http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4293-9716
Figures
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine the contamination of game meat with copper and zinc and establish whether the use of alternative (non-lead) ammunition can lead to higher or unsafe levels of copper and zinc in the meat of roe deer, wild boar and red deer. The research project “Safety of game meat obtained through hunting” (LEMISI) was conducted in Germany with the purpose of examining the entry of lead as well as copper and zinc into the meat of hunted game when using either lead or non-lead ammunition.
The outcome of this study shows that the usage of both lead-based ammunition and alternative non-lead ammunition results in the entry of copper and zinc into the edible parts of the game. Using non-lead ammunition does not entail dangerously elevated levels of copper and zinc, so replacing lead ammunition with alternative ammunition does not introduce a further health problem with regard to these metals. The levels of copper and zinc in game meat found in this study are in the range found in previous studies of game. The content of copper and zinc in game meat is also comparable to those regularly detected in meat and its products from livestock (pig, cattle, sheep) for which the mean human consumption rate is much higher. From the viewpoint of consumer health protection, the use of non-lead ammunition does not pose an additional hazard through copper and zinc contamination. A health risk due to the presence of copper and zinc in game meat at typical levels of consumer exposure is unlikely for both types of ammunition.
Citation: Schlichting D, Sommerfeld C, Müller-Graf C, Selhorst T, Greiner M, Gerofke A, et al. (2017) Copper and zinc content in wild game shot with lead or non-lead ammunition – implications for consumer health protection. PLoS ONE 12(9): e0184946. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184946
Editor: Antoni Margalida, University of Lleida, SPAIN
Received: February 17, 2017; Accepted: September 2, 2017; Published: September 21, 2017
Copyright: © 2017 Schlichting et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: The study was supported mainly by the Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL) in Germany (http://www.bmel.de) but also by the listed Länder (Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, Lower Saxony, Saxony-Anhalt, Bavaria, Hesse, North Rhine-Westphalia, Hamburg and Bremen) and organisms (European Poultry, Egg and Game Association (EPEGA), Deutscher Jagdverband e.V. (DJV, German Hunting Association), Bayerischer Jagdverband e.V. (BJV, Bavarian Hunting Association), Bundesverband Deutscher Berufsjäger e.V. (German Association of Professional Hunters), Verband der Hersteller von Jagd-, Sportwaffen und Munition e.V. (JSM, Association of the Manufacturers of Hunting and Sports Weapons and Ammunition), Universität für Nachhaltige Entwicklung Eberswalde (HNEE, University for Sustainable Development)). A lot of people helped obtaining the data: the hunters, game traders and others, but were not employed or contracted to do so. The funders had no active role in study design, analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Lead or non-lead, that is the question: whether lead ammunition for hunting can or should be replaced by non-lead ammunition–due to health concerns about lead levels in game meat—has been discussed intensely in recent years [1, 2]. Not only the question of a possible entry of lead into the edible parts of game meat through the different bullet types has been raised, but also whether the other metals used (i.e. copper and zinc) enter the meat in a similar way and if so, their possible relevance for consumer health protection [3–5].
Non-lead bullets are solid bullets made of copper or alloys of copper and zinc (tombac or brass), which—depending on their construction and impact velocity–either fragment or expand. Not much is known, however, about a possible increase of copper and zinc content in game meat through the use of non-lead bullets for hunting [4, 6].
In contrast to lead, copper and zinc are essential trace elements for humans. They are important parts of different enzymes, for example. Nonetheless, above a certain concentration, copper as well as zinc are also toxic according to Paracelsus’ observation that “the dose makes the poison”. Copper is stored in the liver and is excreted via the bile. Tolerable upper intake levels for copper are 1 to 5 mg per day, and for zinc 7 to 25 mg per day, depending on age [7].
In order to obtain a knowledge-based background for political decision making, the research project “Safety of game meat obtained through hunting (LEMISI)” was initiated [8]. The project was developed in six regions in Germany from 2011 to 2014 on behalf of the Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL). The effects of different bullet materials (lead versus non-lead) on the content of lead, copper and zinc in the edible parts of game meat were examined.
Within the scope of the LEMISI project, the influence of using alternative (non-lead) ammunition on the concentrations of copper and zinc in game meat was examined. The following questions were addressed in the course of the project:
- Is there any difference in the copper and zinc content of the game meat between game hunted with lead ammunition compared to non-lead ammunition?
- Is higher copper and zinc content measured in the area around the wound channel of animals killed with non-lead ammunition?
- Are there significant differences in the copper and zinc content in the three subsamples taken from the edible tissue of hunted game (i.e., the area close to the wound channel, the saddle and the haunch)?
Previous experiences show that lead ammunition on average results in a higher lead content in game meat than non-lead ammunition [9, 10]. In the following, the data gained on the copper and zinc content in edible meat are presented and discussed in order to avoid replacing one problem with another.
Material and methods
Within the scope of the study, samples of 1254 roe deer, 854 wild boar and 90 red deer from different regions within Germany were examined [8].
Ethics statement
Licensed hunters killed the game analysed in this study during the established hunting season and in accordance with German regulations (German Hunting Act; Bundesjagdgesetz) and best practices. It did not involve any additional killing other than what is carried out in the German forests on a regular and managerial basis (population control). Permission was granted from the German Federal States (Länder) and their respective hunting authorities.
Choice of regions
Within Germany six regions were chosen according to the lead content of the top soil in order to control lead concentrations attributable to soil lead contamination in the (statistical) analysis. Two regions were selected for each of the three lead levels in top soil (i.e. low lead content: < 30 mg lead/kg soil, medium lead content: 30 to 75 mg lead/kg soil and high lead content: > 75 mg lead/kg soil) chosen using a geographical map indicating lead content in top soil, thus resulting in a total of six regions [11]. The content of copper and zinc in soil were not taken into account due to the heterogeneity of soil conditions and the movement of animals.
Experimental design and implementation
Quality assurance measures were integrated in all phases of the project. Hunters were instructed as to the aims of the research project. The animals were either shot with specific lead ammunition or with specific non-lead ammunition. For each animal killed, the hunters had to fill in a sample data sheet in which detailed information on the animals (species, age and gender) and how they had been shot (including bullet material, i.e. lead vs non-lead), bullet type used, information on the entry and exit of the bullet, shooting distance, bone hit (i.e. if the animal was killed by a shot that the hunter reported to have struck not only tissue and organs but also skeletal structures such as the ribs, scapula) were recorded. Parameters included in the statistical analysis were the animal species and bullet material—lead ammunition versus non-lead ammunition. The entry and exit of the bullet were considered in order to discuss the distribution of the metals in the meat depending on the place of entry. In addition, so called bone-hits (see above) were also examined. Here, the underlying hypothesis is that the resistance of the bone could lead to a further distribution of the metals in the muscle compared to bullet hits of “softer tissues”. The sample data sheet was also a vital part of the overall quality and assurance control (see below).
The hunted game was brought to game traders who had also been specifically trained for this project and who collected the samples according to uniform standards. Three samples were taken from each animal after completion of the regular process of skinning and cleaning the carcass according to hygiene standards for game meat [12]. The samples were taken from marketable meat of the saddle, haunch and the area close to the wound channel, which had been widely cut out. The sample amount was 100 g for each of the three subsamples. Subsamples were stored in coloured vials (i.e. one colour for each type of subsample). Samples were numbered and coded. All three subsamples per animal were stored in vials in polythene bags. The corresponding sample data sheet (with the identical coding) was stored in a separate polythene bag. These two bags were stored together in a third polythene bag so that it was possible to trace back each subsample to the location where the animal was shot, the laboratory where analyses were conducted and all the other relevant parameters given in the sample data sheet. In this way, this system served as quality assurance and control (i.e. plausibility check). Until the time of chemical analysis, samples were frozen and stored in polythene bags at −18 C.
Analytics
The samples were transported to 12 accredited laboratories for chemical analysis: 11 of them from governmental agencies and one belonging to a leading international group of laboratories.
Before the beginning of chemical analysis, the samples were homogenized and 0.5 to 1g of each sample was put in a high-pressure Teflon container for microwave pressure digestion in line with EN 13805:2014 [13]. The content of copper in muscle samples was determined either by using the inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometric method (ICP-MS), by applying inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) or alternatively, by applying graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GFAAS) [14–16]. The zinc content in muscle samples was determined either with ICP-MS/ICP-OES or alternatively, by applying flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS) [17].
Determination of plausibility
The analytical results were sent to the Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development (Hochschule für nachhaltige Entwicklung Eberswalde, HNEE) for a plausibility check of the hunting and bullet data using the numeric coding of samples from the laboratories and the complete information from the data sheets. The most important item was the correct identification of the bullets used as reported by the hunters in the sample data sheets as “lead” or “non-lead”. The approved data were subsequently sent to the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung, BfR) where the statistical data analyses as well as the toxicological risk assessment were performed.
Statistical evaluation
The copper and zinc content were quantifiable in all examined subsamples. Since the data were not distributed normally and the distributions were highly heterogeneous, group comparisons were done using non-parametric methods [18]. The Mann-Whitney U test was applied when comparing lead shot samples with non-lead shot samples. The comparison of the subsamples was made by applying either the Friedman test or the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The significance level was determined as p<0.05. When comparing the subsamples, multiple testing was taken into account using a corresponding Bonferroni-adjusted significance level (p<0.017) [19].
The distribution of the analytical results is displayed graphically using beanplots (R-package “beanplot” [20]). Beanplots constitute an alternative to boxplots. They combine a density shape with a one-dimensional scatter plot–showing all analytical data as small lines–thereby allowing a visual comparison of the distribution [21].
Statistical analysis were realized using SPSS (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0). Corresponding graphs were created using R [22].
Results
Copper
The major part of the observed copper content in roe deer, wild boar and red deer which had been hunted using non-lead ammunition was in a low range. This fact is underlined by the height of the 95th percentiles (Table 1), as well as by the distribution of copper content in the beanplots (Fig 1 and S1 Fig).
The average copper content of the samples of non-lead shot roe deer was higher than that of lead shot roe deer. Thus the copper content close to the wound channel was significantly different depending on the type of ammunition (Mann-Whitney U test: p<0.0001; Table 1). But the samples from the area close to the wound channel of non-lead shot roe deer showed significantly lower copper content than samples from the haunch or saddle (Wilcoxon signed-rank test each: p<0.0001; Table 1). For the roe deer samples, the highest copper content was detected in a sample of the saddle (Table 1).
Overall, samples of 14 roe deer had copper content above 5 mg/kg. Thereof, 13 roe deer were shot with non-lead ammunition. Twelve of these animals were killed with a “bone hit” (for definition see material and methods section). One animal shot with non-lead ammunition and killed with bone hit had increased copper content in samples both from the area around the wound channel (9.70 mg/kg) and from the haunch (9.05 mg/kg).
For wild boar, the samples from the area close to the wound channel and the saddle showed significantly higher copper content when non-lead ammunition had been used (Mann-Whitney U test each: p = 0.005). Nevertheless, the highest copper content in wild boar samples was found in a sample from the saddle of an animal which had been shot with lead ammunition (Table 1 and Fig 1).
When using non-lead ammunition, the copper content in the area close to the wound channel in wild boar samples was higher than that of the haunch (Wilcoxon signed-rank test: p = 0.002) or saddle (Wilcoxon signed-rank test: p<0.0001). For lead shot animals, the samples from the area close to the wound channel showed significantly higher copper content than samples from the saddle (Wilcoxon signed-rank test: p<0.0001), but they were still below the copper content of the samples from the haunch (Wilcoxon signed-rank test: p = 0.008).
The copper content of a total of 12 wild boar samples was above a value of 5 mg/kg. Of these, four animals were shot using non-lead ammunition and seven animals using lead ammunition. From these animals, eight (nine samples) had been killed by a bone hit (non-lead: five samples; lead: four samples). In one animal which been shot using non-lead ammunition, the sample from the haunch as well as the sample from the area close to the wound channel had increased copper values (haunch 8.05 mg/kg and area close to the wound channel 7.55 mg/kg, bone hit).
The comparison of the copper content for red deer showed no significant differences between the use of non-lead or lead ammunition (Table 1).
A comparison between roe deer and wild boar showed that the copper content of roe deer was higher than that of wild boar (Mann-Whitney U test; Table 2) irrespective of the subsample and type of ammunition used.
Zinc
The zinc content in the samples of roe deer as well as in those of wild boar varied considerably, but extreme values were only sporadically found (Fig 2 and S2 Fig).
The zinc content in roe deer samples from the area close to the wound channel was significantly higher when using non-lead ammunition compared to lead ammunition (Mann-Whitney U test, p<0.0001). In addition, the zinc content in samples from the saddle was significantly higher when using non-lead ammunition (Mann-Whitney U test, p = 0.006), but the median values were only slightly different. This difference can be seen by looking at the 95th percentile (Table 3), as well as overall distribution (Fig 2). Regardless of the type of ammunition, the roe deer samples from the area close to the wound channel were not significantly different from those from the haunch or saddle (Friedman test; non-lead: p = 0.281, lead: p = 0.149, respectively).
In 171 roe deer samples, the zinc content was above 50 mg/kg (101 of these samples were shot using non-lead ammunition). Of these 171 roe deer samples, 129 samples were bone hits (non-lead: 79 samples, lead: 50 samples).
Samples of wild boar also had significantly higher zinc content in the area close to the wound channel when using non-lead ammunition (Mann-Whitney U test: p = 0.027).
The zinc content of samples from the saddle of wild boar was significantly higher when using lead ammunition as compared to non-lead ammunition (Mann-Whitney U test, p = 0.049). When comparing the subsamples from wild boar shot with non-lead ammunition, the zinc content of samples from the area around the wound channel were significantly higher than those of the samples from the saddle (Wilcoxon signed-rank test: p<0.0001). The zinc content of samples from the area close to the wound channel were also higher than those of the haunch, but they did not differ significantly (Wilcoxon signed-rank test: p = 0.591). When lead ammunition was used, the zinc content in samples from the area close to the wound channel was lower than the zinc content of samples from the haunch (Wilcoxon signed-rank test: p<0.0001). The zinc content of samples from the area close to the wound channel and from the saddle were not significantly different (Wilcoxon signed-rank test: p = 0.048).
The zinc content of 111 wild boar samples was above 50 mg/kg (of these 63 came from non-lead shot animals). Furthermore, 78 of these samples were from animals killed by bone hits (non-lead: 48, lead: 30).
Just as for the copper content, the zinc content of red deer samples showed no significant differences between non-lead and lead ammunition.
When comparing samples of roe deer and wild boar, a significant difference in their zinc content can only be seen for samples of the saddle when using non-lead ammunition. The zinc content of samples from the saddle of roe deer is significantly higher than those of wild boar (Mann-Whitney-U-test, Table 4).
Discussion
One of the aims of the LEMISI project was to determine possible differences in the copper and zinc content in game meat of the examined species when using lead or non-lead ammunition for hunting. Both types of ammunition contain copper and zinc. Whereas non-lead bullets are mainly copper-zinc alloys with partly differing copper content, many lead-based bullets used for hunting are surrounded by a tombac jacket, which has a high copper (>80%) and zinc content. For both metals, variations in amount could be observed for lead and non-lead ammunition.
The maximum residue level (MRL) for copper permitted in food of animal origin from pigs, cattle, sheep, goats, horses, poultry and other farm animals is 5 mg/kg (fresh weight) according to regulation (EC) No 149/2008 and the amending regulation (EC) No 396/2005. This regulation applies to all residues of pesticides, veterinary drugs, or biocides in or on food and feed of plant and animal origin. For wild game meat (i.e. the meat after removal of trimmable fat) the permitted residue level so far has been 0.01 mg/kg, which corresponds with the lower level of detection. This is because since spring 2013 “game meat” has been listed under “other terrestrial animal products”in Annex I to regulation (EC) No 212/2013 and the amending regulation (EC) No 396/2005 and no residue value has been derived based on natural content up to now.
In order to account for the natural background levels of copper in game meat (as a result of environmental uptake mainly through feeding), Germany–in its role as “evaluating member state”—proposed a residue level for copper in game meat of 4 mg/kg [23]. The proposed value is derived from German food monitoring data [24], and incorporates the 95th percentile of the determined copper content. EFSA found that the contribution of the proposed MRL to total consumer exposure to copper was negligible. It amounts up to 0.7% of the Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) of an adult [23]. This fact recommends the setting of the MRL at 4 mg/kg for copper compounds in wild game in order to cover the natural background level of copper observed in the survey conducted in Germany in 2012. It should be noted that the game meat examined for the monitoring had been shot using lead ammunition.
The maximum residue levels mentioned above can be used as general guidance since the results obtained within the scope of the LEMISI-project show that copper is not evenly distributed in the game meat. The data indicate that an exceedance of the maximum residue levels for copper in game meat cannot be excluded and that the variance of the copper content detected is rather large. As shown in Table 1, the maximum residue level was exceeded, in some cases multiple times, in all examined subsamples (i.e. haunch, saddle, meat close to the wound channel) when using either lead or non-lead ammunition for hunting. One sample of roe deer (saddle, non-lead ammunition) had a copper content of 37.5 mg/kg, and one sample of wild boar (saddle, lead ammunition) had a copper content of 110.0 mg/kg.
The results of the copper content in different meat samples do not present a consistent picture. Regarding the 95th percentile, it can be seen that the copper content is slightly higher in the area close to the wound channel than in the saddle or haunch when using non-lead ammunition for hunting wild boar. On the other hand, the copper content measured in roe deer samples of the area close to the wound channel is lower than in samples of haunch and saddle when using either non-lead or lead-based ammunition. However, some of these contradictory findings for copper and zinc could also be a result of the sample size, which may not have been sufficient for some of the subgroups analysed, even though overall it was quite a considerable sample size.
The median values of the copper content of lead or non-lead shot game meat were relatively close together to a large extent. Lead as well as non-lead bullets result in a comparable entry of copper into the edible parts of the game with only minor differences. Comparing the 95th percentiles of copper content in edible meat of pork, veal and beef with the 95th percentile of the copper content of samples of roe deer, wild boar and red deer, it becomes apparent that pork has the lowest copper content, whereas the percentile values for beef and above all veal are in a range comparable to game meat (Fig 3).
Red broken line: 5 mg copper/kg meat.
The levels of zinc attributable to the use of lead ammunition are slightly higher in some subsamples as compared to the levels of zinc when shooting with non-lead ammunition. This could be explained by the composition of the bullet material and the bullet construction. A major part of lead ammunition contains varying amounts of zinc in the tombac jacket which surrounds the lead core. Depending on the bullet construction, bullet hit and meat characteristics, varying amounts of zinc are released into the game meat. The median values are only slightly different, even though statistically significant differences have been found for zinc contamination when considering the type of ammunition used (lead or non-lead).
It can be concluded that the content of copper and zinc in game meat in this study are roughly comparable to those found in other studies (Table 5). An analysis of wild boar samples in Austria showed slightly lower ranges in the values (0.86 to 1.48 mg/kg) for the copper content [25]. The zinc content, however, is roughly comparable to this study with a range of values form 24.1 to 60.6 mg/kg. In an analysis of wild boar samples (muscle meat) in western Slovakia, similar values to this study were found with an average copper content of 1.61 mg/kg [26]. In contrast, the zinc content was on average significantly lower (arithmetical average: 13.48 mg/kg). The number of examined samples, however, was markedly lower in both cases.
Table according to Ertl et al. 2016 [27], complemented by additional references.
There are further factors which can play a role for the entry of metal into game meat. Among these, there are differences in the physical properties of the ammunition used for hunting due to either the bullet construction or the material composition (alloys), which incidentally may also vary within the classification as non-lead or lead ammunition [39]. However, this could not be analysed in detail in this study due to the limited number of bullet constructions and the corresponding–mainly–low number of samples per bullet type. The muscle meat of hunted species differs too: whereas roe deer exhibits a more tender muscle meat, the muscle meat of wild boar is more solid, resulting in smaller or greater resistance to the bullets [40]. This factor also determines the choice of the bullet construction used for hunting. Fragmenting bullets dispense particles to a greater extent while deforming bullets—which mostly “mushroom”—lead to a few bigger fragments in the surrounding game meat, if at all. Beyond this, the hit of the bullet determines the distribution of the bullet particles in the game meat, e.g. after a bone hit. Furthermore, it is possible that the natural background levels (through absorption from soil, plants, water) could also play a role. In this study, however, the background contamination could not be determined for copper and zinc.
For red deer, no difference was observed in copper and zinc content when using lead or non-lead ammunition. It should be kept in mind though that the sample size was significantly lower than that for the other two species.
The copper and zinc content in game meat is comparable to those regularly detected in the meat of farm animals (pork, beef, sheep) or products made from them (Table 6).
Copper compounds play an important role as a feed additive in the fattening of pigs and poultry and are therefore brought into the soil via the application of manure with the result that they enter the food chain. Furthermore, copper compounds are used as fertilizers and pesticides. The exposure of the consumers to copper and zinc is determined by the average consumption habits of the general population.
Considering the exposure with copper and zinc by game meat it has to be included that the consumption rate of the German general population is comparatively low, but nevertheless there are consumers with high consumption rates (“extreme consumers”) and correspondingly higher risk by exposure. For the German population, the mean consumption rate of pork is about 40 kg per year, whereas the average male consumer of game meat in Germany eats two portions of 200 g per year and the average female consumer one portion of 200 g per year. Among the high consumers of game meat are men who eat up to 10 meals and women who eat up to five meals of game meat per year. So-called “extreme consumers”, i.e. hunters and their families, eat up to 90 meals of game meat per year [46]. High male consumers of game meat thus consume almost 18 kg of game meat per year, equalling nearly half the amount of pork meat eaten by the average consumer in Germany.
The mean copper intakes of adults and children in EU countries are below the upper intake level (UL) ranging from 1 mg copper per day for 1–3 year olds up to 5 mg per day for adults with the exception of expectant and nursing mothers [7]. The consumption of game meat contributes to the copper intake. If the mean or median values of the copper content in the game meat are considered, then the intake of copper is between 0.2 and 0.5 mg for average consumption. A health risk for the consumer due to an average consumption of game meat with the reported content of copper is therefore unlikely.
The mean zinc intakes of adults and children in EU countries are below the upper intake level (UL). The UL for adults is about 25 mg per day and for children at the age of one to three years 7 mg per day [7]. The consumption of game meat contributes to the zinc intake. If the mean or median values are considered then the intake is between 5.2 and 7.5 mg per day. A health risk for the consumer due to an average consumption of game meat with the reported content of zinc is therefore unlikely.
Since the general population on average eats more meat and/or products of farm animals, the intake of copper through the consumption of these products is much higher than it is through the consumption of hunted game meat–irrespective of whether lead or non-lead ammunition was used for hunting. This only applies, of course, if game meat hygiene measures have been properly applied, i.e. the meat close to the wound channel has been widely cut out and areas with hematomas have also been widely removed.
From the point of view of consumer health protection, a health risk due to the presence of copper and zinc in game meat at typical consumer exposure levels is therefore unlikely due to the comparably low hazard potential of copper and zinc as compared to lead.
Supporting information
S1 Fig. Beanplot of copper content in different edible parts of roe deer and wild boar by bullet material (logarithmic scale).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184946.s001
(PDF)
S2 Fig. Beanplot of zinc content in different edible parts of roe deer and wild boar by bullet material (logarithmic scale).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184946.s002
(PDF)
S1 File. Data File.
This file (Zip format) contains the data file (both csv and xlsx format) on which analyses were based and a corresponding readme file.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184946.s003
(ZIP)
Acknowledgments
We would like to express our thanks for the support and funding provided by the Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL) in Germany (http://www.bmel.de) but also by the listed Länder (Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, Lower Saxony, Saxony-Anhalt, Bavaria, Hesse, North Rhine-Westphalia, Hamburg and Bremen) and organisms (European Poultry, Egg and Game Association (EPEGA), Deutscher Jagdverband e.V. (DJV, German Hunting Association), Bayerischer Jagdverband e.V. (BJV, Bavarian Hunting Association), Bundesverband Deutscher Berufsjäger e.V. (German Association of Professional Hunters), Verband der Hersteller von Jagd-, Sportwaffen und Munition e.V. (JSM, Association of the Manufacturers of Hunting and Sports Weapons and Ammunition), Universität für Nachhaltige Entwicklung Eberswalde (HNEE, University for Sustainable Development)). A lot of people helped obtaining the data: the hunters, game traders and others, but were not employed or contracted to do so. The funders had no active role in study design, analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript. A lot of people were involved in this project and we would like to thank them for their valuable contributions, especially Dr. Niels Bandick.
References
- 1. Hunt WG, Watson RT, Oaks JL, Parish CN, Burnham KK, Tucker RL, et al. Lead bullet fragments in venison from rifle-killed deer: potential for human dietary exposure. PLoSOne. 2009;4(4):e5330. pmid:19390698
- 2. Iqbal S, Blumenthal W, Kennedy C, Yip FY, Pickard S, Flanders WD, et al. Hunting with lead: association between blood lead levels and wild game consumption. Environ Res. 2009;109(8):952–9. pmid:19747676.
- 3. Morales JS, Rojas RM, Perez-Rodriguez F, Casas AA, Lopez MA. Risk assessment of the lead intake by consumption of red deer and wild boar meat in Southern Spain. Food additives & contaminants Part A, Chemistry, analysis, control, exposure & risk assessment. 2011;28(8):1021–33. Epub 2011/07/07. pmid:21728894.
- 4. Irschik I, Bauer F, Sager M, Paulsen P. Copper residues in meat from wild artiodactyls hunted with two types of rifle bullets manufactured from copper. Eur J Wildl Res. 2013;59(2):129–36.
- 5. Paulsen P, Sager M, Bauer F, Schuhmann-Irschik I. Pilot study on metal contents in meat portions from wild game killed by "lead-free" rifle bullets. J Food Saf Food Qual. 2015;66(5):128–31. WOS:000364798700001.
- 6.
Völk F. Lebensmittelhygienische Aspekte bzw. Gefährdungspotential von Resten bleifreier Geschoße in Wildfleisch. Wien: 2012.
- 7.
Scientific Committee on Food, Scientific Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies. Tolerable Upper Intake Levels for Vitamins and Minerals: European Food Safety Authority; 2006.
- 8. Müller-Graf C, Gerofke A, Martin A, Bandick N, Lahrssen-Wiederholt M, Schafft H, et al. Reduction of lead contents in game meat: results of the ‘Food safety of game meat obtained through hunting’ research project. In: Paulsen P, Bauer A, Smulders FJM, editors. Game meat hygiene–Food safety and security2017. p. 201–12.
- 9.
German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR). Research project “Safety of game meat obtained through hunting” (LEMISI). Final report of the BfR of 19 December 2014. Berlin: Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), 2014.
- 10. Lahrssen-Wiederholt M, Müller-Graf C, Sommerfeld C, Bandick N, Schafft H. Minimierung des Bleieintrags bei jagdlich gewonnenem Wildbret. Fleischwirtschaft. 2015;95(6):99–102. pmid:2015010A3.
- 11.
Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources. http://www.bgr.bund.de/DE/Themen/Boden/Bilder/Bod_HGW_Karte_g.html. 2004.
- 12.
REGULATION (EC) No 853/2004 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 29 April 2004 laying down specific hygiene rules for on the hygiene of foodstuffs. 2004.
- 13.
European Committee for Standardization. Standard Reference EN 13805:2014. Foodstuffs–Determination of Trace Elements–Pressure Digestion. Brussels, Belgium: European Committee for Standardization; 2014.
- 14.
Borges DLG, Holcombe JA. Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrometry. Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2006.
- 15.
Hou X, Amais RS, Jones BT, Donati GL. Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry. Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2006.
- 16. Nardi EP, Evangelista FS, Tormen L, Saint´Pierre TD, Curtius AJ, Souza SSd, et al. The use of inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) for the determination of toxic and essential elements in different types of food samples. Food Chemistry. 2009;112(3):727–32.
- 17. Chen J, Teo KC. Determination of cadmium, copper, lead and zinc in water samples by flame atomic absorption spectrometry after cloud point extraction. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2001;450(1):215–22. doi: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(01)01367-8.
- 18.
Sachs L, Hedderich J. Angewandte Statistik. Methodensammlung mit R. Heidelberg: Springer; 2009.
- 19. Abdi H. The Bonferonni and Šidák corrections for multiple comparisons. Encyclopedia of measurement and statistics. 2007;3:103–7.
- 20. Kampstra P. Beanplot: A Boxplot Alternative for Visual Comparison of Distributions. Journal of Statistical Software, Code Snippets. 2008;28(1):1–9.
- 21. Muthers S, Matzarakis A. Use of beanplots in applied climatology—A comparison with boxplots. Meteorol Z. 2010;19(6):641–4. WOS:000285683100010.
- 22.
R Core Team. A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2015.
- 23. EFSA. Reasoned opinion on setting of an MRL for copper compounds in wild game. EFSA Journal2014. p. 3870.
- 24.
Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety (BVL). Berichte zur Lebensmittelsicherheit. Monitoring 2007. Berlin: 2008.
- 25. Sager M. Aktuelle Elementgehalte in Fleisch, Leber und Nieren aus Österreich. Ernährung/Nutrition. 2005;29(5):199–206.
- 26. Gasparik J, Dobias M, Capcarova M, Smehyl P, Slamecka J, Bujko J, et al. Concentration of cadmium, mercury, zinc, copper and cobalt in the tissues of wild boar (Sus scrofa) hunted in the western Slovakia. Journal of environmental science and health Part A, Toxic/hazardous substances & environmental engineering. 2012;47(9):1212–6. Epub 2012/05/01. pmid:22540642.
- 27. Ertl K, Kitzer R, Goessler W. Elemental composition of game meat from Austria. Food additives & contaminants Part B, Surveillance. 2016;9(2):120–6. Epub 2016/02/18. pmid:26886253.
- 28. Dannenberger D, Nuernberg G, Nuernberg K, Hagemann E. The effects of gender, age and region on macro- and micronutrient contents and fatty acid profiles in the muscles of roe deer and wild boar in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania (Germany). Meat science. 2013;94(1):39–46. Epub 2013/02/05. pmid:23376435.
- 29. Falandysz J. Some toxic and trace metals in big game hunted in the northern part of Poland in 1987–1991. The Science of the total environment. 1994;141(1–3):59–73. Epub 1994/01/25. pmid:8178124.
- 30. Hermoso de Mendoza Garcia M, Hernandez Moreno D, Soler Rodriguez F, Lopez Beceiro A, Fidalgo Alvarez LE, Perez Lopez M. Sex- and age-dependent accumulation of heavy metals (Cd, Pb and Zn) in liver, kidney and muscle of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) from NW Spain. Journal of environmental science and health Part A, Toxic/hazardous substances & environmental engineering. 2011;46(2):109–16. pmid:21170773.
- 31. Amici A, Danieli PP, Russo C, Primi R, Ronchi B. Concentrations of some toxic and trace elements in wild boar (Sus scrofa) organs and tissues in different areas of the Province of Viterbo (Central Italy). Italian Journal of Animal Science. 2012;11(4).
- 32. Bilandžić N, Đokić M, Sedak M, Varenina I, Kolanović BS, Oraić D, et al. Determination of copper in food of animal origin and fish in Croatia. Food Control. 2012;27(2):284–8.
- 33. Roślewska A, Stanek M, Janicki B, Buzała M, Roślewska A, Cygan-Szczegielniak D, et al. Effect of sex on the content of elements in meat from wild boars (Sus scrofa L.) originating from the Province of Podkarpacie (south-eastern Poland). Journal of Elementology. 2012;(3/2016).
- 34. Strmisková G, Strmiska F. Contents of mineral substances in venison. Food / Nahrung. 1992;36(3):307–8.
- 35. Falandysz J, Szymczyk-Kobrzynska K, Brzostowski A, Zalewski K, Zasadowski A. Concentrations of heavy metals in the tissues of red deer (Cervus elaphus) from the region of Warmia and Mazury, Poland. Food Addit Contam. 2005;22(2):141–9. pmid:15824004.
- 36. Jarzynska G, Falandysz J. Selenium and 17 other largely essential and toxic metals in muscle and organ meats of Red Deer (Cervus elaphus)—consequences to human health. Environment international. 2011;37(5):882–8. pmid:21429582.
- 37. Gasparik J, Massanyi P, Slamecka J, Fabis M, Jurcik R. Concentration of selected metals in liver, kidney, and muscle of the red deer (Cervus elaphus). Journal of environmental science and health Part A, Toxic/hazardous substances & environmental engineering. 2004;39(8):2105–11. Epub 2004/08/31. pmid:15332672.
- 38. Lazarus M, Orct T, Blanusa M, Vickovic I, Sostaric B. Toxic and essential metal concentrations in four tissues of red deer (Cervus elaphus) from Baranja, Croatia. Food additives & contaminants Part A, Chemistry, analysis, control, exposure & risk assessment. 2008;25(3):270–83. pmid:17852398.
- 39.
Irschik I, Wanek C, Bauer F, Sager M, Paulsen P. Composition of bullets used for hunting and food safety considerations. Paulsen P, Bauer A, Smulders FJM, editors. Wageningen: Wageningen Acad Publ; 2014. 363–70 p.
- 40.
Hofbauer P, Smulders FJM. The muscle biological background of meat quality including that of game species. In: Paulsen P, Bauer A, Vodnansky M, Winkelmayer R, Smulders FJM, editors. Game meat hygiene in focus: Microbiology, epidemiology, risk analysis and quality assurance. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers; 2011. p. 273–95.
- 41.
Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety (BVL). Lebensmittel-Monitoring 2001. Berlin: 2001.
- 42.
Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety (BVL). Berichte zur Lebensmittelsicherheit. Monitoring 2012. Berlin: 2013.
- 43.
German Research Centre for Food Chemistry, Leibniz Institute (DFA). Souci–Fachmann–Kraut-Online Database. https://www.sfk.online. medpharm Scientific Publishers; 2017.
- 44.
Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety (BVL). Berichte zur Lebensmittelsicherheit. Monitoring 2010. Berlin: 2011.
- 45.
Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety (BVL). Berichte zur Lebensmittelsicherheit. Monitoring 2014. Berlin: 2015.
- 46. Haldimann M, Baumgartner A, Zimmerli B. Intake of lead from game meat—a risk to consumers' health? European Food Research and Technology. 2002;215(5):375–9.