Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

The TGFB1 Functional Polymorphism rs1800469 and Susceptibility to Atrial Fibrillation in Two Chinese Han Populations

  • Weixing Zheng ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Weixing Zheng, Chenghui Yan, Xiaohu Wang

    Affiliation Department of Cardiology, Fuzhou General Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China

    ⨯
  • Chenghui Yan ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Weixing Zheng, Chenghui Yan, Xiaohu Wang

    Affiliation Department of Cardiology, Shenyang General Hospital, Shenyang, China

    ⨯
  • Xiaohu Wang ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Weixing Zheng, Chenghui Yan, Xiaohu Wang

    Affiliation Department of Cardiology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China

    ⨯
  • Zhurong Luo,

    Affiliation Department of Cardiology, Fuzhou General Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China

    ⨯
  • Fengping Chen,

    Affiliation Department of Cardiology, Fuzhou General Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China

    ⨯
  • Yuhui Yang,

    Affiliation Department of Cardiology, Fuzhou General Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China

    ⨯
  • Donglin Liu,

    Affiliation Department of Cardiology, Fuzhou General Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China

    ⨯
  • Xiaobo Gai,

    Affiliation Department of Cardiology, Fuzhou General Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China

    ⨯
  • Jianping Hou,

    Affiliation Department of Cardiology, Fuzhou General Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China

    ⨯
  • Mingfang Huang

    huangmf30@aliyun.com

    Affiliation Department of Cardiology, Fuzhou General Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China

    ⨯

Abstract

Transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) is related to the degree of atrial fibrosis and plays critical roles in the induction and perpetuation of atrial fibrillation (AF). To investigate the association of the common promoter polymorphism rs1800469 in the TGF-β1 gene (TGFB1) with the risk of AF in Chinese Han population, we carried out a case-control study of two hospital-based independent populations: Southeast Chinese population (581 patients with AF and 723 controls), and Northeast Chinese population (308 AF patients and 292 controls). Two hundred and seventy-eight cases of AF were lone AF and 334 cases of AF were diagnosed as paroxysmal AF. In both populations, AF patients had larger left atrial diameters than the controls did. The rs1800469 genotypes in the TGFB1 gene were determined by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism. The genotype and allele frequencies of rs1800469 were not different between AF patients and controls of the Southeast Chinese population, Northeast Chinese population, and total Study Population. After adjustment for age, sex, hypertension and LAD, there was no association between the rs1800469 polymorphism and the risk of AF under the dominant, recessive and additive genetic models. Similar results were obtained from subanalysis of the lone and paroxymal AF subgroups. Our results do not support the role of the TGFB1 rs1800469 functional gene variant in the development of AF in the Chinese Han population.

Citation: Zheng W, Yan C, Wang X, Luo Z, Chen F, Yang Y, et al. (2013) The TGFB1 Functional Polymorphism rs1800469 and Susceptibility to Atrial Fibrillation in Two Chinese Han Populations. PLoS ONE 8(12): e83033. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083033

Editor: Xiongwen Chen, Temple University, United States of America

Received: July 30, 2013; Accepted: October 29, 2013; Published: December 12, 2013

Copyright: © 2013 Zheng et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Funding: The present study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province, China (Grant No. 2009J01182 and 2013J01342) and the Key Programs of Science and Technology Commission Foundation of Fujian Province, China (Grant No.2007Y0029). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Atrial fibrillation (AF) , the most common clinical arrhythmia, is responsible for substantial morbidity and mortality in the general population [1,2]. AF is associated with changes in cardiac structure and electrical properties known as structural and electrical remodeling. Atrial fibrosis, a hallmark of arrhythmogenic structural remodeling, can lead to increased nonuniform anisotropy in conduction and has been found to be an important substrate for the induction and perpetuation of AF [3–6].

In the heart, fibrosis is thought to be partially mediated by transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), a potent stimulator of collagen-producing cardiomyofibroblasts [3]. There is growing evidence that TGF-β1 can induce atrial fibrosis and play a major role in AF. Using microarray analysis, Barth et al [7] demonstrated upregulated expression of mRNA in the atria of patients with permanent AF. In patients who underwent both open heart surgery for valvular heart disease and the surgical maze procedure for persistent AF, preoperative plasma TGF-β1 levels were related to the degree of atrial fibrosis and could be used to predict the recurrence of AF at the 1-year follow-up after the surgical maze procedure [8]. In patients with non-paroxysmal AF, the plasma TGF-β1 level is an independent predictor of AF recurrence after catheter ablation [9]. In human AF, Gramley et al noted upregulated TGF-β1 expression at the mRNA and protein levels in atrial tissue at different stages of fibrogenesis [10] .

In canine models, heart failure led to increased atrial TGF-β1 expression and atrial fibrosis, and inhibition of TGF-β1 expression prevented atrial fibrosis and development the AF substrate [11]. In a transgenic mouse model over-expressing constitutively active TGF-β1, there was selective atrial interstitial fibrosis, while ventricular histology was normal [12–14]. This increase in atrial fibrosis was shown to correspond to an increase in conduction heterogeneity and AF vulnerability [13,14]. In another study by the same group, the drug pirfenidone was used to target TGF-β1 expression [15]. Similar results were observed in an experimental model of heart failure, from which increased TGF-β1 expression and atrial fibrosis were reported [11,15], and pirfenidone treatment resulted in a significant reduction of TGF-β1 expression and atrial fibrosis. This reduction in atrial fibrosis also corresponded to a decrease in conduction abnormalities and in AF vulnerability [15].

A number of studies have attempted to determine whether naturally occurring single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the TGF-β1 gene (TGFB1; gene map locus: chromosome 19q13.1-13.3) affect TGFB1 expression and TGF-β1 production. For example, A C-to-T SNP at position -509 relative to the first major transcription start site (-509C>T SNP; rs1800469) was found to be differentially related with transcription factor binding to the TGFB1 promoter, transcriptional activity of TGFB1, and TGF-β1 plasma concentration [16,17]. The 868T>C SNP (rs1982073), which gives rise to an amino acid substitution at position 10 (Leu10Pro), was reported to influence steady-state concentrations of TGFB1 mRNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and serum TGF-β1 levels [18,19]. Other SNPs, such as variants at positions -800 (rs1800468), codon 25 (rs1800471, Arg25Pro), and codon 263 (rs1800472, Thr263Ile), were also reported to be functional and can affect TGF-β1 production and/or activation[16,18–23]. It is reasonable to believe that one of these functional genetic variants is associated with the risk of AF. To the best of our knowledge, none of these SNPs has ever been studied in relation to the risk of AF in a general population.

We hypothesized that functional genetic variations in TGFB1 might contribute to the susceptibility to AF. A high degree of linkage disequilibrium has been observed between rs1800469 and rs1982073 in the Chinese Han population [24–26], whereas the rs1800468, rs1800471, and rs1800472 are extremely rare in the unrelated Chinese individuals [24,26–28]. We focused on rs1800469 as a tagging SNP, to explore its relationship with the risk of AF in two Chinese Han populations in a case-control study.

Patients and Methods

Ethics Statement

The Ethics Committees of Fuzhou General Hospital and Shenyang General Hospital approved this study. All subjects provided informed written consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Populations

The subjects in this study were unrelated Chinese Han from Southeast and Northeast Chinese populations. Subjects from the Southeast Chinese population were patients from Fuzhou General Hospital. We enrolled 581 patients with AF and 723 controls consecutively from June 2007 to April 2010. Subjects from the Northeast Chinese population were patients from Shenyang General Hospital. We enrolled 308 AF patients and 292 controls consecutively from December 2008 to April 2010.

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

For cases, i.e., AF patients, the inclusion criteria were signs and symptoms of AF confirmed by a cardiologist based on at least one 12-lead resting electrocardiogram (ECG). Controls were enrolled from the same ward during the same period as the cases and verified as being free of AF by a cardiologist, based on ECG or medical files. The controls were individually matched with cases according to the following criteria: sex, age (±5 years), area of residence (from the same province), and presence of hypertension.

Subjects with signs of moderate to severe congestive heart failure greater than New York Heart Association class II, any significant valvular disease greater than grade II on a scale of I-IV, dilated or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, congenital heart disease or a history of myocarditis were excluded from the study to avoid the role of disease-related atrial remodeling for the genesis of secondary AF. Further exclusion criteria were any severe concomitant pathologic condition such as hyperthyroidism, acute pneumonia or chronic lung disease, and neoplastic, renal and liver diseases. Subjects with palpitations without ECG documentation were excluded from both the case and control groups. Patients with pacemakers or cardioverter-defibrillator implantation before the occurrence of AF were also excluded.

Protocol

AF was defined as the replacement of sinus P waves by rapid oscillations or fibrillatory waves of varied in size, shape, and timing that were associated with an irregular ventricular response when atrioventricular conduction was intact. The presence of AF was determined from history, followed by serial ECG or ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring. Lone AF was defined as AF occurring in individuals aged <65 years without hypertension, overt structural heart disease, or thyroid dysfunction, as determined by clinical examination, ECG, echocardiography, and thyroid function tests. Paroxysmal AF was defined as AF lasting >30 s that terminated spontaneously. The AF was classified as persistent when it lasted >7 days and required either pharmacological therapy or electrical cardioversion for termination. AF that was completely refractory to cardioversion or that was allowed to continue was classified as permanent [29]. Hypertension was defined according to the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure criteria: systolic blood pressure equal to or over 140 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure equal to or over 90 mm Hg (average of two measurements) or being on treatment with antihypertensive therapy [30]. Current smoking status was determined at the time of blood collection. Dyslipidemia was defined according to the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) [31], and diabetes in agreement with the American Diabetes Association [32].

Twelve-lead ECG, routine laboratory screening, thyroid function test, and echocardiography were performed for all subjects. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed to measure the left atrial dimension (LAD) and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD); we also assessed the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and detected the presence of significant valvular disease, which was defined as moderate to severe valvular regurgitation or stenosis.

DNA Extraction and Genotyping

DNA was extracted from ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid anti-coagulated peripheral blood using a commercially available kit (Beijing CoWin Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) as described previously and stored at −20 °C [33].

The genotype of the -509C>T (rs1800469) polymorphism of the TGFB1 gene was determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-restriction fragment length polymorphism. In briefly, to detect the -509C>T polymorphism in the promoter, the primers 5`-CCC GGC TCC ATT TCC AGG TG-3` and 5`-GGT CAC CAG AGA AAG AGG AC-3` were used to PCR-amplify a fragment of the TGFB1 gene [34]. The PCR was performed in a 25-μl reaction containing 25-50 ng genomic DNA, 1х PCR buffer, 2.0 mmol/l MgCl2, 200 μmol/l dNTP, 10 pmol of each primer, and 0.5 U of Ex Taq DNA polymerase (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). Amplification conditions were as follows: an initial activation step of 94°C for 5 min followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 60°C for 30 s, extension at 72°C for 1 min, and a final extension step at 72°C for 10 min.

The resultant 808-bp fragment was digested at 37°C for overnight using restriction enzyme Eco81I (TaKaRa, Darlian, China). Eco81I does not digest the T allele, but digest the C allele into 617-bp and 191-bp fragments.

Standard precautions to avoid contamination during PCR were taken. A negative control serum was included in each reaction to ensure specificity. Two researchers, who were blinded to the clinical data performed the genotyping independently. If there was any discordance between their findings, a third researcher would perform the genotyping and determine whether it was necessary to repeat the assay. Additionally, about 10% of the samples were randomly selected to perform the repeat assays, the results were 100% concordant. Furthermore, approximately 3% of the samples were randomly selected for direct sequencing, and the results were 100% concordant.

Statistical Analysis

The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was performed to evaluate the normality of data distribution. Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± SD or median and interquartile ranges as appropriate. Statistical significance of differences in quantitative variables was tested using the Student’s independent samples t-test and analysis of covariance or the nonparametric Wilcoxon test for normally or non-normally distributed variables, respectively. Categorical data are presented as frequencies (percentage). Differences between categorical variables, genotype/allele frequencies, and Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium were tested by the χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test. The association between the rs1800469 polymorphism and AF was assessed using logistic regression analysis under dominant, recessive, and additive genetic models. Variables such as age, sex, hypertension, and LAD were included in the multivariate model. We determined the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval. Analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows Version 11.5 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Two-sided P-values <0.05 were considered significant.

The software package Quanto 2.4 (http://hydra.usc.edu/gxe) was used for power calculations. Based on the minor allele frequency of 0.442 for rs1800469 as reported in the haplotype may of the CHB population, and assuming a dominant model, the study had >80% statistical power to detect an association (at P < 0.05) with an OR of 1.40, indicating a very low risk of a false-negative result.

Results

There were 889 patients with AF and 1015 controls. Two hundred and seventy-eight cases of AF were lone AF (146 and 132 cases in the Southeast and Northeast Chinese population, respectively) and 334 cases of AF were diagnosed as paroxysmal AF (192 and 142 cases in the Southeast and Northeast Chinese population, respectively). As expected, AF patients in both study populations had larger LAD than the controls did (Southeast and Northeast Chinese cases vs. controls: 4.2 cm vs. 3.7 cm; and 4.1 cm vs. 3.6 cm, respectively, both P < 0.001). However, no significant differences were observed between the cases and controls with regard to age, sex distribution, and cardiovascular risk factors, such as hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and smoking habits in both study populations. Moreover, the distribution of other clinical characteristics such as height, weight and body mass index, LVEF and LVEDD were not significantly different in both the cases and controls (Table 1).

Southeast Chinese populationNortheast Chinese population
CharacteristicscasesControlsPcasesControlsP
Sample size, n581723308292
Age-range, years21-9235-9332-9040-92
Age, years70.6 ± 11.170.6 ± 10.20.99266.4 ± 11.266.0 ± 10.10.671
Gender (male/female), n361/220444/2790.789212/96197/950.720
Hypertension, n (%)249 (42.9)296 (41.0)0.486142 (46.1)132 (45.2)0.825
Diabetes mellitus, n (%)100 (17.2)106 (14.7)0.20965 (21.1)69 (23.6)0.458
Dyslipidemia, n (%)110 (18.9)151 (20.9)0.38170 (22.7)59 (20.2)0.452
Smoking, n (%)130 (22.4)187 (25.9)0.144109 (35.4)92 (31.5)0.314
Height,cm165.5 ± 7.4164.8 ± 7.20.103168.1 ± 5.9167.6 ± 5.50.242
Weight, kg67.0 ± 9.566.2 ± 9.80.18970.7 ± 8.070.4 ± 7.10.617
BMI, kg/m224.5 ± 2.724.3 ± 2.90.29525.0 ± 2.425.1 ± 2.20.701
LAD, cm4.2 (3.8-4.7)3.7 (3.3-4.1)< 0.0014.1 (3.6-4.6)3.6 (3.3-4.0)< 0.001
LVEF, %61 (58-64)62 (59-64)0.06959 (56-64)60 (57-64)0.155
LVEDD, cm4.7 (4.4-5.1)4.7 (4.5-5.0)0.3324.7 (4.4-5.1)4.7 (4.3-4.9)0.216

Table 1. Clinical characteristics of cases and controls.

Values are mean±SD, n (%), or median (interquartile range).
BMI indicates body mass index; LAD, left atrial dimension; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LVEDD, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter.
CSV
Download CSV

The demographic and clinical characteristics of the study populations are reported in Table S1. There were significant differences in the years of AF, age, height, weight, body mass index, and LVEF between the Southeast and Northeast Chinese population. Significant differences were also found in sex ratio, the ratio of paroxysmal, permanent, and lone AF, diabetes mellitus, smoking, and use of antiarrhythmic medication between the two populations. There were no significant differences in the ratio of hypertension, dyslipidemia, persistent AF, LAD, LVEDD, and use of anticoagulant and β-blocker medication between the two populations.

The genotype distribution and allele frequencies of the rs1800469 polymorphism in the TGFB1 gene are listed in Tables 2-4. The genotype distributions of the SNP in all groups were consistent with those expected for samples in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Despite their geographical distance (Southeast and Northeast China), there was no difference in genotype distribution of the SNP between the two populations in control groups. The respective genotype and allele frequencies of the rs1800469 polymorphism were not different between AF patients and controls in the Southeast Chinese population, Northeast Chinese population and total study population. After adjustment for age, sex, hypertension, and LAD, there was no association between the SNP rs1800469 polymorphism and the risk of AF under the dominant, recessive and additive genetic models in the Southeast Chinese population, Northeast Chinese population and total study populations (Table 5). We further investigated whether the SNP was associated with lone AF and paroxysmal AF. There were no significant differences in the genotype and allele frequencies of the rs1800469 and no association between the rs1800469 and the risk of AF between lone AF patients and controls, and between paroxysmal AF patients and controls in the Southeast Chinese population, Northeast Chinese population and total study populations (Tables 2-5).

Genotypes and allelesControls (n = 723)Cases (n = 581)OR (95% CI)PLone AF (n = 146)OR (95% CI)PParoxysmal AF (n = 192)OR (95% CI)P
CC196 (27.1)159 (27.4)Reference39 (26.7)Reference59 (30.8)Reference
CT356 (49.2)301 (51.8)1.04 (0.80-1.35)0.75575 (51.4)1.06 (0.69-1.62)0.79288 (45.8)1.22 (0.84-1.77)0.300
TT171 (23.7)121 (20.8)0.87 (0.64-1.19)0.39232 (21.9)0.94 (0.56-1.57)0.81445 (23.4)1.14 (0.74-1.77)0.548
HWE0.7060.3280.7190.277
C748 (51.7)619 (53.3)Reference153 (52.4)Reference206 (53.6)Reference
T698 (48.3)543 (46.7)0.94 (0.81-1.10)0.433139 (47.6)0.97 (0.89-1.17)0.835178 (46.4)1.08 (0.86-1.35)0.504

Table 2. Genotype distribution and allele frequencies of

-509C>T polymorphism in the Southeast Chinese population.

Genotype distribution and allelic status were analyzed with the χ2 value test. Values are given as n (%).
Genotype distribution of the SNP between groups: for AF patients: global χ2=1.578, df=2, P=0.454; for lone AF patients: global χ2=0.275, df=2, P=0.872; for paroxysmal AF patients: global χ2=1.079, df=2, P=0.583;
AF, atrial fibrillation; HWE, P-value for exact Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium test; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
CSV
Download CSV
Genotypes and allelesControls (n = 292)Cases (n = 308)OR (95% CI)PLone AF (n = 132)OR (95% CI)PParoxysmal AF (n = 142)OR (95% CI)P
CC88 (30.1)83 (26.9)Reference39 (29.6)Reference38 (26.8)Reference
CT152 (52.1)160 (52.0)1.12 (0.77-1.62)0.56463 (47.7)0.94 (0.58-1.51)0.78473 (51.4)0.90 (0.56-1.44)0.659
TT52 (17.8)65 (21.1)1.33 (0.83-2.13)0.24230 (22.7)1.30 (0.72-2.34)0.37831 (21.8)0.72 (0.40-1.30)0.279
HWE0.3290.4560.6380.715
C328 (56.2)326 (52.9)Reference141 (53.4)Reference149 (52.5)Reference
T256 (43.8)290 (47.1)1.14 (0.91-1.43)0.260123 (46.6)1.12 (0.84-1.50)0.455135 (47.5)0.86 (0.65-1.15)0.304

Table 3. Genotype distribution and allele frequencies of -509C>T polymorphism in the Northeast Chinese population.

Genotype distribution and allelic status were analyzed with the χ2 value test. Values are given as n (%).
Genotype distribution of the SNP between groups: for AF patients: global χ2=1.370, df=2, P=0.504; for lone AF patients: global χ2=1.484, df=2, P=0.476; for paroxysmal AF patients: global χ2=1.191, df=2, P=0.551;
AF, atrial fibrillation; HWE, P-value for exact Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium test; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
CSV
Download CSV
Genotypes and allelesControls (n = 1015)Cases (n = 889)OR (95% CI)PLone AF (n = 278)OR (95% CI)PParoxysmal AF (n = 334)OR (95% CI)P
CC284 (27.9)242 (27.2)Reference78 (28.1)Reference97 (29.0)Reference
CT508 (50.1)461 (51.9)1.07 (0.86-1.32)0.562138 (49.6)0.99 (0.72-1.35)0.945161 (48.2)1.08 (0.81-1.44)0.614
TT223 (22.0)186 (20.9)0.98 (0.76-1.27)0.87262 (22.3)1.01 (0.70-1.48)0.94976 (22.8)1.00 (0.71-1.42)0.990
HWE0.8830.2190.9480.557
C1076 (53.0)945 (53.1)Reference294 (52.9)Reference355 (53.1)Reference
T954 (47.0)833 (46.9)0.99 (0.88-1.13)0.929262 (47.1)1.01 (0.83-1.21)0.958313 (46.9)1.01 (0.84-1.20)0.950

Table 4. Genotype distribution and allele frequencies of -509C>T polymorphism in total study population.

Genotype distribution and allelic status were analyzed with the χ2 value test. Values are given as n (%).
Genotype distribution of the SNP between groups: for AF patients: global χ2=0.645, df=2, P=0.724; for lone AF patients: global χ2=0.019, df=2, P=0.991; for paroxysmal AF patients: global χ2=0.343, df=2, P=0.843;
AF, atrial fibrillation; HWE, P-value for exact Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium test; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
CSV
Download CSV
Controls, nCases, nM1 OR (95% CI)aPM2 OR (95% CI)aPM3 OR (95% CI)aP
Southeast Chinese population7235810.98 (0.73-1.30)0.8640.95 (0.73-1.24)0.7011.06 (0.84-1.34)0.630
Northeast Chinese population2923081.27 (0.82-1.97)0.2770.75 (0.51-1.10)0.1431.08 (0.77-1.53)0.644
Total study population10158891.03 (0.81-1.30)0.8310.89 (0.72-1.11)0.2981.08 (0.89-1.31)0.453
Lone AF 10152781.00 (0.83-1.22)0.9640.98 (0.74-1.24)0.7371.05 (0.83-1.32)0.690
Paroxysmal AF10153341.06 (0.90-1.24)0.4980.97 (0.73-1.30)0.8521.03 (0.85-1.24)0.782

Table 5. Association between the -509C>T polymorphism with atrial fibrillation.

a Adjusted for age, gender, hypertension and Left atrial dimension.
AF indicates atrial fibrillation; M1, dominant model; M2, recessive model; M3, additive model; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
CSV
Download CSV

We investigated the association between the SNP genotype and other risk factors for AF. Table S2 lists the demographic data, clinical parameters, cardiovascular risk factors, and echocardiographic features of the three genotypes. None of these parameters was significantly different among the three groups.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to exam the association between the rs1800469 polymorphism of the TGFB1 gene and susceptibility to AF. We did not observe a significant difference in the genotype or allele frequencies of this SNP between AF patients and controls in the Southeast Chinese population, Northeast Chinese population and total study populations. Emerging data supports the premise that lone AF and paroxysmal AF are mechanistically different from non-lone and non-paroxymal AF phenotypes [35,36]. Thus, we performed a subanalysis of the AF population. There were similar findings for the lone AF and paroxysmal AF subgroups. Our results suggest that rs1800469 of the TGFB1 gene is not related to AF susceptibility in the Chinese Han population.

The TGFB1 gene was analyzed as a candidate gene for AF because of its functional relation with the modulation of tissue fibrosis, upregulated expression in experimental and human AF [7–11,15,37], as well as selective atrial fibrosis and increased AF inducibility in cardiac-specific overexpression of constitutively active TGFB1 in mice [12–14]. Promoter polymorphisms and non-synonymous variants are generally considered likely causal variants themselves and not merely markers associated by linkage disequilibrium to causal variants in their vicinity. Several such variants in the TGFB1 gene with possible functional significance have been reported [16–23]. In the present study, we examined the association between rs1800469 of the TGFB1 gene and susceptibility to AF. Cases and controls were matched by geographic regions, and the two study populations comprised a single Chinese Han ethnicity. There was no difference in genotype distribution of rs1800469 between controls in the two populations, rendering the risk of stratification of the populations for the polymorphism unlikely. The minor allele frequency of rs1800469 was 0.442, similar to that previously reported in normal Chinese Han populations [24–27,38]. Assuming an additive genetic model, our sample size had >80% power to detect an association with an OR for disease of >1.2. Under a dominant or a recessive model, association with an OR of >1.4 was detected. The power of the study was thus sufficient to detect associations of modest magnitude. We found no significant association between the common SNP rs1800469 of the TGFB1 gene and the risk of AF. The rs1800473 polymorphism (868T>C, Leu10Pro), in strong linkage disequilibrium with the rs1800469 polymorphism in the Chinese Han population [24–26], is theoretically not related to susceptibility to AF. Our results were consistent with that of Wang et al. [39] who noted no significant association between the rs1800473 and the risk of AF in subjects with essential hypertension. These results indicated that the effect of the functional SNP effect did not significantly increase the risk of AF. Although we were unable to examine TGFB1 gene expression, there is evidence that the SNP involved in the present candidate gene study has functional significance, and likely alters the promoter-reporter activity and plasma concentration of TGF-β1 [16,17]. However, the function of the TGF-β1 protein may be too complex for a single variant effect, and the true relationship between TGF-β1 and AF may lie in gene-gene or gene-environment interactions.

Recent genome-wide association studies of AF have focused on a few chromosomal regions with strong signals [40–43]. Despite such studies yielding promising results, a large percentage of the heritability of AF remains unexplained [44]. A growing number of researchers are turning to rare genetic changes with strong effects as important contributors [45,46]. The variants at positions -800, of codon 25 or 263 of the TGFB1 gene are rare variants in unrelated Chinese Han individuals [24,26–28]. The rs1800468 polymorphism is located in a partial putative cyclic adenosine monophosphate response element-binding protein consensus site and may alter transcription [16]. The rs1800471 polymorphism was found to be related to TGF-β1 production in peripheral blood leukocytes [19–22], and functional analysis of rs1800472 with a luciferase reporter assay demonstrated that the protective variant I263 of the TGFB1 gene is more active than the T263 variant [23]. These rare SNPs may be related with the risk of AF. However, our sample did not have sufficient power to detect the effect of any rare variants with a frequency of < 0.05. The rapid development of next-generation sequencing allows reliable detection of associations between rare variants and AF in larger populations [47,48]. Future research involving large-scale studies is needed to extend the present findings by detecting associations between these rare variants and the risk of AF in independent populations.

The present study has several limitations. First, different geographical and racial backgrounds of the individuals studied can affect the results of an association study. Therefore, our findings need to be confirmed in other populations. Moreover, potential selection bias might have occurred because control subjects selection in our study was hospital-based. Lastly, we cannot exclude the presence of asymptomatic AF in the controls even though we conducted an accurate interview weighted to symptoms related to dysrhythmias.

In summary, our results did not indicate a direct influence of the TGFB1 rs1800469 functional gene polymorphism in increased risk of AF in two Chinese Han populations. Further studies are required to elucidate the role of this gene in the predisposition to AF.

Supporting Information

Table S1.

Clinical Characteristics of the study population.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083033.s001

(DOC)

Table S2.

Clinical features in study subjects by TGF-β1 -509C>T genotype.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083033.s002

(DOC)

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to all patients for their invaluable collaboration. We also thank Xi Meng and Jinge Ouyang for their help in recruiting the patients.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: WZ CY XW ZL MH. Performed the experiments: WZ CY XW ZL FC YY DL MH. Analyzed the data: CY XW ZL FC JH XG YY DL MH. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: WZ CY XW ZL FC YY DL XG JH MH. Wrote the manuscript: WZ CY XW ZL MH.

References

  1. 1. Nattel S (2002) New ideas about atrial fibrillation 50 years on. Nature 415: 219-226. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/415219a. PubMed: 11805846.
  2. 2. Heeringa J, van der Kuip DA, Hofman A, Kors JA, van Herpen G et al. (2006) Prevalence, incidence and lifetime risk of atrial fibrillation: the Rotterdam study. Eur Heart J 27: 949-953. PubMed: 16527828.
  3. 3. Akiyama-Uchida Y, Ashizawa N, Ohtsuru A, Seto S, Tsukazaki T et al. (2002) Norepinephrine enhances fibrosis mediated by TGF-beta in cardiac fibroblasts. Hypertension 40: 148-154. doi:https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.0000025443.61926.12. PubMed: 12154105.
  4. 4. Li D, Fareh S, Leung TK, Nattel S (1999) Promotion of atrial fibrillation by heart failure in dogs: atrial remodeling of a different sort. Circulation 100: 87-95. doi:https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.100.1.87. PubMed: 10393686.
  5. 5. Li D, Shinagawa K, Pang L, Leung TK, Cardin S et al. (2001) Effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on the development of the atrial fibrillation substrate in dogs with ventricular tachypacing-induced congestive heart failure. Circulation 104: 2608-2614. doi:https://doi.org/10.1161/hc4601.099402. PubMed: 11714658.
  6. 6. Aldhoon B, Melenovský V, Peichl P, Kautzner J (2010) New insights into mechanisms of atrial fibrillation. Physiol Res 59: 1-12. PubMed: 19249911.
  7. 7. Barth AS, Merk S, Arnoldi E, Zwermann L, Kloos P et al. (2005) Reprogramming of the human atrial transcriptome in permanent atrial fibrillation: expression of a ventricular-like genomic signature. Circ Res 96: 1022-1029. doi:https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.0000165480.82737.33. PubMed: 15817885.
  8. 8. On YK, Jeon ES, Lee SY, Shin DH, Choi JO et al. (2009) Plasma transforming growth factor beta1 as a biochemical marker to predict the persistence of atrial fibrillation after the surgical maze procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 137: 1515-1520. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.10.022. PubMed: 19464473.
  9. 9. Wu CH, Hu YF, Chou CY, Lin YJ, Chang SL et al. (2012) Transforming growth factor-beta(1) level and outcome after catheter ablation for nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm Epub ahead of print.
  10. 10. Gramley F, Lorenzen J, Koellensperger E, Kettering K, Weiss C et al. (2010) Atrial fibrosis and atrial fibrillation: the role of the TGF-beta1 signaling pathway. Int J Cardiol 143: 405-413. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2009.03.110. PubMed: 19394095.
  11. 11. Hanna N, Cardin S, Leung TK, Nattel S (2004) Differences in atrial versus ventricular remodeling in dogs with ventricular tachypacing-induced congestive heart failure. Cardiovasc Res 63: 236-244. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardiores.2004.03.026. PubMed: 15249181.
  12. 12. Nakajima H, Nakajima HO, Salcher O, Dittiè AS, Dembowsky K et al. (2000) Atrial but not ventricular fibrosis in mice expressing a mutant transforming growth factor-beta(1) transgene in the heart. Circ Res 86: 571-579. doi:https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.86.5.571. PubMed: 10720419.
  13. 13. Verheule S, Sato T, Everett Tt, Engle SK, Otten D, et al. (2004) Increased vulnerability to atrial fibrillation in transgenic mice with selective atrial fibrosis caused by overexpression of TGF-beta1. Circ Res 94: 1458-1465.
  14. 14. Choi EK, Chang PC, Lee YS, Lin SF, Zhu W et al. (2012) Triggered firing and atrial fibrillation in transgenic mice with selective atrial fibrosis induced by overexpression of TGF-beta1. Circ J 76: 1354-1362. doi:https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-11-1301. PubMed: 22447020.
  15. 15. Lee KW, Everett TH, Rahmutula D, Guerra JM, Wilson E et al. (2006) Pirfenidone prevents the development of a vulnerable substrate for atrial fibrillation in a canine model of heart failure. Circulation 114: 1703-1712. doi:https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.624320. PubMed: 17030685.
  16. 16. Grainger DJ, Heathcote K, Chiano M, Snieder H, Kemp PR et al. (1999) Genetic control of the circulating concentration of transforming growth factor type beta1. Hum Mol Genet 8: 93-97. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/8.1.93. PubMed: 9887336.
  17. 17. Silverman ES, Palmer LJ, Subramaniam V, Hallock A, Mathew S et al. (2004) Transforming growth factor-beta1 promoter polymorphism C-509T is associated with asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 169: 214-219. doi:https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200307-973OC. PubMed: 14597484.
  18. 18. Cambien F, Ricard S, Troesch A, Mallet C, Générénaz L et al. (1996) Polymorphisms of the transforming growth factor-beta 1 gene in relation to myocardial infarction and blood pressure. The Etude Cas-Temoin de l'Infarctus du Myocarde (ECTIM) Study. Hypertension 28: 881-887. doi:https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.28.5.881. PubMed: 8901839.
  19. 19. Awad MR, El-Gamel A, Hasleton P, Turner DM, Sinnott PJ et al. (1998) Genotypic variation in the transforming growth factor-beta1 gene: association with transforming growth factor-beta1 production, fibrotic lung disease, and graft fibrosis after lung transplantation. Transplantation 66: 1014-1020. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-199810270-00009. PubMed: 9808485.
  20. 20. Dunning AM, Ellis PD, McBride S, Kirschenlohr HL, Healey CS et al. (2003) A transforming growth factorbeta1 signal peptide variant increases secretion in vitro and is associated with increased incidence of invasive breast cancer. Cancer Res 63: 2610-2615. PubMed: 12750287.
  21. 21. Yokota M, Ichihara S, Lin TL, Nakashima N, Yamada Y (2000) Association of a T29--C polymorphism of the transforming growth factor-beta1 gene with genetic susceptibility to myocardial infarction in Japanese. Circulation 101: 2783-2787. doi:https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.101.24.2783. PubMed: 10859282.
  22. 22. Suthanthiran M, Li B, Song JO, Ding R, Sharma VK et al. (2000) Transforming growth factor-beta 1 hyperexpression in African-American hypertensives: A novel mediator of hypertension and/or target organ damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97: 3479-3484. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.050420897. PubMed: 10725360.
  23. 23. Thys M, Schrauwen I, Vanderstraeten K, Janssens K, Dieltjens N et al. (2007) The coding polymorphism T263I in TGF-beta1 is associated with otosclerosis in two independent populations. Hum Mol Genet 16: 2021-2030. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddm150. PubMed: 17588962.
  24. 24. Guo W, Dong Z, Guo Y, Chen Z, Yang Z et al. (2011) Polymorphisms of transforming growth factor-beta1 associated with increased risk of gastric cardia adenocarcinoma in north China. Int J Immunogenet 38: 215-224. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-313X.2010.00991.x. PubMed: 21205231.
  25. 25. Shu XO, Gao YT, Cai Q, Pierce L, Cai H et al. (2004) Genetic polymorphisms in the TGF-beta 1 gene and breast cancer survival: a report from the Shanghai Breast Cancer Study. Cancer Res 64: 836-839. doi:https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-3492. PubMed: 14871809.
  26. 26. Wang H, Zhao YP, Gao CF, Ji Q, Gressner AM et al. (2008) Transforming growth factor beta 1 gene variants increase transcription and are associated with liver cirrhosis in Chinese. Cytokine 43: 20-25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cyto.2008.04.013. PubMed: 18547814.
  27. 27. Zhang Y, Liu B, Jin M, Ni Q, Liang X et al. (2009) Genetic polymorphisms of transforming growth factor-beta1 and its receptors and colorectal cancer susceptibility: a population-based case-control study in China. Cancer Lett 275: 102-108. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2008.10.017. PubMed: 19036501.
  28. 28. Liu DS, Li XO, Ying BW, Chen L, Wang T et al. (2010) Effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms 869 T/C and 915 G/C in the exon 1 locus of transforming growth factor-beta1 gene on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease susceptibility in Chinese. Chin Med J (Engl) 123: 390-394. PubMed: 20193474.
  29. 29. Fuster V, Rydén LE, Asinger RW, Cannom DS, Crijns HJ et al. (2001) ACC/AHA/ESC Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Executive Summary A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines and Policy Conferences (Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) Developed in Collaboration With the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Circulation 104: 2118-2150. PubMed: 11673357.
  30. 30. Cifkova R, Erdine S, Fagard R, Farsang C, Heagerty AM et al. (2003) Practice guidelines for primary care physicians: 2003 ESH/ESC hypertension guidelines. J Hypertens 21: 1779-1786. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00004872-200310000-00001. PubMed: 14508180.
  31. 31. Warnick GR, Myers GL, Cooper GR, Rifai N (2002) Impact of the third cholesterol report from the adult treatment panel of the national cholesterol education program on the clinical laboratory. Clin Chem 48: 11-17. PubMed: 11751533.
  32. 32. Genuth S, Alberti KG, Bennett P, Buse J, Defronzo R et al. (2003) Follow-up report on the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 26: 3160-3167. doi:https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.26.11.3160. PubMed: 14578255.
  33. 33. Gai X, Lan X, Luo Z, Wang F, Liang Y et al. (2009) Association of MMP-9 gene polymorphisms with atrial fibrillation in hypertensive heart disease patients. Clin Chim Acta 408: 105-109. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2009.07.020. PubMed: 19665460.
  34. 34. Qi P, Ruan CP, Wang H, Zhou FG, Zhao YP et al. (2010) 509C>T polymorphism in the TGF-beta1 gene promoter is not associated with susceptibility to and progression of colorectal cancer in Chinese. Colorectal Dis 12: 1153-1158. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02079.x. PubMed: 19863608.
  35. 35. Cuculich PS, Wang Y, Lindsay BD, Faddis MN, Schuessler RB et al. (2010) Noninvasive characterization of epicardial activation in humans with diverse atrial fibrillation patterns. Circulation 122: 1364-1372. doi:https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.945709. PubMed: 20855661.
  36. 36. Kottkamp H (2013) Human atrial fibrillation substrate: towards a specific fibrotic atrial cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J 34: 2731-2738. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht194. PubMed: 23761394.
  37. 37. Polyakova V, Miyagawa S, Szalay Z, Risteli J, Kostin S (2008) Atrial extracellular matrix remodelling in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Cell Mol Med 12: 189-208. PubMed: 18194448.
  38. 38. Jin G, Deng Y, Miao R, Hu Z, Zhou Y et al. (2008) TGFB1 and TGFBR2 functional polymorphisms and risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a case-control analysis in a Chinese population. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 134: 345-351. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-007-0290-1. PubMed: 17680270.
  39. 39. Wang Y, Hou X, Li Y (2010) Association between transforming growth factor beta1 polymorphisms and atrial fibrillation in essential hypertensive subjects. J Biomed Sci 17: 23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1423-0127-17-S1-S23. PubMed: 20356380.
  40. 40. Gudbjartsson DF, Arnar DO, Helgadottir A, Gretarsdottir S, Holm H et al. (2007) Variants conferring risk of atrial fibrillation on chromosome 4q25. Nature 448: 353-357. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06007. PubMed: 17603472.
  41. 41. Gudbjartsson DF, Holm H, Gretarsdottir S, Thorleifsson G, Walters GB et al. (2009) A sequence variant in ZFHX3 on 16q22 associates with atrial fibrillation and ischemic stroke. Nat Genet 41: 876-878. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.417. PubMed: 19597491.
  42. 42. Benjamin EJ, Rice KM, Arking DE, Pfeufer A, van Noord C et al. (2009) Variants in ZFHX3 are associated with atrial fibrillation in individuals of European ancestry. Nat Genet 41: 879-881. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.416. PubMed: 19597492.
  43. 43. Ellinor PT, Lunetta KL, Glazer NL, Pfeufer A, Alonso A et al. (2010) Common variants in KCNN3 are associated with lone atrial fibrillation. Nat Genet 42: 240-244. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.537. PubMed: 20173747.
  44. 44. Manolio TA, Collins FS, Cox NJ, Goldstein DB, Hindorff LA et al. (2009) Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature 461: 747-753. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08494. PubMed: 19812666.
  45. 45. Cirulli ET, Goldstein DB (2010) Uncovering the roles of rare variants in common disease through whole-genome sequencing. Nat Rev Genet 11: 415-425. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2779. PubMed: 20479773.
  46. 46. Bodmer W, Bonilla C (2008) Common and rare variants in multifactorial susceptibility to common diseases. Nat Genet 40: 695-701. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.f.136. PubMed: 18509313.
  47. 47. Mardis ER (2008) Next-generation DNA sequencing methods. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 9: 387-402. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genom.9.081307.164359. PubMed: 18576944.
  48. 48. Shendure J, Ji H (2008) Next-generation DNA sequencing. Nat Biotechnol 26: 1135-1145. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1486. PubMed: 18846087.