Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Spiroplasma infection in Harmonia axyridis - Diversity and multiple infection

  • Irina Goryacheva ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Irina Goryacheva, Alla Blekhman, Boris Andrianov, Denis Romanov, Ilya Zakharov

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis

    Affiliation Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

  • Alla Blekhman ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Irina Goryacheva, Alla Blekhman, Boris Andrianov, Denis Romanov, Ilya Zakharov

    Roles Data curation, Resources

    Affiliation Koltsov Institute of Developmental Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

  • Boris Andrianov ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Irina Goryacheva, Alla Blekhman, Boris Andrianov, Denis Romanov, Ilya Zakharov

    Roles Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    andrianovb@mail.ru

    Affiliation Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

  • Denis Romanov ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Irina Goryacheva, Alla Blekhman, Boris Andrianov, Denis Romanov, Ilya Zakharov

    Roles Investigation, Validation, Visualization

    Affiliation Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

  • Ilya Zakharov

    Contributed equally to this work with: Irina Goryacheva, Alla Blekhman, Boris Andrianov, Denis Romanov, Ilya Zakharov

    Roles Formal analysis, Resources, Supervision

    Affiliation Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

Correction

9 Aug 2018: The PLOS ONE Staff (2018) Correction: Spiroplasma infection in Harmonia axyridis - Diversity and multiple infection. PLOS ONE 13(8): e0202444. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202444 View correction

Abstract

The heritable endosymbiotic bacterium Spiroplasma is found in the harlequin ladybird Harmonia axyridis. The proportion of beetles infected with Spiroplasma in different native H. axyridis populations varies from 2% to 49%. We investigated the polymorphism of Spiroplasma strains in samples from individual beetles from Kyoto, Vladivostok, Troitsa Bay, Novosibirsk, and Gorno-Altaisk. To identify Spiroplasma strains, we analyzed nucleotide polymorphisms of the 16S rRNA gene and the ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS1). The majority of infected beetles were infected with two or more Spiroplasma strains. We measured Spiroplasma density in beetles with different infection status using quantitative PCR. The abundance of Spiroplasma in samples with a single infection is an order of magnitude lower than in samples with multiple infections. Density dependent biological effects of Spiroplasma are discussed.

Introduction

Many insect species are infected with intracellular symbiotic bacteria, which are inherited maternally and affect host reproduction. Among such bacteria, Wolbachia, Spiroplasma, Rickettsia, and Cardinium are widely known. Spiroplasma is one of the most prevalent and well characterized facultative insect endosymbionts, and it is estimated to infect 5–10% of all insect species [1, 2]. This bacterium is an endosymbiont of some members of all the main insect orders: Coleoptera [38], Diptera [1, 915], Hemiptera [1618], Homoptera [1922], Lepidoptera [23, 24], and Odonata [25]. Spiroplasma is found in the midgut, filter chamber, malpighian tubules, hindgut, fat tissues, hemocytes, muscle, trachea, salivary glands, reproductive tissues and eggs [23, 26, 27]. Phylogenetic reconstruction of the genus Spiroplasma using the 16S rRNA gene sequences revealed that the genus comprises four distinct clades: the Ixodetis clade, the Citri-Chrysopicola-Mirum clade, the Apis clade sensu lato, and the Mycoides-Entomoplasmataceae clade [28, 29].

In insects, the effects of symbiosis with Spiroplasma range from mutualistic to parasitic. In some insects, Spiroplasma determines male-killing at an embryogenesis stage [5, 8, 30], resulting in strongly female-biased offspring. The male-killing spiroplasmas are known in Drosophila [31, 32], ladybird beetles: Adalia bipunctata, Anisosticta novemdecimpunctata, Harmonia axyridis, Menochilius sexmaculatus [3, 5, 6, 8, 33]; in lepidopterans: Danaus chrysippus, Ostrinia zaguliaevi [23, 24], and in Oriental tea tortrix (Homona magnanima) [34]. Male-killing Spiroplasmas from Drosophila belong to the Citri-Chrysopicola-Mirum clade [15]. The male-killing effect for Spiroplasma strains in their native host is density-dependent [35]. Strains that do not exhibit male-killing effect have a lower Spiroplasma density at all stages of the host’s life cycle compared with the male-killing Spiroplasma strains. The highest density at all stages of the Drosophila life cycle was noted for male-killing Spiroplasma which infects Drosophila melanogaster. A strain that causes male-killing in D. melanogaster (its native host) also does so in Drosophila neotestacea, even though these insects diverged 40–60 mya, indicating that male-killing is not strongly dependent on host genetic background [36]. In H. axyridis, Spiroplasma induces early male-killing phenomena in some Japanese populations revealed by genetic and cytological analysis [3], and much later Spiroplasma infection of Japanese and continental populations of H. axyridis was confirmed by molecular-genetic methods [6, 33]. This Spiroplasma belongs to the Ixodetis clade. Japanese populations of H. axyridis are infected with two strains of Spiroplasma, named HARFUKU1 and HARFUKU2 [37]. The proportion of females infected with Spiroplasma in different populations was estimated to be 49% in Sapporo [38], 4% in Muikamachi and 14% in Fukuyama [37], about 10% in Western Siberia [33], and about 2% in the Altai [38]. In all these populations, there was a shift in the sex ratio toward females. In addition, to male-killing, Spiroplasma also affects other biological characteristics of infected H. axyridis females, such as reduced adult female survival and reduced female embryo survival [39, 40]; reduced development time, with the strongest effect seen at the larval stage; and increased body size of infected insects [41]. Greater body size in Spiroplasma-infected H. axyridis corresponds to a greater ovariole number [41]. Data on the effect of Sprioplasma on the H. axyridis fertility are ambiguous. Some authors report a reduced fertility of females infected with Spiroplasma [39, 40], while others suggest an increase in potential fertility [39]. Shortening the developmental time, increasing body size and fecundity in Spiroplasma infected H. axyridis, and the effect on the sexual structure of the population may have important implications for the H. axyridis biology [41].

The aim of this work was to investigate the polymorphism of intracellular Spiroplasma bacteria in Western and Eastern populations of H. axyridis and to study the relative density of different bacterial strains in one host with single and multiple infections. A significant proportion of infected females are characterized by multiple (e.g. double, triple) infections. The density of a bacterial population in insects with multiple infections is an order of magnitude higher than the density of a bacterial population in insects infected by a single Spiroplasma strain. We discuss the potential consequences of multiple Spiroplasma infections.

Materials and methods

DNA sampling

To study Spiroplasma polymorphism from H. axyridis, we used DNA samples of 16 Spiroplasma-infected beetles from Eastern and Western populations, of which the infectious status was determined previously by us [42]. Twelve samples originate from females from the Eastern population, including six samples from Vladivostok (V) and Troitsa Bay (Tr) and two samples from Kyoto (K), as well as four samples from females of the Western population, including two samples from Novosibirsk (N) and two samples from Gorno-Altaisk (G). Map of H. axyridis sampling locations in S1 Fig. In two H. axyridis samples from Novosibirsk, two new Spiroplasma strains (GenBank ID: KR363169, KR363170) were detected previously by us [42]. H. axyridis is not a protected insect species. Collections of beetles were conducted in the territories of municipalities that do not limit the collection of H. axyridis. No specific permissions were required for collecting H. axyridis in these territories.

Ethical approval is not required for this study because we use only DNA preparations and do not experiment in any way with living insects.

Amplification

All DNA samples from beetles were tested before use. To validate the prepared templates, the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase 1 (COI) gene region of H. axyridis was amplified by PCR primers LCO1490 and HCO2198 [43]. To detect Spiroplasma infection and to study Spiroplasma diversity, we used Spiroplasma-specific primers that amplify the 301-bp DNA fragment including ITS1 complete sequence [6], and Spiroplasma-specific primers that amplify the 1028 bp fragment of 16S rRNA gene [18] (Table 1). The amplification reaction was conducted under the following conditions: initial denaturation (one cycle 4 min at 95°С), followed by 38 cycles that include denaturation (30 s at 95°С), annealing (40 s at 59°С for ITS1 and 40 s at 53°С for gene fragment of 16S rRNA), and polymerization 40 s at 72°С. This was followed by a cycle of final polymerization (5 min at 72°С). For a positive control, we used a DNA sample of H. axyridis, infected by Spiropasma from the DNA collection at the Vavilov Institute of General Genetics RAS. For a negative control, we used DNA samples from uninfected H. axyridis imago from the same collection.

thumbnail
Table 1. Primers used in this work for amplification of Spiroplasma and H. axyridis sequences.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198190.t001

qPCR

Using a NanoDrop8000 (Termo Scientific, Germany), DNA concentrations were measured. Samples were then diluted as necessary so that each were of the same DNA concentration for qPCR. Real-time qPCR reactions were carried out in the ANK-32 real-time PCR system (Syntol, Russia). Quantitative PCR was performed in 25-μL reactions containing Lightcycler 480 SYBR Green I (Invitrogen) and 0.5 μM of each of the primers. The following thermal cycling protocol was applied: 95°C for 5 min followed by 35 cycles at 95°C for 10 s, 60°C for 10 s, then 72°C for 30 sec. Three technical replicates per biological sample were performed for each set of primers, SP-ITS-JO4 and SP-ITS-N55 for the internal transcribed spacer (ITS1) of Spiroplasma and CPS-F and CPS-R for the carbamoyl phosphate synthetase (CPS) gene of H. axyridis (Table 1). Melting curves were examined to confirm the specificity of amplified products. Cycle threshold (Ct) values were obtained using the ANK-32 real-time PCR system at default threshold settings. The efficiency of each primer pair was predetermined in separate experiments using serial 10-fold dilutions of the DNA samples. The amplification efficiency of CFP (E = 1.94) is different from that of the Spiroplasma ITS1 sequence (E = 1.72). Therefore, qPCR from CFP was used to confirm H. axyridis total DNA quantity (Table 2). To estimate differences in Spiroplasma DNA quantities between samples, ratios of Spiroplasma DNA quantities between samples were calculated as: No/Mo = EΔCt, where (No) is the initial concentration in sample N, (Mo) is the initial concentration in sample M, and (ΔCt) is the difference in the number of control cycles between samples N and M. The quantity of Spiroplasma ITS1 DNA in sample N19 was used as a proxy for Spiroplasma DNA titers in other samples. To determine the 95% confidence interval of the mean Ct, the one-sample Student t test was used. To compare relative quantifications of Spiroplasma DNA in samples with single and multiple infections, the Mann-Whitney test was used.

thumbnail
Table 2. Measurement of H. axyridis samples DNA concentration.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198190.t002

Electrophoresis, elution, cloning, and sequencing

PCR products were run on an 1.5% agarose gel, then extracted from the gel and purified with an elution kit (Zymoclean™ Gel DNA Recovery Kit, Zymo Research, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. PCR product cloning was performed using the pGEM®-T Easy Vector System, according to standard protocols (Fermentas InsTAclone™ PCR Cloning Kit). We use random sampling of the clones for sequencing. Sequencing of the amplification products was conducted with both primers on an ABI PRISM 3500 instrument using a BigDye® Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, United States), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Multiple sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis

Sequences were aligned using the Clustal W algorithm in the MEGA 4.00 program package [44]. As a reference sequence for the rRNA gene cluster, we used Spiroplasma sequence from the closely related H. axyridis species of ladybirds Anisosticta novemdecimpunctata (GenBank ID: AM087471). The Median-Joining network of the Spiroplasma rRNA genes from different strains was constructed in the PopART program [45] using the TCS algorithm [46].

Results

Spiroplasma ITS1 and the fragment of 16S rRNA gene nucleotide variability are presented in Tables 3 and 4. Spiroplasma sequences from females G9, K13, N19, and N1 showed no evidence of ambiguous nucleotide positions. This allowed us to conclude that these females were infected with a single Spiroplasma strain. The ITS1 sequences from G9 and K13 females were identical to the sequence of the Spiroplasma strain HARFUKU2 that was previously found in H. axyridis from Japan (GenBank ID: AB127933) [37]. The ITS1 sequences in samples N1 and N19 were previously recorded as the Sib1 strain (GenBank ID: KR363169) and Sib19 strain (GenBank ID: KR363170), respectively.

thumbnail
Table 3. Spiroplasma ITS1 nucleotide variability.

Nucleotides of phylogenetically informative polymorphic positions are indicated.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198190.t003

thumbnail
Table 4. Nucleotide variability of 16S rRNA fragments of Spiroplasma of H. axyridis.

Nucleotides of phylogenetically informative polymorphic positions are indicated.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198190.t004

However, in most Spiroplasma-infected H. axyridis females from Gorno-Altaisk (G16), Birobidzhan (Bi16, Bi29), Troitsa Bay (T5, T21), Vladivostok (V37, V42), and Kyoto (K11, K15), some nucleotides were ambiguously read at phylogenetically informative sites of both ITS1 and in the fragment of 16S rRNA gene. Because the emergence of ambiguous sites could indicate multiple infections in females, we cloned PCR fragments and then a set of individual clones were sequenced. We cloned the ITS1 fragment with ambiguous sites of all samples and the 16S gene fragment of three samples: G16, V37 and Tr21.

Spiroplasma strain identification of individual clones is presented in Tables 5 and 6. Newly obtained sequences of the Spiroplasma 16S rRNA gene and ITS1 were deposited into GenBank (GenBank ID: KR363166-KR363168, MF543310-MF543312). Multiple infections with Spiroplasma strains were detected in H. axyridis females from five studied populations in both (western and eastern) parts of the native range. HARFUKU1 and HARFUKU2 Spiroplasma strains co-occur in most females with multiple infections. HARFUKU1 strain is absent only in one female from Vladivostok (V42, Table 5). Rare Spiroplasma strains were detected in multiply infected females from Birobidzhan, Vladivostok and Troitsa Bay. One beetle from Japan (K13) and one beetle from the Gorno-Altaisk (G9) are infected only by HARFUKU2. The sequences of the Sib19 strain and Bi22 strain found in females from Troitsa Bay and Birobidzhan were identical.

thumbnail
Table 5. ITS1 based identification of Spiroplasma strains from individual females of H. axyridis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198190.t005

thumbnail
Table 6. 16S rRNA based identification of Spiroplasma strains from individual females of H. axyridis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198190.t006

Because HARFUKU1 and HARFUKU2 have the same length and differ only by few point nucleotide substitutions that do not alter the structure of the PCR fragments ends, we assume that possible differences in the amplification efficiency of these fragments in one reaction and possible differences in the cloning efficiency are negligible. Therefore, we approximate the quantitative relationship of Spiroplasma strains in the case of multiple infection from the number of plasmid clones of different types in a random sampling of clones (Tables 5 and 6). In a random sampling of clones, we found a total of 26 HARFUKU1 and 87 HARFUKU2 strains. Based on this data, we propose that the density of HARFUKU2 may be more than twice the density of HARFUKU1 in beetles with double infection. Analysis of the 16S rRNA gene polymorphism confirms the presence of multiple infections in females. Overall, we identified 45 clones of this fragment: 27 clones corresponding to the Ha-2 strain and 18 clones corresponding to the Ha-1 strain. One beetle from Japan (K13) and one beetle from the Altai (G9) are infected only by Ha-2 strain. Since it is known that the ITS1 sequence is physically linked to the 16S rRNA sequence in the ribosomal gene cluster and based on the infection of the beetles K13 and G9 with only one Spiroplasma strain it can be assumed that Ha2 16S rRNA fragment is physically linked to HARFUKU2 fragment of ITS1. Consequently Ha1 16S rRNA fragment is linked to HARFUKU1 fragment of ITS1. Quantitative data of the number of clones of different types supports this assumption. Obviously, the На3 sequence of the 16S rRNA fragment found in the V37 female, is linked with the Bi24 ITS1 strain and Ha4 and Ha5 sequences of the 16S rRNA fragment found in females from Novosibirsk infected with a single Spiroplasma strain, are linked with Sib1 and Sib19 fragments of ITS1 respectively.

Phylogenetic analysis

The results of the phylogenetic analysis of ITS1 and the 16S rRNA gene fragment of Spiroplasma from H. axyridis are presented in Figs 1 and 2. All identified Spiroplasma strains belong to the Ixodetis clade. The nucleotide divergence of the ITS1 fragment is π = 0.0091. There are 17 variable sites, and of these, there are 16 phylogenetically informative sites. The nucleotide divergence of the 16S rRNA fragment is π = 0.002. There are 19 variable sites, four of them are phylogenetically informative.

thumbnail
Fig 1. ITS1 median network of Spiroplasma strains from H. axyridis.

A reconstruction based on the analysis of the internal transcribed spacer ITS1 polymorphism. ITS1 strain sequences are shown in Table 5. Mutations are indicated by dashes. The size of the circles is proportional to the number of sequences in each group. Spiroplasma from Ixodites ricinus was used as a control.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198190.g001

thumbnail
Fig 2. 16S rRNA median network of Spiroplasma strains from H. axyridis.

This reconstruction is based on the analysis of 16S rRNA gene fragment polymorphisms. Characteristics of the strains are presented in Table 6. Mutations are indicated by dashes. The size of the circles is proportional to the number of sequences in each group. Spiroplasma from A. novemdecimpunctata, a closely related ladybird species, was used as a control.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198190.g002

Survey for abundance of Spiroplasma in H. axyridis

The Spiroplasma relative densitys were measured in 13 DNA samples from H. axyridis. The results are shown in Table 7. To verify the data we divided our sampling into two groups. The first group included four beetles (G9, G13, N1, N19) infected with only one Spiroplasma strain. The second group included beetles with multiple infections. Comparison of the groups based on the value of Spiroplasma relative densities was performed using the Mann-Whitney test. The value of Mann–Whitney U test (U-empirical = 0. Is less then U-critical = 3 for p≤0.01) confirms that this groups are different. We may conclude that the relative density of Spiroplasma in samples with a single infection is lower than in samples with multiple infections. All samples with high Spiroplasma density are infected simultaneously with strains HARFUKU1 and HARFUKU2. This is likely to be one of the necessary conditions to achieve high Spiroplasma density.

thumbnail
Table 7. Relative density of Spiroplasma in females with single and multiple infections.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198190.t007

Discussion

We detected nine Spiroplasma strains within populations of the H. axyridis native range. The two most common strains–HARFUKU1 and HARFUKU2 –as well as two minor strains–Sib1 and Sib19 –have been previously noted in Japanese and Novosibirsk populations, respectively [42, 37]; the rest of the strains described here are recorded for the first time. Our study is the first to note the diversity of Spiroplasma from a single host. Previously, the diversity of Spiroplasma strains was investigated in the genus Drosophila. In Drosophilidae, the infected species has a single Spiroplasma strain [15]. However, a diversity of strains that infect one host species have been repeatedly discussed for other reproductive endosymbiotic bacteria. In particular, the diversity of Wolbachia strains was found in Drosophiala simulans, Drosophila melanogaster, Culex pipiens [47, 48, 49]; a diversity of Rickettsia and Arsenophonus strains were found in Bemisia tabaci invasive biotype [50]. Interpretation of the data of Rickettsia and Arsenophonus diversity in B. tabaci requires some caution; it is known that B. tabaci is a cryptic species complex comprising at least 24 morphologically indistinguishable species [51].

All Spiroplasma strains previously detected in H. axyridis belong to the Ixodetis clade. The Sib1 strain belongs to the Spiroplasma cluster whose members infect arachnids; three other strains are phylogenetically close to the male-killing Spiroplasma from A. bipunctata [42]. Five new Spiroplasma lines (Fig 2), which differ from previously identified strains by single nucleotide substitutions, also belong to the Ixodetis clade and are phylogenetically close to Spiroplasma from the ladybird beetle Anistotica novemdecempunctata. The position on the median network (Fig 1) of the Bi22 strain, which is closely related to the Spiroplasma strain from Ixodites ricinus, suggests that this strain is ancestral to the remaining Spiroplasma strains of H. axyridis, with the exception of the Sib1 strain. The remaining strains can be considered to be derivatives of the primary ones via the accumulation of point mutations. However, on the other hand, the HARFUKU2 strain could be acquired independently by H. axyridis. In this case, the Bi10 and Bi24 strains could arise as a result of recombination between HARFUKU1 and HARFUKU2, which is possible when the strains coexist in one individual. Such coexistence has been demonstrated in our study. The formation of new lines via the recombination of the original lines coexisting in the same organism was previously noted in Wolbachia [5257]. However, evidence of Spiroplasma strain recombination requires an analysis of a longer genome fragment than we had in our possession. The Sib1 strain, found only in one female from the Novosibirsk population, likely infected H. axyridis independently. The uniqueness of the Spiroplasma Sib1 strain infecting female N1 from Novosiborsk is supported by data pertaining to the variability of both ITS1 and 16S rDNA (Figs 1 and 2).

The Spiroplasma strains detected in this study exist in various combinations and quantitative ratios in different females and in different populations of the native range of H. axyridis. The proportion of HARFUKU2 (Ha2) (Tables 5 and 6) in the total strain pool is more than 62%. This strain is found in females with both multiple and single infections (Table 5). The HARFUKU1 strain is also widespread in the H. axyridis area, where it is detected at a frequency of nearly 22%. Although we found this strain only in multiply infected females in combination with the strain HARFUKU2, in Japanese populations HARFUKU1 occurs in females with a single infection [42]. The Bi22 strain, which is identical to the Sib19 strain (5% in the total strain pool) was detected in H. axyridis as a single infection only in Novosibirsk (as Sib19), and as a multiple infection in females from the eastern part of the range (Table 5). Minor strains of Tr21, Tr55 and Tr54 were found only in two females with multiple infections in the Troitsa Bay population. The Bi10 and Bi24 strains were detected in four females from two different populations of the eastern part of the range.

Single-strain Spiroplasma female infections were detected only in Novosibirsk (Sib1, Sib19), Gorno-Altaisk (HARFUKU2), and Kyoto (HARFUKU2) populations, which are all located on the periphery of the native range. In the same edge populations (Gorno-Altaisk and Kyoto), the diversity of Spiroplasma strains was reduced in multiply infected females, which carry only two Spiroplasma strains (HARFUKU1 and HARFUKU2). The number of Spiroplasma strains ranged from 3–5 in multiply infected females from other populations (Table 5). We hypothesize that a decrease in the overall diversity of Spiroplasma strains from the center to the periphery of the range, both in one host individual and in populations as a whole, reflects the well-known pattern of the microevolutionary process, which consists of reductions in diversity in edge populations [5860]. The possibility cannot be excluded that Spiroplasma reduces the fitness of infected beetles in conditions of ecological pessimum at the border of the H. axyridis native range (Novosibirsk, Gorno-Altaisk). In this case, a mono infection and a decrease in bacterial abundance may be considered to be a stage of Spiroplasma elimination from the populations of H. axyridis. The assumption of the negative Spiroplasma effect on the viability of H. axyridis is indirectly supported by the absence (or very low occurrence) of Spiroplasma in invasive populations of H. axyridis [61].

The diversity of Spiroplasma strains in H. axyridis is the result of at least two events of infection of the host. The existence of repeated infections of H. axyridis was previously shown for its symbiotic bacteria Rickettsia [61] and Wolbachia [62]. Multiple infection events are known for other symbiotic pairs. D. simulans is infected by five strains of Wolbachia that span across both supergroup A and B, including three supergroup A strains and two supergroup B strains [47, 63]. These strains attained a different density in the host cells and, accordingly, determined different levels of cytoplasmic incompatibility, as well as different levels of protection against pathogens.

In most of the samples studied, we detected infection with two or more Spiroplasma strains. The same type of infection, more than a single strain in one host–can be assumed in ticks. At least in the study of the symbiotic community structure in Zygiella x-notata Clerck, 1757 (Araneae: Araneidae) within the Spiroplasma, there was evidence for several “heterozygous nucleotide positions”. Individual Spiroplasma ITS sequences contained up to eight such sites [64], which we suggest is the result of multiple infections. Multiple infections are also known for Wolbachia [6567]. Because multiple infections are widespread among Spiroplasma infected individuals (88%), it is possible that such co-infections are functionally significant for H. axyridis and favored by selection.

The effects of symbiotic bacteria are density-dependent. Male-killing correlates with Spiroplasma density in species of the genus Drosophila [35]. The level of cytoplasmic incompatibility and the level of antiviral protection in Drosophila positively correlate with Wolbachia density [48, 6871]. Until now, the mechanisms of density formation for Spiroplasma remain unknown. Mechanisms of density formation were studied for Wolbachia, and these mechanisms depend both on the characteristics of the host and bacterial genomes. In most cases of multiple Wolbachia infections, the density of each strain is under independent host control. The strains do not compete with each other, except for the only known case today, when one Wolbachia strain was shown to be suppressed by another strain during co-infection [65, 67, 68, 7276]. Bacterial density may be under the control of bacterial genes. The density of Wolbachia strain wMelPop depends on the number of copies of a special operon named Octomom [48, 77]. Ambient temperature and the host diet also influence the bacterial density [75, 78, 79]. The density of symbiotic bacteria is consistently increased during embryonic and larval development [35]. In this study, we showed that two parameters—infections type (mono- or multiple infection) and Spiroplasma density are correlated. Molecular mechanisms of genetic control of the Spiroplasma density, as well as the biological consequences of single and multiple infections, remain unclear. It can be assumed that the increased density of Spiroplasma in beetles infected with several strains can increase the stability of the infection, reducing the likelihood of spontaneous loss of Spiroplasma, which explains the wide spread of multiple infection in H. axyridis. Quite possible Spiroplasma strains can interact according to the principle of complementarity. Our data can be the basis for further experimental study of the genetic control of Spiroplasma density in H. axyridis.

The diversity of strains seems to provide Spiroplasma with a variety of manipulations with the reproductive strategy of the host. Cytological studies of Spiroplasma revealed two scenarios of interactions with H. axyridis embryos. In the first case, embryo development stops at the stage of yellow eggs, and there are four critical development points, after which embryos die. In the second scenario, embryos died at the stage of gray eggs immediately before hatching [80]. We suggest that such differences can be the result of competition between two Spiroplasma strains with different and density dependent effects. Therefore, it is of considerable interest to investigate associations between the type of infection (single or multiple), and the degree of manifestation of male-killing and probably cytoplasmic incompatibility, which has not been shown in H. axyridis.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Map of H.axyridis sampling locations.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198190.s001

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to M. Ya. Orlova-Ben’kovskaya, L. V. Frisman, V. P. Korablev, and A.V. Zimenko for providing them with the H. axyridis collections. We used the materials of the Coccinellidae Collection of the Koltzov Institute of Developmental Biology of RAS. The Collection is supported by the contract 0108-2017-0010. We also used the materials of the Genetic Collection of Insects Models for biomedical and population-genetic studies of the Vavilov Institute of General Genetics RAS. The study of Spiroplasma in western group of populations of H.axyridis was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (Project No. 15-04-07466_A). The study of Spiroplasma in eastern group of populations of H.axyridis -the source of the global invasion, was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (Project No. 16-16-00079.

References

  1. 1. Hackett KJ, Clark TB. Ecology of Spiroplasmas. In: Whitcomb RF, Tully JG, editors. The mycoplasmas, vol. 5. New York: Academic Press; 1989. pp. 113–200.
  2. 2. Duron O, Bouchon D, Boutin S, Bellamy L, Zhou L, Engelstädter J, et al. The diversity of reproductive parasites among arthropods: Wolbachia do not walk alone. BMC Biol. 2008; 6: 27. pmid:18577218
  3. 3. Matsuka M, Hashi H, Okada I. Abnormal sex ratio found in the lady beetle Harmonia axyridis Pallas (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Appl Entomol Zool. 1975; 10: 84–89.
  4. 4. Niijima K, Nakajima K. Abnormal sex-ratio in Menochilus sexmaculatus (Fabricius). Bull of the Faculty of Agriculture-Tamagawa Univ (Japan). 1981; 21: 59–67.
  5. 5. Hurst GD, Graf von der Schulenburg JH, Majerus TM, Bertrand D, Zakharov IA, Baungaard J, et al. Invasion of one insect species, Adalia bipunctata, by two different male-killing bacteria. Insect Mol. Biol. 1999; 8: 133–139. pmid:9927182
  6. 6. Majerus TMO, Graf von der Schulenburg JH, Majerus MEN, Hurst GD. Molecular identification of a male-killing agent in the ladybird Harmonia axyridis (Pallas) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Insect Molecular Biology. 1999; 8: 551–555. pmid:10634973
  7. 7. Majerus ME, Schulenburg JH, Zakharov IA. Multiple causes of male-killing in a single sample of the two-spot ladybird, Adalia bipunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) from Moscow. Heredity. 2000; 84: 605–609. pmid:10849086
  8. 8. Tinsley MC, Majerus ME. A new male-killing parasitism: Spiroplasma bacteria infect the ladybird beetle Anisosticta novemdecimpunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Parasitology. 2006; 132: 757–765. pmid:16454865
  9. 9. Slaff M, Chen TA. The isolation of a Spiroplasma from Aedes sollicitans (Walker) in New Jersey. J Fla Anti-Mosq Assoc. 1982; 53: 19–21.
  10. 10. Chastel C, Gilot B, Le Goff F, Gruffaz R, Abalain-Colloc ML. Isolement de spiroplasmes en France (Savoie, Alpes du Nord) à partir de moustiques du genre Aedes. C R Acad Sci Paris. série III. 1985; 300: 261–266.
  11. 11. Chastel C, Devau B, Le Goff F, Simitzis-Le Flohic AM, Gruffaz R, Kerdraon G, et al. Mosquito spiroplasmas from France and their ecology. Israel journal of medical sciences. 1987; 23(6): 683–686. pmid:2889698
  12. 12. Clark TB, Henegar RB, Rosen L, Hackett KJ, Whitcomb RF, Lowry JE, et al. New Spiroplasmas from insects and flowers: isolation, ecology, and host association. Isr J Med Sci. 1987; 23: 687–690. pmid:2889699
  13. 13. Shaikh AA, Johnson WE, Stevens C, Tang AY. The isolation of Spiroplasmas from mosquitoes in Macon County, Alabama. J Amer Mosq Contr Assoc. 1987; 3: 289–295.
  14. 14. Regassa LB, Murphy AC, Zarzuela AB, Jandhyam HL, Bostick DS, Bates CR, et al. An Australian environmental survey reveals moderate Spiroplasma biodiversity: characterization of four new serogroups and a continental variant. Canadian Journal of Microbiology. 2009; 55(12): 1347–1354. pmid:20029526
  15. 15. Haselkorn TS, Jaenike J. Macroevolutionary persistence of heritable endosymbionts: acquisition, retention and expression of adaptive phenotypes in Spiroplasma. Mol Ecol. 2015; 14: 3752–65. pmid:26053523
  16. 16. Fukatsu T, Tsuchida T, Nikoh N, Koga R. Spiroplasma symbiont of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Insecta: Homoptera). Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001; 67: 1284–1291. pmid:11229923
  17. 17. Simon JC, Boutin S, Tsuchida T, Koga R, Le Gallic JF, Frantz A, et al. Facultative symbiont infections affect aphid reproduction. PLoS One. 2011; 6: e21831. pmid:21818272
  18. 18. Sanada-Morimura S, Matsumura M, Noda H. Male killing caused by a Spiroplasma symbiont in the small brown planthopper, Laodelphax striatellus. J Hered. 2013; 104(6): 821–829. pmid:23975837
  19. 19. Mouches C, Bové JM, Tully JG, Rose DL, McCoy RE, Carle-Junca P, et al. Spiroplasma apis, a new species from the honey-bee Apis mellifera. Ann Microbiol (Paris). 1983; 134A: 383–397.
  20. 20. Mouches C, Bové JM, Albisetti J. Pathogenicity of Spiroplasma apis and other Spiroplasmas for honeybees in southwestern France. Ann Microbiol. 1984; 135A(1): 151–155.
  21. 21. Konai M, Whitcomb RF, Tully JG, Rose DL, Carle P, Bové JM, et al. Spiroplasma velocicrescens sp. nov., from the vespid wasp Monobia quadridens. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1995; 45(2): 203–206. pmid:7727271
  22. 22. Ammar ED, Hogenhout SA. Use of immunofluorescence confocal laser scanning microscopy to study distribution of the bacterium corn stunt Spiroplasma in vector leafhoppers (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) and in host plants. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2005; 98(6): 820–826.
  23. 23. Jiggins FM, Hurst GDD, Jiggins CD, Graf von der Schulenburg JH, Majerus ME. The butterfly Danaus chrysippus is infected by a male-killing Spiroplasma bacterium. Parasit. 2000; 120: 439–446.
  24. 24. Tabata J, Hattori Y, Sakamoto H, Yukuhiro F, Fujii T, Kugimiya S, et al. Male-killing and incomplete inheritance of a novel Spiroplasma in the moth Ostrinia zaguliaevi. Microb Ecol. 2011; 61: 254–263. pmid:21234752
  25. 25. Williamson DL, Adams JR, Whitcomb RF, Tully JG, Carle P, Konai M, et al. Spiroplasma platyhelix sp. nov., a new mollicute with unusual morphology and genome size from the dragonfly Pachydiplax longipennis. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1997; 47: 763–766. pmid:9226909
  26. 26. Hayashi M, Watanabe M, Yukuhiro F, Nomura M, Kageyama D. A Nightmare for Males? A Maternally transmitted male-killing bacterium and strong female bias in a green lacewing population. PLoS ONE. 2016; 11(6): e0155794. pmid:27304213
  27. 27. Herren JK, Paredes JC, Schüpfer F, Lemaitre B. Vertical transmission of a Drosophila endosymbiont via cooption of the yolk transport and internalization machinery. mBio. 2013; 4(2): e00532–12. pmid:23462112
  28. 28. Weisburg WG, Tully JG, Rose DL, Petzel JP, Oyaizu H, Yang D, et al. A phylogenetic analysis of the mycoplasmas: Basis for their classification. J Bacteriol. 1989; 171: 6455–6467. pmid:2592342
  29. 29. Gasparich GE, Whitcomb RF, Dodge D, French FE, Glass J, Williamson DL. The genus Spiroplasma and its non-helical descendants: phylogenetic classification, correlation with phenotype and roots of the Mycoplasma mycoides clade. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004; 54(Pt 3): 893–918. pmid:15143041
  30. 30. Williamson DL, Poulson DF. Sex Ratio Organisms (Spiroplasma) of Drosophila. In: Whitcomb RF, editor. The Mycoplasmas III: Plant and Insect Mycoplasmas. New York: Academic Press; 1979. pp. 176–206.
  31. 31. Poulson DF, Sakaguchi B. Nature of the “sex-ratio” agent in Drosophila. Science. 1961; 133: 1489–1490. pmid:13737554
  32. 32. Williamson DL, Sakaguchi B, Hackett KJ, Whitcomb RF, Tully J.G., Carle P, et al. Spiroplasma poulsonii sp. nov., a new species associated with male-lethality in Drosophila willistoni, a neotropical species of fruit fly. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1999; 49: 611–618. pmid:10319483
  33. 33. Zakharov IA, Zinkevich NS, Shaikevich EV, Vysotskaya LV, Dorzhu CM, Majerus MEN. Sex ratio and male-killing in Siberian populations of Harmonia axyridis Pall. Russian Journal of Genetics. 1999; 35(6): 771–776.
  34. 34. Tsugeno Y, Koyama H, Takamatsu T, Nakai M, Kunimi Y, Inoue MN. Identification of an early male-killing agent in the oriental tea tortrix, Homona magnanima. J Hered. 2017; 108(5): 553–560. pmid:28505369
  35. 35. Haselkorn TS, Watts TD, Markow TA. Density dynamics of diverse Spiroplasma strains naturally infecting different species of Drosophila. Fly (Austin). 2013; 7(3): 204–210. pmid:23846301
  36. 36. Haselkorn TS, Jaenike J. Macroevolutionary persistence of heritable endosymbionts: acquisition, retention and expression of adaptive phenotypes in Spiroplasma. Mol Ecol. 2015; 14: 3752–65. pmid:26053523
  37. 37. Nakamura K, Ueno H, Miura K. Prevalence of inherited male-killing microorganisms in japanese population of ladybird beetle Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2005; 98(1): 96–99.
  38. 38. Majerus TMO, Majerus MEN, Knowles B, Wheeler J, Bertrand D, Kuznetzov V, et al. Extreme variation in the prevalence of inherited male-killing microorganisms between three populations of Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Heredity. 1998; 81: 683–691.
  39. 39. Majerus TMO. The evolutionary genetics of male-killing in the Coccinellidae. Ph. D. thesis, The University of Cambridge. 2002.
  40. 40. Majerus MEN. Sex wars: genes, bacteria, and sex ratios. Princenton. New Jersey: Princenton University Press; 2003.
  41. 41. Elnagdy S, Majerus MEN, Gardener M, Handley LJL. The direct effects of male killer infection on fitness of ladybird hosts (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 2013; 26: 1816–1825. pmid:23869568
  42. 42. Goryacheva I, Blekhman A, Andrianov B, Zakharov I. Heritable bacterial endosymbionts in native and invasive populations of Harmonia axyridis. Biol Invasions. 2017; 19(2): 493–502.
  43. 43. Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology. 1994; 3: 294–299. pmid:7881515
  44. 44. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011; 28: 2731–2739. pmid:21546353
  45. 45. Leigh JW, Bryant D. POPART: full-feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2015; 6: 1110–1116.
  46. 46. Clement M, Posada D, Crandall KA. TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol Ecol. 2000; 9: 1657–1659. pmid:11050560
  47. 47. Zhou W, Rousset F, O’Neill S. Phylogeny and PCR-based classification of Wolbachia strains using wsp gene sequences. Proc R Soc London B. 1998, 265: 509–515. pmid:9569669
  48. 48. Chrostek E, Marialva MSP, Esteves SS, Weinert LA, Martinez J, et al. Wolbachia variants nduce differential protection to viruses in Drosophila melanogaster: A phenotypic and phylogenomic analysis. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9(12): e1003896. pmid:24348259
  49. 49. Ghosh S, Bouvaine S, Maruthi MN. Prevalence and genetic diversity of endosymbiotic bacteria infecting cassava whiteflies in Africa. BMC Microbiology. 2015, 15:93. pmid:25933928
  50. 50. Zhu D-T, Xia W-Q, Rao Q., Liu S-S, Ghanim M, Wang X-W. Sequencing and comparison of the Rickettsia genomes from the whitefly Bemisia tabaci Middle East Asia Minor I. Insect Science. 2016, 23: 531–542. pmid:27273750
  51. 51. Dinsdale A, Cook L, Riginos C, Buckley YM, De Barro P. Refined global analysis of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Aleyrodoidea: Aleyrodidae) mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase 1 to identify species level genetic boundaries. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2010, 103(2): 196–208. https://doi.org/10.1603/AN09061
  52. 52. Werren JH, Bartos JD. Recombination in Wolbachia. Curr Biol. 2001, 11(6): 431–435. pmid:11301253
  53. 53. Reuter M, Keller L. High levels of multiple Wolbachia infection and recombination in the ant Formica exsecta. Mol Biol Evol. 2003, 20: 748–753. pmid:12679529
  54. 54. Baldo L, Bordenstein S, Wernegreen JJ, Werren JH. Widespread recombination throughout Wolbachia genomes. Mol Biol Evol. 2006, 23(2): 437–449. pmid:16267140
  55. 55. Verne S, Johnson EM, Bouchon D, Grandjean F. Evidence for recombination between feminizing Wolbachia in the isopod genus Armadillidium. Gene. 2007, 397: 58–66. pmid:17537593
  56. 56. Ros VID, Fleming VM, Feil EJ, Breeuwer JAJ. Diversity and recombination in Wolbachia and Cardinium from Bryobia spider mites. BMC Microbiology. 2012, 12(Suppl 1): S13. pmid:22375894
  57. 57. Yang XH, Zhu DH, Liu Z, Zhao L, Su CY. High levels of multiple infections, recombination and horizontal transmission of Wolbachia in the Andricus mukaigawae (Hymenoptera; Cynipidae) communities. PLoS ONE. 2013, 8(11): e78970. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078970 pmid:24250820
  58. 58. Mayr EW Populations, Species, and Evolution. 1970, 453 p., Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
  59. 59. Dobzhansky Th, Ayala FI. Temporal frequency changes of enzyme and chromosomal polymorphisms in natural populations of Drosophila. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 1973, 70: 680–683. pmid:4514981
  60. 60. Saura A, Lakovaara S, Lokki I, Lankinen P. Genie variation in central and marginal populations of Drosophila subobscura. Hereditas. 1973, 75: 33–46. pmid:4778105
  61. 61. Goryacheva I, Blekhman A, Andrianov B, Zakharov I. Heritable bacterial endosymbionts in native and invasive populations of Harmonia axyridis. Biol Invasions. 2017, 19: 493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1298-8
  62. 62. Goryacheva II, Andrianov BV, Gorelova TV, Zakharov IA, Blekhman AV. Genotypic diversity of Wolbachia pipientis in native and invasive Harmonia axyridis Pall., 1773 (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae) populations. Russian Journal of Genetics. 2015, 51(8): 731–736.
  63. 63. Casiraghi M., Bordenstein SR, Baldo L, Lo N, Beninat T, Wernegreen JJ, Werren JH, Bandi C. Phylogeny of Wolbachia pipientis based on gltA, groEL and ftsZ gene sequences: clustering of arthropod and nematode symbionts in the F supergroup, and evidence for further diversity in the Wolbachia tree. Microbiology. 2005,151: 4015–4022. pmid:16339946
  64. 64. Goodacre SL, Martin OY, Thomas CF, Hewitt GM. Wolbachia and other endosymbiont infections in spiders. Mol Ecol. 2006; 15(2): 517–527. pmid:16448417
  65. 65. Ikeda T, Ishikawa H, Sasaki T. Regulation of Wolbachia density in the Mediterranean flour moth, Ephestia kuehniella, and the almond moth, Cadra cautella. Zoological Science. 2003; 20(2): 153–157. pmid:12655178
  66. 66. Mouton LH, Henri H, Bouletreau M, Vavre F. Strain-specific regulation of intracellular Wolbachia density in multiply infected insects. Molecular Ecology. 2003; 12(12): 3459–3465. pmid:14629360
  67. 67. Kondo N, Shimada M, Fukatsu T. Infection density of Wolbachia endosymbiont affected by co-infection and host genotype. Biol Lett. 2005; 1(4): 488–491. pmid:17148240
  68. 68. Boyle L, O'Neill SL, Robertson HM, Karr TL. Interspecific and intraspecific horizontal transfer of Wolbachia in Drosophila. Science. 1993; 260: 1796–1799. pmid:8511587
  69. 69. Osborne SE, Leong YS, O’Neill SL, Johnson KN. Variation in antiviral protection mediated by different Wolbachia strains in Drosophila simulans. PLoS Pathog. 2009; 5(11): e1000656. pmid:19911047
  70. 70. Lu P, Bian G, Pan X, Xi Z. Wolbachia induces density-dependent inhibition to dengue virus in mosquito cells. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012; 6(7): e1754. pmid:22848774
  71. 71. Martinez J, Longdon B, Bauer S, Chan YS, Miller WJ, Bourtzis K, et al. Symbionts commonly provide broad spectrum resistance to viruses in insects: a comparative analysis of Wolbachia strains. PLoS Pathogens. 2014; 10(9): e1004369. pmid:25233341
  72. 72. Poinsot D, Bourtzis K, Markakis G, Savakis C, Merçot H. Wolbachia transfer from Drosophila melanogaster into D. simulans: Host effect and cytoplasmic incompatibility relationships. Genetics. 1998; 150(1): 227–237. pmid:9725842
  73. 73. McGraw EA, Merritt DJ, Droller JN, O’Neil SL. Wolbachia density and virulence attenuation after transfer into a novel host. PNAS. 2002; 99(5): 2918–2923. pmid:11880639
  74. 74. Mouton L, Dedeine F, Henri H, Boulétreau M, Profizi N, Vavre F. Virulence, multiple infections and regulation of symbiotic population in the Wolbachia-Asobara tabida symbiosis. Genetics. 2004; 168: 181–189. pmid:15454536
  75. 75. Mouton LH, Henri H, Boulétreau M, Vavre F. Effect of temperature on Wolbachia density and impact on cytoplasmic incompatibility. Parasitology. 2006; 132: 49–56. pmid:16393353
  76. 76. Mouton LH, Henri H, Charif D, Boulétreau M, Vavre F. Interaction between host genotype and environmental conditions affects bacterial density in Wolbachia symbiosis. Biol Lett. 2007; 3(2): 210–213. pmid:17251124
  77. 77. Chrostek E, Teixeira L. Mutualism breakdown by amplification of Wolbachia genes. PLoS Biology. 2015; 13(2): e1002065. pmid:25668031
  78. 78. Serbus LR, White PM, Pintado SJ, Rabe A, Teixeira L, Albertson R, et al. The impact of host diet on Wolbachia titer in Drosophila. PLoS Pathogens. 2015; 11(3): e1004777. pmid:25826386
  79. 79. Camacho M, Oliva M, Serbus LR. Dietary saccharides and sweet tastants have differential effects on colonization of Drosophila oocytes by Wolbachia endosymbionts. Biol Open. 2017; 6(7): 1074–1083. pmid:28596296
  80. 80. Zinkevich NS1, Temkina LM, Sokolova MI. The characteristics of embryogenesis and oogenesis in Adalia bipunctata L. and Harmonia axyridis Pall. beetles in all-female families. Russian Journal of Developmental Biology. 2000; 31(1): 57–62.