http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2979-9314
Figures
Abstract
The reproductive season is energetically costly as revealed by elevated glucocorticoid concentrations, constrained immune functions and an increased risk of infections. Social allies and affiliative interactions may buffer physiological stress responses and thereby alleviate associated effects. In the present study, we investigated the seasonal differences of immune reactive corticosterone metabolite concentrations, endoparasite burden (nematode eggs and coccidian oocysts) and affiliative interactions in northern bald ibis (Geronticus eremita), a critically endangered bird. In total, 43 individually marked focal animals from a free-ranging colony were investigated. The analyses included a description of initiated and received affiliative interactions, pair bond status as well as seasonal patterns of hormone and endoparasite levels. During the reproductive season, droppings contained parasite eggs more often and corticosterone metabolite levels were higher as compared to the period after reproduction. The excretion rate of endoparasite products was lower in paired individuals than in unpaired ones, but paired animals exhibited higher corticosterone metabolite concentrations than unpaired individuals. Furthermore, paired individuals initiated affiliative behaviour more frequently than unpaired ones. This suggests that the reproductive season influences the excretion patterns of endoparasite products and corticosterone metabolites and that affiliative interactions between pair partners may positively affect endoparasite burden during periods of elevated glucocorticoid levels. Being embedded in a pair bond may have a positive impact on individual immune system and parasite resistance.
Citation: Puehringer-Sturmayr V, Wascher CAF, Loretto M-C, Palme R, Stoewe M, Kotrschal K, et al. (2018) Seasonal differences of corticosterone metabolite concentrations and parasite burden in northern bald ibis (Geronticus eremita): The role of affiliative interactions. PLoS ONE 13(1): e0191441. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191441
Editor: Heike Lutermann, University of Pretoria, SOUTH AFRICA
Received: June 29, 2017; Accepted: January 4, 2018; Published: January 24, 2018
Copyright: © 2018 Puehringer-Sturmayr et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This study was funded by a Sparkling Science grant (SPA-05/026, https://www.sparklingscience.at/) to DF, VP-S and M-CL. Permanent support is provided by the “Verein der Förderer der Konrad Lorenz Forschungsstelle”, and the “Herzog von Cumberland Stiftung”. Open access funding provided by University of Vienna. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
The reproductive season is considered socially and energetically costly when compared to the post-reproductive one [1,2]. Such costs of reproduction are often manifested by up-regulated glucocorticoid secretion and constrained immune functions [3,4]. For instance, territorial male Alpine chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra) showed elevated cortisol metabolite concentrations and parasite levels during the mating season as compared to the post-mating period [5]. Chronically elevated glucocorticoid levels suppress immune function [6] and the down-regulation of the immune system may increase the susceptibility to parasitic infections [7–10]. The physiological costs of parasitic infection can be confirmed by experimentally removing parasites. Wild mice populations (Peromyscus maniculatus and P. leucopus; [11]) and cliff swallows (Petrochelidon pyrrhonota; [12]) showed reduced corticosterone levels when intestinal nematodes or hematophagous ectoparasites were removed. Furthermore, in greylag geese (Anser anser) parasite excretion decreased throughout the parental season, which has been suggested to be related to the high energetic costs of the reproductive season [13]. Furthermore, in altricial birds parental care is modulated by the offspring’s parasite load [14,15]. When caring for parasitized offspring, blue tit parents (Parus caeruleus) increased their feeding rates in compensation [14], whereas reduced parental effort was shown in male spotless starlings (Sturnus unicolor) with parasitized nests [15]. However, information on the contribution of other individual life-history traits (e.g. sex, age, social status) is difficult to obtain in free-living social animals, which may complicate the analyses of parasite infection patterns [13,16].
Social allies and affiliative behaviour may help buffering physiological stress responses [17–21]. For example, Barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus; [22]) and wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii, [23]) showed decreased glucocorticoids in the company of a bonding partner, suggesting that affiliative interactions may provide a buffer against stressors, benefitting immune function and alleviating parasite burden. Furthermore, in chicks of domestic hens (Gallus gallus domesticus), the presence of the mother buffered the stress response to an aversive stimulus [24] and in greylag geese the presence of socially supportive family members reduced corticosterone secretion [13,18,19]. Although individual levels of corticosterone metabolites in parental geese were negatively correlated with the number of offspring [19], the excretion of nematode eggs increased with family size [13], indicating that parental effort is costly [25]. A recent study in northern bald ibis (Geronticus eremita) showed that paired individuals excreting high levels of endoparasite products during the reproductive season also engaged in more allopreening behaviour [26].
We presently aim at investigating the seasonal differences of concentrations of excreted immune reactive corticosterone metabolites (CM), parasite burden (as measured by the number of samples containing endoparasite products) and frequencies of affiliative behaviour between the reproductive and post-reproductive season in the free-roaming and individually marked colony of northern bald ibis at the Konrad Lorenz Research Station (Austria). This seasonally monogamous and year-round colonial species breeds in dense colonies and forages in flocks, that often split into subgroups of different sizes [27]. Pair bond stability changes with time in seasonally monogamous species, with strong social bonds among the adults at the start of each reproductive season and loose ones during the post-reproductive period [28]. Especially for paired individuals we expected higher levels of corticosterone metabolites and endoparasite products in the reproductive period as compared to the post-reproductive one. We also expected paired individuals to engage more often in affiliative interactions than unpaired ones, with interactions occurring more frequently during the reproductive season than outside.
We distinguished between initiated and received affiliative behaviour since they may differ in their effects on glucocorticoid secretion, as measured by a reduced excretion of CM [29], self-directed behaviours (self-grooming/self-scratching) [30,31] or heart rate [32–34]. We predicted that receiving rather than initiating affiliative behaviour may lead to a greater reduction of glucocorticoid levels and hence to reduced parasite burden.
Material and methods
This study complies with all current Austrian laws and regulations concerning the work with wildlife. Catching, restraining of the birds, observing the animals and collecting droppings were performed under Animal Experiment Licence Number 66.006/0026-WF/V/3b/2014 by the Austrian Federal Ministry for Science and Research (EU Standard, equivalent to the Animal Ethics Board). We confirm that the owner of the land, the Duke of Cumberland, gave permission to conduct the study on this site. All data were collected non-invasively. Birds were habituated to the presence of humans.
Field site and study animals
The study was conducted in Grünau im Almtal (Upper Austria, 47°48’E, 13°56’N). The free-ranging colony of northern bald ibis was established in 1997 at the Konrad Lorenz Research Station (KLF) in Grünau im Almtal by hand-raising zoo-bred chicks [35] in coordination with the European Breeding Programme (EEP, [36]). Since 2001 the birds raise their chicks autonomously and the colony has grown to more than 40 individuals. The animals are housed in a large aviary, which is open year round, at the local Herzog-von-Cumberland game park. They are free-flying and roam the foraging grounds in the Almtal-region, returning to the aviary for roosting at night and for breeding. From November to May the birds are supplied twice a day with hash made from 1-day-old chicks mixed with soaked dog food (Alpha Multicroc, RWA Raiffeisen Ware Austria AG, Vienna, Austria). All birds are individually marked with a combination of coloured leg rings. At the start of data collection, the colony consisted of 43 birds (focal animals; Nmales = 24, Nfemales = 19). The age ranged from 0 to 16 years (mean: 4.2). According to the classification described by Böhm and Pegoraro [27] focal individuals were assigned to three different age classes: (1) juvenile (first year after hatching, N = 6), (2) sub-adult (second and third year after hatching, N = 15) and (3) adult (from fourth year on, N = 22). Details about focal individuals (name, sex, year of hatching, pair bond status) are given in S1 Table.
Data collection
Behavioural data and individual droppings were collected over a period of 112 days between 15 May 2015 and 31 October 2015. Days of data collection were irregularly distributed over the sampling period, as the northern bald ibis population flew to Molln (Upper Austria, 47°53’E, 14°15’N; 25 km linear distance from Grünau im Almtal; 112 days in Grünau and 76 days in Molln) and stayed there from August until October. In Molln, standardised data collection was not possible, due to inaccessible foraging grounds (e.g. cow paddocks). Hence, data collected in Molln were excluded from the analyses. We included both the reproductive and post-reproductive season in this study. The reproductive season was determined as the time from rearing to fledging of the offspring (generally from May to mid-June, provisioning phase), whereas the post-reproductive season lasted from mid-June to October. Due to individual variations in the start of egg-laying, beginning and end of both periods were determined separately for each breeding pair depending on the hatching date of the offspring.
Behavioural data.
The behaviour was measured by applying a continuous recording method [37,38] for each focal individual. All focal observations were evenly distributed during daylight hours (i.e. between 08.00 AM and 08.00 PM) to avoid temporal biases. Behavioural protocols lasted 5 minutes per individual and were recorded using the software CyberTracker (CyberTracker Conservation, Cape Town, South Africa; www.cybertracker.org, [39]). The frequencies of affiliative behaviours initiated and received by the focal birds, such as greeting, preening, preening invitation, mutual bill shaking and contact sitting were monitored in the aviary or the nearby foraging grounds (for a detailed description of northern bald ibis’ ethogram: see [40]). In sum, a total of 284 behavioural protocols were collected over the entire period ( ± SE: 6.6 ± 0.8 focal observations per individual). The mean frequencies per minute per individual per week were: initiated– 0.72 ± 0.10, received– 0.10 ± 0.04.
Collection of droppings and analysis of corticosterone metabolites.
Droppings of the focal individuals were collected in order to determine the amount of (1) CM and (2) excreted endoparasite products (nematode eggs and coccidian oocysts).
Steroid metabolites in droppings represent an integrated, proportional record of the unbound portion of plasma steroids depending on the frequency of defecation and gut passage time [41]. We assumed the gut passage time of northern bald ibises to be 2–3 hours, comparable to the white ibis (Eudocimus albus) which are similar in size and diet [42]. The sample collection was performed daily independently of behavioural observations. To account for possible endogenous diurnal variations, droppings were collected during the same time period (04.00 PM to 07.00 PM CET). The samples were collected immediately after defecation in Eppendorf® microtubes (Eppendorf®, Hamburg, Germany), with one sample per tube in order to avoid contamination with other droppings. Due to constraints of dropping collection in the field, the sample size varies in the different analyses. The samples were (1) stored on ice during collection and then frozen at -20°C within 3 hours after collection for the determination of CM or (2) stored at +6°C and analysed within 7 days after collection for parasite burden. A total number of 142 droppings were collected for CM analysis (on average: ± SE = 3.74 ± 0.47 samples per individual) and 130 for parasite burden (on average:
± SE = 4.06 ± 0.57 samples per individual). The different sample sizes result from the fact that CM and parasite samples were collected independently from each other. CM were determined using an enzyme immunoassay (EIA, selection for the best suited assay see below) [43] at the laboratory of the Department of Behavioural Biology, University of Vienna (Austria). The intra- and interassay coefficients of variation were below 5%.
Selection of the best-suited assay.
Besides the data collection described above, we compared several available enzyme immunoassays in order to select the best-suited one for measuring corticosterone secretion in the northern bald ibis, a necessary step when using such non-invasive methods for measuring faecal glucocorticoid metabolites [44,45].
To evaluate which of the currently available EIAs is best suited for measuring adrenocortical activity of the northern bald ibis, a handling experiment was run on two experimental days in December 2015 and January 2016. Four individuals (2 males and 2 females, S1 Table) were subjected to a handling stress. For baseline CM levels droppings were collected one day prior to the experiment during the same time period in which an increase in CM concentrations was expected in response to the handling stress on the following day (10.00 AM to 12.00 AM). We tested males and females separately on two different days. The focal individuals were captured between 09.30 AM and 09.45 AM on both experimental days to avoid the early morning peaks of adrenocortical activity [46] and to prevent unnecessary disturbance of the other colony individuals. Upon capture, each bird was put into a cloth bag (approximately 40x45x2 cm) for 10 minutes. Afterwards, the individuals were released into a test room, which was divided into two compartments by a mesh. Both birds were in visual and acoustic contact with each other and with the other members of the colony in the main aviary. We kept the birds to be tested separated from the other birds to prevent cross-contamination of droppings and to enable the simultaneous data collection of two individuals. The test room was enriched with branches and the floor was covered with a clear tarp to facilitate the collection of each dropping. Dropping collection was conducted for 6 hours after the beginning of the experiments (i.e. approximately between 10.00 AM and 04.00 PM). The exact time of defecation was recorded for each sample. An aliquot (0.5 g) of each dropping was extracted with 5 ml 60% methanol [47]. The analysis was run at the Department of Biomedical Sciences, Unit of Physiology, Pathophysiology and Experimental Endocrinology, University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna (Austria). The following 5 assays, which work well in diverse bird species, were tested on northern bald ibis droppings to determine the best-suited one: a corticosterone EIA ([41]; this assay has previously been used for northern bald ibis droppings by Sorato and Kotrschal [48]), an 11-oxoaetiocholanolone EIA [43], a cortisone EIA [49], an 11ß-hydroxyaetiocholanolone EIA [50] and a 5α-pregnane-3ß,11ß,21-triol-20-one EIA [51]. All extracts were diluted with assay buffer (1:10) and 50 μl were used for the EIA. All samples were analysed in duplicates. The 11-oxoaetiocholanolone assay (‘best assay’) turned out to be the most appropriate for northern bald ibis droppings, meaning that this assay is considerably more sensitive compared to the others. In fact, it detected higher peak values within the same sample (highest increase of median CM concentration from baseline–best assay: 348%, corticosterone EIA: 293%; Fig 1). Furthermore, the ‘best assay’ also detected peaks of CM concentrations over a longer time period after the stress-induced handling, whereas the corticosterone EIA only detected the first peak concentration.
Median (± SE) levels of excreted corticosterone metabolites of all four individuals for the 11-oxoaetiocholanolone enzyme immunoassay (best-suited assay, grey boxplots) and the corticosterone enzyme immunoassay (white boxplots). Nindividuals = 4, Nsamples = 81.
Parasitological examination.
The examination for excreted parasite products (nematode eggs and coccidian oocysts) was done using a flotation method in a McMaster counting chamber [52]. At least 0.1 g dropping was diluted with the triple volume of saturated NaCl solution (350 g NaCl, 1000 ml distilled water) and filtered through a sieve to remove large food particles and debris. The remaining solution was transferred into both McMaster counting chambers, in which the excreted coccidian oocysts and nematode eggs were counted. A value for oocysts/eggs per gramme faeces was calculated according to Hiepe et al. [52]:
Due to generally low parasite egg and oocyst abundance in the samples (percentage of samples containing nematode eggs: 22.52%; percentage of samples containing coccidian oocysts: 15.32%), we treated samples either as containing or not containing nematode eggs or coccidian oocysts.
Statistical analyses
All statistical analyses were conducted using R version 3.2.5 [53] and the additional packages ‘glmmADMB’ [54,55] for calculation of generalised linear mixed models (GLMM) and ‘MuMIn’ [56] for information-theoretic model selection as well as model averaging based on the information criteria. A ratio per minute was calculated for all behavioural parameters observed. Due to few occurrences of behavioural interactions, we treated initiated and received affiliative behaviour as a binomial variable, i.e. occurred or not occurred events, which were taken into further statistical analyses.
To assess which factors influence (1) parasite burden (samples containing nematode eggs and coccidian oocysts–yes/no), (2) initiated (yes/no) and (3) received (yes/no) affiliative behaviour (all three response variables) we used GLMMs with binomial error distribution and logit link function. To analyse which factors influence (4) CM (response variable) we used a GLMM with gamma error distribution and inverse link function. Fixed factors in these models were (1) sex, (2) age, (3) pair bond status (paired, unpaired) and (4) season (reproductive and post-reproductive season). Since the northern bald ibis is a social, seasonally monogamous and colonial species, affiliative interactions can be observed between all colony members. Therefore, we also included pair bond status as a fixed factor in the affiliative behaviour models. Subject identities were included as random factors in all GLMMs to control for between-subject variation and unbalanced design. Field constraints did not allow a regular data collection for the three data sets (parasite burden, CM, affiliative behaviour). Interactions between fixed factors were not considered in the statistical analyses as they did not improve the model fit.
To select the best models, we used an information theoretic approach and calculated all possible candidate models [57]. We ranked them according to their AICc values (second-order form of Akaike’s information criterion to account for small sample sizes; [58]) and selected the models with ΔAICc ≤ 2 with respect to the top-ranked model. The models were averaged in order to create model-averaged coefficients following Burnham & Anderson [57].
Results
Model-averaged results identified season as the strongest determinant of the excretion patterns of nematode eggs and coccidian oocysts. The number of droppings containing endoparasite products was highest during the reproductive season as compared to the time after reproduction (Fig 2). While season was the second-most important variable for corticosterone metabolite (CM) concentrations, it was the least important parameter for initiated affiliative behaviour. During the reproductive season, we found higher CM levels as compared to the post-reproductive period. Affiliative interactions were initiated more frequently during the reproductive season, while the rates decreased in the post-reproductive period (Fig 3).
Percentage of samples containing (grey bars) as well as not containing (white bars) endoparasite products for the reproductive and post-reproductive season. Nreproductive = 83, Npost-reproductive = 28, Nsamples = 111.
Percentage of occurrences of initiated affiliative behaviour for the reproductive and post-reproductive season. Nreproductive = 87, Npost-reproductive = 197.
Pair bond status was the second-most important variable influencing the excretion of coccidian oocysts. Furthermore, pair bond status was indicated as the third-most important variable for nematode egg excretion, CM levels and initiated affiliative behaviour. Paired individuals excreted fewer droppings containing endoparasites (Fig 4) and exhibited generally higher CM concentrations and initiated more often affiliative behaviour as compared to unpaired ones.
Percentage of samples containing (grey bars) as well as not containing (white bars) endoparasite products for paired and unpaired individuals. Npaired = 10, Nunpaired = 22, Nsamples = 130.
We found that initiated affiliative behaviour and the excretion pattern of nematode eggs were best explained by sex. Males initiated affiliative interactions more frequently and excreted a higher number of droppings containing endoparasite products than females. The relative importance indicated the variable sex to be less important for coccidian oocysts. Furthermore, sex had no influence on CM.
The most influential variable on the excretion patterns of CM was age, with juveniles exhibiting higher CM levels compared to adults, whereas sub-adult individuals showed lower concentrations than adults. Furthermore, it was the second-most influential variable for initiated affiliative behaviour. A higher frequency of initiating affiliative behaviour was found in juveniles compared to adults, whereas sub-adults initiated less than adults. Age had the least importance when considering the excretion patterns of coccidian oocysts, with lower excretion rates in juvenile and sub-adult individuals as compared to adult ones. Age, however, did not predict the excretion rate of nematode eggs.
All candidate models with received affiliative behaviour as response variable did not improve penalised model fit over the null model, as assessed by AICc, indicating that variation in the data cannot be explained by any of these factors [57].
Statistical details of the top-ranked models are presented in Tables 1 and 2.
Given are the predictors influencing the response variables nematode eggs, coccidian oocysts and initiated affiliative behaviour.
Given are the coefficients with adjusted standard errors, lower and upper confidence intervals and relative importance of the top-ranked models.
Discussion
We found different modulation patterns of excreted immune reactive corticosterone metabolites (CM) and endoparasites in the reproductive season as compared to the post-reproductive period in the seasonally monogamous but year-round social northern bald ibis. The reproductive season is energetically costly in terms of egg-laying, incubation and rearing of the offspring [59], which was indicated by high CM concentrations during the reproductive period and decreasing CM afterwards. This was mirrored by the decrease of the excretion of endoparasite products as well. In contrast, initiating affiliative behaviour was only weakly modulated by season.
As our data are correlative, we can only speculate about a potential causality between elevated CM concentrations and endoparasite burden. We suggest that the increased excretion of endoparasite products as well as high corticosterone metabolite concentrations during the reproductive season may be the result of a trade-off between reproductive effort and immune function [3]. High CM levels may suppress immune responses [60], impairing the defence against parasites. This would explain the similar excretion patterns of endoparasite products and CM during the reproductive and post-reproductive season. Alternatively, we cannot exclude that patterns of endoparasite burden may have also been driven by the phenology of the parasites themselves, meaning that the seasonality of the parasites and their underlying dissemination could result in certain patterns in parasite product excretion, independent of the animals’ immune response [13,61,62]. However, as parasitic infections are often associated with a suppressed immune system [7,8,10] and CM showed similar secretion patterns, parasite phenology alone is probably insufficient to explain the observed patterns.
We further found that males produced more endoparasite-positive droppings than females, suggesting that particularly the male immune system was affected by social investment. This is also indicated by the fact that males in general, independently of age, initiated more affiliative interactions compared to females, which would be expected to function as social support buffering females glucocorticoid secretion. As males are the donors of social support, which benefits the females, they also may generally be more susceptible to infections with parasites due to reduced immune functions as compared to females [60,63]. Another possible explanation for these sex-specific differences may be the immunosuppressive effects of testosterone [64], whereas oestrogens are thought to enhance immune function [65]. However, Sorato and Kotrschal [48] showed that excreted testosterone metabolite levels are similar between male and female northern bald ibis, indicating that testosterone alone may not be the major driving factor in parasite infection. Hence, patterns of parasite burden may be influenced by several factors, such as pair bond status, reproductive state and rearing condition [66] as well as individual factors such as sex and age [65] and they may be seen as a result of the interaction of all the factors mentioned above [13].
Higher CM levels and excretions of endoparasite products were found in adults compared to sub-adult individuals and adults also initiated more affiliative interactions. This may be linked to sexual maturity and hence to the necessary behavioural and physiological investment into reproduction. As glucocorticoids are the major hormones regulating metabolism [67], this investment is reflected by a greater glucocorticoid up-regulation during the reproductive season as compared to the post-reproductive period [59,68,69]. In contrast, juvenile individuals exhibited higher CM concentrations while having a lower parasite burden than adults and initiated more frequently affiliative interactions. A possible explanation for these age differences may be that age causes changes in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis [70]. For instance, plasma corticosterone concentrations in response to a stressor decreased with age in Florida scrub-jays (Aphelocoma coerulescens), while the oldest individuals exhibited again greater corticosterone levels [71].
Probably due to relaxed pair bond relationships outside the reproductive season in the northern bald ibis [27], affiliative interactions generally occurred more frequently during the reproductive as compared to the post-reproductive season. Affiliative interactions during the post-reproductive season may be seen as social investment towards old or new pair partners before the start of the new breeding season [27]. As paired individuals exhibited lower excretion patterns of coccidian oocysts compared to unpaired ones, which may indicate that pair partners, via mutual social support, can control endoparasite burden in stressful periods, such as the reproductive season.
Contrary to expectations, we found no link between receiving affiliative behaviour and the excretion of CM and endoparasite products. However, the excretion patterns of endoparasite products were still lower in paired than unpaired individuals. This may indicate that initiating affiliative interactions with social partners may up-regulate immune functions, even though high CM levels are still present. In fact, pair bonded northern bald ibis excreted higher concentrations of CM compared to unpaired ones. Moreover, long-term monogamous avian species, such as greylag geese, show decreased excretion of CM when family members are present during stressful situations [19,72]. In separated zebra finch pairs (Taeniopygia guttata) for example, elevated corticosterone concentrations returned to baseline levels after reunion with the pair partner [73]. This implies that familiar individuals are more effective for social buffering than unfamiliar ones [23,74,75]. Similarly in mammals, male Wistar rats (Rattus norvegicus) did not show fear-related behaviours, such as freezing, when smelling the odour of a familiar conspecific [75] and squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus) females showed decreased basal cortisol levels in the presence of a female pair partner [76].
On the other hand, it might be expected that interacting with parasitized conspecifics increase the risk of infection [77]. However, paired individuals were less parasitized with coccidian oocysts than unpaired ones. Furthermore, as being paired is also related to age and dominance [78,79], dominant individuals could defend better resting places, which are less contaminated with faeces.
A previous study on northern bald ibis showed that more nematode eggs were excreted in females than in males during the reproductive season [26], whereas in the present study it was the other way round. Contrary to this previous study, we did not include the egg-laying phase in the data collection, which may be the reason for not finding an elevated excretion of endoparasite products in females. This suggests that the high energetic costs of egg-laying suppress female immune responses in a socially stressful situation. A possible explanation may be that resources are allocated to reproduction during the egg-laying period and hence down-regulate female immune functions [80], which may lead to an increase in parasite burden.
We conclude that excretion patterns of endoparasite products and CM concentrations differ in the colonial and seasonally monogamous northern bald ibis according to season. Even though reproduction is energetically costly and may be accompanied by elevated glucocorticoid concentrations [1,2], affiliative interactions may buffer endoparasite burden during stressful periods. This suggests that being well embedded in a pair bond may have a positive impact on individual parasite burden and therefore also on the immune system, at least for females.
Supporting information
S1 Dataset. Initiated and received affiliative behaviour for single individuals in the reproductive and post-reproductive season.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191441.s001
(CSV)
S2 Dataset. Corticosterone metabolite (CM) concentrations for single individuals in the reproductive and post-reproductive season.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191441.s002
(CSV)
S3 Dataset. Excretion patterns of endoparasite products (coccidian oocysts and nematode eggs) for single individuals in the reproductive and post-reproductive season.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191441.s003
(CSV)
S1 Table. List of all focal individuals.
Name, sex (m = male, f = female), year of hatching, age class, pair bond status as well as involvement in the assay comparison are indicated.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191441.s004
(DOCX)
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge Josef Hemetsberger for helping with catching the birds, Marlon Millard for carrying out the comparison of assays, Elisabeth Pschernig for analysing the droppings, Julia Krejci and Claudia Bär for field assistance.
References
- 1. Svensson E, Råberg L, Koch C, Hasselquist D. Energetic stress, immunosuppression and the costs of an antibody response. Funct Ecol. 1998;12: 912–919.
- 2. Williams GC. Natural selection, the costs of reproduction, and a refinement of Lack’s principle. Am Nat. 1966;100: 687–690.
- 3. Sheldon BC, Verhulst S. Ecological immunology: costly parasite defences and trade-offs in evolutionary ecology. Trends Ecol Evol. 1996;11: 317–321. pmid:21237861
- 4. Hanssen SA, Hasselquist D, Folstad I, Erikstad KE. Cost of reproduction in a long-lived bird: incubation effort reduces immune function and future reproduction. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2005;272: 1039–1046. pmid:16024362
- 5. Corlatti L, Béthaz S, von Hardenberg A, Bassano B, Palme R, Lovari S. Hormones, parasites and male mating tactics in Alpine chamois: identifying the mechanisms of life history trade-offs. Anim Behav. 2012;84: 1061–1070.
- 6. Vitlic A, Lord JM, Phillips AC. Stress, ageing and their influence on functional, cellular and molecular aspects of the immune system. Age (Omaha). 2014;36: 1169–1185. pmid:24562499
- 7. Dwyer CM, Bornett HLI. Chronic stress in sheep: assessment tools and their use in different management conditions. Anim Welf. 2004;13: 293–304.
- 8. Brown TT, Fuller CA. Stress and parasitism of white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus) in dry and floodplain environments. Can J Zool. 2006;84: 1833–1839.
- 9. Eberhardt AT, Costa SA, Marini MR, Racca A, Baldi CJ, Robles MR, et al. Parasitism and physiological trade-offs in stressed capybaras. PLoS One. 2013;8: e70382. pmid:23894644
- 10. Dhabhar FS. Enhancing versus suppressive effects of stress on immune function: implications for immunoprotection and immunopathology. Neuroimmunomodulation. 2009;16: 300–317. pmid:19571591
- 11. Pedersen AB, Greives TJ. The interaction of parasites and resources cause crashes in a wild mouse population. J Anim Ecol. 2008;77: 370–377. pmid:18028357
- 12. Raouf SA, Smith LC, Bomberger Brown M, Wingfield JC, Brown CR. Glucocorticoid hormone levels increase with group size and parasite load in cliff swallows. Anim Behav. 2006;71: 39–48.
- 13. Wascher CAF, Bauer AC, Holtmann AR, Kotrschal K. Environmental and social factors affecting the excretion of intestinal parasite eggs in graylag geese. Behav Ecol. 2012;23: 1276–1283.
- 14. Tripet F, Richner H. Host responses to ectoparasites: food compensation by parent blue tits. Oikos. 1997;78: 557–561.
- 15. Avilés JM, Pérez-Contreras T, Navarro C, Soler JJ. Male spotless starlings adjust feeding effort based on egg spots revealing ectoparasite load. Anim Behav. 2009;78: 993–999.
- 16. Papazahariadou M, Diakou A, Papadopoulos E, Georgopoulou I, Komnenou A, Antoniadou-Sotiriadou K. Parasites of the digestive tract in free-ranging birds in Greece. J Nat Hist. 2008;42: 381–398.
- 17. Sachser N, Dürschlag M, Hirzel D. Social relationships and the management of stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 1998;23: 891–904. pmid:9924743
- 18. Frigerio D, Weiss B, Dittami J, Kotrschal K. Social allies modulate corticosterone excretion and increase success in agonistic interactions in juvenile hand-raised graylag geese (Anser anser). Can J Zool. 2003;81: 1746–1754.
- 19. Scheiber IBR, Weiß BM, Frigerio D, Kotrschal K. Active and passive social support in families of greylag geese (Anser anser). Behaviour. 2005;142: 1535–1557. Active pmid:21984839
- 20. Stöwe M, Bugnyar T, Schloegl C, Heinrich B, Kotrschal K, Möstl E. Corticosterone excretion patterns and affiliative behavior over development in ravens (Corvus corax). Horm Behav. 2008;53: 208–216. pmid:18022623
- 21. Kikusui T, Winslow JT, Mori Y. Social buffering: relief from stress and anxiety. Philos Trans R Soc London B Biol Sci. 2006;361: 2215–2228. pmid:17118934
- 22. Young C, Majolo B, Heistermann M, Schülke O, Ostner J. Responses to social and environmental stress are attenuated by strong male bonds in wild macaques. PNAS. 2014;111: 18195–18200. pmid:25489097
- 23. Wittig RM, Crockford C, Weltring A, Langergraber KE, Deschner T, Zuberbühler K. Social support reduces stress hormone levels in wild chimpanzees across stressful events and everyday affiliations. Nat Commun. 2016;7. pmid:27802260
- 24. Edgar J, Held S, Paul E, Pettersson I, Price RIA, Nicol C. Social buffering in a bird. Anim Behav. 2015;105: 11–19.
- 25. Kotrschal K, Hirschenhauser K, Möstl E. The relationship between social stress and dominance is seasonal in greylag geese. Anim Behav. 1998;55: 171–176. doi:06/anbe.1997.0597 pmid:9480683
- 26. Frigerio D, Cibulski L, Ludwig SC, Campderrich I, Kotrschal K, Wascher CAF. Excretion patterns of coccidian oocysts and nematode eggs during the reproductive season in Northern Bald Ibis (Geronticus eremita). J Ornithol. 2016;77: 955–961.
- 27.
Böhm C, Pegoraro K. Der Waldrapp. Hohenwarsleben, Germany: Westarp Wissenschaften-Verlagsgesellschaft mbH; 2011.
- 28.
Rowley I. Re-mating in birds. In: Bateson P, editor. Mate Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1985. pp. 331–360.
- 29. Shutt K, MacLarnon A, Heistermann M, Semple S. Grooming in Barbary macaques: better to give than to receive? Biol Lett. 2007;3: 231–233. pmid:17327200
- 30. Fraser ON, Stahl D, Aureli F. Stress reduction through consolation in chimpanzees. PNAS. 2008;105: 8557–8562. pmid:18559863
- 31. Radford AN. Post-allogrooming reductions in self-directed behaviour are affected by role and status in the green woodhoopoe. Biol Lett. 2012;8: 24–27. pmid:21795264
- 32. Aureli F, Preston SD, de Waal FBM. Heart rate responses to social interactions in free-moving rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatto): a pilot study. J Comp Psychol. 1999;113: 59–65. pmid:10098269
- 33. Feh C, de Mazières J. Grooming at a preferred site reduces heart rate in horses. Anim Behav. 1993;46: 1191–1194.
- 34. Sato S, Tarumizu K. Heart rates before, during and after allo-grooming in cattle (Bos taurus). J Ethol. 1993;11: 149–150.
- 35. Tuckova K, Zisser B, Kotrschal K. Versuch der Ansiedlung einer ortsfesten Waldrapp-Kolonie an der Konrad-Lorenz-Forschungsstelle. ÖKOL. 1998;20: 3–14.
- 36.
Böhm C. Ten years of Northern bald ibis EEP: a review. In: Boehm C, editor. 2nd International EEP Studbook. Innsbruck: Alpenzoo; 1999. pp. 73–88.
- 37. Altmann J. Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour. 1974;49: 227–267. pmid:4597405
- 38.
Martin P, Bateson P. Measuring behavior. An introductory guide. 3rd editio. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
- 39. Pimm SL, Alibhai S, Bergl R, Dehgan A, Giri C, Jewell Z, et al. Emerging technologies to conserve biodiversity. Trends Ecol Evol. 2015;30: 685–696. pmid:26437636
- 40.
Pegoraro K. Zur Ethologie des Waldrapps (Geronticus eremita L.). Beobachtungen in Volieren und im Freiland (Türkei, Marokko). University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. 1992.
- 41. Palme R, Möstl E. Measurement of cortisol metabolites in faeces of sheep as a parameter of cortisol concentration in blood. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkd—Int J Mamm Biol. 1997;62: 192–197, Suppl II.
- 42. Adams EM, Frederick PC, Larkin ILV, Guillette LJ Jr.. Sublethal effects of methylmercury on fecal metabolites of testosterone, estradiol, and corticosterone in captive juvenile white ibises (Eudocimus albus). Environ Toxicol Chem. 2009;28: 982–989. pmid:19045935
- 43. Möstl E, Maggs JL, Schrötter G, Besenfelder U, Palme R. Measurement of cortisol metabolites in faeces of ruminants. Vet Res Commun. 2002;26: 127–139. doi:10.1023/A pmid:11922482
- 44. Touma C, Palme R. Measuring fecal glucocorticoid metabolites in mammals and birds: the importance of validation. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005;1046: 54–74. pmid:16055843
- 45. Sheriff MJ, Dantzer B, Delehanty B, Palme R, Boonstra R. Measuring stress in wildlife: techniques for quantifying glucocorticoids. Oecologia. 2011;166: 869–887. pmid:21344254
- 46. Carere C, Groothuis TGG, Möstl E, Daan S, Koolhaas JM. Fecal corticosteroids in a territorial bird selected for different personalities: daily rhythm and the response to social stress. Horm Behav. 2003;43: 540–548. pmid:12799170
- 47. Palme R, Touma C, Arias N, Dominchin MF, Lepschy M. Steroid extraction: get the best out of faecal samples. Wien Tierarztl Monatsschr. 2013;100: 238–246.
- 48. Sorato E, Kotrschal K. Hormonal and behavioural symmetries between the sexes in the northern bald ibis. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2006;146: 265–274. pmid:16457825
- 49. Stöwe M, Rettenbacher S, Busso JM, Grasse A, Mahr K, Vogl W, et al. Patterns of excreted glucocorticoid metabolites change during development–analytical and physiological implications. Wien Tierarztl Monatsschr. 2013;100: 271–282.
- 50. Frigerio D, Dittami J, Möstl E, Kotrschal K. Excreted corticosterone metabolites co-vary with ambient temperature and air pressure in male greylag geese (Anser anser). Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2004;137: 29–36. pmid:15094333
- 51. Touma C, Sachser N, Möstl E, Palme R. Effects of sex and time of day on metabolism and excretion of corticosterone in urine and feces of mice. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2003;130: 267–278. pmid:12606269
- 52.
Hiepe T, Buchwalder R, Ribbeck R. Lehrbuch der Parasitologie. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag; 1981.
- 53.
R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing [Internet]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74686-7
- 54. Fournier DA, Skaug HJ, Ancheta J, Ianelli J, Magnusson A, Maunder M, et al. AD Model Builder: using automatic differentiation for statistical inference of highly parameterized complex nonlinear models. Optim Methods Softw. 2012;27: 233–249.
- 55.
Skaug H, Fournier D, Bolker B, Magnusson A, Nielsen A. Generalized linear mixed models using “AD Model Builder.” R package version 0.8.3.3.; 2016.
- 56.
Barton K. MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference [Internet]. R package version 1.15.6; 2016. Available: https://cran.r-project.org/package=MuMIn
- 57.
Burnham K, Anderson D. Model selection and multi-model inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. New York: Springer; 2002.
- 58. Hurvich CM, Tsai C-L. Regression and time series model selection in small samples. Biometrika. 1989;76: 297–307.
- 59. Romero LM. Seasonal changes in plasma glucocorticoid concentrations in free-living vertebrates. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2002;128: 1–24. pmid:12270784
- 60. Klein SL. Hormones and mating system affect sex and species differences in immune function among vertebrates. Behav Processes. 2000;51: 149–166. pmid:11074318
- 61. Demarais S, Everett DD, Pons ML. Seasonal comparison of endoparasites of northern bobwhites from two types of habitat in southern Texas. J Wildl Dis. 1987;23: 256–260. pmid:3586203
- 62. Pap PL, Pătraş L, Osváth G, Buehler DM, Versteegh MA, Sesarman A, et al. Seasonal patterns and relationships among coccidian infestations, measures of oxidative physiology, and immune function in free-living house sparrows over an annual cycle. Physiol Biochem Zool. 2015;88: 395–405. pmid:26052636
- 63. Klein SL. Hormonal and immunological mechanisms mediating sex differences in parasite infection. Parasite Immunol. 2004;26: 247–264. pmid:15541029
- 64. Trigunaite A, Dimo J, Jørgensen TN. Suppressive effects of androgens on the immune system. Cell Immunol. 2015;294: 87–94. pmid:25708485
- 65. Zuk M, McKean KA. Sex differences in parasite infections: patterns and processes. Int J Parasitol. 1996;26: 1009–1024. pmid:8982783
- 66. Zuk M, Kim T, Robinson SI, Johnsen TS. Parasites influence social rank and morphology, but not mate choice, in female red junglefowl, Gallus gallus. Anim Behav. 1998;56: 493–499. pmid:9787041
- 67. Vegiopoulos A, Herzig S. Glucocorticoids, metabolism and metabolic diseases. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2007;275: 43–61. pmid:17624658
- 68. Deviche P, Wingfield JC, Sharp PJ. Year-class differences in the reproductive system, plasma prolactin and corticosterone concentrations, and onset of prebasic molt in male dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis) during the breeding period. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2000;118: 425–435. pmid:10843794
- 69. Breuner CW, Orchinik M. Seasonal regulation of membrane and intracellular corticosteroid receptors in the house sparrow brain. J Neuroendocrinol. 2001;13: 412–420. pmid:11328450
- 70. Chahal HS, Drake WM. The endocrine system and ageing. J Pathol. 2007;211: 173–180. pmid:17200939
- 71. Wilcoxen TE, Boughton RK, Bridge ES, Rensel MA, Schoech SJ. Age-related differences in baseline and stress-induced corticosterone in Florida scrub-jays. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2011;173: 461–466. pmid:21827761
- 72. Scheiber IBR, Kotrschal K, Weiß BM. Benefits of family reunions: social support in secondary greylag goose families. Horm Behav. 2009;55: 133–138. pmid:18848947
- 73. Remage-Healey L, Adkins-Regan E, Romero LM. Behavioral and adrenocortical responses to mate separation and reunion in the zebra finch. Horm Behav. 2003;43: 108–114. pmid:12614640
- 74. Rukstalis M, French JA. Vocal buffering of the stress response: exposure to conspecific vocalizations moderates urinary cortisol excretion in isolated marmosets. Horm Behav. 2005;47: 1–7. pmid:15579259
- 75. Kiyokawa Y, Honda A, Takeuchi Y, Mori Y. A familiar conspecific is more effective than an unfamiliar conspecific for social buffering of conditioned fear responses in male rats. Behav Brain Res. 2014;267: 189–193. pmid:24698797
- 76. Saltzman W, Mendoza SP, Mason WA. Sociophysiology of relationships in squirrel monkeys. I. Formation of female dyads. Physiol Behav. 1991;50: 271–280. pmid:1745669
- 77. Martinez-Padilla J, Vergara P, Mougeot F, Redpath SM. Parasitized mates increase infection risk for partners. Am Nat. 2012;179: 811–820. pmid:22617268
- 78. Komers PE, Dhindsa MS. Influence of dominance and age on mate choice in black-billed magpies: an experimental study. Anim Behav. 1989;37: 645–655.
- 79. Hepp GR. Benefits, costs, and determinants of dominance in American black ducks. Behaviour. 1989;109: 222–234.
- 80. Nordling D, Andersson M, Zohari S, Gustafsson L. Reproductive effort reduces specific immune response and parasite resistance. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 1998;265: 1291–1298.