Tph2−/− female mice restore socio-sexual recognition through upregulating ERα and OTR genes in the amygdala

Ying Huo; Yaohua Zhang; Huifen Guo; Yingjuan Liu; Qi Fang; Jianxu Zhang

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0193395

Abstract

The central 5-hydroxytryptamine system impairs sociosexual behaviors and olfaction preferences in sexually naive mice. However, it remains unknown whether reproductive experiences impart an effect on the sexual olfactory preferences of female mice lacking central serotonin. Here, we aimed at examining such effects and the underlying mechanisms using Tph2 knockout female mice. Sexually naive Tph2^−/− female mice failed to recognize olfactory cues regarding sex, genetic relatedness, and social hierarchy despite exhibiting normal olfactory discrimination. However, reproduction-experienced Tph2^−/− female mice recovered sexual olfactory preferences, as did sexually naive Tph2^+/+ females. Meanwhile, both the estrogen receptor α and oxytocin receptor in the amygdala of reproduction-experienced Tph2^−/− females presented upregulated expression at the mRNA level and an upward tendency at the protein level vs. sexually naive Tph2^−/− females. Intracerebroventricular administration of a combination of estrogen receptor α and oxytocin receptor agonists, but not either agent alone, could restore the sexual olfactory preferences of sexually naive Tph2^−/− female mice to some degree. We speculate that estrogen receptor α and oxytocin receptor activation in the amygdala after reproductive experiences restores sexual olfactory recognition in Tph2^−/− female mice.

Citation: Huo Y, Zhang Y, Guo H, Liu Y, Fang Q, Zhang J (2018) Tph2^−/− female mice restore socio-sexual recognition through upregulating ERα and OTR genes in the amygdala. PLoS ONE 13(2): e0193395. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193395

Editor: Jian Jing, Nanjing University, CHINA

Received: August 22, 2017; Accepted: February 10, 2018; Published: February 22, 2018

Copyright: © 2018 Huo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper.

Funding: This work was supported by grants from the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB11010400], the National Basic Research Program of China [973 Program, no. 2010CB833900], and the China National Science Foundation [no. 31272322]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

In rodents, choice of mate relies heavily on olfactory signals, of which urine odor is one of the most important signals with which to communicate sex, social status, kinship, and individual identity [1, 2, 3]. For high reproductive success and offspring fitness, females usually use olfactory assessment to ensure accurate sex identification and to select genetically dissimilar and high-quality male mates [4, 5, 6, 7].

Sexual experiences are able to guide animals toward stimuli that are predictive of sexual reward and reproductive success [8, 9, 10, 11]. In particular, sexual experiences can provide a disinhibitory influence on the disruptive effects of certain treatments, such as anosmia, castration, penile deafferentation, novelty stress, and deficiency in olfactory information processing [8, 12, 13]. Under natural conditions, sexual behaviors usually result in the occurrence of reproduction, including copulation, pregnancy, parturition, and lactation in females [10, 11]. Therefore, reproductive experiences might also play a disinhibitory role in sexual behaviors.

As one of the most important neurotransmitters in the brain, serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) has a widespread and profound effect on information processing, cognition, memory, stress adaption, anxiety, depression, aggression, sexual preference, and maternal care in rodents [14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19]. Tryptophan hydroxylase 2 (Tph2) is the initial and rate-limiting enzyme on the pathway from tryptophan to central 5-HT [14, 16]. Tph2 knockout mice generated by deleting exon 5 that encodes the tryptophan hydroxylase domain only have minute amounts of central 5-HT and show strong deficiencies, such as growth retardation, 50% lethality in the first 4 weeks after birth, loss of sexual preference evidenced by the paradigms of mating choice assay, genital odor preference assay, bedding preference assay, and lordosis assay, exaggerated aggression, and decreased anxiety [14, 15, 17, 18, 19].

Evidence for both the disinhibitory effect of reproductive experiences and the inhibitory effect of central 5-HT deficiency on sexual preferences of both male and female mice has been published [10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15]. So, we speculated that reproductive experiences could mitigate the detrimental effects of Tph2 knockout on the sexual olfactory preference. Furthermore, females are often the choosy sex that could discriminate amongst competitive males inmate choice for high fitness [15, 20]. Then, reproductive experience would make the Tph2 knockout female mice prefer female urine odor more than the male one? The right strain? The dominant male odor?

Even though there are still no direct evidences of how ERα, ERβ, OT and OTR changed in Tph2 knockout mice, a sophisticated interplay among 5-HT, estrogens and oxytocin (OT) has been shown to affect sexual performance [21, 22, 23, 24]. Estrogen acts largely through estrogen receptor α (ERα) and estrogen receptor β (ERβ) to alter the function of the 5-HT system at various levels, including synthesis, reuptake, neural firing, degradation, binding, and receptor activation [22, 23]. Furthermore, estrogen modulates OT and oxytocin receptor (OTR) via ERα and ERβ, and may also contribute to regulate sexual preferences [22, 24, 25, 26]. ERβ controls OT production in the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) of the hypothalamus. Then, axonal projections of the PVN neurons reach the amygdala, where ERα drives the transcription of the OTR gene and ultimately regulates sexual preferences [24, 27].

Here, we examined whether reproductive experiences could make the Tph2 knockout female mice prefer female urine odor more than the male one? The right strain? The dominant male odor? And, the role of ERα, ERβ, OT and OTR played in such processes?

Materials and methods

Experimental animals

The Tph2 line generated from C57BL/6 mice was a generous gift from the laboratory of Dr. Yi Rao (Peking University, Beijing, China). It was then maintained and genotyped in our laboratory, as previously described [6]. About 150 female and 80 male heterozygotes were repeatedly used for breeding and about 2,000 pups were got. These pups were weaned at the age of 3 weeks, and approximately 1-cm sections of the tail of each mouse were collected at the same time for isolation of genomic DNA. The dams and pups were monitored about every 2 weeks. After the pups reached the age of 8 weeks, the male mice were housed singly, while female mice sharing the same genotype were kept in groups of four or five until treatment. The pups (about 0.5%) showing obvious signs of illness were euthanized.

Twenty male and 24 female C57BL/6 mice at an age of 40 weeks were used as urine donors for sex. The estrous status of the female C57BL/6 mice was determined by microscopic examination of vaginal epithelium. An additional 20 male C57BL/6 mice and 20 male Balb/c mice at an age of 12 weeks were used as urine donors for genetic relatedness. Nine pairs of male C57BL/6 mice with a stable dominance–submission relationship were selected as urine donors for social hierarchy at the age of 17 weeks. The formation of a stable dominance–submission relationship was ensured by use of a dyadic encountering test in a neutral area between paired males over the course of 21 consecutive days at the age of 13 weeks. In brief, weight-matched male mice were paired and simultaneously placed into a clean mouse cage for 10 min of continuous recording beginning with initial aggressive behavior (i.e., tail rattles, sideway postures, pushing, chasing, and biting) [5, 28].

The plastic cage was 27 × 12 × 17 cm in size. The housing room was kept under a reversed 14L: 10D light/dark photoperiod (lights on at 7:00 pm), and the temperature was maintained at 23 ± 2 °C. Commercial standard rat/mouse pellet chow (Beijing KeAo Feed Co., Beijing, China) and water were provided ad libitum.

Ethical notes

All of the mice experiments were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (approval No. IOZ12018). Adequate measures were taken to minimize discomfort for mice and to ensure that the entire experimental protocol complied with the Institutional Guidelines for Animal Use and Care at the Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Reproductive experiences

Eight sexually naive Tph2^+/+ female mice (aged 19–20 weeks) and 27 Tph2^−/− female mice (aged 12 weeks) were separately brought into the home cage of Tph2^+/+ male mice of the same age for sexual intercourse. When there was a visible sign of pregnancy, the male mice were removed from the cage. The gestation period showed no difference between Tph2^+/+ and Tph2^−/− females. Then, the female mice were allowed to experience parturition and lactation. In spite of being fertile and producing milk, Tph2^−/− female mice present poor maternal care leading to a low survival rate of their pups, most of which die on Day 2 or 3 after birth. If the pups died during lactation, the corpses were immediately removed from the cage. If the pups were still alive, they were removed from the cage on the day following 21 days of lactation. Whether or not there were living pups, the female mice had to go all the way through to 21 days of lactation. Female mice experienced the processes including mating, pregnancy, parturition, and lactation were classified as reproduction-experienced (R-E) females. R-E female mice were housed singly for 1–2 weeks before the start of behavioral tests.

Urine collection

As previously described [3], during the dark phase, we placed each donor in a clean mouse cage (27 × 12 × 17 cm) covered with a wire grid 1 cm above the bottom of the cage. The urine was immediately drawn after the animal urinated, and transferred to an Eppendorf tube in ice using a disposable glass capillary (i.d. 1.8 mm; length, 15 cm). If the urine was deposited next to feces, it was not collected due to possible contamination. The urine was stored at –20 °C until use.

Binary test of urinary attractiveness

Binary choice tests using the capillary method were carried out to explore urinary preference [5, 6]. The recipient subjects were investigated regarding their preference for two tested urine samples during the dark phase in their home cages. Urine samples were presented to the test recipient subjects using the same two disposable glass capillaries (internal diameter, 1.8 mm; length, 15 cm), both containing 2 μL urine approximately 1 cm from the sample-containing end, with the other end sealed by odorless gum suspending the sample aliquot inside the capillary. After showing an initial sniffing response, the mouse investigating behavior was recorded for 3 min. The length of time that the female mice spent sniffing within 1 cm from the tip and licking the end of the capillary was recorded using two handheld stopwatches. Every new test was performed with new capillary tubes and urine samples. The estrous cycles were not determined in any test for recipient female mice.

As it was difficult to maintain the Tph2 line, female mice used in these binary tests were taken from different generations. In Figs 1, 2 and 3, the batch of sexually naive Tph2^−/− female mice and sexually naive Tph2^+/+ female mice was Generation 1 (at the age of 12–14 weeks). The batch of reproduction-experienced Tph2^−/− female mice was Generation 2 (at the age of 20–21 weeks). The order of these binary tests was as follows: 1) male C57BL/6 mice urine vs. female C57BL/6 mice (estrous) urine; 2) dominant male C57BL/6 mice urine vs. subordinate male C57BL/6 mice urine; 3) male C57BL/6 mice urine vs. male Balb/c mice urine. Each test recipient female mouse was given 1 d of rest between each test for repeated use. In Fig 4, the batch of 15 sexually naive Tph2^−/− female mice used for intracerebroventricular injection was Generation 3 (at the age of 24–36 weeks). Each of the mice was given approximately 1 week of rest before the next drug administration and the following binary test for repeated use.

Download:

Fig 1. Discrimination (mean ± SE) of 12 sexually naive Tph2^−/− female mice between urine odor related to sex, genetic relatedness, and social hierarchy.

(a) Male C57BL/6 mice urine vs. female C57BL/6 mice (estrous) urine; (b) Male C57BL/6 mice urine vs. male Balb/c mice urine; (c) Subordinate male C57BL/6 mice urine vs. dominant male C57BL/6 mice urine. The investigation time of the fourth presentation was lower compared with the first presentation (* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, independent-samples t-test or Mann-Whitney U test). The investigation time of the fifth presentation was higher compared with the fourth presentation of the habituated sample (# P < 0.05, independent-samples t-test or Mann-Whitney U test).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193395.g001

Download:

Fig 2. Duration of the investigation (mean ± SE) of 12 sexually naive Tph2^−/− female mice, 12 reproduction-experienced (R-E) Tph2^−/− female mice, and 12 sexually naive Tph2^+/+ female mice to urine odor related to sex, genetic relatedness, and social hierarchy during a 3-min choice test.

(a) Male C57BL/6 mice urine vs. female C57BL/6 mice (estrous) urine; (b) Male C57BL/6 mice urine vs. male Balb/c mice urine; (c) Dominant male C57BL/6 mice urine vs. subordinate male C57BL/6 mice urine. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, paired t-test or Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193395.g002

Download:

Fig 3. Comparison of the relative expression (mean ± SE) of ERα, ERβ, and OTR in the amygdala at the mRNA and protein level.

(a) Comparison of the relative expression of ERα, ERβ, and OTR in the amygdala (unilateral) between sexually naive Tph2^+/+ female mice (n = 7) and R-E Tph2^+/+ female mice (n = 8) at the mRNA level; (b) Comparison of the relative expression of ERα, ERβ, and OTR in the amygdala (unilateral) between sexually naive Tph2^+/+ female mice (n = 7) and R-E Tph2^+/+ female mice (n = 7) at the protein level; (c) Comparison of the relative expression of ERα, ERβ, and OTR in the amygdala (bilateral) among sexually naive Tph2^−/− female mice (n = 6), R-E Tph2^−/− female mice (n = 6), and sexually naive Tph2^+/+ female mice (n = 6) at the mRNA level; (d) Comparison of the relative expression of ERα, ERβ, and OTR in the amygdala (bilateral) among sexually naive Tph2^−/− female mice (n = 5), R-E Tph2^−/− female mice (n = 5), and sexually naive Tph2^+/+ female mice (n = 5) at the protein level. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01, independent-samples t-test or Mann-Whitney U test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193395.g003

Download:

Fig 4. Duration of the investigation (mean ± SE) of sexually naive Tph2^−/− female mice (n _control = 7, n _drug = 7) to the urine odor of male C57BL/6 mice vs. female C57BL/6 mice (estrous) 30 min after 2 μL drug infusion.

Duration of the investigation of sexually naive Tph2^−/− female mice to the urine odor of male C57BL/6 mice vs. female C57BL/6 mice (estrous) after ICV infusion of (a) ERα agonist and OTR agonist in combination for the drug group and 38% DMSO/ACSF for the control group; (b) OTR agonist singly for the drug group and 35% DMSO/ACSF for the control group; (c) ERα agonist singly for the drug group and 38% DMSO/ACSF for the control group. Paired t-test or Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193395.g004

Habituation–dishabituation test

Habituation–dishabituation tests were conducted via one capillary using sexually naive Tph2^−/− female mice (Generation 1, after the binary tests above, at the age of 14–15 weeks) in order to investigate olfactory discrimination ability [3, 29]. In order to induce habituation, we provided each female mouse with one urine odor on a series of four trials and then introduced the other urine odor on the fifth trial. Each trial performed as described previously lasted for 3 min with a 2-min interval between consecutive trials. The order of these tests was as follows: 1) male C57BL/6 mice urine vs. male Balb/c mice urine; 2) male C57BL/6 mice urine vs. female C57BL/6 mice (estrous) urine; 3) subordinate male C57BL/6 mice urine vs. dominant male C57BL/6 mice urine. All tests were conducted in the home cages of the mice during the dark phase, and 1 d of rest was given between each test for repeated use.

Tissue sampling

After all of the behavioral tests described above, the amygdala (approximately from −0.22 mm to −2.54 mm relative to the bregma) of all the female mice were dissected in a mouse brain matrix on ice [6]. The tissues were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until use.

Real-time polymerase chain reactions

Quantitative real-time PCR was performed, as previously described [6, 30]. Briefly, 2 μg ribonucleic acid (RNA) extracted from the amygdala was reverse-transcribed using a PrimeScript^® RT reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (Perfect Real Time) (Takara), following the manufacturer’s instructions. PCR reactions were performed using RealMasterMix (SYBR Green) (Tiangen, China) using the a Mx3005P quantitative PCR system (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA). Thermal cycling conditions were: 95 °C for 2 min followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 20 s, 60 °C for 20 s, and 68 °C for 40 s. To exclude the interference of unspecific products, a melting curve analysis was conducted using high-resolution data collection during an incremental temperature change from 60 to 95 °C with a ramp rate of 0.2 °C /s. β-actin was chosen as a reference. Primer sequences were: β-actin, forward-TCCATCATGAAGTGTGACGT, reverse-GAGCAATGATCTTGATCTTCAT; ERα, forward-GCTGGCCTGACTCTGCA, reverse-TCTGGCTGGGCTCCTCT; ERβ, forward-TTGCTCCAGACCTCGTT, reverse-CATCTGTCACTGCGTTCA; OTR, forward-CGTCAATGCGCCCAAAG, reverse-CGAGCAGAGCAGCAGAGGAA. Data were calculated using the 2^-ΔΔC_T formula.

Western blot

Western blot analysis was carried out as previously described [31, 32]. The amygdala was homogenized in lysis buffer (40 μL for unilateral amygdala and 50 μL for bilateral amygdala) comprised of 50 mM tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane hydrochloride (Tris-HCl) at pH 8.0, 0.15 M NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 0.25% sodium deoxycholate, and 4% protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche). Protein concentration was tested using the Bradford protein assay method. Proteins were separated using sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and then transferred onto apolyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Beijing Dingguo Changsheng Biotechnology Co., Ltd, China). The membrane was blocked with 5% milk for 1.5 h at room temperature after being washed three times in tris-buffered saline with Tween 20 (TBST; 8% NaCl, 0.2 M Tris-HCl, pH7.5, 1% Tween20) for 10 min each. Incubation with the primary antibody of ERα (1:2000, ab2746, Abcam), ERβ (1:1000, ab3577, Abcam), OTR (1:250, AP17658a, ABGENT), and β-actin (1:5000, cw0263, Beijing CoWin Biotech, China) diluted in blocking buffer was carried out overnight at 4°C. Then, the membrane was washed three times in TBST, for 10 min each, and incubated for 1 h at room temperature with the corresponding horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugated secondary antibody (cw0102 or cw0103, Beijing CoWin Biotech, China) diluted 1:5000 in blocking buffer. After being washed three times in TBST for 10 min each time, chemiluminescence with substrate (Millipore, USA) was performed using chemiluminescent-sensitive film (Kodak). Relative amounts were analyzed using Quantity One 4.6.2 software, while β-actin was chosen as the reference.

Intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection

Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; Beijing Chemical Works, China) and artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF) were selected as the solvent. The vehicle and the final concentration of each drug were as given below: ERα agonist-PPT (Tocris, Cat. No. 1426), 38% DMSO/ACSF, 2.5 μg/μL; OTR agonist-WAY 267464 dihydrochloride (Tocris, Cat. No. 3933), 35% DMSO/ACSF, 1.25 μg/μL.

As described previously [33], another 15 sexually naive Tph2^−/− female mice were anesthetized using sodium pentobarbital (80 mg/kg) by intraperitoneal injection and then placed in a stereotaxic frame (68001, RWD Life Science Co., Ltd, China) with blunt ear bars. One stainless-steel guide cannula (diameter, 0.48 mm, RWD Life Science Co., Ltd, China) was implanted into the brain, targeting the lateral ventricle at the following coordinates (mm) anteroposterior (AP)/mediolateral (ML)/dorsoventral (DV): −0.58/−1.0/−2.0, respectively, relative to Bregma [34]. We have checked that such intracerebroventricular administration would make the given solution diffuse to the whole ventricle. Then, the corresponding stylet (diameter, 0.3 mm; RWD Life Science Co., Ltd, China) was inserted into the cannula and removed only for the drug infusion. Mice were given at least 1 week to recover from surgery before testing. Then, each mouse received an injection of 2 μL test compounds at a rate of 300–400 nL/min. Binary choice tests were performed 30 min later. Each drug administration was repeated once to the same mice after approximately 1 week of rest, and the sum of the two investigation times was calculated and presented in the figure. All test recipient female mice were given approximately 1 week of rest between each new drug infusion for repeated use. Drug administration to sexually naive Tph2^−/− female mice was in the following order (the control group received an injection of the same amount of corresponding solvent): 1) ERα agonist plus OTR agonist in combination; 2) OTR agonist; 3) ERα agonist. During the course of this procedure, one sexually naive and two reproduction-experienced Tph2^−/− female mice belonging to the drug group died.

Statistical evaluation

The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to determine parametric or nonparametric tests. For binary choice tests, normally distributed data were tested using a paired-samples t-test, while non-normally distributed data were examined using a Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test. For others analyses, independent-samples t-test was used for normally distributed data and a Mann-Whitney U test was used for the nonparametric test. All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 16.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) with the critical value of a = 0.05.

Results

Sexually naive Tph2^−/− female mice showed normal olfactory discrimination

In habituation–dishabituation tests, sexually naive Tph2^−/− female mice were habituated to repeated exposure to the urine odor of male C57BL/6 mice (Mann-Whitney U test, Z = 2.889, N = 24, P = 0.004, Fig 1a), while they increased their investigation of the urine odor of C57BL/6 females (Mann-Whitney U test, Z = 2.310, N = 24, P = 0.021, Fig 1a).

Likewise, after sexually naive Tph2^−/− females habituated themselves to the urine odor of C57BL/6 males (Mann-Whitney U test, Z = 2.824, N = 24, P = 0.005, Fig 1b), they could be dishabituated by the urine odor of Balb/c males (Mann-Whitney U test, Z = 2.510, N = 24, P = 0.012, Fig 1b). This was also found for sexually naive Tph2^−/− female mice between repeated exposures to subordinate male urine (independent-samples t-test, t = 2.355, df = 22, P = 0.028, Fig 1c) and dominant male urine (independent-samples t-test, t = –2.465, df = 22, P = 0.022, Fig 1c).

Sexually naive Tph2^−/− females exhibited abnormal sociosexual olfactory preferences, but Tph2^+/+ females and reproduction-experienced Tph2^−/− females did not

In the binary choice tests, sexually naive Tph2^−/− female mice showed no olfactory preferences between the paired urine odor (Fig 2a–2c).

Nevertheless, sexually naive Tph2^+/+ female mice spent more time sniffing urine from male C57BL/6 mice than from female C57BL/6 mice (paired t = 2.707, df = 11, P = 0.020, Fig 2a). They also exhibited a tendency to prefer the urine of genetically dissimilar Balb/c males to that from genetically similar C57BL/6 males (Wilcoxon rank sum test, Z = 1.726, N = 12, P = 0.084, marginal significance, Fig 2b). Similarly, sexually naive Tph2^+/+ female mice showed an olfactory preference for dominant C57BL/6 males vs. subordinate C57BL/6 males (Wilcoxon rank sum test, Z = 2.187, N = 12, P = 0.028, Fig 2c). In addition, reproduction-experienced Tph2^+/+ females also exhibited an olfactory preference for male C57BL/6 mice to female C57BL/6 mice (Wilcoxon rank sum test, Z = 2.100, N = 8, P = 0.036, not shown in figure).

Meanwhile, similar to the sexually naive Tph2^+/+ female mice, the Tph2^−/− female mice with reproductive experiences preferred urine odor from male C57BL/6 mice to female C57BL/6 mice (Wilcoxon rank sum test, Z = 1.647, N = 12, P = 0.099, marginal significance, Fig 2a), male Balb/c mice to male C57BL/6 mice (Wilcoxon rank sum test, Z = 1.961, N = 12, P = 0.050, Fig 2b) and dominant males to subordinate males (Wilcoxon rank sum test, Z = 2.589, N = 12, P = 0.010, Fig 2c).

Both ERα and OTR in the amygdala of reproduction-experienced Tph2^−/− females presented higher expression at the mRNA level and an upward tendency at the protein level

Messenger RNA (mRNA) expression (independent-samples t-test, t = 2.812, df = 12, P = 0.016, Fig 3a), but not protein expression (Fig 3b), of OTR in the amygdala was lower in Tph2^+/+ females with reproductive experiences as compared with sexually naive Tph2^+/+ females. The expression of ERα and ERβ genes did not differ at either the mRNA or protein level between the sexually naive and reproduction-experienced Tph2^+/+ females (Fig 3a and 3b).

However, relative to sexually naive Tph2^−/− females, the mRNA expression of ERα (independent-samples t-test, t = 3.348, df = 10, P = 0.007, Fig 3c) and OTR (independent-samples t-test, t = 2.486, df = 10, P = 0.032, Fig 3c) in the amygdala became significantly higher in reproduction-experienced Tph2^−/− females. Similarly, compared with sexually naive Tph2^−/− females, the protein expression of OTR (independent-samples t-test, t = 2.252, df = 8, P = 0.054, marginal significance, Fig 3d) also exhibited an upward tendency in the amygdala of reproduction-experienced Tph2^−/− females. Moreover, there was a clear trend that the protein expression of ERα in the amygdala of reproduction-experienced Tph2^−/− females was higher than in sexually naive Tph2^−/− females (0.6374 ± 0.2385 vs. 1.4734 ± 0.4743, independent-samples t-test, t = 1.575, df = 8, P = 0.154, Fig 3d), although the difference did not reach statistical difference. In addition, as compared with sexually naive Tph2^−/− females, ERβ gene expression in the amygdala of reproduction-experienced Tph2^−/− females presented an upward tendency at the mRNA level (independent-samples t-test, t = 1.886, df = 9, P = 0.092, marginal significance, Fig 3c), but was unaltered at the protein level (Fig 3d).

Furthermore, as compared with sexually naive Tph2^+/+ female mice, the mRNA expression of ERα (independent-samples t-test, t = 2.878, df = 10, P = 0.016, Fig 3c) in the amygdala of sexually naive Tph2^−/− females was lower, while the mRNA expression of ERβ also had a downward tendency (independent-samples t-test, t = 2.159, df = 9, P = 0.059, marginal significance, Fig 3c). Likewise, at the protein level, compared with sexually naive Tph2^+/+ female mice, the expression of ERα (Mann-Whitney U test, Z = 2.402, N = 10, P = 0.016, Fig 3d) and OTR (Mann-Whitney U test, Z = 2.193, N = 10, P = 0.028, Fig 3d) rather than ERβ were also lower in the amygdala of sexually naive Tph2^−/− females.

OTR and ERα agonists combination, but not alone, rescued the deficit in the sexual olfactory preference of sexually naive Tph2^−/− female mice to a degree

Binary choice tests revealed that infusion of OTR and ERα agonists in combination could elicit sexually naive Tph2^−/− females to choose the urine odor of C57BL/6 males over that of C57BL/6 females to some extent (Wilcoxon rank sum test, Z = 1.947, N = 7, P = 0.051, marginal significance, Fig 4a), while the control group showed no sexual preferences (paired t = 0.778, df = 6, P = 0.466, Fig 4a). However, a single infusion of either OTR agonist or ERα agonist failed to elicit such sexual preferences (Fig 4b and 4c).

Discussion

It is well known that 5-HT is closely related to central information processing, stress adaption, anxiety, depression, aggression, sexual preference, and maternal care in rodents [14, 15, 18, 19, 35, 36]. The current study, in which sexually naive Tph2^−/− female mice could not recognize urine odor related to sex, corroborated previous studies that deficiency in central 5-HT could bring the loss of sexual preference [14, 15]. Additionally, the findings that sexually naive Tph2^−/− female mice could not recognize urine odor not only related to sex but also related to genetic relatedness and social hierarchy despite possessing normal olfactory discrimination extended previous observations [14, 15, 37].

As evident from extensive literature in this area, sexual preference can be affected by previous sexual experiences in both early life and adulthood in many species of rodents, such as hamsters, lemmings, prairie voles, and mice [8, 9, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42]. Usually, previous sex-related experiences would lower the threshold for stimuli that is capable of eliciting copulatory behaviors, increase sexual receptivity, confer a reproductive advantage, and increase the probability of coming into contact with better quality mates [8, 43, 44, 45, 46]. Furthermore, reproductive experiences have been suggested as playing a role in altering the endocrine status and conferring beneficial changes to females in terms of improving cognition and enhancing some aspects of memory in sexual behavior [10, 11]. For example, lesioning the vomeronasal organ (VNO), which is mainly responsible for the perception of sex pheromones, induced a loss of sexual responses in sexually naive males; however, sexual experiences restored such impairment by activating the main olfactory system [13, 47, 48, 49]. In the current study, reproductive experiences mitigated the disruptive effect of Tph2 knockout and may, thereby, have guided Tph2^−/− female mice toward male urine odor.

Reproduction-experienced Tph2^−/− female mice gained sexual olfactory preference, implying that some facilitative mechanisms may exist. The pathways through which estrogens and serotonin exert their effects appear to be linked, although each has an independent effect [22, 23]. A four-gene micronet involving ERα, ERβ, OT, and OTR has been proposed as the underlying regulatory basis [24, 50]. In the central processing of odorant signals, the amygdala is one of the most important brain regions, where olfactory signals from both the main and accessory olfactory system finally converge to enable socio-sexual recognition [2, 50, 51, 52]. Here, we found that the expressions of ERα and OTR in the amygdala of reproduction-experienced Tph2^−/− female mice were higher than in sexually naive Tph2^−/− females at the mRNA level. Meanwhile, at the protein level, relative to the sexually naive Tph2^−/− females, the expressions of ERα and OTR in the amygdala of reproduction-experienced Tph2^−/− female mice also exhibited an upward tendency. Moreover, OTR and ERα agonists in combination, but not singly, had a tendency to rescue the sexual olfactory preference of sexually naive Tph2^−/− female mice to some degree.

Consequently, from the upregulated expression of ERα and OTR in the amygdala of reproduction-experienced Tph2^−/− female mice together with the pharmacological effect of ERα and/or OTR agonist on sexual olfactory preference of Tph2^−/− female mice, we speculate that ERα and OTR might act in a combined way to exert their effects. Such findings confirm and further expand on the view of Young that ERα and OTR in the amygdala are necessary for the regulation of social identification and recognition [27]. Furthermore, these findings suggest that ERα and OTR might constitute the neurobiological basis through which estrogens and the OT system affect the central 5-HT system in its mediation of olfactory preference. Additionally, ERα and ERβ may differ in their importance for neuroprotection in that ERα, rather than ERβ, might be the required receptor for the neuroprotective effect following brain injury [53]. The present results also indicate a differential role of ERα and ERβ in regulating sexual olfactory preference in the context of a defective 5-HT signaling system in the brain.

However, as stated above, it should be pointed out that there were some weaknesses in the current study. As it is difficult to maintain the Tph2 line, we only have a limited sample size for each batch and each test. This small sample size may have caused some results to present marginal significance or no statistical difference, even though the tendency was suggestive. Furthermore, the fact that the estrous cycles were not determined in any test for recipient female mice was really a limitation and might account for the high variability and lack of statistical significance for some outcomes. Also, different batches used in binary choice tests was another limitation and might be the most important reasons that the investigation time seem to vary considerably between reproduction-experienced Tph2^−/− female mice in Figs 2 and 4. Moreover, restricted by technical limitations, for gene expression analysis, we just investigated the whole amygdala and could not identify a precise location of the specific subnuclei. Likewise, the ICV infusion just referred to the lateral ventricle rather than any specific brain area. Thus, this research remained at the level of rough correlation analysis and should be regarded with caution.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our results indicate that Tph2 knockout affected the ability of olfactory recognition rather than olfactory discrimination, which confirms and expand on previous findings. For the first time, reproductive experiences have been shown to mitigate the disruptive effect of Tph2 knockout on the sexual olfactory preference of female mice. Furthermore, ERα and OTR activation might constitute the neural substrates that are involved in the facilitative mechanisms.

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to Yi Rao’s laboratory (Peking University, Beijing) for the generous gift of the Tph2 line mice, Jinhua Zhang for animal breeding and behavioral tests, and Jinlong Han for early assistance in molecular techniques.

References

1. Ehman KD, Scott ME. Urinary odour preferences of MHC congenic female mice, Mus domesticus: implications for kin recognition and detection of parasitized males. Anim Behav. 2001; 62: 781–789.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
2. Dulac C, Torello AT. Molecular detection of pheromone signals in mammals: from genes to behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003; 4: 551–562. pmid:12838330
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Zhang YH, Zhang JX. Urine-derived key volatiles may signal genetic relatedness in male rats. Chem Senses. 2011; 36: 125–135. pmid:20978136
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Huck UW, Banks EM. Male dominance status, female choice and mating success in the brown lemming, Lemmus trimucronatus. Anim Behav. 1982; 30: 665–675.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
5. Zhang JX, Sun L, Bruce KE, Novotny MV. Chronic exposure of cat odor enhances aggression, urinary attractiveness and sex pheromones of mice. J Ethol. 2008; 26: 279–286.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
6. Huo Y, Fang Q, Shi YL, Zhang YH, Zhang JX. Chronic exposure to a predator or its scent does not inhibit male-male competition in male mice lacking brain serotonin. Front Behav Neurosci. 2014; 8: 116. pmid:24782727
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Tennenhouse EM. Inbreeding avoidance in male primates: a response to female mate choice? Ethology, 2014; 120: 111–119.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
8. Pfaus JG, Kippin TE, Centeno S. Conditioning and sexual behavior: a review. Horm Behav. 2001; 40: 291–321. pmid:11534994
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Woodson JC. Including ‘learned sexuality’ in the organization of sexual behavior. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2002; 26: 69–80. pmid:11835985
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Byrnes EM, Bridges RS. Reproductive experience alters anxiety-like behavior in the female rat. Horm Behav. 2006; 50: 70–76. pmid:16524576
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Macbeth AH, Luine VN. Changes in anxiety and cognition due to reproductive experience: A review of data from rodent and human mothers. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010; 34: 452–467. pmid:19761791
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Thor DH, Flannelly KJ. Social-olfactory experience and initiation of copulation in the virgin male rat. Physiol Behav. 1977; 19: 411–417. pmid:605165
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Pfeiffer CA, Johnston RE. Hormonal and behavioral responses of male hamsters to females and female odors: roles of olfaction, the vomeronasal system, and sexual experience. Physiol Behav. 1994; 55: 129–138. pmid:8140156
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Liu Y, Jiang Y, Si Y, Kim JY, Chen ZF, Rao Y. Molecular regulation of sexual preference revealed by genetic studies of 5-HT in the brains of male mice. Nature. 2011; 472: 95–99. pmid:21441904
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Zhang S, Liu Y, Rao Y. Serotonin signaling in the brain of adult female mice is required for sexual preference. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013; 110: 9968–9973. pmid:23716677
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Young SN, Leyton M. The role of serotonin in human mood and social interaction: Insight from altered tryptophan levels. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2002; 71: 857–865. pmid:11888576
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Gutknecht L, Waider J, Kraft S, Kriegebaum C, Holtmann B, Reif A, et al. Deficiency of brain 5-HT synthesis but serotonergic neuron formation in Tph2 knockout mice. J Neural Transm. 2008; 115: 1127–1132. pmid:18665319
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Alenina N, Kikic D, Todiras M, Mosienko V, Qadri F, Plehm R, et al. Growth retardation and altered autonomic control in mice lacking brain serotonin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009; 106: 10332–10337. pmid:19520831
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Mosienko V, Bert B, Beis D, Matthes S, Fink H, Bader M, et al. Exaggerated aggression and decreased anxiety in mice deficient in brain serotonin. Transl Psychiatry. 2012; 2: e122. pmid:22832966
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Andersson M, Simmons LW. Sexual selection and mate choice. Trends Ecol Evol. 2006; 21: 296–302. pmid:16769428
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Choleris E, Little SR, Mong JA, Puram SV, Langer R, Pfaff DW. Microparticle-based delivery of oxytocin receptor antisense DNA in the medial amygdala blocks social recognition in female mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008; 104: 4670–4675.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
22. Amin Z, Canli T, Epperson CN. Effect of estrogen-serotonin interactions on mood and cognition. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev. 2005; 4: 43–58. pmid:15886402
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Bethea CL, Lu NZ, Gundlah C, Streicher JM. Diverse actions of ovarian steroids in the serotonin neural system. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2002; 23: 41–100. pmid:11906203
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Choleris E, Gustafsson JA, Korach KS, Muglia LJ, Pfaff DW, Ogawa S. An estrogen-dependent four-gene micronet regulating social recognition: A study with oxytocin and estrogen receptor-α and –β knockout mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003; 100: 6192–6197. pmid:12730370
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Kavaliers M, Choleris E, Ågmo A, Muglia LJ, Ogawa S, Pfaff DW. Involvement of the oxytocin gene in the recognition and avoidance of parasitized males by female mice. Anim Behav. 2005; 70: 693–702.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
26. Donaldson ZR, Young LJ. Oxytocin, vasopressin, and the neurogenetics of sociality. Science. 2008; 322: 900–904. pmid:18988842
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Bonthuis PJ, Patteson JK, Rissman EF. Acquisition of sexual receptivity: roles of chromatin acetylation, estrogen receptor-alpha, and ovarian hormones. Endocrinology. 2011; 152: 3172–3181. pmid:21652725
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Clancy AN, Coquelin A, Macrides F, Gorski RA, Noble EP. Sexual behavior and aggression in male mice: involvement of the vomeronasal system. J Neurosci. 1984; 4: 2222–2229. pmid:6541245
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Liu YJ, Zhang JX, Zhang JH, Bao WD, Liu DZ. Vomeronasal organ ablation elicits chemosensory dysfunction and abnormal behavior in mice. J Ethol. 2010; 28: 263–271.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
30. Wang HS, Zhou CS, Guo W, Kang L. Thermoperiodic acclimations enhance cold hardiness of the eggs of the migratory locust. Cryobiology. 2006; 53: 206–217. pmid:16876151
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Malkani S, Wallace KJ, Donley MP, Rosen JB. An egr-1 (zif268) antisense oligodeoxynucleotide infused into the amygdala disrupts fear conditioning. Learn Mem. 2004; 11: 617–624. pmid:15466317
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Ke YD, Delerue F, Gladbach A, Götz J, Ittner LM. Experimental diabetes mellitus exacerbates tau pathology in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. PLoS One. 2009; 4: e7917. pmid:19936237
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Xu HY, Liu YJ, Xu MY, Zhang YH, Zhang JX, Wu YJ. Inactivation of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis suppresses the innate fear responses of rats induced by the odor of cat urine. Neuroscience. 2012; 221: 21–27. pmid:22766237
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Paxinos G, Franklin K. The mouse brain in stereotaxic coordinates. 2st ed. San Diego: Academic Press. 1997.
35. Kane MJ, Angoa-Peréz M, Briggs DI, Sykes CE, Francescutti DM, Rosenberg DR, et al. Mice genetically depleted of brain serotonin display social impairments, communication deficits and repetitive behaviors: possible relevance to autism. PLoS One. 2012; 7: e48975. pmid:23139830
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Sachs BD, Rodriguiz RM, Siesser WB, Kenan A, Royer EL, Jacobsen JP, et al. The effects of brain serotonin deficiency on behavioural disinhibition and anxiety-like behaviour following mild early life stress. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013; 16: 2081–2094. pmid:23672796
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Freichel M, Vennekens R, Olausson J, Hoffmann M, Müller C, Stolz S, et al. Functional role of TRPC proteins in vivo: lessons from TRPC-deficient mouse models. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004; 322: 1352–1358. pmid:15336983
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Landauer MR, Banks EM, Carter CS. Sexual and olfactory preferences of naive and experienced male hamsters. Anim Behav. 1978; 26: 611–621.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
39. Huck UW, Banks EM. Social olfaction in male brown lemmings (Lemmus sibiricus = trimucronatus) and collared lemmings (Dicrostonyx groenlandicus): I. Discrimination of species, sex, and estrous condition. J Comp Psychol. 1984; 98: 54–59. pmid:6368118
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Taylor SA, Dewsbury DA. Effects of experience and available cues on estrous versus diestrous preferences in male prairie voles, Microtus ochrogaster. Physiol Behav. 1988; 42: 379–388. pmid:3290915
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Féron C, Baudoin C. Sexual experience and preferences for odors of estrous females in staggerer mutant male mice. Behav Neural Biol. 1993; 60: 280–281. pmid:8297325
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. Patris B, Baudoin C. Female sexual preferences differ in Mus spicilegus and Mus musculus domesticus: the role of familiarization and sexual experience. Anim Behav. 1998; 56: 1465–1470. pmid:9933543
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. Thompson ML, Edwards DA. Experiential and strain determinants of the estrogen-progesterone induction of sexual receptivity in spayed female mice. Horm Behav. 1971; 2: 299–305.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
44. Crawford LL, Akins CK, Domjan M. Stimulus control of copulatory behavior in sexually naive male Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica): effects of test context and stimulus movement. J Comp Psychol. 1994; 108: 252–261. pmid:7924255
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. Moncho-Bogani J, Lanuza E, Hernández A, Novejarque A, Martínez-García F. Attractive properties of sexual pheromones in mice: innate or learned? Physiol Behav. 2002; 77: 167–176. pmid:12213516
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
46. Jouhanneau M, Cornilleau F, Keller M. Peripubertal exposure to male odors influences female puberty and adult expression of male-directed odor preference in mice. Horm Behav. 2014; 65: 128–133. pmid:24361197
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
47. Murphy MR, Schneider GE. Olfactory bulb removal eliminates mating behavior in the male golden hamster. Science. 1970; 167: 302–304. pmid:5409714
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
48. Winans SS, Powers JB. Olfactory and vomeronasal deafferentation of male hamsters: histological and behavioral analyses. Brain Res. 1977; 126: 325–344. pmid:861723
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
49. Powers JB, Fields RB, Winans SS. Olfactory and vomeronasal system participation in male hamsters' attraction to female vaginal secretions. Physiol Behav. 1979; 22: 77–84. pmid:451041
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
50. Choleris E, Ogawa S, Kavaliers M, Gustafsson JA, Korach KS, Muglia LJ, et al. Involvement of estrogen receptor α, β and oxytocin in social discrimination: a detailed behavioral analysis with knockout female mice. Genes, Brain Behav. 2006; 5: 528–539.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
51. Choi GB, Dong HW, Murphy AJ, Valenzuela DM, Yancopoulos GD, Swanson LW, et al. Lhx6 delineates a pathway mediating innate reproductive behaviors from the amygdala to the hypothalamus. Neuron. 2005; 46: 647–660. pmid:15944132
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
52. Brennan PA, Zufall F. Pheromonal communication in vertebrates. Nature. 2006; 444: 308–315. pmid:17108955
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
53. Dubal DB, Zhu H, Yu J, Rau SW, Shughrue PJ, Merchenthaler I, et al. Estrogen receptor α, not β, is a critical link in estradiol-mediated protection against brain injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001; 98: 1952–1957. pmid:11172057
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Ehman KD, Scott ME. Urinary odour preferences of MHC congenic female mice, Mus domesticus: implications for kin recognition and detection of parasitized males. Anim Behav. 2001; 62: 781–789.
View Article
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Dulac C, Torello AT. Molecular detection of pheromone signals in mammals: from genes to behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003; 4: 551–562. pmid:12838330
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[5] View Article

[6] PubMed/NCBI

[7] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Zhang YH, Zhang JX. Urine-derived key volatiles may signal genetic relatedness in male rats. Chem Senses. 2011; 36: 125–135. pmid:20978136
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[9] View Article

[10] PubMed/NCBI

[11] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Huck UW, Banks EM. Male dominance status, female choice and mating success in the brown lemming, Lemmus trimucronatus. Anim Behav. 1982; 30: 665–675.
View Article
Google Scholar

[13] View Article

[14] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Zhang JX, Sun L, Bruce KE, Novotny MV. Chronic exposure of cat odor enhances aggression, urinary attractiveness and sex pheromones of mice. J Ethol. 2008; 26: 279–286.
View Article
Google Scholar

[16] View Article

[17] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Huo Y, Fang Q, Shi YL, Zhang YH, Zhang JX. Chronic exposure to a predator or its scent does not inhibit male-male competition in male mice lacking brain serotonin. Front Behav Neurosci. 2014; 8: 116. pmid:24782727
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[19] View Article

[20] PubMed/NCBI

[21] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Tennenhouse EM. Inbreeding avoidance in male primates: a response to female mate choice? Ethology, 2014; 120: 111–119.
View Article
Google Scholar

[23] View Article

[24] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Pfaus JG, Kippin TE, Centeno S. Conditioning and sexual behavior: a review. Horm Behav. 2001; 40: 291–321. pmid:11534994
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] PubMed/NCBI

[28] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Woodson JC. Including ‘learned sexuality’ in the organization of sexual behavior. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2002; 26: 69–80. pmid:11835985
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[30] View Article

[31] PubMed/NCBI

[32] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Byrnes EM, Bridges RS. Reproductive experience alters anxiety-like behavior in the female rat. Horm Behav. 2006; 50: 70–76. pmid:16524576
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[34] View Article

[35] PubMed/NCBI

[36] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Macbeth AH, Luine VN. Changes in anxiety and cognition due to reproductive experience: A review of data from rodent and human mothers. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010; 34: 452–467. pmid:19761791
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[38] View Article

[39] PubMed/NCBI

[40] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Thor DH, Flannelly KJ. Social-olfactory experience and initiation of copulation in the virgin male rat. Physiol Behav. 1977; 19: 411–417. pmid:605165
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[42] View Article

[43] PubMed/NCBI

[44] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Pfeiffer CA, Johnston RE. Hormonal and behavioral responses of male hamsters to females and female odors: roles of olfaction, the vomeronasal system, and sexual experience. Physiol Behav. 1994; 55: 129–138. pmid:8140156
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[46] View Article

[47] PubMed/NCBI

[48] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Liu Y, Jiang Y, Si Y, Kim JY, Chen ZF, Rao Y. Molecular regulation of sexual preference revealed by genetic studies of 5-HT in the brains of male mice. Nature. 2011; 472: 95–99. pmid:21441904
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[50] View Article

[51] PubMed/NCBI

[52] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Zhang S, Liu Y, Rao Y. Serotonin signaling in the brain of adult female mice is required for sexual preference. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013; 110: 9968–9973. pmid:23716677
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[54] View Article

[55] PubMed/NCBI

[56] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Young SN, Leyton M. The role of serotonin in human mood and social interaction: Insight from altered tryptophan levels. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2002; 71: 857–865. pmid:11888576
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[58] View Article

[59] PubMed/NCBI

[60] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Gutknecht L, Waider J, Kraft S, Kriegebaum C, Holtmann B, Reif A, et al. Deficiency of brain 5-HT synthesis but serotonergic neuron formation in Tph2 knockout mice. J Neural Transm. 2008; 115: 1127–1132. pmid:18665319
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[62] View Article

[63] PubMed/NCBI

[64] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Alenina N, Kikic D, Todiras M, Mosienko V, Qadri F, Plehm R, et al. Growth retardation and altered autonomic control in mice lacking brain serotonin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009; 106: 10332–10337. pmid:19520831
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[66] View Article

[67] PubMed/NCBI

[68] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Mosienko V, Bert B, Beis D, Matthes S, Fink H, Bader M, et al. Exaggerated aggression and decreased anxiety in mice deficient in brain serotonin. Transl Psychiatry. 2012; 2: e122. pmid:22832966
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[70] View Article

[71] PubMed/NCBI

[72] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Andersson M, Simmons LW. Sexual selection and mate choice. Trends Ecol Evol. 2006; 21: 296–302. pmid:16769428
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[74] View Article

[75] PubMed/NCBI

[76] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Choleris E, Little SR, Mong JA, Puram SV, Langer R, Pfaff DW. Microparticle-based delivery of oxytocin receptor antisense DNA in the medial amygdala blocks social recognition in female mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008; 104: 4670–4675.
View Article
Google Scholar

[78] View Article

[79] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Amin Z, Canli T, Epperson CN. Effect of estrogen-serotonin interactions on mood and cognition. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev. 2005; 4: 43–58. pmid:15886402
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[81] View Article

[82] PubMed/NCBI

[83] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Bethea CL, Lu NZ, Gundlah C, Streicher JM. Diverse actions of ovarian steroids in the serotonin neural system. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2002; 23: 41–100. pmid:11906203
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[85] View Article

[86] PubMed/NCBI

[87] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Choleris E, Gustafsson JA, Korach KS, Muglia LJ, Pfaff DW, Ogawa S. An estrogen-dependent four-gene micronet regulating social recognition: A study with oxytocin and estrogen receptor-α and –β knockout mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003; 100: 6192–6197. pmid:12730370
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[89] View Article

[90] PubMed/NCBI

[91] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Kavaliers M, Choleris E, Ågmo A, Muglia LJ, Ogawa S, Pfaff DW. Involvement of the oxytocin gene in the recognition and avoidance of parasitized males by female mice. Anim Behav. 2005; 70: 693–702.
View Article
Google Scholar

[93] View Article

[94] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Donaldson ZR, Young LJ. Oxytocin, vasopressin, and the neurogenetics of sociality. Science. 2008; 322: 900–904. pmid:18988842
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[96] View Article

[97] PubMed/NCBI

[98] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Bonthuis PJ, Patteson JK, Rissman EF. Acquisition of sexual receptivity: roles of chromatin acetylation, estrogen receptor-alpha, and ovarian hormones. Endocrinology. 2011; 152: 3172–3181. pmid:21652725
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[100] View Article

[101] PubMed/NCBI

[102] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Clancy AN, Coquelin A, Macrides F, Gorski RA, Noble EP. Sexual behavior and aggression in male mice: involvement of the vomeronasal system. J Neurosci. 1984; 4: 2222–2229. pmid:6541245
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[104] View Article

[105] PubMed/NCBI

[106] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Liu YJ, Zhang JX, Zhang JH, Bao WD, Liu DZ. Vomeronasal organ ablation elicits chemosensory dysfunction and abnormal behavior in mice. J Ethol. 2010; 28: 263–271.
View Article
Google Scholar

[108] View Article

[109] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Wang HS, Zhou CS, Guo W, Kang L. Thermoperiodic acclimations enhance cold hardiness of the eggs of the migratory locust. Cryobiology. 2006; 53: 206–217. pmid:16876151
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[111] View Article

[112] PubMed/NCBI

[113] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Malkani S, Wallace KJ, Donley MP, Rosen JB. An egr-1 (zif268) antisense oligodeoxynucleotide infused into the amygdala disrupts fear conditioning. Learn Mem. 2004; 11: 617–624. pmid:15466317
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[115] View Article

[116] PubMed/NCBI

[117] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Ke YD, Delerue F, Gladbach A, Götz J, Ittner LM. Experimental diabetes mellitus exacerbates tau pathology in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. PLoS One. 2009; 4: e7917. pmid:19936237
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[119] View Article

[120] PubMed/NCBI

[121] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Xu HY, Liu YJ, Xu MY, Zhang YH, Zhang JX, Wu YJ. Inactivation of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis suppresses the innate fear responses of rats induced by the odor of cat urine. Neuroscience. 2012; 221: 21–27. pmid:22766237
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[123] View Article

[124] PubMed/NCBI

[125] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Paxinos G, Franklin K. The mouse brain in stereotaxic coordinates. 2st ed. San Diego: Academic Press. 1997.

[ref35] 35. Kane MJ, Angoa-Peréz M, Briggs DI, Sykes CE, Francescutti DM, Rosenberg DR, et al. Mice genetically depleted of brain serotonin display social impairments, communication deficits and repetitive behaviors: possible relevance to autism. PLoS One. 2012; 7: e48975. pmid:23139830
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[128] View Article

[129] PubMed/NCBI

[130] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Sachs BD, Rodriguiz RM, Siesser WB, Kenan A, Royer EL, Jacobsen JP, et al. The effects of brain serotonin deficiency on behavioural disinhibition and anxiety-like behaviour following mild early life stress. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013; 16: 2081–2094. pmid:23672796
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[132] View Article

[133] PubMed/NCBI

[134] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Freichel M, Vennekens R, Olausson J, Hoffmann M, Müller C, Stolz S, et al. Functional role of TRPC proteins in vivo: lessons from TRPC-deficient mouse models. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004; 322: 1352–1358. pmid:15336983
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[136] View Article

[137] PubMed/NCBI

[138] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Landauer MR, Banks EM, Carter CS. Sexual and olfactory preferences of naive and experienced male hamsters. Anim Behav. 1978; 26: 611–621.
View Article
Google Scholar

[140] View Article

[141] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Huck UW, Banks EM. Social olfaction in male brown lemmings (Lemmus sibiricus = trimucronatus) and collared lemmings (Dicrostonyx groenlandicus): I. Discrimination of species, sex, and estrous condition. J Comp Psychol. 1984; 98: 54–59. pmid:6368118
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[143] View Article

[144] PubMed/NCBI

[145] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Taylor SA, Dewsbury DA. Effects of experience and available cues on estrous versus diestrous preferences in male prairie voles, Microtus ochrogaster. Physiol Behav. 1988; 42: 379–388. pmid:3290915
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[147] View Article

[148] PubMed/NCBI

[149] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Féron C, Baudoin C. Sexual experience and preferences for odors of estrous females in staggerer mutant male mice. Behav Neural Biol. 1993; 60: 280–281. pmid:8297325
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[151] View Article

[152] PubMed/NCBI

[153] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Patris B, Baudoin C. Female sexual preferences differ in Mus spicilegus and Mus musculus domesticus: the role of familiarization and sexual experience. Anim Behav. 1998; 56: 1465–1470. pmid:9933543
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[155] View Article

[156] PubMed/NCBI

[157] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Thompson ML, Edwards DA. Experiential and strain determinants of the estrogen-progesterone induction of sexual receptivity in spayed female mice. Horm Behav. 1971; 2: 299–305.
View Article
Google Scholar

[159] View Article

[160] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Crawford LL, Akins CK, Domjan M. Stimulus control of copulatory behavior in sexually naive male Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica): effects of test context and stimulus movement. J Comp Psychol. 1994; 108: 252–261. pmid:7924255
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[162] View Article

[163] PubMed/NCBI

[164] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Moncho-Bogani J, Lanuza E, Hernández A, Novejarque A, Martínez-García F. Attractive properties of sexual pheromones in mice: innate or learned? Physiol Behav. 2002; 77: 167–176. pmid:12213516
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[166] View Article

[167] PubMed/NCBI

[168] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Jouhanneau M, Cornilleau F, Keller M. Peripubertal exposure to male odors influences female puberty and adult expression of male-directed odor preference in mice. Horm Behav. 2014; 65: 128–133. pmid:24361197
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[170] View Article

[171] PubMed/NCBI

[172] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Murphy MR, Schneider GE. Olfactory bulb removal eliminates mating behavior in the male golden hamster. Science. 1970; 167: 302–304. pmid:5409714
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[174] View Article

[175] PubMed/NCBI

[176] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Winans SS, Powers JB. Olfactory and vomeronasal deafferentation of male hamsters: histological and behavioral analyses. Brain Res. 1977; 126: 325–344. pmid:861723
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[178] View Article

[179] PubMed/NCBI

[180] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Powers JB, Fields RB, Winans SS. Olfactory and vomeronasal system participation in male hamsters' attraction to female vaginal secretions. Physiol Behav. 1979; 22: 77–84. pmid:451041
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[182] View Article

[183] PubMed/NCBI

[184] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Choleris E, Ogawa S, Kavaliers M, Gustafsson JA, Korach KS, Muglia LJ, et al. Involvement of estrogen receptor α, β and oxytocin in social discrimination: a detailed behavioral analysis with knockout female mice. Genes, Brain Behav. 2006; 5: 528–539.
View Article
Google Scholar

[186] View Article

[187] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. Choi GB, Dong HW, Murphy AJ, Valenzuela DM, Yancopoulos GD, Swanson LW, et al. Lhx6 delineates a pathway mediating innate reproductive behaviors from the amygdala to the hypothalamus. Neuron. 2005; 46: 647–660. pmid:15944132
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[189] View Article

[190] PubMed/NCBI

[191] Google Scholar

[ref52] 52. Brennan PA, Zufall F. Pheromonal communication in vertebrates. Nature. 2006; 444: 308–315. pmid:17108955
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[193] View Article

[194] PubMed/NCBI

[195] Google Scholar

[ref53] 53. Dubal DB, Zhu H, Yu J, Rau SW, Shughrue PJ, Merchenthaler I, et al. Estrogen receptor α, not β, is a critical link in estradiol-mediated protection against brain injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001; 98: 1952–1957. pmid:11172057
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[197] View Article

[198] PubMed/NCBI

[199] Google Scholar

Tph2^−/− female mice restore socio-sexual recognition through upregulating ERα and OTR genes in the amygdala

Tph2^−/− female mice restore socio-sexual recognition through upregulating ERα and OTR genes in the amygdala

Correction

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and methods

Experimental animals

Ethical notes

Reproductive experiences

Urine collection

Binary test of urinary attractiveness

Habituation–dishabituation test

Tissue sampling

Real-time polymerase chain reactions

Western blot

Intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection

Statistical evaluation

Results

Sexually naive Tph2^−/− female mice showed normal olfactory discrimination

Sexually naive Tph2^−/− females exhibited abnormal sociosexual olfactory preferences, but Tph2^+/+ females and reproduction-experienced Tph2^−/− females did not

Both ERα and OTR in the amygdala of reproduction-experienced Tph2^−/− females presented higher expression at the mRNA level and an upward tendency at the protein level

OTR and ERα agonists combination, but not alone, rescued the deficit in the sexual olfactory preference of sexually naive Tph2^−/− female mice to a degree

Discussion

Conclusions

Acknowledgments

References

Correction

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and methods

Experimental animals

Ethical notes

Reproductive experiences

Urine collection

Binary test of urinary attractiveness

Habituation–dishabituation test

Tissue sampling

Real-time polymerase chain reactions

Western blot

Intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection

Statistical evaluation

Results

Sexually naive Tph2−/− female mice showed normal olfactory discrimination

Sexually naive Tph2−/− females exhibited abnormal sociosexual olfactory preferences, but Tph2+/+ females and reproduction-experienced Tph2−/− females did not

Both ERα and OTR in the amygdala of reproduction-experienced Tph2−/− females presented higher expression at the mRNA level and an upward tendency at the protein level

OTR and ERα agonists combination, but not alone, rescued the deficit in the sexual olfactory preference of sexually naive Tph2−/− female mice to a degree

Discussion

Conclusions

Acknowledgments

References

Sexually naive Tph2^−/− female mice showed normal olfactory discrimination

Sexually naive Tph2^−/− females exhibited abnormal sociosexual olfactory preferences, but Tph2^+/+ females and reproduction-experienced Tph2^−/− females did not

Both ERα and OTR in the amygdala of reproduction-experienced Tph2^−/− females presented higher expression at the mRNA level and an upward tendency at the protein level

OTR and ERα agonists combination, but not alone, rescued the deficit in the sexual olfactory preference of sexually naive Tph2^−/− female mice to a degree