Skip to main content
Advertisement

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Phase 1 Randomized Clinical Trial of AQ-13 in Comparison with CQ

Designed as a series of double-blind RCTs at incremental oral doses of 10, 100, 300, 600, and 1,500 mg, with a 700 mg adjustment dose after 600 mg to ensure similar bioavailability for AQ-13 and CQ at the 1,500/1,750 mg dose (based on the area under the curve, AUCτ, in h × μM, as in Figure 3). *AQ-13 dosages: 700 + 700 + 350 mg on days 1, 2, and 3, respectively; CQ dosages: 600 + 600 + 300 mg on days 1, 2, and 3, respectively.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Structures of AQ-13, CQ, and Their Metabolites

Two-dimensional structures are presented. Note that the AQ rings of AQ-13 and CQ are identical; the structural differences between AQ-13 and CQ are in their side chains: linear propyl side chain for AQ-13, branched isopentyl side chain for CQ. Therefore, the molecular weight (MW) of AQ-13 (292 Da) is 28 Da less than CQ (320 Da). Metabolism by N-dealkylation converts an ethyl group to a hydrogen (proton) at each step, resulting in stepwise MW differences of 28 Da.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

Pharmacokinetics of AQ-13 and CQ at Doses Equivalent to 600 and 700 mg CQ Base

Charts of blood concentration data for individual volunteers during the first week (168 h) after: 600 mg dose of AQ-13 (A), 700 mg dose of AQ-13 (B), or 600 mg dose of CQ (C). Individual volunteers received single oral doses of 600 mg AQ-13 or CQ, or 700 mg AQ-13. Blood samples of 5 ml were then obtained at multiple points in time after drug administration (see Methods) and examined using a fluorescence HPLC assay for AQ-13, CQ, and their N-dealkylated metabolites [34]. Modeling was performed using the WinNonlin software (Pharsight).

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Table 1.

Randomization of Volunteers to AQ-13 and CQ: Baseline Characteristics

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Frequency of Related Adverse Events by Drug and Dose

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Comparative Pharmacokinetics of AQ-13 and CQ at 600 and 700 mg Doses

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Comparative Pharmacokinetics of AQ-13 and CQ at 1,750 and 1,500 mg Doses

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Comparative Pharmacokinetics of AQ-72 and MDCQ at Different Doses of AQ-13 and CQ (median, range)

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Effects of AQ-13 and CQ on the QTc Interval

More »

Table 6 Expand

Figure 4.

Changes in the QTc Interval after 1,750 mg AQ-13 or 1,500 mg CQ

Changes in the QTc interval from baseline were determined using the Rozinn Electronics system software to evaluate the Holter recordings.

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Figure 5.

Modeled Concentration-Time Data (1,750 mg AQ-13 Therapeutic Dose)

Individual volunteers received daily oral doses of AQ-13 for 3 d (day 1, 700; day 2, 700; and day 3, 350 mg). Blood samples were then obtained, analyzed, and modeled (see Methods).

More »

Figure 5 Expand

Figure 6.

Modeled Concentration–Time Data (1,500 mg CQ Therapeutic Dose)

Individual volunteers received daily oral doses of CQ for 3 d (day 1, 600; day 2, 600; and day 3, 300 mg). Blood samples were then obtained, analyzed and modeled (see Methods).

More »

Figure 6 Expand