http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5190-4574
Figures
Abstract
Lactococcus lactis is one of the most important microorganisms in the dairy industry and has “generally recognized as safe” (GRAS) status. L. lactis belongs to the group of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and is encountered in a wide range of environments. Recently, the use of the intramammary infusion of a live culture of LAB has been investigated as a new antibiotic alternative for treating mastitis in dairy ruminants. Controversial results are described in literature regarding its efficacy and safety. In this study we conducted in-depth investigation of the mammary gland immune response induced by intramammary inoculum of a live culture of L. lactis LMG 7930 using the mouse mastitis model. Overnight cultures either of L. lactis (≈ 107 CFU) or of the mastitis pathogens Staphylococcus chromogenes (≈ 105 CFU) or S. aureus (≈ 102 CFU/ml) were injected into the mouse inguinal glands. A double injection, consisting of S. chromogenes first and then L. lactis, was also investigated. Bacterial recovery from the gland and inflammatory cell infiltration were assessed. L. lactis-treated and control glands were analysed for proinflammatory cytokine production. Microbiological results showed that L. lactis was able to survive in the mammary gland 24 h post infection, as were the mastitis pathogens S. chromogenes and S. aureus. L. lactis reduced S. chromogenes survival in the glands and increased its own survival ability by coexisting with the pathogen. Histology showed that L. lactis-treated glands presented variable histological features, ranging from undamaged tissue with no inflammatory cell infiltrate to severe PMN infiltrate with focal areas of tissue damage. S. aureus-treated glands showed the most severe histological grade of inflammation despite the fact that the inoculum size was the smallest. In contrast, most S. chromogenes-treated glands showed normal structures with no infiltration or lesions. Significant increases in IL-1β and TNF-α levels were also found in L. lactis-inoculated glands. The above findings seem to suggest that food-grade L. lactis at a high-inoculum dose such as an overnight culture may elicit a suppurative inflammatory response in the mammary gland, thus becoming a potential mastitis-causing pathogen. Because of the unpredictable potential of L. lactis in acting as a potential mastitis pathogen, this organism cannot be considered a safe treatment for bovine mastitis.
Citation: Camperio C, Armas F, Biasibetti E, Frassanito P, Giovannelli C, Spuria L, et al. (2017) A mouse mastitis model to study the effects of the intramammary infusion of a food-grade Lactococcus lactis strain. PLoS ONE 12(9): e0184218. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184218
Editor: Juan J. Loor, University of Illinois, UNITED STATES
Received: February 21, 2017; Accepted: August 21, 2017; Published: September 5, 2017
Copyright: © 2017 Camperio et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper.
Funding: This work was supported by the Italian Ministry of Health, grant number RF-2010-2313040. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Mastitis, generally defined as the inflammation of the mammary gland, is one of the most prevalent diseases affecting dairy ruminants worldwide [1,2]. This disease causes huge economic losses due to decreases in milk quantity and quality, veterinary services and labour expenses [3].
Antibiotics are extensively used for the treatment and prevention of mastitis in dairy ruminants [4]. Due to concerns regarding the growing antibiotic resistance of mastitis-causing pathogens that often make antibiotic therapy ineffective and the implications of the overuse of antibiotics on public health, the development of alternatives are strongly encouraged.
The use of bacteriocins, such as nisin and lacticin 3147, has recently been proposed as an alternative to antibiotics for treating and preventing bovine mastitis. The efficacy of bacteriocin-based formulations administered to the teat by dipping or intramammary infusion has been documented both for treatment of clinical and subclinical bovine mastitis [5,6] and prevention of streptococcal [7] and staphylococcal [8] mastitis infections in cattle. However, controversial results are described in literature regarding the use of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) as intramammary inocula for treating mastitis in dairy ruminants. On the one hand, safety and efficacy in reducing Staphylococcus aureus infection have been described with the inoculation of the live culture of Lactococcus lactis DPC 3147 [9]. On the other hand, inefficacy of the intramammary Lactobacillus therapy in decreasing coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) infections in cattle, has been documented [10]. Recently, our group has conducted in vitro investigations of the probiotic potential of L. lactis subsp. lactis LMG 7930, a food-grade nisin-producing strain, against mastitis-causing pathogens [11]. Our in vitro results suggested that this strain might be a promising candidate for the development of new strategies of mastitis control in ruminants [11]. We then discussed the efficacy and safety of the intramammary infusion of an overnight culture of L. lactis LMG 7930 in in vivo studies under field conditions (still unpublished data from our group). We conducted two trials involving naturally infected ewes with clinical and subclinical staphylococcal mastitis. We found that the L. lactis treatment rapidly activated the mammary glands' innate immune response and initiated an inflammatory response as evidenced by the recruitment of polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) and increased somatic cell counts. But while leading to a transient clearance of CNS in the gland, this response caused mild to moderate clinical cases of mastitis characterized by abnormal milk secretions and udder inflammation (still unpublished data from our group).
To further investigate the host immune response induced by the intramammary infusion of the L. lactis culture, we used the mouse mastitis model that is known to be more time- and cost-effective than larger animal models. The experimental mouse model of mastitis was developed and characterized by Chandler in 1970 [12]. Although differences may exist between ruminants and murine mammary glands [13], the mouse model of S. aureus mastitis provided reliable, useful and economical alternatives for studying bacterial pathogenesis of bovine mastitis-causing pathogens [14–17] and for primary evaluation of experimental drugs [18]. Recently, a mouse model of S. chromogenes mastitis has been proposed by Breyne and colleagues to study differences between bovine associated CNS species [19].
In this study, we have explored the effects of the intramammary inoculum of an overnight culture of the food-grade L. lactis LMG 7930 strain on the mouse mammary gland immune response by proposing, for the first time, to the best of our knowledge, a mouse model of L. lactis mastitis. Inoculum size, time of infection, bacterial recovery from the gland, histological features and proinflammatory cytokine production are described.
Material and methods
Bacterial strains
L. lactis subsp. lactis LMG 7930 (BCCM/LMG Bacteria Collection, Belgium), a food grade strain used in the dairy industry in the production of Swiss cheese, was used for the intramammary inoculum. Two mastitis-causing pathogens, S. aureus LMG 16805 isolated from bovine mastitis (BCCM/LMG Bacteria Collection, Belgium) and S. chromogenes 100-SA isolated from a chronic case of subclinical mastitis in sheep (Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sardegna Bacteria Collection, Italy), were also used in this study.
Bacterial cultures were performed in Trypticase Soy Broth (TSB, BD, Italy) and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Overnight cultures were used for the intramammary injection in mice. L. lactis was used as is, while S. chromogenes and S. aureus were properly diluted in PSB to achieve the desired concentration (see the “Mouse mastitis model of infection” section below). The bacterial inoculum size was determined by serially diluting the culture and pour-plating the dilutions on TSB agar.
Mice
A total of 41 timed-pregnant CD-1 mice (ca. 17 days of gestation), purchased from Envigo RMS Srl (Italy), were considered. Mice were randomly divided into six groups: LL (n = 11, treated with L. lactis), S.CH (n = 7, treated with S. chromogenes), S.CH-LL (n = 7, treated with S. chromogenes and L. lactis), S.AU (n = 3, treated with S. aureus), PBS (n = 6, control group treated with sterile PBS solution) and UNT (n = 7, untreated control group).
The animals were individually housed in the animal facilities of the Istituto Superiore di Sanità (Rome, Italy). All procedures involving animals were approved by the Italian Ministry of Health (Permit number 120/2014-B-24/03/2014). Animal care and treatment were conducted in accordance with the institutional guidelines and international laws and policies (Directive 2010/63/EU on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes).
Mouse mastitis model of infection
The general procedure for mouse mammary gland infection was adapted from the method used by Breyne et al. [19] and Brouillette et al. [18]. Briefly, CD-1 lactating mice were used 10–12 days after birth of the offspring. The pups were removed 2 h before inoculation into the teat canal of the inguinal mammary glands L5 (on the left) and R5 (on the right). One hundred μl of either an overnight culture of L. lactis (approximately 108 CFU/ml) or PBS-diluted cultures of S. chromogenes (approximately 106 CFU/ml) and S. aureus (approximately 103 CFU/ml) were used for the intramammary injections in groups LL, S.CH and S.AU, respectively. In the S.CH-LL group, each gland received two consecutive injections: an initial inoculum of 100 μl of S. chromogenes (approximately 106 CFU/ml) was followed by a second inoculum of 100 μl of L. lactis (approximately 108 CFU/ml), 4 h later, in order to facilitate absorption. In the PBS control group the inguinal glands were treated with 100 μl of PBS (Sigma Aldrich Srl, Italy). Syringes with 33-gauge blunt needles were used for the inocula.
Twenty-four hours post infection (p.i.), all mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation. For each animal, both L5 and R5 mammary glands were aseptically collected and pooled for cultures and histological investigations. Cytokine production was also measured in the LL, PBS and UNT groups.
Microbiological culture of mammary glands
Inguinal mammary gland samples from each animal were weighed, homogenized and cultured. In summary, tissue samples were homogenized (1:1) in PBS and then serially diluted (1:10). Dilutions were plated onto both Trypticase Soy Agar (TSA, BD, Italy)–nonselective medium–and Mannitol Salt Agar (MSA, BD, Italy)–selective and differential medium used for the isolation of pathogenic staphylococci–to enumerate bacteria. PBS and UNT control glands were also plated onto both TSA and MRA. Plates were incubated for 24–48 h at 37°C until colonies became visible for enumeration. In S.CH-LL, L. lactis counts were determined by subtracting the total S. chromogenes + L. lactis obtained on TSA from the S. chromogens counts obtained on MSA.
Random colonies were picked from each plate and molecularly identified by PCR amplifying and sequencing 16S rDNA [20]. Results were expressed as colony forming unit per gram (CFU/g) of mammary gland. Mean values per group with standard deviation were then calculated.
Histological investigation
Mammary gland samples from all groups were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin and routinely processed to obtain 4 μm paraffin-embedded histological sections which were then stained with haematoxylin and eosin and examined via light microscopy.
Lesions observed were measured semiquantitatively using a scoring system based on the characterization of the inflammatory cell infiltrate, specifically by accumulation of PMNs, according to the literature [21]. A scale from 1 to 4 was applied to the following alterations: 0, no lesions, absence of interstitial and/or alveolar inflammatory cell infiltrate and undamaged tissue; 1, focal to multifocal, mild interstitial and/or alveolar infiltrate of inflammatory cells and undamaged tissue; 2, multifocal, moderate interstitial and/or alveolar infiltrate of inflammatory cells and undamaged tissue; 3, severe, diffuse interstitial and/or alveolar infiltrate of inflammatory cells and focal areas of tissue damage; 4, severe, diffuse interstitial and/or alveolar infiltrate of inflammatory cells and extensive necrotic areas. All the slides were assessed blinded by three observers (EB, LS and MTC) using a light microscope, and the discordant cases were reviewed at a multi-head microscope until a consensus was reached.
Cytokine analysis
Mammary gland samples from the LL, PBS and UNT groups were weighed and homogenized in PBS (1: 9, w/v) supplemented with a cocktail of protease inhibitors which is able to inhibit serine and cysteine proteases, calpain proteases and metallo-proteases (Roche, Germany). The homogenate was centrifuged at 2000 x g for 30 min at 4°C, and the supernatant was collected. The levels of the cytokines interleukin (IL)-1β and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α were determined by using an ELISA kit (PeproTech, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s instructions and the literature [22]. ELISA tests were performed in triplicate. Mean values per group with standard deviation were then calculated.
Statistical analysis
Mean values per group with standard deviation were used to describe data sets of bacterial recovery and cytokine production.
Two-way ANOVA was performed to analyse main effects of L. lactis and S. chromogenes inoculations, as well as their interaction. Post-hoc Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was performed where appropriate.
Inter-group analyses of differences in TNF-α and IL-1β levels among LL, PBS and UNT were performed by the one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test where applicable.
GraphPad Prism 6 version 6.07 for Windows, GraphPad Software, La Jolla California USA, www.graphpad.com, was used. Differences were considered significant at P< 0.05.
Results
Recovery of bacteria from glands
Bacterial count mean values of L. lactis (groups LL and S.CH-LL), S. chromogenes (groups S.CH and S.CH-LL) and S. aureus (S.AU group) are shown in Fig 1 and expressed as log10 CFU/g of gland.
All inoculated bacteria were counted in mammary glands at 24 h p.i. in treated (LL, S.CH, S.CH-LL, S.AU and PBS) and untreated (UNT) groups. Results are expressed as mean values with standard deviation of log10 CFU/g values. The initial bacterial inoculum size is shown. Significant differences are indicated. * P ≤ 0.05, ** P ≤ 0.01.
All bacteria here tested were recovered from the glands at 24 h p.i. The mean value of S. aureus count in S.AU (1.79 x 108 CFU/g of gland) was greater than the mean values recorded for L. lactis in LL (9.32 x 106 CFU/g of gland) and S.CH-LL (5.78 x 107 CFU/g of gland) and for S. chromogenes in S.CH (1.55 x 103 CFU/g of gland) and S.CH-LL (2.56 x 102 CFU/g of gland) even though the inoculum size of S. aureus was smaller than that of L. lactis or S. chromogenes. Main effects of S. chromogenes (F = 6.80, P = 0.0147), L. lactis (F = 13.03, P = 0.0012) as well as their interaction (F = 6.80, P = 0.0147) were observed on L. lactis counts. A significant increase of L. lactis recovery was found in S.CH-LL compared to LL (P = 0.0025). Main effects of S. chromogenes (F = 8.50, P = 0.0071), L. lactis (F = 4.36, P = 0.0464) and their interaction (F = 4.36, P = 0.0464) were also observed on S. chromogenes counts. A significantly lower bacteria recovery was recorded in S.CH-LL mice compared to the S.CH group (P = 0.0364). No bacterial colonization was observed in the control glands (groups PBS and UNT).
Histopathological changes
Representative histological sections, scored from 0 to 4, are shown in Fig 2. Most of the mammary gland tissue samples from the PBS (4/6) and UNT (5/7) groups, as well as from S.CH (6/7), showed a normal structure and no infiltration or lesions (score 0), as shown in panel A. The rest showed minimal interstitial non suppurative inflammations (score 1): 2/6 in PBS, 2/7 in UNT and 1/6 in S.CH.
Panels A: UNT group, score 0, no infiltration and undamaged tissue; B: LL group, score 1, mild PMN infiltration in isolated areas of tissue sections; C: LL group, score 2, moderate PMN alveolar and interstitial infiltration; D: LL group, score 3, severe PMN infiltration and focal areas of tissue damage; E: S.AU group, score 4, severe PMN infiltration and extensive necrotic areas. Magnifications 20X, bar = 100 μm.
The glands challenged with L. lactis (LL and S.CH-LL) showed variable histological features, with scores ranging from 0 to 3. In LL, tissue damage recorded ranged from no lesions (3/11, score 0) to mild (1/11), moderate (5/11) and severe (2/11) inflammatory cell infiltrations, scored from 1 to 3, respectively (panels B-D). In S.CH-LL, no lesions (1/7, score 0), as well as mild (2/7, score 1) and severe inflammatory cell infiltrations (4/7, score 3) were histologically documented. In S.AU, the S. aureus challenge caused severe PMN infiltrations with extensive necrotic areas (3/3, score 4) in the mammary glands (panel E).
Effect of L. lactis on the proinflammatory cytokine production
TNF-α and IL-1β levels were measured in L. lactis-treated (LL), PBS-treated (PBS) and untreated (UNT) control glands at 24 h p.i. and expressed as mean values with standard deviations (pg/ml) in Table 1.
Significant differences in the proinflammatory cytokine production data set were observed comparing LL versus UNT only. Significant increases in TNF-α (P = 0.0351) and lL-1β (P = 0.0204) levels were recorded in LL. Comparing LL versus PBS data sets, no statistical differences were found, although higher levels of TNF-α and IL-1β were recorded in LL. Higher levels of TNF-α and IL-1β were recorded in two L. lactis-treated glands presenting severe PMN infiltrations at histology. The more pronounced dispersion was observed in IL-1β values in LL as measured by the standard deviation. Results as shown in Table 1.
Discussion
We have previously assessed, in two trials, the efficacy and safety of intramammary infusion of a live overnight culture of the food-grade Lactococcus lactis LMG 7930 for the treatment of subclinical (by CNS infections) and clinical (by S. aureus infections) mastitis in lactating ewes. We have found that, under our experimental conditions, the live bacterial culture rapidly activated the mammary innate immune system. This led to a transient clearance of the CNS in the gland, but also caused mild to moderate clinical cases of mastitis (still unpublished data from our group). To make further progress in our understanding of L. lactis mastitis, we decided to study the interaction between L. lactis LMG 7930 and the mammary gland in a mouse mastitis model in greater detail.
The mouse mastitis model has been proven to be a fast, cheap and reproducible intermediate in vivo alternative for studying the specific host immune response to intramammary injection with major mastitis pathogens, such as Escherichia coli and S. aureus [15,23]. Recently, a pilot study has suggested that a mouse mastitis CNS model can mimic bovine CNS mastitis and be used to study differences between bovine CNS species and strains [19]. Here we investigated whether an intraductal injection of an overnight L. lactis culture into the murine mammary gland (approximately 107 CFU/100 μl) can be used to evaluate L. lactis survival in the tissue and success in overcoming host immune response 24 h p.i. Therefore we conducted microbial cultures and histopathological investigations on L.lactis-treated mammary glands. We also treated additional mice with bacterial suspensions of mastitis-causing pathogens, i.e. S. chromogenes (S.CH) or S. aureus (S.AU) in order to have two mouse mastitis models as complementary tools to better evaluate the effects of the L. lactis challenge into the mammary gland. We decided to inoculate approximately 105 CFU/100 μl of S. chromogenes because a previous study had documented that an S. chromogenes inoculum dose as high as 105 CFU displayed clinical symptoms of inflammation if inoculated into murine mammary glands [19]. According to the validated mouse mastitis S. aureus model, we inoculated approximately 102 CFU/100 μl of S. aureus because an inoculum dose as high as 100 CFU of that pathogen has been proven to be nonfatal and to cause a significant level of infection with evident signs of mammary gland inflammation at 24 h p.i. [18,19]. An additional group was included in our study: S.CH-LL, containing animals treated with two separate injections–S. chromogenes first, followed by L. lactis–in order to assess whether L. lactis was able to affect S. chromogenes survival in the mammary gland.
Microbiological results showed that L. lactis was able to survive in the mammary gland 24 h p.i., as were the mastitis pathogens S. chromogenes and S. aureus. In contrast, no bacterial colonization was observed in the control glands (groups PBS and UNT). We observed that L. lactis reduced S. chromogenes survival in the glands in S.CH-LL at 24 h p.i., and increased its own survival ability by coexisting with the pathogen. It seems that L. lactis and S. chromogenes engaged in interspecies cooperative behaviours rather than competitive interactions. Bacterial species may in fact coexist with, or dominate, other organisms, competing for the same pool of resources by adopting many active mechanisms [24]. L. lactis-treated glands showed variable histological features, ranging from undamaged tissue with no inflammatory cell infiltrate to severe PMN infiltrate with focal areas of tissue damage (scores 0 to 3). A moderate mammary gland inflammation characterized by alveolar and/or interstitial PMN infiltration was the most prevalent change observed in the mammary glands challenged with L. lactis alone (LL). Glands challenged with both S. chromogenes and L. lactis (S.CH-LL), however, showed a more severe degree of inflammation. Neutrophil infiltration was observed in almost all glands and in both interstitium and alveoli, suggesting a more severe inflammation than observed in udders challenged with L. lactis alone. These differences in histology are likely related to the greater number of L. lactis colonies measured in S.CH-LL than that recorded in LL.
Proinflammatory cytokine production was measured in LL, PBS and UNT glands. Significant increases in IL-1β and TNF-α levels were found in L. lactis-inoculated glands by comparing LL with UNT. However, no significant changes were observed between groups LL and PBS, although we recorded higher proinflammatory cytokine trends and a more pronounced dispersion of values in LL. The cytokine production results are in accordance with the greater number of glands with inflammatory cells infiltrate that we recorded in LL compared with the control groups.
Predictably, bacterial growth in S. aureus inoculated glands was the highest we recorded, even though the inoculum size was the smallest. Moreover, S. aureus-treated glands all showed the most severe histological grade of inflammation (score 4). Both results are compatible with previous studies [18,19] and seem to support an inoculum dose as high as 100 CFU of a mastitis S. aureus isolate per gland, irrespective of the strain, like the injection that was able to cause severe mammary gland inflammation in the mouse model at 24 h p.i. That confirms lactating mice as animals very susceptible to intramammary infusion by S. aureus. Contrary to our expectations, the mastitis isolate of S. chromogenes here used was unable to induce mastitis when it was used alone at the inoculum size as high as 105 CFU at 24 h p.i. Indeed, most mammary glands in S.CH showed normal structures with no inflammatory infiltration or lesions detected by the histological exam. Concordant results were found in the control groups (PBS and UNT). Few cases of mammary gland inflammation–and, moreover, mild ones–were recorded in S.CH, as well as in PBS and UNT. That mild inflammation seemed to have been caused by milk accumulation (physiological inflammation) rather than by the pathogen or inoculum itself. The rapid accumulation of milk in the mammary gland–due to the permanent removal of offspring from a lactating mother, which is referred to in the literature as “forced weaning”–has been documented to result in elevation of inflammatory mediators [25] and influx of macrophages into the mammary gland [26,27], all of which are critical components of the cell death and tissue remodelling process [28]. Our results together with the literature [19] confirm that CNSs are minor mastitis pathogens and that epidemiologically different mastitis isolates of CNS strains may induce variable host innate immune responses in the mouse mammary gland.
In conclusion, the L. lactis inoculum caused variable histological features in the mammary gland, ranging from undamaged tissue to severe inflammation. Our results suggest that bacteria with GRAS status, such as L. lactis, can act as mastitis-causing pathogens when inoculated at high density into the mammary glands of lactating mice. Because of the unpredictable potential of L. lactis in acting as a potential mastitis pathogen, this organism cannot be considered a safe treatment for bovine mastitis.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Dr. Stefano A. Lollai (Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sardegna, Italy) for kindly providing the mastitis-causing pathogen S. chromogenes 100-SA.
References
- 1. Contreras A, Sierra D, Sanchez A, Corrales JC, Marco JC, Paape MJ, et al. Mastitis in small ruminants. Small Rumin Res. 2007; 68: 145–153.
- 2. Haftu R, Taddele H, Gugsa G, Kalayou S. Prevalence, bacterial causes, and antimicrobial susceptibility profile of mastitis isolates from cows in large-scale dairy farms of Northern Ethiopia. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2012; 44:1765–1771. pmid:22476790
- 3. Halasa T, Huijps K, Østerås O, Hogeveen H. Economic effects of bovine mastitis and mastitis management: a review. Vet Q. 2007; 29: 18–31. pmid:17471788
- 4. Tiwari JG, Babra C, Tiwari HK, Williams V, Wet SD, Gibson J, et al. (2013) Trends In Therapeutic and Prevention Strategies for Management of Bovine Mastitis: An Overview. J Vaccines Vaccin. 4: 176.
- 5. Cao LT, Wu JQ, Xie F, Hu SH, Mo Y. Efficacy of nisin in treatment of clinical mastitis in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2007; 90: 3980–3985. pmid:17639009
- 6. Wu J, Hu S, Cao L. Therapeutic effect of nisin Z on subclinical mastitis in lactating cows. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007; 51: 3131–3135. pmid:17606675
- 7. Ryan MP, Flynn J, Hill C, Ross RP, Meaney WJ. The natural food grade inhibitor, lacticin 3147, reduced the incidence of mastitis after experimental challenge with Streptococcus dysgalactiae in nonlactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 1999; 82: 2625–2631.
- 8. Twomey DP, Wheelock AI, Flynn J, Meaney WJ, Hill C, Ross RP. Protection against Staphylococcus aureus mastitis in dairy cows using a bismuth-based teat seal containing the bacteriocin, lacticin 3147. J Dairy Sci. 2000; 83: 1981–1988. pmid:11003227
- 9. Klostermann K, Crispie F, Flynn J, Ross RP, Hill C, Meaney W. Intramammary infusion of a live culture of Lactococcus lactis for treatment of bovine mastitis: comparison with antibiotic treatment in field trials. J Dairy Res. 2008; 75: 365–373.
- 10. Greene WA, Gano AM, Smith KL, Hogan JS, Todhunter DA. Comparison of probiotic and antibiotic intramammary therapy of cattle with elevated somatic cell counts. J Dairy Sci. 1991; 74: 2976–2981.
- 11. Armas F, Camperio C, Marianelli C. In vitro assessment of the probiotic potential of Lactococcus lactis LMG 7930 against ruminant mastitis-causing pathogens. PLoS ONE 2017; 12: e0169543. pmid:28068371
- 12. Chandler RL. Experimental bacterial mastitis in the mouse. J Med Microbiol 1970; 3: 273–282.
- 13. Notebaert S, Meyer E. Mouse models to study the pathogenesis and control of bovine mastitis. A review. Vet Q. 2006; 28: 2–13. pmid:16605156
- 14. Brouillette E, Grondin G, Talbot BG, Malouin F. Inflammatory cell infiltration as an indicator of Staphylococcus aureus infection and therapeutic efficacy in experimental mouse mastitis. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2005; 104: 163–169. pmid:15734537
- 15. Brouillette E, Malouin F. The pathogenesis and control of Staphylococcus aureus-induced mastitis: study models in the mouse. Microbes Infect. 2005; 7: 560–568. pmid:15777742
- 16. Nazemi S, Aalbæk B, Kjelgaard-Hansen M, Safayi S, Klærke DA, Knight CH. Expression of acute phase proteins and inflammatory cytokines in mouse mammary gland following Staphylococcus aureus challenge and in response to milk accumulation. J Dairy Res. 2014; 81: 445–454. pmid:25230141
- 17. Zhao Y, Zhou M, Gao Y, Liu H, Yang W, Yue J, et al. Shifted T helper cell polarization in a murine Staphylococcus aureus mastitis model. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0134797. pmid:26230498
- 18. Brouillette E, Grondin G, Lefebvre C, Talbot BG, Malouin F. Mouse mastitis model of infection for antimicrobial compound efficacy studies against intracellular and extracellular forms of Staphylococcus aureus. Vet Microbiol. 2004; 101: 253–262. pmid:15261998
- 19. Breyne K, De Vliegher S, De Visscher A, Piepers S, Meyer E. Technical note: a pilot study using a mouse mastitis model to study differences between bovine associated coagulase-negative staphylococci. J Dairy Sci. 2015; 98: 1090–1100. pmid:25497801
- 20. Tabacchioni S, Visca P, Chiarini L, Bevivino A, Di Serio C, Fancelli S, et al. Molecular characterization of clinical and environmental isolates of Burkholderia cepacia. Res Microbiol. 1995; 146: 531–542. pmid:8577994
- 21. Biasibetti E, Amedeo S, Brugiapaglia A, Destefanis G, Di Stasio L, Valenza F, et al. Lipomatous muscular "dystrophy" of Piedmontese cattle. Animal 2012; 6: 1839–1847. pmid:22717052
- 22. Chen F, Liu B, Wang D, Wang L, Deng X, Bi C, et al. Role of sortase A in the pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus-induced mastitis in mice. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2014; 351: 95–103. pmid:24330077
- 23. Notebaert S, Demon D, Vanden Berghe T, Vandenabeele P, Meyer E. Inflammatory mediators in Escherichia coli-induced mastitis in mice. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008; 31: 551–565. pmid:18243314
- 24. Hibbing ME, Fuqua C, Parsek MR, Peterson SB. Bacterial competition: surviving and thriving in the microbial jungle. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010; 8: 15–25. pmid:19946288
- 25. Baxter FO, Came PJ, Abell K, Kedjouar B, Huth M, Rajewsky K, et al. IKKbeta/2 induces TWEAK and apoptosis in mammary epithelial cells. Development 2006; 133: 3485–3494. pmid:16887827
- 26. Stein T, Morris JS, Davies CR, Weber-Hall SJ, Duffy MA, Heath VJ, et al. Involution of the mouse mammary gland is associated with an immune cascade and an acute-phase response, involving LBP, CD14 and STAT3. Breast Cancer Res. 2004; 6: R75–91. pmid:14979920
- 27. O'Brien J, Martinson H, Durand-Rougely C, Schedin P. Macrophages are crucial for epithelial cell death and adipocyte repopulation during mammary gland involution. Development 2012; 139: 269–275.
- 28. Ingman WV, Glynn DJ, Hutchinson MR. Mouse models of mastitis–how physiological are they? Int Breastfeed J. 2015; 10:12. pmid:25848399