Reader Comments
Post a new comment on this article
Post Your Discussion Comment
Please follow our guidelines for comments and review our competing interests policy. Comments that do not conform to our guidelines will be promptly removed and the user account disabled. The following must be avoided:
- Remarks that could be interpreted as allegations of misconduct
- Unsupported assertions or statements
- Inflammatory or insulting language
Thank You!
Thank you for taking the time to flag this posting; we review flagged postings on a regular basis.
close3 things to consider before making your decision
Posted by Zeagerbros on 28 Jan 2010 at 15:06 GMT
The title of the news article says "Sand safer for playground falls"
When you look further into the study, "Granite" sand was used which IS NOT INDICTIVE OF ALL SANDS! It is one specific sand that is primarily available in the Toronto / Ottawa areas. The typical consumer is going to generalize this and say that all sands must be better than EWF. This is anecdotal information in that, they should have done a study using several brands of wood fiber, several types of sand and so forth. Here they mention Fibar and granite sand that I believe was supplied by Hutcheson. Sands are significantly more variable than any of the other surfacing types (some offer great resiliency and displacement, others do not --- whereas engineered wood fiber is relatively consistent from product to product). Other locally available sands will likely not provide the same impact and disbursement properties as Hutcheson Granite Sand.
Let’s compare life threatening injuries which admittedly have been drastically reduced since the creation of new playground standards and the introduction of various types of playground surfaces such as engineered wood fiber. According to table D.2 of the CAN/CSA Z614-2007 standard booklet, you can see EWF provides a critical fall height approximately 20 inches (50cm) greater than that of sand in protecting against head injuries. I think it’s unfortunate that this study fails to mention this.
The third issue would be the imminent passing of an accessibility standard in Canada. The Accessible Built Environment Standard is currently out for public comment but will soon be submitted by the standards development committee to the government for law. The doctor in the news clip mentions that the wood chips don't allow the limb to "slide" but rather the limb "plants" into the surface. This is most likely due to the fact that wood fibers tend to "knit" together to form a soft yet firm and stable surface to allow children with disabilities to travel across it. This has always been the balancing act in the U.S as it pertains to playground surfacing. Some products like loose rubber have excellent impact qualities but pale in comparison to poured in place, rubber tiles or EWF when it comes to accessibility. Engineered wood fiber is the closest playground surfacing choice that tends to have both desired characteristics in a playground surfacing – Great impact attenuating qualities yet firm and stable enough to provide wheelchair access. Sand of any kind just doesn’t give you this.
RE: 3 things to consider before making your decision
plosmedicine replied to Zeagerbros on 04 Feb 2010 at 18:22 GMT
The news article referred to in the above comment can be viewed here: http://www.cbc.ca/health/...
"The Accessible Built Environment Standard" referred to in the above comment can be viewed here: http://www.mcss.gov.on.ca...