https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7638-1263
Figures
Abstract
The government of India has adopted the elimination of vertical transmission of HIV as one of the five high-level goals under phase V of the National AIDS and STD Control Programme (NACP). In this paper, we present the data from HIV estimations 2021 for India and select States detailing the progress as well as the attributable causes for vertical transmissions. The NACP spearheads work on mathematical modelling to estimate HIV burden based on the periodically conducted sentinel surveillance for guiding program implementation and policymaking. Using the results of the latest round of HIV Estimations in 2021, we analysed the mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) during the perinatal and postnatal (breastfeeding) period. In 2021, overall, around 5,000 [3,000–7,800] vertical transmissions were estimated nationally with 58% being perinatal infections and remaining during breastfeeding. MTCT at 6 weeks was around 12.95% [9.45–16.02] with the final transmission rate at 24.25% [18.50–29.50]. Overall, 57% of vertical transmissions were among HIV-positive mothers who did not receive ART during pregnancy or breastfeeding, 19% among mothers who dropped off ART during pregnancy or delivery, and 18% among mothers who were infected during pregnancy or breastfeeding. There were significant variations between States. Depending upon the States, the programme needs to focus on the intervention domains of timely engagement in antenatal care-HIV testing-ART initiation as well as programme retention and adherence support. Equally important would be strengthening the strategic information to generate related evidence for inputting India and State-specific parameters improving the MTCT-related modelled estimates.
Citation: Kumar P, Das C, Das U, Kumar A, Priyam N, Ranjan V, et al. (2023) Augmenting progress on the elimination of vertical transmissions of HIV in India: Insights from Spectrum-based HIV burden estimations. PLOS Glob Public Health 3(8): e0002270. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0002270
Editor: Julia Robinson, PLOS: Public Library of Science, UNITED STATES
Received: March 27, 2023; Accepted: July 17, 2023; Published: August 9, 2023
Copyright: © 2023 Kumar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: The data informing the burden estimations are available from NACO on request from Dr. Chinmoyee Das (c.das@gov.in), Head of Division, Strategic Information, National AIDS Control Organisation, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India. Access will be granted dataset as per the data sharing guidelines available on NACO's website (http://naco.gov.in/).
Funding: The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
United Nations envisages ending the AIDS epidemic as a public health threat by 2030 as one of the targets (Target 3.3) under the third Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) of ensuring healthy lives and promoting well-being for all at all ages [1]. Elimination of vertical transmission of HIV (EVTH), reflected by the global HIV response in its pledge to zero new HIV infections, zero AIDS-related deaths and zero HIV-related discrimination, is integral to the attainment of target 3.3 [2, 3]. The elimination of vertical transmission of HIV has been defined in scientific terms. World Health Organization (WHO) has released specific guidance periodically to measure the progress on EVTH. Attainment of a population case rate of new paediatric HIV infections due to vertical transmission of ≤50 cases per 100 000 live births and mother-to-child-transmission (MTCT) rate of HIV of <2% in non-breastfeeding populations OR <5% in breastfeeding populations are two impact targets for EVTH [4].
There has been significant progress on EVTH. As of November 2021, WHO has validated fourteen countries/territories including Cuba, Thailand, Belarus, Armenia, Anguilla, Montserrat, Cayman Islands, Bermuda, Antigua and Barbuda, St Christopher and Nevis, Malaysia, Maldives, Sri Lanka and Dominica for EVTH [4]. The annual vertical transmissions between 2010 and 2021 have decreased by fifty per cent. Still, with around 160,000 (110,000–230,000) vertical transmissions in 2021, progress on EVTH is far from satisfactory [5].
India, the second largest HIV epidemic with an estimated 2.4 million [1.99–2.90 million] people living with HIV (PLHIV) in 2021, is critical to the global AIDS response [6]. Being committed to the attainment of ending AIDS as a public health threat by 2030, the Government of India has adopted new strategies and targets under phase V of the National AIDS and STD Control Programme (NACP Phase-V) [7]. NACP Phase-V has five top-level goals and 23 output/outcome targets to anchor the national HIV response till 2025–26. EVTH is explicitly stated as Goal 3 of NACP Phase-V.
Efforts to prevent and eliminate vertical transmission of HIV under NACP are not new. Direct interventions for the prevention of vertical transmission of HIV in India were initiated as early as 2002 [8, 9]. The focus gradually shifted to attain elimination of vertical transmission by 2020 as one of the priorities areas under NACP through four-pronged strategies of primary prevention of HIV, prevention of unintended pregnancies, prevention of vertical transmission, and care, support, and treatment of women living with HIV (WLHIV) and her children. As a result of the focus on primary preventions under NACP with new infections declining by more than 80% since the peak, the case rate of vertical pediatric HIV infections declined to 24 per 100,000 live births in 2021. MTCT rate, reflecting the treatment coverages among HIV-positive pregnant and breastfeeding women, declined from ≥ 40% in 2010 to 24% in 2021. Still, NACP has a long way to go to attain the target MTCT rate of <5% for the elimination of paediatric new infections [6, 9].
MTCT rate under NACP of India is calculated using UNAIDS recommended Spectrum Model. This is consistent with global recommendations to estimate the population-level MTCT rate [4]. To better understand the vertical transmission of HIV in India, we present the first disaggregated estimates of the vertical transmission of HIV acquired during pregnancy, delivery and breastfeeding in India. We provide this estimate not only for the national level but also for the high HIV burden States (either PLHIV size of ≥ 50,000 PLHIV or adult HIV prevalence of ≥1%) increasing the granularity of analysis for informing the tailored policy-making and interventions designed to augment the progress on EVTH under NACP in India.
Methods
Ethics statement
For the present analysis, we used aggregated deidentified outputs of HIV Estimations 2021 to quantify the vertical transmissions during different phases of motherhood. HIV burden estimations under the NACP of India are undertaken periodically and are the outcome of robust epidemic monitoring techniques implemented through an institutionalised mechanism of Surveillance & Epidemiology informing policy-making and programmatic improvements [10]. The institutions involved in primary data collection through periodic HIV sero-surveillance submit their proposals for the surveillance program using globally recommended methods to their respective ethics committees to seek approval on the informed consent forms. The survey at each site is initiated after the approval of the local ethics committee. The epidemic data thus generated, along with programmatic data, is used for HIV burden estimations by employing the Spectrum model, developed by Avenir Health, UNAIDS and partners [11]. As this study used aggregated de-identified outputs generated through the HIV Estimations 2021 model, ethical approval was not required.
MTCT estimation under Spectrum
The details of the process and method for the HIV burden estimations through Spectrum, used by 170 countries representing 99% of the global population, have been described elsewhere [12–18]. The model assumptions are reviewed and updated periodically by the multi-disciplinary UNAIDS reference group on Estimates, Modelling and Projections.
In brief, country teams input demographics, programmatic and HIV prevalence data among 15–49 years old in the model. The model transforms prevalence trends into incidence trends based on the inputted data about antiretroviral therapy (ART) coverage and assumptions about CD4 progression and survival on and off ART. The incidence estimates are then distributed by age and sex based on the community-based survey data or the epidemic type and then progressed over time to death depending upon coverage of the ART programme.
WLHIV in the age group of 15–49 years are subjected to fertility rates. The number of WLHIV in each age group is multiplied by total fertility rates and the age distribution of fertility in that age group as given in the formula below [18, 19]. The adjustment is done to account for the impact of HIV infection on fertility [20, 21].
Where;
BWt = the number of births occurring among WLHIV in year ‘t’; Wa,t = the number of WLHIV of age ‘a’ at time ‘t’; TFRt = the total fertility rate at time ‘t’, and; ASFRa,t = the percentage of life time births that occur to women of age ‘a’ at time ‘t’
The model estimates the perinatal vertical transmission rate as the weighted average of the proportion in each of the 11 prophylaxis/treatment group and the corresponding probability of transmission [20]. The prophylaxis/treatment groups include: No prophylaxis (in three category of CD4 count of <200 cells/ /μl, 200–350 cells/μl and >350 cells/μl), incident infections, single dose Neviripine, Dual ARVs, Option A, Option B, Option B+ (in three category of ART started before current pregnancy, ART started during current pregnancy more than 4 weeks before delivery and ART started during current pregnancy less than 4 weeks before delivery).
Where, PTRt = Perinatal transmission rate; Prophylaxisc,t = the proportion of women by prophylaxis/treatment category, and; TRc = probability of transmission of HIV by prophylaxis/treatment category.
The transmission probabiliby in Spectrum model vary by each of the prophylaxis/treatment group (Table 1) and are based on the expert review of available studies [16, 22]. In the model, the risk of vertical transmission is highest when the HIV infections in women occus while pregnant or breastfeeding (incident infections). The probability of vertical transmission with incident infections during pregnancy is estimated at around 18%, and 27% for those occurring during breastfeeding. WLHIV who were on antiretroviral therapy prior to pregnancy have the lowest peripartum and postnatal transmission probabilities; 0.26% for peripartum and 0.02% per month of breastfeeding, respectively.
The model estimates the number of HIV+ births by applying the perinatal transmission rate to the number of births among WLHIV [20].
Where; BHIV+,t = the number of HIV+ births; BWt = the number of births occurring among WLHIV in year ‘t’; PTRt = Perinatal transmission rate.
The model estimates the postnatal vertical transmission as product of the number of children born to HIV+ mothers who were not infected perinatally (= BWt- BHIV+,t), the proportion of children exposed to transmission through breastfeeding, the monthly probability of transmission through breastfeeding (on and off-ART) and the duration of breastfeeding [20]. Postnatal transmisison is estimated for each month from birth to 36 months.
Where, BFTRm,t = breastfeeding transmission rate at month; No_prophylaxism,t = HIV+ mothers with no prophylaxis/treatment; PropLT350 = proportion of HIV+ mothers with no prophylaxis/treatment having CD4 counts < 350; TR LT350 = monthly transmission rate among HIV+ mothers with no prophylaxis/treatment having CD4 counts < 350; TR GT350 = monthly transmission rate among HIV+ mothers with no prophylaxis/treatment having CD4 counts ≥ 350; PropInct = HIV incidence women during breastfeeding; TRi = tranmission rate for incident cases; OptAm,t = HIV+ mothers using Option A in a month; TROptA = tranmission rate among HIV positive mothers who are on Option A; OptBm,t = HIV+ mothers using Option B in a month; TROptB = tranmission rate among HIV positive mothers who are on Option B; ARTbeforet = HIV+ mothers on-ART before current pregnancy; TRARTbefore = tranmission rate among HIV positive mothers who are on ART before current pregnancy; ARTcurrentt = HIV+ mothers identified during current pregnancy; TRARTcurrent = tranmission rate among HIV positive mothers who are put on ART during current pregnancy.
The model estimates the number of new HIV infections among children in postnatal period using two factors: the number of exposed children (HIV-negative infants born to HIV+ mothers who are breastfeeding) and the monthly transmission rate during breastfeeding [20].
Where, CBm,t = new infections occurring among children through breastfeeding in month ‘m’; BWt = the number of births occurring among WLHIV in year ‘t’; PropBFm,t = proportion of children born in year ‘t’ who are still breastfeeding at age ‘m’ months, and; BFTRm,t = breastfeeding transmission rate.
In the model, the children infected due to vertical tranmission would move into the subsequent age group based on age when they were infected and if they received any treatment [16, 22]. For the children estimated to have been infected perinatally but not put on ART, the median survival is less than two years. For the postnatal infections, the median longevity without ART ranges between 6 years to 14 years depending on the age at which infection occurs [23].
Among children living with HIV (CLHIV) who are getting the treatment, the annual AIDS-related mortality is informed by the International Epidemiological Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA) Consortium. CLHIV are also subjected to background mortality. When the CLHIV reaches the age-group of 5 years, they are distributed by CD4 category based on the IeDEA data. At age 15, CLHIV transition from the CD4 count categories associated with children 5–14 to the adult HIV states.
MTCT-estimations related data inputs under the NACP of India
Periodic HIV burden estimations using Spectrum under the NACP of India is a practice since long [24–29]. Subnational Spectrum files, one file for each of the State/Union Territory (UT), are created for each round given the availability of the demographic, surveillance and programmatic data with epidemic starts year set at 1981 in each of the models. The inputted data includes ASFR since 1981 based on the Sample Registration System.
ART/prenatal prophylaxis coverage among pregnant WLHIV is inputted as zero before 2004 and then entered for single dose Nevirapine till 2012. For 2013, the coverage is entered for Option B (triple prophylaxis from 14 weeks). From 2014 onwards, the data is entered for Option B+ for ART started before and during the current pregnancy. Data entered on ART/prenatal prophylaxis coverage is specific to State/UT as reported in the NACP information system.
Retention on ART among pregnant WLHIV is kept as the default value of 85% for WLHIV on ART before the current pregnancy and at 80% for WLHIV put on ART during the current pregnancy across all State/UT-model. The data on ART/postnatal prophylaxis coverage for WLHIV identified during the breastfeeding period is not inputted given the lack of data on the same. Data on breastfeeding patterns among WLHIV is entered as same as that of HIV-negative women, specific for each State/UT, as informed by the rounds of the National Family Health Survey.
The model estimates vertical transmission separately for the peripartum (in utero and intrapartum) and postnatal (breastfeeding) period. The peripartum transmission probabilities, depending upon the on or off prenatal prophylaxis or ART regimen type, are applied to all deliveries among WLHIV to estimate the peripartum infections. The postnatal transmission probabilities, separate for the on or off prenatal prophylaxis or ART regimen type, are monthly probabilities applied to breastfeeding WLHIV during the whole of the breastfeeding period. Transmission due to incident infections during pregnancy or breastfeeding is modelled as a one-time risk. For all States/UTs models, default MTCT probabilities provided in the Spectrum model were used in HIV Estimations 2021 as in the previous rounds (see Table 1).
The Spectrum provides an exhaustive list of epidemiological indicators, adult as well as pediatric, including the number of people living with HIV (PLHIV), new HIV infections, AIDS-related deaths etc as an output of the modelling process. We present the analysis of vertical transmission by timing (prenatal or during breastfeeding) and by ART status (on or off prophylaxis or ART). The analysis includes the data for India and the high HIV burden States (either PLHIV size of ≥ 50,000 PLHIV or adult HIV prevalence of ≥1%) comprising Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Delhi, Gujarat, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Manipur, Mizoram, Nagaland, Odisha, Punjab, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Telangana, Uttar Pradesh and West Bengal. Table 2 summarizes the key characteristics of the States selected for the analysis [29, 30].
Results
Overall, around 5 thousand new HIV infections were estimated to happen as a result of vertical transmission during the peripartum (in utero and intrapartum) and the postnatal (breastfeeding) period in India in 2021 (Table 3). This included around 950 infections in Bihar, 600 each in Uttar Pradesh and Maharashtra, 400 in Andhra Pradesh, 325 in Karnataka, 200 each in Telangana and Odisha, 150 in Gujarat and Manipur each, 120 each in Delhi, Nagaland and Rajasthan and 100 in West Bengal. In the States of Madhya Pradesh, Mizoram, Tamil Nadu and Punjab, around 60–90 new infections were estimated to happen because of vertical transmission.
Nationally, the MTCT rate was at around 13% at 6 weeks in 2021. The estimated MTCT rate at 6 weeks was ~22% in Manipur, 20% in Bihar, ~18–19% in Nagaland and Odisha, ~13–16% in Delhi, Uttar Pradesh and Maharashtra and ~10–12% in Telangana, Mizoram, Karnataka, and Andhra Pradesh. In West Bengal, Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh, the estimated MTCT rate at 6 weeks ranged between >6% to <9% while in Punjab and Tamil Nadu, it ranged between >5% to <6%.
The final MTCT transmission rate, including the breastfeeding period, was estimated at around 24% nationally in 2021. The final transmission rate was more than 30% in Bihar, Delhi, Manipur, Nagaland, and Odisha. It was between 22–28% in Maharashtra, Mizoram and Uttar Pradesh and between >15–20% in Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, West Bengal, Telangana and Madhya Pradesh. The final MTCT rate was between 10–15% in Rajasthan, Gujarat and Punjab and less than 10% in Tamil Nadu.
Nationally, out of the total estimated 5,000 vertical transmissions in 2021, around 58% were estimated to happen during peripartum and rest during the breastfeeding period (Figs 1, 2 and Table 4). Overall, around two-fifth (40%) of total infections were peripartum infections among WLHIV who did not receive ART during pregnancy followed by around 12% among WLHIV who dropped off ART during pregnancy and another 4% among incident cases during the pregnancy. Around 17% of the total estimated vertical transmissions were attributed through breastfeeding among WLHIV who did not receive ART during breastfeeding followed by 15% among mothers who were incident cases during the breastfeeding period. Another 7% of the total estimated infections were postnatal infections among WLHIV who dropped off ART.
In Andhra Pradesh, sixty per cent of total estimated vertical transmissions in 2021 were transmission during the peripartum period (Figs 1, 2 and Table 4). Overall, around two-fifth (39%) of total infections were peripartum infections among WLHIV who did not receive ART during pregnancy followed by around 17% among WLHIV who dropped off ART during pregnancy and another 2% among babies whose mothers were incident cases during the pregnancy. Around 16% of the total estimated vertical transmissions were infections during the breastfeeding period among WLHIV who did not receive ART during breastfeeding followed by 10% among HIV-positive mothers who dropped off ART during breastfeeding. Another 9% of vertical transmission was among incident HIV infections during the breastfeeding period.
In Bihar, fifty-two per cent of total estimated vertical transmissions were attributed during the peripartum period. Overall, slightly less than half (46%) of total infections were peripartum infections among WLHIV who did not receive ART during pregnancy. Almost 27% of the total estimated vertical transmissions were infections during the breastfeeding period among WLHIV who did not receive ART during breastfeeding followed by another ~19% transmission during the breastfeeding period among mothers who were incident cases.
In Delhi, slightly more than half (52%) of total estimated vertical transmissions were transmission during the peripartum period. Overall, around 39% of total infections were peripartum infections among WLHIV who did not receive ART during pregnancy followed by around 19% during breastfeeding among WLHIV who did not receive ART during breastfeeding. Another ~22% transmission was during the breastfeeding period among mothers who were incident cases during breastfeeding and ~8% were during peripartum transmission among WLHIV who dropped off ART during pregnancy.
In Gujarat, almost 26% of the vertical transmission was peripartum transmission among WLHIV who dropped off ART during pregnancy followed by around 21% transmission during the breastfeeding period among mothers who were incident cases during breastfeeding. Around sixteen per cent of total infections were peripartum infections among WLHIV who did not receive ART during pregnancy. Another 15% of HIV-positive mothers who dropped off ART during breastfeeding.
In Punjab, slightly more than two-fifths (~43%) of the vertical transmission was peripartum transmission among WLHIV who dropped off ART during pregnancy. Another ~20% were transmission during the breastfeeding period among HIV-positive mothers who dropped off ART during breastfeeding. Around 15% of the estimated vertical transmission was during the breastfeeding period from mothers who were incident infections during breastfeeding.
In Tamil Nadu, more than half (53%) of the vertical transmission was peripartum transmission among WLHIV who dropped off ART during pregnancy. Another 19% were transmission during the breastfeeding period among HIV-positive mothers who dropped off ART during breastfeeding. Around 12% of the estimated vertical transmission was during the breastfeeding period from mothers who were incident infections during breastfeeding.
In Telangana, fifty-seven per cent of total estimated vertical transmissions happened during the peripartum period. Overall, almost one-third (33%) of total infections were peripartum infections among WLHIV who did not receive ART during pregnancy. Another 18% were estimated to be peripartum infections among WLHIV who dropped off ART during pregnancy. Around 16% of the postnatal infections were among WLHIV who did not receive ART during breastfeeding followed by 12% among those who dropped off ART during breastfeeding. Around 10% were postnatal infections among women who were incident cases.
In Uttar Pradesh, almost half (51%) of the total estimated vertical transmissions happened during the peripartum period. Overall, almost two-fifths (39%) of total infections were peripartum infections among WLHIV who did not receive ART during pregnancy while another 22% were postnatal infections among WLHIV who did not receive ART during breastfeeding. Another ~18% were postnatal infections among women who were incident cases.
In West Bengal, slightly less than half (46%) of the total estimated vertical transmissions happened during the peripartum period. Almost 40% of the total vertical transmission was perinatal transmission among WLHIV who were either not at all on ART during pregnancy or dropped off ART after initiating. Around 21% of the total estimated vertical transmissions were among incident cases during the breastfeeding period followed by another 15% among WLHIV who dropped off ART during breastfeeding.
Discussions
The goal of eliminating mother-to-child transmission of HIV is integral to India’s commitment of achieving ending AIDS as a public health threat by 2030. With an overall national-level MTCT rate of 24% against the target of ≤ 5% being a breastfeeding population, it is evident that the country has to intensify the interventions, tailored to the local contexts, to accelerate the progress on the elimination of vertical transmission. This paper analyses the data from HIV estimations 2021 by States detailing the progress as well as the attributable causes for vertical transmissions.
Overall, around 95% of the total vertical infections in India are among three broad categories: 57% among HIV-positive mothers who did not receive ART during pregnancy or breastfeeding, 19% among mothers who dropped off ART during pregnancy or delivery, and 18% among mothers who were infected during pregnancy or breastfeeding. However, there are stark differences between States.
At least two-thirds of vertical transmission in Bihar, Maharashtra, Manipur, Nagaland and Odisha were among HIV-positive mothers who did not receive ART during pregnancy or breastfeeding. Andhra Pradesh, Delhi, Karnataka and Uttar Pradesh were other States where more than half of the vertical transmission were among HIV-positive mothers who did not receive ART followed by 40—<50% in Mizoram and Telangana.
Timely engagement in antenatal care (ANC), HIV testing and ART initiation are key intervention domains for responding to the missed opportunities of identifying HIV-positive mothers and subsequently initiating them on ART [31]. In some States like Nagaland and Bihar, only half of the mothers are having at least one ANC visit in the first trimester. In Uttar Pradesh, accounting for almost one-fourth of the total pregnant women, only around two-thirds had at least one ANC visit in the first trimester [30, 32]. Delayed registration in ANC care shortens the windows for offering complete packages of services including HIV testing and ART initiation.
Diagnosis of HIV during pregnancy/breastfeeding, the earlier the better, is fundamental to the initiation of the battery of services under EMTCT. HIV testing among pregnant women has seen rapid scale-up under the NACP with testing in 2021–22 almost three times of 2012–13. Incorporation of ‘opt out’ HIV testing services into routine ANC services and subsequent scale-up through decentralized models like facility-integrated model and community-based screening etc has driven this uptake. Still, even after not accounting for duplications, a total of 14 States/Union Territories in India, including Bihar, Delhi and Nagaland had less than 80 HIV tests for every 100 estimated pregnant women [30, 33]. EMTCT aims to test at least 95% of the estimated pregnant women for HIV as one of the three process indicators. Increasing the reach and uptake of HIV testing services in these 14 States would be critical to drive the elimination agenda under NACP.
Around 62–72% of total vertical transmissions in Tamil Nadu and Punjab is estimated among mothers who dropped off ART during pregnancy or breastfeeding followed by 30–41% in Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Telangana and West Bengal. These are States with coverage of 75% or more against estimated EMTCT needs [30]. Improving the retention and adherence support will be critical elements for making progress in these States. A basket of community and facility-based interventions, tailored to the local context, has helped to improve retention and adherence during pregnancy and breastfeeding. Mentor mother approach, facility and community-based adherence support groups, community-level health providers empowered through information technology-enabled tools, and engagement of WLHIV’s social network including male partners have all worked in different settings [34–38].
Nationally, around one out of every five vertical transmissions (18%) is among mothers who were infected with HIV during pregnancy or breastfeeding and ranged from 11% in Maharashtra to around 35% in Rajasthan. Responding to the vertical transmission of HIV among mothers infected during pregnancy or breastfeeding would require strategies to identify such cases creating opportunities for diagnosing and initiating them on ART. In general, NACP recommends one test for pregnant women as a norm. Though WHO has recommended repeat HIV testing in high-incidence settings, studies in diverse settings, including in India, have demonstrated repeat HIV testing in the third trimester, during labour and/or during breastfeeding among women who tested HIV negative in the first test as a cost-effective strategy [39–41].
Our analysis provides an opportunity to understand the estimated number of vertical transmissions from the 2021 round of HIV burden estimations in India as a whole and by the major States, however, there are limitations which need to be taken into account to put the results in the context. Part of the limitations is attributed to the Spectrum model itself while part comes from limitations in the availability of local input data.
While Spectrum-based modelled estimates on the level and trends of the HIV/AIDS epidemic continue to be the workhorse of AIDS response globally, nationally and locally; limitations of model-based estimates are well documented [42–46]. The UNAIDS Reference Group on Estimates, Modelling and Projections regularly review the emerging science and provides technical guidance on the incorporation of the latest evidence into the model transmission parameters informing the periodic update on the HIV component of the Spectrum model [47, 48]. Still many assumptions on the age-sex patterns, fertility rates and mother-to-child-transmission probabilities, each with significant implications for the EMTCT estimates, are from settings which may have limitations in terms of representing country context [49]. International Epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA) global consortium and Analysing Longitudinal Population-based HIV/AIDS data on Africa (ALPHA) network are two key sources periodically informing some of the fundamental assumptions under the Spectrum updates but with limited to no study sites in India [50–53].
Validation of modelled vertical transmission rate is another issue. In scenarios where it has been tested against real-world transmissions, it usually falls within the acceptable margin of error or closely meets observed rates [16, 54–56]. However, the validation has been done in only select settings as as there are very few studies, and those only in high-prevalence settings, describing the vertical tranmission rate at population level.
Limitations on EMTCT estimates also arise from sub-optimum alignment between strategic information being generated under the routine service delivery vis-à-vis model need. For example, the default value for retention to ART programmes of HIV-positive mothers at the time of delivery ranges from 80–85% [57]. This default value is used for each of the State/UT-model in India in the absence of evidence on this particular parameter under the programme. It is possible that at least in some of the high-performing States in the southern and western regions of the country, the retention of ART is higher than 85%. The assumption that the breastfeeding pattern among HIV-positive women is the same as that of HIV-negative women is another strategic information gap with potential implications on EMTCT estimates. Investments augmenting the available strategic information, through a complementing system of programme monitoring, surveillnace and research, for the generation of local evidence informing various parameters of HIV burden estimations would be vital to improving progress tracking on EMTCT under NACP Phase-V of India.
Despite the limitations, to the best of our knowledge, the analysis presented in this paper is the first of its kind to describe the MTCT rate by State/UTs. Understanding the vertical transmission by States, along with their attributable causes, is one of the most basic steps towards the attainment of EMTCT under NACP Phase-V. The two-pronged complementing strategy of improving the service delivery along with augmenting the strategic information would be a critical determinant. The study also provides opprtunity for further research to understand the inter-state variations. While the study describes the differences in MTCT and underlying causes between States, more can be done to give insight into the reasons for these differences augmenting the intervention focus.
Acknowledgments
The project was part of the Surveillance and Epidemiological activities of the National AIDS and STD Control Programme of the Government of India. The authors thank the Project Directors and Strategic Information Team of all State AIDS Control Societies for their support in undertaking HIV Surveillance and Estimation activities in their states.
References
- 1.
United Nations General Assembly. Political Declaration On HIV And AIDS: On The Fast-Track To Accelerate The Fight Against HIV And To End The AIDS Epidemic By 2030. United Nations; 2016. https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/documents/2016/2016-political-declaration-HIV-AIDS.
- 2.
Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. Global AIDS Strategy 2021–2026. End Inequalities. End AIDS. UNAIDS, Geneva, Switzerland; 2021. https://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/global-AIDS-strategy-2021-2026_en.pdf.
- 3.
Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. New global pledge to end all inequalities faced by communities and people affected by HIV towards ending AIDS. UNAIDS, Geneva, Switzerland; 2021. https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/presscentre/pressreleaseandstatementarchive/2021/june/20210608_hlm-opens.
- 4.
World Health Organization. Global guidance on criteria and processes for validation: elimination of mother-to-child transmission of HIV, syphilis and hepatitis B virus. Geneva: WHO; 2021. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
- 5.
Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. UNAIDS 2022 epidemiological estimates. UNAIDS, Geneva, Switzerland; 2022. https://aidsinfo.unaids.org/.
- 6.
National AIDS Control Organization & ICMR-National Institute of Medical Statistics. India HIV Estimates 2021: Fact Sheet. New Delhi: NACO, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, 2022.
- 7.
National AIDS Control Organization. Strategy Document: National AIDS and STD Control Programme Phase-V (2021–26). NACO, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2022.
- 8. Kadri AM, Kumar P. Institutionalization of the NACP and Way Ahead. Indian journal of community medicine: official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine. 2012 Apr;37(2):83. pmid:22654280
- 9. Kumar P, Das C. Elimination of Vertical Transmission of HIV and Syphilis as a Public Health Threat in India: Strategic Information-Driven Pathway. Indian Journal of Community Medicine. 2022 Oct 1;47(4):467–70. pmid:36742981
- 10.
National AIDS Control Organization. Integrated and Enhanced Surveillance and Epidemiology of HIV, STI and related Co-morbidities Under the National AIDS and STD Control Programme: Strategic Framework. NACO, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2022.
- 11.
Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. Quick start guide for Spectrum. UNAIDS; (2020). https://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/QuickStartGuide_Spectrum_en.pdf.
- 12. Stover J, Walker N, Grassly NC, Marston M. Projecting the demographic impact of AIDS and the number of people in need of treatment: updates to the Spectrum projection package. Sexually transmitted infections. 2006 Jun 1;82(suppl 3):iii45–50. pmid:16735293
- 13. Stover J, McKinnon R, Winfrey B. Spectrum: a model platform for linking maternal and child survival interventions with AIDS, family planning and demographic projections. International journal of epidemiology. 2010 Apr 1;39(suppl_1):i7–10. pmid:20348129
- 14. Mahy M, Marsh K, Sabin K, Wanyeki I, Daher J, Ghys PD. HIV estimates through 2018: data for decision-making. AIDS (London, England). 2019 Dec 15;33(Suppl 3):S203. pmid:31343430
- 15.
World Health Organization. A short guide on methods measuring the impact of national PMTCT programmes. WHO Geneva; 2012.
- 16. Mary MA, Penazzato M, Ciaranello A, Mofenson L, Yiannoutsos C, Davies MA, et al. Improving estimates of children living with HIV from the Spectrum AIDS Impact Model. AIDS (London, England). 2017 Apr;31(Suppl 1):S13. pmid:28301337
- 17. Slogrove AL, Powis KM, Johnson LF, Stover J, Mahy M. Estimates of the global population of children who are HIV-exposed and uninfected, 2000–18: a modelling study. The Lancet Global Health. 2020 Jan 1;8(1):e67–75. pmid:31791800
- 18. Rollins N, Mahy M, Becquet R, Kuhn L, Creek T, Mofenson L. Estimates of peripartum and postnatal mother-to-child transmission probabilities of HIV for use in Spectrum and other population-based models. Sexually transmitted infections. 2012 Dec 1;88(Suppl 2):i44–51. pmid:23172345
- 19.
Avenir Health. Spectrum Manual: Spectrum System of Policy Models. Avenir Health; 2023. https://www.avenirhealth.org/software-spectrum.php.
- 20. Lewis JJ, Ronsmans C, Ezeh A, Gregson S. The population impact of HIV on fertility in sub-Saharan Africa. Aids. 2004 Jun 1;18:S35–43. pmid:15319742
- 21. Chen WJ, Walker N. Fertility of HIV-infected women: insights from Demographic and Health Surveys. Sexually transmitted infections. 2010 Dec 1;86(Suppl 2):ii22–7. pmid:21106511
- 22.
Mofenson, L, Updating PMTCT Transmission Probabilities for Use in the Spectrum Model, Report to UNAIDS, October 24, 2018.
- 23. Becquet R, Marston M, Dabis F, Moulton LH, Gray G, Coovadia HM, et al. Children who acquire HIV infection perinatally are at higher risk of early death than those acquiring infection through breastmilk: a meta-analysis. PloS one. 2012 Feb 23;7(2):e28510. pmid:22383946
- 24. Pandey A, Reddy DC, Ghys PD, Thomas M, Sahu D, Bhattacharya M, et al. Improved estimates of India’s HIV burden in 2006. Indian Journal of Medical Research. 2009 Jan 1;129(1):50–8. pmid:19287057
- 25. Pandey A, Thomas M, Reddy DC, Kant S, Bhattacharya M. Process of estimating the number of people living with HIV in India. Editorial Board Vol. 51 No. 1 January-March 2007. 2007 Jan;51(1). pmid:18232134
- 26. Pandey A, Sahu D, Bakkali T, Reddy DC, Venkatesh S, Kant S, et al. Estimate of HIV prevalence and number of people living with HIV in India 2008–2009. BMJ open. 2012 Jan 1;2(5):e000926. pmid:23028110
- 27. Pandey A, Dhingra N, Kumar P, Sahu D, Reddy DC, Narayan P, et al. Sustained progress, but no room for complacency: Results of 2015 HIV estimations in India. The Indian journal of medical research. 2017 Jul;146(1):83. pmid:29168464
- 28. Sahu D, Kumar P, Chandra N, Rajan S, Shukla DK, Venkatesh S, et al. Findings from the 2017 HIV estimation round & trend analysis of key indicators 2010–2017: evidence for prioritising HIV/AIDS programme in India. The Indian Journal of Medical Research. 2020 Jun;151(6):562.
- 29.
National AIDS Control Organization & ICMR-National Institute of Medical Statistics. India HIV Estimates 2021: Technical Report. New Delhi: NACO, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2022.
- 30.
National AIDS Control Organization. Sankalak: Status of National AIDS Response Fourth edition. New Delhi: NACO, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2022.
- 31.
UNICEF, UNAIDS and WHO, Key considerations for programming and prioritization. Going the ‘Last Mile’ to EMTCT: A road map for ending the HIV epidemic in children, UNICEF, New York; 2020. https://library.unaids.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/1-EMTCT-Whitepaper-EN-WEB-hi-res.pdf
- 32.
International Institute for Population Sciences and ICF. National Family and Household Survey (NFHS). IIPS, Mumbai; 2022.
- 33.
Indian Institute of Public Administration. Evaluation of National AIDS and STD Control Programme; Phase IV & Extension Period. IIPA, New Delhi; 2020.
- 34. Sam-Agudu NA, Ramadhani HO, Isah C, Anaba U, Erekaha S, Fan-Osuala C, et al. The impact of structured mentor mother programs on 6-month postpartum retention and viral suppression among HIV-positive women in rural Nigeria: a prospective paired cohort study. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 2017 Jun 1;75:S173–81. pmid:28498187
- 35. Myer L, Iyun V, Zerbe A, Phillips TK, Brittain K, Mukonda E, et al. Differentiated models of care for postpartum women on antiretroviral therapy in Cape Town, South Africa: a cohort study. Journal of the International AIDS Society. 2017 Jul;20:21636. pmid:28770593
- 36. Audet CM, Blevins M, Chire YM, Aliyu MH, Vaz LM, Antonio E, et al. Engagement of men in antenatal care services: increased HIV testing and treatment uptake in a community participatory action program in Mozambique. AIDS and Behavior. 2016 Sep;20(9):2090–100. pmid:26906021
- 37. Phiri S, Tweya H, van Lettow M, Rosenberg NE, Trapence C, Kapito-Tembo A, et al. Impact of facility-and community-based peer support models on maternal uptake and retention in Malawi’s option B+ HIV prevention of mother-to-child transmission program: a 3-arm cluster randomized controlled trial (PURE Malawi). JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 2017 Jun 1;75:S140–8. pmid:28498183
- 38. Suryavanshi N, Kadam A, Kanade S, Gupte N, Gupta A, Bollinger R, et al. Acceptability and feasibility of a behavioral and mobile health intervention (COMBIND) shown to increase uptake of prevention of mother to child transmission (PMTCT) care in India. BMC Public Health. 2020 Dec;20(1):1–1.
- 39.
World Health Organization. WHO technical brief: preventing HIV during pregnancy and breastfeeding in the context of PrEP. World Health Organization; 2017.
- 40. Joshi S, Kulkarni V, Gangakhedkar R, Mahajan U, Sharma S, Shirole D, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a repeat HIV test in pregnancy in India. BMJ open. 2015 Jun 1;5(6):e006718. pmid:26068507
- 41. Kim LH, Cohan DL, Sparks TN, Pilliod RA, Arinaitwe E, Caughey AB. The cost-effectiveness of repeat HIV testing during pregnancy in a resource-limited setting. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 2013 Jun 1;63(2):195–200. pmid:23392461
- 42. Ghys PD, Williams BG, Over M, Hallett TB, Godfrey-Faussett P. Epidemiological metrics and benchmarks for a transition in the HIV epidemic. PLoS medicine. 2018 Oct 25;15(10):e1002678. pmid:30359372
- 43. Autenrieth CS, Beck EJ, Stelzle D, Mallouris C, Mahy M, Ghys P. Global and regional trends of people living with HIV aged 50 and over: Estimates and projections for 2000–2020. PloS one. 2018 Nov 29;13(11):e0207005. pmid:30496302
- 44. Wang H, Wolock TM, Carter A, Nguyen G, Kyu HH, Gakidou E, et al. Estimates of global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and mortality of HIV, 1980–2015: the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. The Lancet HIV. 2016 Aug 1;3(8):e361–87. pmid:27470028
- 45. Larmarange J, Bendaud V. HIV estimates at second subnational level from national population-based surveys. AIDS (London, England). 2014 Nov;28(4):S469. pmid:25406750
- 46. Mahy M, Marsh K, Sabin K, Wanyeki I, Daher J, Ghys PD. HIV estimates through 2018: data for decision-making. AIDS (London, England). 2019 Dec 12;33(Suppl 3):S203. pmid:31343430
- 47. Stover J, Glaubius R, Kassanjee R, Dugdale CM. Updates to the Spectrum/AIM model for the UNAIDS 2020 HIV estimates. Journal of the International AIDS Society. 2021 Sep;24:e25778. pmid:34546648
- 48. Risher KA, Cori A, Reniers G, Marston M, Calvert C, Crampin A, et al. Age patterns of HIV incidence in eastern and southern Africa: a modelling analysis of observational population-based cohort studies. The Lancet HIV. 2021 Jul 1;8(7):e429–39. pmid:34197773
- 49. Stover J, Brown T, Marston M. Updates to the Spectrum/Estimation and Projection Package (EPP) model to estimate HIV trends for adults and children. Sexually transmitted infections. 2012 Dec 1;88(Suppl 2):i11–6. pmid:23172341
- 50. IeDEA Pediatric Working Group. Taking a critical look at the UNAIDS global estimates on paediatric and adolescent HIV survival and death. Journal of the International AIDS Society. 2017;20(1).
- 51. Marbaniang I, Joshi S, Sangle S, Khaire S, Thakur R, Chavan A, et al. Smokeless tobacco use and oral potentially malignant disorders among people living with HIV (PLHIV) in Pune, India: Implications for oral cancer screening in PLHIV. Plos one. 2022 Jul 5;17(7):e0270876. pmid:35788753
- 52. Kim JH, Jiamsakul A, Kiertiburanakul S, Huy BV, Khusuwan S, Kumarasamy N, et al. Patterns and prognosis of holding regimens for people living with HIV in Asian countries. PloS one. 2022 Mar 30;17(3):e0264157. pmid:35353840
- 53. Risher KA, Cori A, Reniers G, Marston M, Calvert C, Crampin A, et al. Age patterns of HIV incidence in eastern and southern Africa: a modelling analysis of observational population-based cohort studies. The Lancet HIV. 2021 Jul 1;8(7):e429–39. pmid:34197773
- 54. Sinunu MA, Schouten EJ, Wadonda-Kabondo N, Kajawo E, Eliya M, Moyo K, et al. Evaluating the impact of prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV in Malawi through immunization clinic-based surveillance. PloS one. 2014 Jun 26;9(6):e100741. pmid:24968298
- 55. Goga AE, Dinh TH, Jackson DJ, Lombard C, Delaney KP, Puren A, et al. First population-level effectiveness evaluation of a national programme to prevent HIV transmission from mother to child, South Africa. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015;69:240–248. pmid:25371480
- 56. Buzdugan R, Kang Dufour MS, McCoy SI, Watadzaushe C, Dirawo J, Mushavi A, et al. Option A improved HIV-free infant survival and mother to child HIV transmission at 9–18 months in Zimbabwe. AIDS. 2016;30:1655–1662. pmid:27058354
- 57. Stover J, Glaubius R, Mofenson L, Dugdale CM, Davies MA, Patten G, et al. Updates to the Spectrum/AIM model for estimating key HIV indicators at national and subnational levels. AIDS (London, England). 2019 Dec 12;33(Suppl 3):S227. pmid:31805028