae were significantly lower than those in cloned and TSA-treated cloned placentae (Fig 5B). This pattern was similar to that observed for the protein expression of TIMP-2 (Fig 2A and 2C). With respect to the PBEF gene promoter, the H3K9 and -K14 acetylation levels in cloned, TSA-treated, and ICSI-derived placentae were considerably lower than those in NM control placentae and those of the ICSI mouse placentae were comparable to those of TSA-treated cloned placenta (Fig 5E). This was consistent with the patterns observed for PBEF protein and mRNA expression (Figs 2B, 2D, 3B, 3D and 3F). In contrast, no significant difference in H4K5 acetylation was observed for the TIMP-2 or PBEF promoter regions in any tested sample (Fig 5C and 5F).

thumbnail
Fig 4. Methylation patterns at the promoter regions of TIMP-2 and PBEF.

(A) Positions of the 47 CpG dinucleotides within the 641-bp region upstream of the TIMP-2 transcription initiation start site. (B) The methylation status of these CpG sites in NM control, ICSI-derived, cloned, and TSA-treated cloned placentae, as determined by bisulfite sequencing of at least 20 independent PCR clones. (C) The 49 CpG dinucleotides within the 652-bp region upstream of PBEF. (D) The methylation status of the CpG sites shown in (C). Gray circle, unmethylated; black circle, methylated. Percentages indicate the proportions of total available CpG sites that are methylated.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166241.g004

thumbnail
Fig 5. Histone modifications at the TIMP-2 and PBEF promoter regions.

(A) Schematic of the TIMP-2 promoter region. Abbreviations: +1, the transcription start site; and A2, site analyzed for histone acetylation. (B) H3-K9/K14 acetylation of TIMP-2 in NM control, ICSI-derived, cloned, and TSA-treated cloned placentae. (C) Graph showing the H4-K5 acetylation status of TIMP-2. (D) Schematic of the PBEF promoter region. Abbreviations: +1, the transcription start site; and PA1, site analyzed for histone acetylation. (E) H3-K9/K14 acetylation of PBEF was assessed by real-time PCR. (F) Graph showing the H4-K5 acetylation status of PBEF. The minimum value was standardized to 1. Four replicates were performed. The mean of fold change with different superscripts (a-c) differ significantly (P < 0.05). Error bars show the standard error (SE).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166241.g005

Discussion

Fetal growth and development during pregnancy is supported by the placenta, which is a highly specialized organ that precisely ensures the efficient exchange of nutrients and waste products between the maternal and fetal circulatory systems. During the gestation of cloned mice and bovines, researchers have observed a high frequency of hypertrophic placentae [3, 11]. In mice, a comparative study of placental weight at term showed that placentae derived from somatic cell nuclear transfer tended to show placental overgrowth [11]. Placentomegaly in cloned mouse concepti, which is caused by expansion of the spongiotrophoblast layer, has been speculated to reflect abnormal gene expression [11]. We previously identified several placental proteins that were up- and downregulated in cloned animal placentae and could be used to distinguish between cloned and normal placentae [19]. Here, we quantitatively determined the mRNA and protein expression patterns for two of them, TIMP-2 and PBEF, in the placentae of cloned, TSA-treated cloned, ICSI-derived and NM control mice.

TIMP-2 has been associated with extracellular matrix remodeling [32,33], and we previously reported that it is overexpressed in cloned placentae, particularly at the end of gestation [17,18,19]. High-level TIMP-2 secretion from binucleate giant cells in bovine placentae reportedly inhibits the proteolytic activity of MMP-2 (matrix metalloproteinase-2), leading to decreased extracellular matrix degradation during the prepartum period [34]. At the end of pregnancy, the number of binucleate giant cells decreases, as does TIMP-2 protein production [34]. In addition, enzymatic extracellular matrix degradation increases, the placenta detaches, and the fetal membranes are released [33]. Thus, proper control of TIMP-2 secretion may be important for successful placentation and parturition. In the present study, markedly higher levels of TIMP-2 expression were observed in cloned and TSA-treated cloned placentae compared with ICSI-derived and NM control placentae. Together with the previous findings in mouse and bovine cloned placentae [17,18,19], our results suggest that cloned and TSA-treated cloned placentae, which maintain strong TIMP-2 expression at the end of gestation, are likely to exhibit decreased proteolytic activity and MMP-induced ECM degradation, potentially leading to placental dysfunction and enlargement.

The PBEF protein, in contrast, was downregulated in cloned, TSA-treated cloned and ICSI-derived placentae. PBEF appears to function at the proximal pathway for labor initiation [35], and is reportedly upregulated following distension of human amniotic epithelial cells [36]. We previous reported that the protein and mRNA expression levels of PBEF in normal mouse placentae gradually decreased from 11.5 to 18.5 dpc, but remained detectable throughout this period [24]. Similarly, a previous study found that PBEF is constitutively expressed in placentae and may play a role during normal pregnancy [37]. PBEF reportedly increases when fetal membranes are transiently distended [38], and it has been suggested to act as a growth regulator, facilitating the accommodation of placental tissue and preventing it from rupturing prematurely when advancing gestation increasingly distends the membranes [35]. In addition, PBEF was recently reported to have a local protective antiapoptotic effect in fetal membranes during placentation [38, 39]. Since distension of fetal membranes in vivo may increase apoptosis in the placenta [35], our present results and the previous reports collectively suggest a model wherein PBEF expression in the developing mouse placenta could protect against the fetal membrane distension-induced apoptosis of placental cells. Interestingly, PBEF expression was lower in cloned and ICSI-derived placentae than in NM control placentae. Placenta of survived ICSI fetuses have a normal level of TIMP-2 but a different level of PBEF compared with NM, which may cause a relatively mild placentomegaly in ICSI samples. These results indicate that insufficient levels of PBEF, which appears to be important for proper placental function, may be associated with the abnormal placental development and/or unsuccessful parturition of cloned and ICSI-derived animals [17, 40].

After cloning, the transferred nucleus must undergo epigenetic reprogramming in order to support successful development. Previous studies have shown that epigenetic reprogramming defects often occur in cloned embryos, as reflected by aberrant gene expression [15, 39,40] and abnormal DNA methylation patterns [14, 41,42]. The sall3 locus, for example, has been shown to be an epigenetic hotspot for the aberrant DNA methylation associated with placentomegaly of cloned mice [43]. Thus, altered gene expression in the placenta appears to be at least partly due to abnormalities in DNA methylation. To examine whether the protein expression changes identified in the present work might reflect epigenetic programming defects, we investigated DNA methylation and histone acetylation in the promoter regions of TIMP-2 and PBEF genes. No significant difference was observed in the methylation status of TIMP-2 or PBEF among NM control, ICSI-derived, cloned and TSA-treated cloned placentae, indicating that the TIMP-2 and PBEF genes are correctly methylated in the tested system and the methylation status may not appear to affect the mRNA expression of TIMP-2 and PBEF in the placenta. In contrast, H3-K9 and -K14 acetylations of TIMP-2 and PBEF analyzed by ChIP were up- and downregulated, respectively, in cloned placentae, in accordance with their observed mRNA and protein expression levels. Thus, cloned placentae must have suffered from aberrant reprogramming of histone changes in these (and potentially other) developmentally important genes, causing unusual expression of their proteins. These changes could give rise to the placental abnormalities seen in cloned mouse placentae, including enlargement and/or lack of proper placental function. Effect of TSA treatment in reconstructed embryos could be transient during embryo development. During early development, nuclei of reconstructed embryos treated with TSA could change acetylation status on H3K9 or globally on histone residues, and later, the modified epigenetic status could be erased or changed. Finally fetuses that have less severe modifications or proper changes in epigenetics could survive at term.

In sum, our findings indicate that TIMP-2 and PBEF are involved in abnormal hypertrophic placental development in the mouse. In cloned placentae, the failure of histone modification reprogramming in these (and potentially other) developmentally important genes appears to trigger the abnormal expression of their protein products. This is the first report to demonstrate that aberrant TIMP-2 and PBEF protein expression in the placentae of cloned mice is closely related to altered epigenetic modification of placental development-related genes.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the BioGreen 21 Program (grant no. PJ01119601) and the Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science & Technology Development (grant no. PJ0118512016) in Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

Author Contributions

  1. Conceptualization: DIJ.
  2. Data curation: DIJ.
  3. Formal analysis: HRK JEL SYK SJS JSW.
  4. Funding acquisition: DIJ.
  5. Investigation: DIJ.
  6. Methodology: HRK RKO.
  7. Project administration: DIJ.
  8. Resources: TW CL.
  9. Supervision: DIJ.
  10. Validation: HRK.
  11. Visualization: HRK.
  12. Writing – original draft: DIJ.
  13. Writing – review & editing: HRK TW DIJ.

References

  1. 1. Wooding FB, Morgan G, Brandon MR, Camous S. Calcium transport and the localisation of calbindin-D9k in the ruminant placenta during the second half of pregnancy. Cell Tissue Res. 1994;276(2): 387–397.
  2. 2. Hill JR, Roussel AJ, Cibelli JB, Edwards JF, Hooper NL, Miller MW, et al. Clinical and pathologic features of cloned transgenic calves and fetuses (13 case studies). Theriogenology1999;51: 1451–1465. pmid:10729073
  3. 3. Hill JR, Edwards JF, Sawyer N, Blackwell C, Cibelli JB. Placental anomalies in a viable cloned calf. Cloning 2001;3: 83–88. pmid:11900642
  4. 4. Niemann H, Wrenzycki C. Alterations of expression of developmentally important genes in preimplantation bovine embryos by in vitro culture conditions: implications for subsequent development. Theriogenology 2000;53: 21–34. pmid:10735059
  5. 5. Wakayama T, Rodriguez I, Perry AC, Yanagimachi R, Mombaerts P. Mice cloned from embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.1999;96 (26): 14984–14989. pmid:10611324
  6. 6. Wakayama T, Yanagimachi R. Cloning of male mice from adult tail-tip cells. Nat Genet. 1999;22: 127–128. pmid:10369248
  7. 7. Ogura A, Inoue K, Ogonuki N, Noguchi A, Takano K, Nagano R, et al. Production of male cloned mice from fresh, cultured, and cryopreserved immature Sertoli cells. Biol Reprod. 2000;62: 1579–1584. pmid:10819758
  8. 8. Thuan NV, Kishiqami S, Wakayama T. How to improve the success rate of mouse cloning technology. J Reprod Dev. 2010;56(1): 20–30. pmid:20203432
  9. 9. Thibault C. Recent data on the development of cloned embryos derived from reconstructed eggs with adult cells. Reprod Nutr Dev. 2003;43 (4): 303–324. pmid:14971823
  10. 10. Calzonetti T, Stevenson L, Rossant J. A novel regulatory region is required for trophoblast-specific transcription in transgenic mice. Dev Biol. 1995;171(2): 615–626. pmid:7556941
  11. 11. Tanaka S, Oda M, Toyoshima Y, Wakayama T, Tanaka M, Yoshida N, et al. Placentomegaly in cloned mouse concepti caused by expansion of the spongiotrophoblast layer. Biol Reprod. 2001;65: 1813–1821. pmid:11717146
  12. 12. Kono T. Nuclear transfer and reprogramming. Rev Reprod. 1997;2: 74–80. pmid:9414468
  13. 13. Kang YK, Koo DB, Park JS, Choi YH, Kim HN, Chang WK, et al. Typical demethylation events in cloned pig embryos. Clues on species-specific differences in epigenetic reprogramming of a cloned donor genome. J Bio Chem. 2001;276(43): 39980–39984.
  14. 14. Humpherys D, Eggan K, Akutsu H, Hochedlinger K, Rideout WM 3rd, Biniszkiewicz D, et al. Epigenetic instability in ES cells and cloned mice. Science 2001;293(5527): 95–97. pmid:11441181
  15. 15. Inoue K, Kohda T, Lee J, Ogonuki N, Mochida K, Noguchi Y, et al. Faithful expression of imprinted genes in cloned mice. Science 2002;295(5553): 297. pmid:11786635
  16. 16. Kohda T, Inoue K, Ogonuki N, Miki H, Naruse M, Kaneko-Ishino T, et al. Variation in gene expression and aberrantly regulated chromosome regions in cloned mice. Biol Reprod. 2005;73: 1302–1311. pmid:16120825
  17. 17. Kim HR, Kang JK, Yoon JT, Seong HH, Jung JK, et al. (2005) Protein profiles of bovine placenta derived from somatic cell nuclear transfer. Proteomics 5: 4264–4273. pmid:16196098
  18. 18. Kim HR, Naruse K, Lee HR, Han RH, Park CS, Lee HM, et al. Abnormal Expression of TIMP-2, SOD, Vimentin and PAI proteins in Cloned Bovine Placentae. Reprod Dom Anim. 2009;44: 714–717.
  19. 19. Kim HR, Han RX, Wakayama T, Park CS, Jin DI. Aberrant protein expression in the placenta of cloned mouse derived from embryonic stem cell. Placenta 2010;31: 853–859. pmid:20684987
  20. 20. Lederberg J. The meaning of epigenetics. The Scientist. 2010;15: 6.
  21. 21. Rideout WM 3rd, Eggan K, Jaenisch R. Nuclear cloning and epigenetic reprogramming of the genome. Science 2010;293: 1093–1098.
  22. 22. Stice SL, Rzucidlo SJ. Increasing cloning efficiencies requires a better understanding of developmental abnormalities and gene expression in manipulated embryos. J Anim Sci. 2002;79: 285–289.
  23. 23. Han RX, Kim HR, Naruse K, Chio SM, Kim BC, Park CS, et al. (2007) Comparative study of protein profile during development of mouse placenta. Reprod Dev Biol. 2007;31: 253–60.
  24. 24. Kim HR, Han RX, Diao YF, Park CS, Jin DI. Epigenetic characterization of the PBEF and TIMP-2 genes in the developing placentae of normal mice. BMB Rep. 2011;44(8): 535–40. pmid:21871178
  25. 25. Isaka K, Usuda S, Ito H, Sagawa Y, Nakamura H, Nishi H, et al. Expression and activity of matrix metalloproteinase 2 and 9 in human trophoblasts. Placenta 2003;24: 53–64. pmid:12495660
  26. 26. Ognjanovic S, Bryant-Greenwood GD. Pre-B-cell colony-enhancing factor, a novel cytokine of human fetal membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187: 1051–1058. pmid:12389004
  27. 27. Wakayama T, Perry AC, Zuccotti M, Johnson KR, Yanagimachi R. Full-term development of mice from enucleated oocytes injected with cumulus cell nuclei. Nature 1998;394(6691): 369–374. pmid:9690471
  28. 28. Ohta H, Wakayama T. Generation of normal progeny by intracytoplasmic sperm injection following grafting of testicular tissue from cloned mice that died postnatally. Biol Reprod. 2005;73(3): 390–395. pmid:15878886
  29. 29. Kishigami S, Wakayama T. Somatic cell nuclear transfer in the mouse. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;518: 207–218. pmid:19085136
  30. 30. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)). Method 2001;25: 402–408.
  31. 31. Li T, Vu TH, Ulaner GA, Yang Y, Hu JF, Hoffman AR. Activating and silencing histone modifications form independent allelic switch regions in the imprinted Gnas gene. Hum Mol Genet. 2004;13: 741–750. pmid:14962976
  32. 32. Alexander CM, Hansell EJ, Behrendtsen O, Flannery ML, Kishnani NS, Hawkes SP, et al. Expression and function of matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors at the maternal-embryonic boundary during mouse embryo implantation. Development 1996;122: 1723–1736. pmid:8674412
  33. 33. Tanaka SS, Toyooka Y, Sato H, Seiki M, Tojo H, Tachi C. Expression and localization of membrane type matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MT1-MMP) in trophoblast cells of cultured mouse blastocysts and ectoplacental cones. Placenta 1998;19: 41–48. pmid:9481784
  34. 34. Walter I, Boos A. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMP-2 and MMP-9) and tissue inhibitor-2 of matrix metalloproteinases (TIMP-2) in the placenta and interplacental uterine wall in normal cows and in cattle with retention of fetal membranes. Placenta 2000;22: 473–483.
  35. 35. Ognjanovic S, Tashima LS, Bryant-Greenwood GD. The effects of pre-B-cell colony-enhancing factor on the human fetal membranes by microarray analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189: 1187–1195. pmid:14586377
  36. 36. Nemeth E, Tashima LS, Yu Z, Bryant-Greenwood GD. Fetal membrane distention: I. Differentially expressed genes regulated by acute distention in amniotic epithelial (WISH) cells. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182: 50–59. pmid:10649156
  37. 37. Millar K, Boesche MH, Yamamoto SY, Killeen J, DeBuque L, Chen R, Bryant-Greenwood GD. A relaxin-mediated pathway to preterm premature rupture of the fetal membranes that is independent of infection. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1998;179: 126–134. pmid:9704777
  38. 38. Osmers RG, Blaser J, Kuhn W, Tschesche H. Interleukin-8 synthesis and the onset of labor. Obstet. Gynecol. 1995;86: 223–229. pmid:7617353
  39. 39. Niemann H, Wrenzycki C, Lucas-Hahn A, Brambrink T, Kues WA, Carnwath JW, et al. Gene expression patterns in bovine in vitro-produced and nuclear transfer-derived embryos and their implications for early development. Cloning Stem Cells 2002;4: 29–38. pmid:12006154
  40. 40. Dean W, Santos F, Stojkovic M, Zakhartchenko V, Walter J, Wolf E, et al. (2001) Conservation of methylation reprogramming in mammalian development: aberrant reprogramming in cloned embryos. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98: 13734–13738. pmid:11717434
  41. 41. Kang YK, Koo DB, Park JS, Choi YH, Chung AS, Lee KK, et al. Aberrant methylation of donor genome in cloned bovine embryos. Nat Genet. 2001;28: 173–177. pmid:11381267
  42. 42. Kang YK, Park JS, Koo DB, Choi YH, Kim SU, Lee KK, et al. (2002) Limited demethylation leaves mosaic-type methylation states in cloned bovine pre-implantation embryos. EMBO J. 2002;21: 1092–1100. pmid:11867537
  43. 43. Ohgane J, Wakayama T, Senda S, Yamazaki Y, Inoue K, Ogura A, et al. The Sall3 locus is an epigenetic hotspot of aberrant DNA methylation associated with placentomegaly of cloned mice. Genes Cells 2004;9: 253–260. pmid:15005712